/* remove this */ Blogger Widgets /* remove this */

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Allahabad Highcourt - UPTET : Dispose objections of Uttar Pradesh Teacher Eligibility Test

टीईटी की आपत्तियां निस्तारित करें
(Allahabad Highcourt - UPTET : Dispose objections of Uttar Pradesh Teacher Eligibility Test)

इलाहाबाद, 17 दिसंबर (जाका) : हाई कोर्ट ने शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा (टीईटी) के घोषित परिणाम में अभ्यर्थियों की आपत्तियों के निस्तारण का निर्देश यूपी बोर्ड को दिया है। कोर्ट ने कहा कि अभ्यर्थी मात्र 100 रुपये प्रोसेस फीस देकर शिकायत 15 दिनों में दर्ज कराएं। कोर्ट ने चार समाचार पत्रों में इसकी सूचना प्रकाशित कराने को भी कहा है। न्यायालय ने बोर्ड को आपत्तियां प्राप्त होने के एक सप्ताह के भीतर इनका निस्तारण करने का निर्देश दिया है। साथ ही निस्तारण का आदेश ई-मेल व पंजीकृत डाक द्वारा भेजने को कहा है। न्यायालय ने स्पष्ट किया कि पूर्व में सफल अभ्यर्थियों के चयन पर इसका प्रभाव नहीं पड़ेगा, परंतु अंक बढ़ने पर उसका लाभ अवश्य मिलेगा। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति सुधीर अग्रवाल ने ललित मोहन सिंह व अन्य की याचिकाओं पर दिया है। याचिका में आरोप लगाया है कि एक ही अनुक्रमांक कई अभ्यर्थियों को आवंटित है। कुछ को अनुपस्थित दिखाया गया है। उत्तर पुस्तिका जांचते समय सीरीज व अंकपत्र में तालमेल नहीं है। कोर्ट ने निर्देश दिया कि बी सीरीज के प्रश्न संख्या 125 के उत्तर में विकल्प बी व सी दोनों सही हैं, इसलिए दोनों विकल्पों पर अंक दिया जाए। बी सीरीज के प्रश्न संख्या 142 पर ए व डी विकल्प चुनने वालों को भी अंक दिए जाएं
News : Jagran ( 18.12.11)
******************************




Amar Ujala News Link - http://epaper.amarujala.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20111218a_002163004&ileft=-4&itop=120&zoomRatio=130&AN=20111218a_002163004

94 comments:

  1. Its mean vacancy gayi thande baste me..
    ab mushkil hai vigyapti ka aana

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mere 118 marks hai,court ne jin qu.par aapttiya jatai hai mujhe usse 3 marks ka fayada hua hai...par maine 5 jilo me form dal diye hai aur usme maine purane marks hi bhare hai,to naye marks ka fayada mujhe kaise milega...kya naye marks aane ke baad fir se aavedan karna hoga..

    ReplyDelete
  3. माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद द्वारा 13 नवंबर को आयोजित शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा में अभ्यर्थियों को शुरू से ही समस्याओं का सामना करना पड़ा। समस्या की शुरुआत आवेदन पत्रों से हुईऔर परीक्षा परिणाम आने के बाद तक जारीहै। किसी ने अधिक अंक पाया लेकिनकम अंक मिले तो किसी का परीक्षा परिणाम ही नहीं आया। समस्याओं का अंतहीन सिलसिला अभी जारी है।
    हजारों की संख्या में आवेदन पत्र लौटआए, जबकि अभ्यर्थियों ने पर्याप्तसमय रहते आवेदन किया था। ऐसे आवेदन पत्रों को शामिल करने की मांग को लेकरकई बार धरना-प्रदर्शन हुए पर बोर्ड नेउनकी मांगों को खारिजकर दिया। जिनके आवेदन स्वीकार किए गएउनकी समस्याएं भी कम नहीं रहीं। हजारों के प्रवेश पत्रों में गड़बड़ी आगई। किसी को प्राथमिक का प्रवेश पत्रमिला तो उच्चप्राथमिक का नहीं मिला। इसी तरह किसी को उच्च प्राथमिक का प्रवेश पत्र मिलातो प्राथमिक का नहीं मिला। प्रवेश पत्रों के डिटेल में भी गड़बड़ी मिली। बोर्ड दफ्तर पर समस्याग्रस्त अभ्यर्थियों का जमावड़ा लगने लगा। किसी को राहत मिली तो किसी को फटकार। परीक्षा की तिथि नजदीक आ गई। पर प्रवेश पत्रों की गड़बड़ी नहीं ठीक हुई।ऐसे भी अभ्यर्थी थे, जिन्होंने प्राथमिक और उच्च प्राथमिक दोनों के आवेदन डाले थे पर एक का भी प्रवेश पत्र नहीं आया। अभ्यर्थी पहले बोर्ड दफ्तरके चक्कर लगाते रहे। बाद में अभ्यर्थियों को जानकारी दी गई कि जेडीकार्यालय से नएप्रवेश पत्र मिलेंगे। जेडी कार्यालयों में तीन दिन दौड़ाने के बाद कहा गया कि परीक्षा के एक दिन पूर्व प्रवेश पत्र मिलेगा। हालात यह रहे कि 13 नवंबर को परीक्षा थी और अभ्यर्थी 12 नवंबर की देर रात प्रवेशपत्र के लिए जेडी कार्यालयों पर डटे रहे। परीक्षा हो गई। 25 नवंबरको परिणाम भी आ गए। नए अनुक्रमांक वालों के परिणाम नहीं आए। हजारों अभ्यर्थियों के परीक्षा परिणाम थोड़ीसी गड़बड़ी के कारण नहीं आए। किसी का अनुक्रमांक गलत तो किसी का वर्ग गलत।
    पांच बार संशोधित हुई आंसर सीट
    बोर्ड ने दो दिन बाद आंसर की भी जारी कर दी। आंसर की में 13 प्रश्नों के बोर्ड दो उत्तर बता रहा था। इसके बाद पांच बार आंसर की संशोधित की गई। इसके बावजूद भी सभी आपत्तियों का निस्तारण नहीं किया गया। नए अनुक्रमांक वालों से कहा गया कि उन्हें दोबारा आवेदन करने होंगे। इसकी भी कोई आधिकारिक सूचना नहीं दी गई। अभ्यर्थियों को अखबारों के माध्यम से यह खबर पता चली। प्रदेश के कोने-कोने से अभ्यर्थियों ने आकर नयाआवेदन किया। उनमें से कुछ अभ्यर्थियों के परीक्षा परिणाम आ चुके हैं, कुछ के अभी भी नहीं आए हैं। विडंबना यह है कि बोर्ड ने अपनी गलतियों को तो सुधार लिया पर अभ्यर्थियों द्वारा हुई मानवीय भूल को नहीं सुधारा। अभ्यर्थियों से स्पष्ट कह दिया गया था कि उनके द्वारा ओएमआर शीट में की गई गलतियों पर बोर्ड कोई विचार नहीं करेगा। बोर्डके इसी रवैये के खिलाफ अभ्यर्थियों नेहाईकोर्ट में याचिका दायर की थी। हाईकोर्ट के इस आदेश के बाद अभ्यर्थियों ने राहत की सांस ली है।आवेदन भरने से ही दुश्वारियां दर दुश्वारियां हो रही है ।
    आनन्द पाण्डेय
    08434755455

    ReplyDelete
  4. New Advt. Zari Ho Gaya Hai. See AMAR UJALA.

    ReplyDelete
  5. सुप्रभात मित्रो ।अरे कोई NCTE के नियमोँ के खिलाफ कोर्ट मे क्योँ नहीँ जाता है ?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Baura gaye ho ka katil bhai?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Boraya Nahi Hun Bhai, Govt. Ne keh To Diya Hai. Court ne 15 Days ka Samay Diya Hai. Lekin Tab Tak Process Shuru Ho Chukegi. Number Badhwane Walo Ko Fayda 2nd Ya 3rd Counselling Me Milega. Roz Roz Ke Natak Se 15 Days Tak Relief To Mili.

    ReplyDelete
  8. कहाँ के अमर उजाला मे लिखा है

    ReplyDelete
  9. Blog Me Upar Lagi News Mein Bhi Likha Dikh Raha Hai Ki Govt. Ne Revised G.O. Jari Kar Diya Hai. Ab To Khush Ho Jao. Court Ki Decision Ki Tension Lene Ki Zarurat Nahi Hai, Isme Kuch Questions Par Sabhi Ke Number Badhenge.

    ReplyDelete
  10. अध्यापक पात्रता परीक्षा से मुक्त शारीरिक शिक्षक!मुरादाबाद : शारीरिक शिक्षक अध्यापक पात्रता परीक्षा अर्थात टीईटी से मुक्त हैं। सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम से इस तथ्य का खुलासा हुआ है। इसके बाद बीपीएड, डीपीएड व सीपीएड शिक्षकों ने समूचे प्रकरण पर मुख्यमंत्री को ज्ञापन देकर बेसिक तथा माध्यमिक विद्यालयों में शारीरिक शिक्षकों का पद सृजित करने तथा उसपर नियुक्ति करने की मांग करेंगे। सीपीएड प्रशिक्षित बेरोजगार संघ के सचिव दीपक कुमार ने 27 सितंबर को सूचना अधिकार अधिनियम के माध्यम से राष्ट्रीय अध्यापक शिक्षा परिषद की जनसूचना अधिकारी ममता कुकरेती से सूचना मांगी थी कि क्या शारीरिक शिक्षकों के लिए अध्यापक पात्रता की परीक्षा पास करना अनिवार्य है। इस पर 5 दिसंबर को ममता कुकरेती ने जवाब दिया कि राष्ट्रीय अध्यापक शिक्षा परिषद विनियम 2010 तथा संशोधन विनियम 2011 जो कि 25 अगस्त 2010 तथा 2 अगस्त 2011 को भारत के असाधारण राजपत्र में प्रकाशित हुए थे, उसमें शारीरिक शिक्षक पद पर नियुक्ति हेतु अध्यापक पात्रता परीक्षा उत्तीर्ण करना अनिवार्य नहीं किया गया है। इस जवाब के आने के बाद बीपीएड, डीपीएड, सीपीएड प्रशिक्षित बेरोजगार संगठन सक्रिय हो गया है। उन्होंने एक बैठक कर शनिवार को अहम निर्णय लिया। इसकी जानकारी देते हुए संगठन की अध्यक्ष अचला मिश्रा व सचिव दीपक कुमार ने बताया कि 22 दिसंबर को एक प्रतिनिधि मंडल प्रदेश की मुख्यमंत्री को संबोधित ज्ञापन यहां के डीएम का सौंपेगा। इसके माध्यम से मांग की जाएगी कि बेसिक तथा माध्यमिक विद्यालयों में शारीरिक शिक्षकों के पद सृजित कर उस पर नियुक्ति की जाए।

    ReplyDelete
  11. Please don't use name of Muskan other than editor, It makes wrong impression to visitors.
    Additionally, we make such comment as spam, threfore once it enabled as spam than all comments generated from ip address/computer becomes spam.
    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  12. UPTET Cancel Nahi Hoga. Ye Manviye Bhoole Hai, Jo Har Pariksha Me Hoti Hain. Agar CTET Me Bhi Answer Keys Di Jati Aur Selection Ka Base CTET Ki Marit Ko Bana Diya Jata To Usme Me Bhi UPTET Jaisa Haal Hota. Pariksha Radd Kiye Jane Ke Liye Usme Ki Gayi Dhandhliyo Ke Pukhta Saboot Hone Chahiye Jo Kisi Ke Pass Nahi Hai. Keval Isme Hue Sanshodano Ko Iske Radd Karne Ka Aadhar Nahi Mana Ja Sakta. Balki Ye To Aur Achha Hai Ki Board Apni Galtiya Sudhar Raha Hai.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Kaatil bhai aap galat soch rahe ho...jab tak naya result nai aa jata tab tak counselling nai suru ho sakti hai,agar suru hoti hai to mai khud court se stay order le aunga...kyoki mere marks badhenge to mujhe pahle chance milna chahiye

    ReplyDelete
  14. POSSIBLE MERIT CUT OFF-
    1ST counselling-121
    2nd counselling-113
    3rd counselling -106
    4th counselling -101
    5th counselling -97 or 98

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ek purani kahawat hain gaon basa nahi chor pahley aa gaye are number badh bhi jayenge to kya hoga jab vigypti/niyukti hi nahi hogi

    ReplyDelete
  16. plz koi bataye ki B series ke question no. 125 n 142 me kaun se questions the.mera que. booklet A tha.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Bhai, Court Ne Result Revised Karne Ko Kaha Hai, Process Stay Nahi Ki Hai. SBTC 2008 Mein Bhi Ab Tak Court Ke Order Aate Rahe Hai, Lekin Process Nahi Roki.

    ReplyDelete
  18. ए जी ओ जी लो जी सुनो जी - सबके गले में माया का फंदा , जेबें भरो करो धंधा

    ReplyDelete
  19. Mai bik chuka hu
    main congress se paise lekar kam karha hu
    mere pas to paisa aa chuka hai tum jao bhad mai

    ReplyDelete
  20. hi friends, abhi tak to new ad. hi nahi aya saturday ko ane ke liye kaha gaya tha per koi bhi information abhi tak nahi hai ki new ad ayega ya old ad. ko hi fill kiya jayega. form bharne main bhi to time lagega.internal area main main itni jaldi kaise pahuch payenge application.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Booket B Ka 125 No. Ka Question- Sea Turtle Ya समुद्री कच्छपोँ
    And 142 Question Is - पृथ्वी पर कितनी मात्रा जल की है।
    125 ke B and C Dono Par Number Diye Jayenge,
    142 Ke A and D Par Number Diye Jayenge.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Chahe kitni bhi koshis kar le madam maya ab kuch nhi ho sakta
    ab to process radh hokar hi rhega
    ab bahut der ho chuki hai
    upcmo.Up.Nic/key_contacts par sabhi bde adhikariyo ke no. Hai jaise shashank shekhar, anil sant etc aap chaho to unse maloom kr sakte ho

    ReplyDelete
  23. Kisi Ne Kaha Hai Ki, "Agar Achhi Bat Nahi Kar Sakte To Buri To Mat Karo." Yeh Kya Sab Log Subah Se Lekar Raat Tak Bus Niyukti Radd Hogi, Selection Nahi Hogi, Jaise Baat Karte Rahte Hai. Kabhi To Achha Bol Liya Karo.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Draft naya banwaya jaye ya purane wale draft ke xerox ka use kiya jaaye.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Mai congress ke liye kam karta hu
    mai nahi chahta ke kisi ki naukri lge jabhi to itni jyada der lgaa rha hu

    ReplyDelete
  26. hi neta nagri ki baat chodiye bus sabhi logo ka khyal rakiye.

    ReplyDelete
  27. merit obc ki kahan tak ja sakti hai

    ReplyDelete
  28. Hc judge sudhir agarwal ji
    tumhe 270000 stu ki hai lagegi
    bhagwan tumhe bhool se bhi manav shreer nahi dega
    aap keede pd pd ke sad ke maroge
    tumhe jeevan mai kabi sukh nhi milega
    tum marne ke baad 1 cr years tk donkey bnoge kyonki tumhe bahut garv hai apni budhi pr

    ReplyDelete
  29. sc/ st ki merit bareilly mein kahan tak jayegi.kisi ko idea ho to bata do bhai.(mera vodafone hai.he..he..he..)

    ReplyDelete
  30. TET KI TARAH MET(MINISTER ELIGIBILLITY TEST)bhi hona chaiye.kmse se kam desh kuch to tarraki karege.plz vote

    ReplyDelete
  31. Booket B Ka 125 No. Ka Question- Sea Turtle Ya समुद्री कच्छपोँ And 142 Question Is - पृथ्वी पर कितनी मात्रा जल की है। 125 ke B and C Dono Par Number Diye Jayenge, 142 Ke A and D Par Number Diye Jayenge
    -------------------
    Thanks Katil Jaat, Main -Two nos. kam count kar rahee thee.
    iska matlab ab 2 no. bad jayenge.
    kya application deni hogee?

    ReplyDelete
  32. dosto vighaypti kis site or kis news paper mai ae h please tell me.

    ReplyDelete
  33. NAYA FORM AAYEGA KI NAHI DOSTO AAP LOG KYA KAR RAHE HO.NAYA YA PURANA YA BAITHE HOBHALI

    ReplyDelete
  34. vigyapti ka kuch pata chalega ki nahi koi nahi janta hai agr koi janta hai top o hai maya ji .

    ReplyDelete
  35. ye court ja order second paper ke liye hai

    ReplyDelete
  36. jitendra g i agry with you completly,main to day one se yahi soch rahi hoon k iss tarah se hooni chahiye coundeling.isse jis k jitney marks hain use us hisaab se district mil jayrga

    ReplyDelete
  37. Amit Sharma from Firozabad says---
    Dear Jitendraji, I m 100% agree to u for this selection procedure. Actually fact is max.candidiate think like this from starting of this application. But nobody knows why is not being done????? What's yr openion jitendraji and other freinds? why selection board is not thinking like this?? What they want?

    ReplyDelete
  38. Good news for all merit holder: Kal ke baad HC band ho rahi hai aur kal Prabha ji HC main paish hongi. Aur jaha tak mujhey news mili hai (sahi ya galt i don't know)vigyapan kal ayega.

    ReplyDelete
  39. hello vijay, or bataoo kya ho rha hai..

    ReplyDelete
  40. vijay bhai, ab tumko kya lagta hai, tet ki kitne merit nikaligi,..

    ReplyDelete
  41. kuch nahi bus wait wait aur sirf wait

    ReplyDelete
  42. wait to pura up kar rha hai.. tumhare kitne marks hai..

    ReplyDelete
  43. merit to baad ki baat hai mere bhai pahley vigyapanto nikle. jab form hi nahi submit ho payega to merit ya number ka kya fayda

    ReplyDelete
  44. vijay bhai aisa nhi hai, ap tension naa lo,, agr foam nhi jama ho payege too date jarur badegi, logo ki batao par jyada dhyana mat doo,, jo hoga acha hoga or sabke sath ak jaise he hoga..

    ReplyDelete
  45. mere nahi haimere bhai ke 112 marks hai general art.

    ReplyDelete
  46. insha allah humara name aoo jayea, or batao party..

    ReplyDelete
  47. wo sab to thik hain par 1.1.2012 ka bhi to dhyan rakhna hai na

    ReplyDelete
  48. Next week election comission election ki ghoshna krega(etvup)
    ab kuch nhi ho sakta
    bhool jao naukri ko

    ReplyDelete
  49. This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Deputy Registrar(Copying).


    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

    (AFR)

    Court No. - 33

    1. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 71563 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Lalit Mohan Singh
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.S. Kushwaha

    Connected with

    2. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 71399 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Jai Prakash Pandey & Others
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another
    Petitioner Counsel :- S.K. Shukla
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

    3. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72823 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Singh
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- B.R. Sharma,Arvind Kumar Srivastava
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Sandeep Kumar Srivastava

    Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72606 of 2011

    4. Petitioner :- Radhey Shyam & Others
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- H.K. Shukla
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Sanjay Dwivedi

    5.Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72350 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Deependra Kumar
    Respondent :- U.P. Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad & Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- Arvind Kumar Tewari
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,C.N. Tripathi.

    6. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72750 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Ranoo Pandey
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- K.M. Tripathi
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

    7. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72825 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Rupali Gupta
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- Ramesh Chandra Agrahari
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

    8. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72557 of 2011
    Petitioner :- Kiran Singh
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another
    Petitioner Counsel :- Anil Kumar Singh
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

    9. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72555 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Neelam Singh
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another
    Petitioner Counsel :- Rajendra Prasad Singh
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

    10. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72554 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Sarita Singh
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another
    Petitioner Counsel :- Rajendra Prasad Singh
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

    ReplyDelete
  50. tum chutiya hoo, har roz koi na koi niyam chang ho rha hai, to kaise tum koi decision lai sakte ho.. jao aish karoo

    ReplyDelete
  51. 11. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72561 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Sandhya
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- Om Prakash Yadav
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,J.N. Maurya

    12. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 71580 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Madhulika Mishra
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Jitendra Kumar

    13. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72432 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Chandan Shukla
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- D.P. Tripathi,M.K. Pandey
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,C.N. Tripathi

    14. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72189 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Prem Pal
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,R.A. Akhtar

    15. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72326 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar & Another
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another
    Petitioner Counsel :- F.A. Ansari
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

    16. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72400 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Pardeshi Ram Kanojia & Another
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- Abhishek Srivastava
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,C.N. Tripathi

    17. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 71406 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Singh
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another
    Petitioner Counsel :- Smt. Pratima Singh,Agni Pal Singh
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

    18. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 71566 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Vishwa Deepak Tripathi
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another
    Petitioner Counsel :- Upendra Kumar Pandey
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

    19. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72558 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Neetu Yadav
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- Rakesh Prasad,Mahendr Kumar
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,V.K. Kushwaha

    ReplyDelete
  52. Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.

    1. In this bunch of more than one and half dozen writ petitions aggrieved by test conducted by Secondary Education Board Allahabad, U.P. (hereinafter referred to as "the Board") termed as "U.P. Teachers Eligibility Test 2011", the petitioners have approached this Court by means of these writ petitions, assailing their failure on various grounds. Some broad issues are as under:
    I. Several questions having multiple options were wrong in the sense that none of the options was correct answer to the concerned question.
    II. Some of the questions were such where according to model answers subsequently disclosed by examining body, the option disclosed to be correct was actually incorrect. Instead some other answer was correct. Hence, the questions have been evaluated with wrong answers, following mistake committed in model key answers prepared by the Board.
    III. The candidates were actually present and had appeared in the examination but were wrongly shown absent.
    IV. More than one candidate were provided same roll number which has influenced their result.
    V. Answer booklet of one series had been examined with model answer sheets of different series resulting in wrong evaluation/assessment of candidates' answer sheets.
    2. There are certain minor individual complaints also with regard to assessment, declaration of result etc.
    3. Considering volume of cases coming to this Court raising similar complaints some of which are referred above and magnitude of the test conducted by the Board, this Court found that it would be in the interest of public at large if these matters are disposed of at the earliest and in this view of the matter with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the Court permitted them to address Court on various aspects based on their averments contained in their respective writ petitions in general.

    ReplyDelete
  53. 4. So far as the Board is concerned, learned Standing Counsel chose not to file counter affidavit and instead had the benefit of presence of Secretary of the Board with relevant information and assisted the Court expressing Board's anxiety also of expeditious disposal of the matter in such a manner so that grievances of the petitioners are attended in an effective and objective manner and all these matters may settle finally. Regarding individual dispute relating to minor mistakes in assessment of answer sheets it was suggested that the Board shall entertain complaints made by individual candidates specifically and after looking into record and examining threadbare, the candidates shall be informed of the consequences. In this context, the only anxiety expressed by the Board is that this indulgence cannot be allowed for an indefinite period and, therefore, the Court may provide any reasonable time within which candidates aggrieved if any, may approach the Board with their complaints which shall be attended by it. Sri Neeraj Upadhyay, learned Standing Counsel, however, also informed the Court that the Board had already been receiving and attending complaints of candidates and had also examined the same in detail. He also informed that with regard to discrepancies in model key answers the complaints were attended by Board and they constituting a committee of experts who examined all the answer sheets threadbare and thereafter submitted their report. It has been explained by him that there were three sets of examinations namely;
    (I) Junior Primary Level Examination (Class I to V) (hereinafter referred to "J.L.E."
    (II) Senior Primary Level Examination (Class VI to VIII) (Science) (hereinafter referred to "S.L.E.(S)"
    (III) Senior Primary Level Examination (Class VI to VIII) (Arts)(hereinafter referred to "J.L.E.(A)"
    He said that in every set of these examinations, answer sheets of four series were circulated to examinees which are Series 'A', 'B', 'C' and 'D'. The total number of questions in one set were 150. Questions set up in all the series of one kind of examination are same but their order/arrangement in different Series is different. For example, in J.L.E. question no.6 in Series 'A' is question no. 26 in Series 'B', 1 in Series 'C' and 21 in Series 'D' and so on. He said that in J.L.E.'s question paper committee of experts' constituted by Board found that there are five questions in which option shown to be correct in the model key answerers was actually incorrect and instead thereof other options were correct. Similar mistake in respect to eight questions was found in S.L.E.(S) and seven questions in S.L.E. (A). Besides in S.L.E.(S) two questions were such for which none of the options was correct. In S.L.E.(A) there are three such questions in which none of the option was correct. Sri Upadhyay, therefore, submitted that acting upon the aforesaid report of Experts, the Board revised its result by assigning marks to such candidates who had answered correct option (revised) by treating model key answers of that question incorrect and deducting marks allotted earlier. So far as the questions where no option was found correct, in respect thereof, all the candidates have been awarded marks whether they attempted the answer or not and revised result as such has been declared.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Bachcha chinta na kro

    hc judge and anil sant dono hram ke beej hai

    mai in dono ki what lga dunga
    aayushman bhav

    ReplyDelete
  55. 5. Details of such questions, where answers, options have been
    varied or where all answers were incorrect in different Series are as
    under:
    J.L.E.
    Series 'A' Series 'B' Series 'C' Series 'D'
    Q.No. Answer Q.No. Answer Q.No. Answer Q.No. Answer
    6 D 26 D 1 D 21 D
    109 B 114 B 99 B 104 B
    141 A 121 A 146 A 126 A
    144 B 124 B 149 B 129 B
    145 B 126 B 150 B 130 B
    S.L.E.(S)
    Series 'A' Series 'B' Series 'C' Series 'D'
    Q.No. Answer Q.No. Answer Q.No. Answer Q.No. Answer
    20 C 7 B 2 B 10 C
    22 B 10 D 5 D 27 B
    25 D 15 C 25 C 30 D
    37 A 36 B 31 B 32 A
    51 B 52 A 57 A 56 B
    69 C 61 C 76 C 64 C
    86 C 84 C 89 C 71 C
    97 B 95 * 92 B 100 *
    140* * 130 * 115 * 105 *
    145* * 147 B 150 * 142 B
    S.L.E.(A)
    Series 'A' Series 'B' Series 'C' Series 'D'
    Q.No. Answer Q.No. Answer Q.No. Answer Q.No. Answer
    20 C 7 B 2 B 10 C
    22 B 10 D 5 D 27 B
    25 D 15 C 25 C 30 D
    37 A 36 B 31 B 32 A
    51 B 52 A 57 A 56 B
    69 C 61 C 76 C 64 C
    86 C 84 C 89 C 71 C
    126 * 93 * 106 * 98 *
    140 * 130 * 115 * 105 *
    143 * 131 * 148 * 111 *
    (The asterisks show questions bearing all options in Key Answers
    incorrect)

    ReplyDelete
  56. Amit-Firozabad, tumhare marks kitne hain. Fzb se highest marjs kitne hain.

    ReplyDelete
  57. 6. Sri Ashok Khare , learned Senior Advocate, appearing in Writ
    Petition No. 71563 of 2011 contended that in L.J.E., answer sheet,
    Series 'B' there are three more questions namely, questions no. 21, 85
    and 142 in regard whereto either of key answers are incorrect, or the
    correct answer as per model key answer is incorrect and instead a
    different answer is correct. These three questions and options given
    thereto in Series 'B' of J.L.E. are as under:
    “Q.21 To maintain interest among students in class, a
    teacher should.
    (A) use the blackboard (B) discuss
    (C) tell stories (D) ask questions.
    Q. 85 Choose the word opposite in meaning to the given
    word:
    ability
    (A) feasibility (B) unability
    (C) disability (D) inability.
    Q.142. Oceans cover most of the earth's surface. Which is
    approximately
    (A) ¾ (B) 1/2 (C) 1/4 (D) 2/3
    7. He further submitted that question no. 121 has four options
    and all these options are incorrect. Similarly, with respect of question
    no.125 he contended that earlier the model key answer shows option
    'C' as correct while as per report of experts committee, the Board has
    now switched to option 'B' but this is also incorrect option. Therefore,
    deduction of marks in respect of question no. 125 Series 'B' of such
    candidates who have opted for 'C' is incorrect.
    8. In Writ Petition No. 71399 of 2011 Sri S.K. Shukla, Advocate,
    advancing his submission on behalf of three petitioners, Sri Jai
    Prakash Pandey, Sunita Pandey and Harshita Malviya, contended that
    in J.L.E. Series 'B' questions no. 2, 3 and 28 also have wrong answers
    in Model Key Answers and instead correct answers ought to be as
    suggested by petitioners. These three questions read as under:
    Q.2. Dyslexia is associated with
    (A) mental disorder (B) mathematical disorder
    (C) reading disorder (D) behavioural disorder.
    Q.3. Education of children with special needs should be
    provided
    (A) along with other normal children
    (B) by methods developed for special children in
    special schools
    (C) in special school
    (D) by special teachers in special schools.
    Q. 28. You have been told to accommodate two
    mentally retarded children in your class. You will
    (A) refuse to accept them as your students
    (B) tell the principal to accommodate them in another class exclusively for mentally retarded children
    (C) learn techniques to teach such students
    (D) none of these.

    ReplyDelete
  58. 9. Similarly in regard to S.L.E.(A) Series 'B' he submitted that
    answers treated correct in model key answer in regard to questions
    no. 3, 17 and 21 are not correct. These questions read as under:
    Q.3. In which of the following stages do children become
    active members of their jeer group?
    (A) Adolescenee (B) Adolthood
    (C) Early childhood (D) Childhood.
    Q. 17. Some students send a greeting card to you on
    Teacher's day. What will you do? You will
    (A) do nothing (B) say thanks to them
    (C) ask them not to waste money (D) reciprocate the
    good wishes to them.
    Q. 21. Authoritarian level teaching is
    (A) teacher centred (B) child centred
    (C) headmaster centred (D) experience based.
    10. In all the remaining matters, learned counsel for the petitioners
    did not make any individual submissions but adopted and followed
    what has been argued by learned Senior Advocate Sri Khare and
    others. Basically, their grievance is that individual errors in respect
    whereto they have raised their complaints, the Board should be asked
    to examine and take appropriate decision accordingly.
    11. I propose to consider first the arguments with respect to
    certain questions which according to petitioners are totally wrong or
    options selected by Board is wrong and how it should be dealt with.
    12. Before adverting to rival submissions, this Court has no
    hesitation in reiterating the well settled exposition of law that in
    academic matters expert's opinion should not be interfered lightly by
    a Court of law in judicial review and instead great weightage has to
    be attached to their opinion. There may be a situation where different
    experts express different opinions but in such matters, broadly, the
    stand of examining body should be accepted unless it is found to be
    palpably wrong and erroneous. It is own case of the Board that in
    J.L.E. five questions are such where options earlier treated correct by
    Board were in fact not so and instead another option was correct.
    Similar is the case in S.L.E.(S) with regard to eight questions and in
    S.L.E.(A) seven questions.
    13. Besides, two questions in S.L.E.(S) and three questions in
    S.L.E.(A) are such where all the four options are incorrect. With
    regard to these two and three questions respectively, the Board has
    taken decision to award marks to all the candidates and for this stand
    of the Board, learned counsel for the petitioners did not find any
    objection, hence, so far as this aspect is concerned, it warrants no
    consideration by this Court.

    ReplyDelete
  59. 14. The Court is concerned with questions where instead of option
    earlier shown correct by the Board, they have changed their view and
    another option has been treated to be correct. What the Board has
    done is that all the candidates who have answered revised option, the
    Board has awarded marks to them and option declared earlier correct
    but now incorrect, the marks awarded in respect thereof have been
    deducted. To my mind this approach of the Board to some extent has
    done more injustice. The Teachers Eligibility Test is a qualifying test
    without which a candidate would not be eligible for appointment as
    Assistant Teacher in Primary School in view of Regulations framed by
    the National Council for Teachers Education (hereinafter referred to
    as “NCTE”) in exercise of power under Section 23 of Right of
    Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (in short “Act,
    2009”).
    15. The general candidates securing 60% and above marks and
    reserved category candidates securing 55% and more marks are to be
    declared successful. It is per se not a competitive test. Inclusion of
    one shall not necessarily result in exclusion of another. If a candidate
    has already been declared successful on the basis of answers to
    respective questions in which options have now have been altered by
    the Board, and, on the basis of awarding of such marks he has been
    declared successful it would be unjust to declare him unsuccessful
    now if due to deduction of marks of such questions, the total marks
    secured by him earlier become lower than the prescribed pass marks.
    In my view the revised opinion of the Board in respect of such
    questions should not affect the result of candidates who have already
    been declared successful and they should remain untouched. The
    process adopted by the Board is basically in the nature of corrective
    steps and if that be so, it ought no to have acted prejudicial to the
    candidates already declared successful merely on account of revised
    opinion with regard to options which were earlier treated correct.
    16. Coming to the submission that in JLE there are some questions
    which are palpably incorrect or options determined by the Board to
    be correct is still incorrect. I proceed to examine whether it can be
    said that the Board's decision is ex facie incorrect and arbitrary or
    not.

    ReplyDelete
  60. JAB vigyapti der se ayegi to form time se kaise pahunc payenge

    ReplyDelete
  61. 17. Question no. 21, Series 'B' J.L.E. is, “what should a teacher do
    to maintain interest amongst the student in a Class”. This question
    forms part of Section I relating to Pedagogy. The dictionary meaning
    of the word 'Pedagogy' is study of teaching methods. It basically
    involves knowledge and training, though scientific but philosophical
    in aspects. Experience of different persons in the field may have
    some variations. In these circumstances, general practice in such
    matter is to follow opinion which is widely accepted and the manner
    in which, most of the Experts treat correct. No mathematical
    precision can be found. By referring to one or two text books or
    individual opinion nothing can be said or argued. Unless shown ex
    facie improbable, the Courts must honour and respect opinion of
    Expert's and examining body since it is their field of expertise and,
    therefore, the same must be given due honour. This is a question
    based on experience and subjective opinion of Experts who may
    differ. The Board has provided option 'D' as the correct answer and it
    cannot be said that it is palpably erroneous or faulty. Where two
    views are possible the opinion of Experts on the subject and the
    examining body must be given due credit, respect and deserved
    preference. I, therefore, find no reason to accept submission of Sri
    Ashok Khare in regard to Question no. 21 Series 'B', J.L.E.
    18. Question no. 85, Series B, J.L.E. asked opposite of 'Ability'. The
    Board finds correct option as 'D'. Sri Khare submitted that even
    'disability' is correct answer. In this question, in fact, according to Sri
    Khare, there are two options which are correct i.e., 'disability' and
    'inability'. Learned counsel for the petitioner tried to rely on certain
    legal dictionaries' meanings in this regard. I find no force.
    19. 'Disability' and 'inability' do not carry the same meaning though
    to some extent the consequences may be the same. The term
    'disability' is defined in New Lexicon Webster's Dictionary of the
    English Language 1987 Edition at page 269 as under:
    “Disability: a being physically or mentally disabled; a
    cause of this; a legal disqualification or
    incapacity .”
    Similarly, 'inability' is also therein at page 488 as under:
    “Inability: The state or quality of being unable”
    20. In Oxford Advanced Learner's Dicitionary, 7th Edition 2005
    defines 'Disability' at page 430 as under:
    “Disability: A physical or mental condition that means you
    cannot use a part of your body completely or
    easily, or that you cannot learn easily”
    21. It also defines 'ability' at page 2 and 'inability' at page 782 as
    under:
    “Ability 1. (Singular)to
    do something, the fact that
    somebody/something is able to do something.
    Opp: Inability. 2. a level of skill or
    intelligence”
    “Inability (to do sth) the fact of not being able to do
    something;”

    ReplyDelete
  62. 22. Terms or words as explained by Law Courts in the context
    of some statute etc. are not to be relied to create confusion that there
    may be some other answers also. I, therefore, find no palpable error
    on the part of the Board in treating option 'D; in question no. 85
    Series 'B', J.L.E. to be correct answer. The argument raised otherwise
    is rejected.
    23. Question no. 121, Series 'B' , J.L.E. really poses a serious
    problem. It asks about an International Organization which looks
    after “environmental protection all over the world”. The options of
    question no. 121 are: (A) WWF (B) WHO (C) PETA (D) UN. The
    Board has treated option 'A' i.e., WWF (World Wildlife Fund) as the
    correct answer. I have serious doubt about this. Rest two options
    namely, 'B' and 'C' admittedly have no connection with the
    environment. The basic object and mission of WWF is to conserve
    nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on
    earth. It deals with protection of wildlife throughout the world and is
    not concerned mainly with environment though forest may constitute
    a part of environment. To any person of common prudence, the
    question is apparently difficult to answer from the options given
    thereunder. It is true that out of four options, 'A' would have gone
    nearest to the answer, but it cannot be said to be totally correct
    answer as such. United Nations Environment Programme is an
    organization of United Nations dealing with environment and its
    development. However, since out of four options, two options
    namely, WHO and PETA are clearly and palpably inapplicable, and
    WWF, to some extent is concerned with nature which includes
    environment, the candidates by process of elimination could have
    rejected other except 'A'. Looking from this angle, determination of
    option 'A' correct by itself may not be palpably wrong and incorrect.
    This could have led me in refraining from interfering with the
    decision taken by Board by treating option 'A' correct provided this
    decision would have been taken initially by the Board also. The Board
    has however, admitted that in the model key answers it has treated
    another answer correct which it has not disclosed. The same has now
    been changed after report of Experts' committee to Option 'A'
    meaning thereby options were so confusing and vague that earlier
    even examining committee, who set the paper also committed a
    mistake. This shows that question and answers are so vague that even
    experts failed to find out correct option at one point of time. In such a
    case, no candidate should be made to suffer. Hence in my view this
    question should be treated to be a wrong question having no correct
    answer. Therefore, marks in respect of question no. 121, Series 'B'
    J.L.E. shall be allotted to all the candidates treating this question
    wrong in its entirety. This direction shall simultaneously apply to the
    corresponding questions in remaining series namely, A, C and D in
    J.L.E.

    ReplyDelete
  63. 24. Now I come to Question No. 125 Series 'B' J.L.E. It talks of
    most popular species of sea turtles found in the Waters of Indian sub
    continent. According to Board's own stand, earlier it has treated some
    other option correct but by virtue of revised option pursuant to
    experts committee report has switched over to option 'B', Series 'B'
    i.e., 'Loggerhead'. According to petitioners the correct answer is
    option 'C' i.e., “Olive Ridley”. In support of their submission,
    petitioners have placed reliance on certain information downloaded
    from internet. At page 99 one of the downloaded information placed
    by petitioner before this Court says, “Olive Ridley Turtle” is
    considered a most abundant Sea Turtle in the world with an
    estimated 800,000 nesting female annually. About the “Loggerhead
    Sea Turtle” at page 104 it reads as under:
    “Habitat: Prefer to feed in coastal bays and estuaries, as
    well as in the shallow water along the continental shelves of
    the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Oceans.”
    25. The Board's Experts initially did not choose 'Loggerhead' as the
    correct option but it has been taken in the revised opinion. About
    'habitat' of “Olive Ridley”, page 100 of writ petition no. 71563 of
    2011 shows that it is globally distributed in tropical regions of South
    Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Oceans. At page 100 about “Olive Ridley”
    it further says “In the Northern Indian Ocean, arribadas occur on three
    different beaches along the coast of India”. Exact population of both
    these categories of turtles in waters of Indian Subcontinent
    is not
    mentioned but at page 101 in writ petition no. 71563 of 2011
    published record says that in 1970s numerous Olive Ridley deaths
    were reported in Eastern Indian Ocean. The question ex facie appears
    to be quite confusing and vague inasmuch as, it contains two options
    over which the readers can lay their claim that both may constitute
    correct answer. Here examinees are not expert Scientists or
    environmentalists or in that way, Scientists in Flora and Fauna. These
    candidates are aspiring to become Assistant Teacher in Primary
    School, i.e., the first stage of education. Extraordinary scientific
    information with extensive details cannot be accepted from these
    persons. The questions ought to have been set in these examinations
    commensurating to the standard of the candidates who are expected
    to appear in the concerned test. In that context the question appears
    to be quite confusing, vague, having multiple correct answers.
    However, these is no dispute in this matter that rest of the two
    options given in Question no. 125 are apparently wrong. It is this
    situation which refrained me from declaring this entire question,
    incorrect. In the circumstances, in my view, both the options 'B' and
    'C' ought to be treated correct and candidate who have answered
    either of the two should be given due credit and awarded marks. I
    answer accordingly.

    ReplyDelete
  64. please confirm the news "Allahabad ke hindustan main kya koi shashanadesh nikla hain?"

    ReplyDelete
  65. 26. Question no. 142, Series 'B', J.L.E. Again poses a more serious
    problem. It asks the “extent of coverage of earth surface
    approximately by oceans”. It does not talk of mere 'water' but is
    confined to 'oceans'. The coverage by Ocean is lesser than water as a
    whole. The Court is informed that the Board treated option 'A' as
    correct answer. Learned counsel for petitioner tried to show that
    actual area covered by oceans comes to about 70.8 per cent which is
    a mid way figure between 2/3 and 3/4 , i. e. 66.6 per cent and 75 per
    cent. These figures could not be disputed by the respondents. Hence,
    in my view, the Board in this question should treat option 'D' also
    correct and candidates who have answered either of options i.e. 'A'
    and 'D' in series 'B', Question 142 in J.L.E. should be awarded marks.
    27. So far as questions no. 2, 3, 28 of Booklet 'B' J.L.E. And 3, 17
    and 21, Series 'B' S.L.E.(A) are concerned, as argued in writ petition
    no. 71399 of 2011, I find that these questions are in the subject of
    Pedagogy. As already said, if Experts and the examining body have
    decided and opined a particular option to be correct, unless that
    option is shown to be palpably incorrect, no interference is called for
    in judicial review. It is the decision of Experts in the subject which
    must be honoured unless it is shown to be totally perverse. Hence, I
    find no irregularity in these questions.
    28. So far as other aspects are concerned, i.e., alleged mistakes
    committed in assessment of copies, duplicate roll number etc., I do
    not find it expedient and appropriate to make any intervention at this
    stage, since Sri Neeraj Upadhyay, learned Standing Counsel has
    stated at the Bar that Board shall look into such grievances of
    candidates if appropriate application is submitted to the Board within
    a prescribed time as deemed proper by this Court, and the matter
    shall be examined and decided at the level of the Board.

    ReplyDelete
  66. NAVED JI PLZ YE BATAYE KI RECRUITMENT PROCESS KA KYA HOGA?KYA IS PER STAY LAG GAYA HAI?YA HUM SABHI ANYA ZILON ME AAVEDAN KERTE RAHE?

    ReplyDelete
  67. 29. In the facts and circumstances, in view of discussion made
    above, I dispose of these writ petitions with the following directions:
    (I) Question No.121, Series 'B', J.L.E. contain all wrong
    options and, therefore, it shall be treated a wrong
    question. Consequently the marks in respect of Question
    no. 121, Series 'B', J.L.E. shall be allotted to all candidates
    who have appeared in the concerned test. This direction
    shall simultaneously apply to corresponding question in
    remaining Series namely, 'A', 'C' and 'D' in J.L.E.
    (II) In respect of Question no.125, Series 'B' JLE, the
    candidates answering any of the options i.e., 'B' or 'C' shall
    be awarded marks. This direction shall simultaneously
    apply to corresponding question in remaining Series
    namely, 'A', 'C' and 'D' in J.L.E.
    (III) In respect of Question No. 142, Series 'B' JLE, the
    candidates who have answered any of the options i.e., 'A'
    or 'D' shall be awarded marks. This direction shall
    simultaneously apply to corresponding question in
    remaining Series namely, 'A', 'C' and 'D' in J.L.E.
    (IV) Revised opinion of the Board with respect to
    Questions shown in the charts in para 5 above (other than
    asterisk marked) shall not affect adversely the result of
    the candidates already declared successful merely for the
    reason of change of opinion of the Board vis a vis correct
    option.
    (V) All the candidates who have attempted these
    questions and have answered by referring to one of the
    two options, namely, the one which was correct as per
    initial Model Key Answer or that which is now correct as
    per the revised opinion, the candidates in both the events
    shall be awarded marks and their result shall be prepared
    accordingly.
    (VI) The Board shall publish a notice at least in four
    newspapers of different languages having wide circulation
    at the State level informing all concerned that in case any
    candidate has any grievance regarding UPTET
    Examination, 2011, about assessment etc., he may
    register his complaint by submitting application along
    with process fee of Rs. 100/per
    application (by cash or
    by demand draft) within 15 days from the date of
    publication in the newspapers.
    (VII) The Board shall entertain all applications of the
    candidates raising their grievance regarding assessment
    etc. and shall look into their grievance and take a decision
    thereon within a week from the date of receipt of such
    application. Such decision shall be communicated to the
    candidate concerned within a week thereafter either by
    placing information on internet or on mail address given
    by the candidate or by registered post.
    (VIII) The candidates who are already declared
    successful, their result shall not be affected to their
    prejudice but in case in view of the directions give above
    regarding certain questions, if their marks are to be
    increased, the same shall be given due credit.
    (IX) The revised result as a consequence of compliance
    of above directions shall be uploaded on internet and
    shall be given due publicity at the earliest.
    (X) No costs.
    Dated: 16.12.2011
    Akn.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Uptet no. Ka aachar dal lo
    aur chle jao court mai

    official news
    bharti cancel

    ReplyDelete
  69. sabhi tet pass candidate dhyan dain
    kya antar hai sabhi jagah form dalne ke option main aur state level par uptet pass ke form bhare bina counseling karane main.

    1. state level par counseling karne par koi form dalne ke aavasyakta nahi hai.
    jabki ab sabhi ko 1 se lekar 30-35 tak form dalne pad rahein hain.

    2. state level par yadi form hi nahi bharvaya jaye to time nahi lagega aur tet result correct hone ke bad sidhe counseling ki prakriya suru ho sakti hai.

    jabki ab 1 candidate ka form dalne ka average 15 tak ja sakta hai aur 15 form matlab 15*270806= 406290 form sabhi diet ka total. form ko alag kar feed karne main lagne wala samya 15 din se jyada.

    3 state level par sirf ek draft banakar lao aur counseling ke time par jis district main join karna hai jama kar do.

    jabki ab draft ke photo copy lagakar sabhi jagah alag alag avedan karna.

    4. state level par counseling karne se samya nahi lagega galti ki sambhavana bahoot hi kam.
    jabki abhi samya to lagega hi sath hi kisi bhi kimat pat mistake kiye bina bharti prakriya nahi ho payegi.

    5. state level par counseling se paisa, main power, time,ki bachat.

    jabki is prakriya main candidate se laker, bank, daak vibhag, DIETs, SELECTORS, SARKAR, sabhi ko proboms.

    6. State level Counseling se NCTE ki jo DEAD LINE 1 JAN 2012 di hai usse pahle bharti prakriya poorn ho jayegi.

    jabki is prakriya se kisi bhi halat main ye bharti time par nahi ho payegi.

    7. sarkar ko koi nayi vigayapti main dimag lagane ki jaroorat nahi.

    8. state level par 1 counseling process main hi bharti prakriya poori ho jayegi.

    jabki vartmaan prakriya se kam se kam 8 se 10 bar marit banani pad sakti hai.

    9. state level par ek hi baar aur ek hi jagah par counseling main jana padega

    jabki is prakriya main ek candidate ko ek din ya do din main 5 se 10 jagah counseling ke liye bulaya ja sakta hai.

    total harasment hai is prakriya main
    so bina form sidhe state level par tet pass candidate ko counseling ke liye bulao
    bina tension bharti karo.

    7597947237

    ReplyDelete
  70. So,frnds this the copy of court's decision.
    recruitment process and all other things are still in suspense

    regards

    NAVED

    ReplyDelete
  71. Ye highcourt in questions per pehle hi kyun jagrook nahi hui jab answerkey me sanshodhan kiya ja raha tha jabki in answers per pehle se hi doubt chal raha tha aur bahut se candidates ne in per complains v kiye the,kya highcourt us samay so raha tha ya is samay ka intejar ker raha tha ki 31 dec aane me jyada din nahi hai ab saari prakriya khatm.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Uptet no. Ka aachar dal lo
    aur chle jao court mai

    official report
    bharti after election

    ReplyDelete
  73. Ye to shocking judgement hai kyoki isme judge ne clear kiya hai ki tet kewal yogyata hai,arhta nahi atah jo purv me pass ho chuke hai unke result par koi prabhav nahi padega, matlab ki ab state govt.chah kar bhi tet merit ko selection ka adhar nahi bana sakti
    mai to is judgement ke khilaf supremecourt jaunga

    ReplyDelete
  74. Court ne bhi man liya hai ki tet kewal yagyata hai,arhata nahi...ise padhe



    14.The Court is concerned with questions where instead of option
    earlier shown correct by the Board, they have changed their view and
    another option has been treatedto be correct. What the Board has
    done is that all the candidates who have answered revised option, the
    Board has awarded marks to them and option declared earliercorrect
    but now incorrect, the marks awarded in respect thereof havebeen
    deducted. To my mind this approach of the Board to some extent has
    done more injustice. The Teachers Eligibility Test is a qualifying test
    without which a candidate would not be eligible for appointment as
    Assistant Teacher in Primary School in view of Regulations framed by
    the National Council for TeachersEducation (hereinafter referred to
    as “NCTE”) in exercise of power under Section 23 of Right of
    Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (in short “Act,
    2009”).
    15. The general candidates securing 60% and above marks and
    reserved category candidates securing 55% and more marks are to be
    declared successful. It is per se not a competitive test. Inclusion of
    one shall not necessarily result inexclusion of another. If a candidate
    has already been declared successful on the basis of answers to
    respective questions in which options have now have been altered by
    the Board, and, on the basis of awarding of such marks he has been
    declared successful it would be unjust to declare him unsuccessful
    now if due to deduction of marks of such questions, the total marks
    secured by him earlier become lower than the prescribed pass marks.
    In my view the revised opinion of the Board in respect of such
    questions should not affect the result of candidates who have already
    been declared successful and they should remain untouched. The
    process adopted by the Board is basically in the nature of corrective
    steps and if that be so, it ought no to have acted prejudicial to the
    candidates already declared successful merely on account of revised
    opinion with regard to options which were earlier treated correct

    ReplyDelete
  75. Ab to Court ne bhi man liya ki tet kewal yogyta hai arhata nahi.ise padhe...



    The Court is concerned with questions where instead of option
    earlier shown correct by the Board, they have changed their view and
    another option has been treatedto be correct. What the Board has
    done is that all the candidates who have answered revised option, the
    Board has awarded marks to them and option declared earliercorrect
    but now incorrect, the marks awarded in respect thereof havebeen
    deducted. To my mind this approach of the Board to some extent has
    done more injustice. The Teachers Eligibility Test is a qualifying test
    without which a candidate would not be eligible for appointment as
    Assistant Teacher in Primary School in view of Regulations framed by
    the National Council for TeachersEducation (hereinafter referred to
    as “NCTE”) in exercise of power under Section 23 of Right of
    Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (in short “Act,
    2009”).
    15. The general candidates securing 60% and above marks and
    reserved category candidates securing 55% and more marks are to be
    declared successful. It is per se not a competitive test. Inclusion of
    one shall not necessarily result inexclusion of another. If a candidate
    has already been declared successful on the basis of answers to
    respective questions in which options have now have been altered by
    the Board, and, on the basis of awarding of such marks he has been
    declared successful it would be unjust to declare him unsuccessful
    now if due to deduction of marks of such questions, the total marks
    secured by him earlier become lower than the prescribed pass marks.
    In my view the revised opinion of the Board in respect of such
    questions should not affect the result of candidates who have already
    been declared successful and they should remain untouched. The
    process adopted by the Board is basically in the nature of corrective
    steps and if that be so, it ought no to have acted prejudicial to the
    candidates already declared successful merely on account of revised
    opinion with regard to options which were earlier treated correct

    ReplyDelete
  76. HighCourt ke anusar tet koi comptitive exam nahi hai jisse ki kisi aur ke pass ho jane ya jayada number aa jane se kisi ka nuksan hoga,
    lekin rajaya sarkar ne to is competitive exam hi bana diya hai kyoki wah isi ke base par job de rahi hai,atah kisi aur ke pass hone ya number badhne se bahot logon ka nuksan hoga,to kya ye court ke decision ka ulanghan nahi hai

    ReplyDelete
  77. Don't worry candidates, Court say only - "Some Extent".
    Additionally if somebody can't select based on TET , it is not specified in NCTE notification.
    therefore bypassing earlier decision is not easily possible as it is playing with the life of so many candidates.
    Some candidates who obtained less marks are creating problems.
    In Rajathan also 20% TET marks are going to be added, why it is?

    Keep hope, Don't worry.

    ReplyDelete
  78. SABHI TET DOSTO, AB ISWAR SE PRARTHANA KARE KI KOI CHAMATKAR KARKE 31 DEC 11 TAK SAB THIK KAR DE AUR GOVT KO SADBUDHI DE

    ReplyDelete
  79. Agar tet ko merit ka adhar nhi banaya gya to high school inter aur graduation k marks bhi na jode jaye.jo tet me ache no. Nhi la paye h wo chahte hi nhi h ki hum logo ko job mile.main to ab kisi party ko vote nhi dunga.sb 1hi thalli k chatte bhatte h.

    ReplyDelete
  80. phir ko koi bhi prakriya fare nahi, kaise aap academic record ko selection ka aadhar manoge? kya up bosrd waale cbse and icse board ki barabari kar sakte hai n kaun nahin jaanta ki board ke exams me dhandhli nahi hoti. toh nakal se pass hue student eligible hai selection ke kya aisa kahna hai court ka, kya court andhi hai.

    ReplyDelete
  81. APPEAL-
    SABHI TET QUALIFIED BHAIYO SE APPEAL HAI KI YE HIGH COURT AUR GOVT. HAMKO TEACHER NAHI BANNE DENGE,SAALE KOI NA KOI TAANG NIKALTE HI RAHTE HAIN.AB HAM INKE KHILAF SUPREME COURT JAYENGE.BE READY TO GO SUPREME COURT.....BE IN TOUCH N KEEP IN TOUCH EVERYBODY......
    MY CONTACT NO. 9045832527
    NAUKRI CHAHIYE TO CHALO SUPREME COURT...

    ReplyDelete
  82. To
    AMMA JU (RADHA RANI)

    Soye hamrihi bar kahan hari
    patit pukar sunat hi dhawat neku na lawat bar
    karan rahit kripalu sda te janat tohi sansar
    "kaisehu patit sharan tuk aaye rakhat charan majhar
    puni ati patit 'kripalu' pekhi kat ur nishthurta dhar
    [AMMA JU ab kewal tera hi sahara hai, ab tere siva kisi se koi ummeed nahi, apne bachcho ko nirash na karna ]

    ReplyDelete
  83. Saras kishori vayas ki thori rati ras bori
    keeje kripa ki kor,shri radhe keeje kripa ki kor
    sadhan heen deen main radhe,tum karunamayee prem agadhe..
    Ka ke dvare jai pukare kaun nihare deen dukhi ki or?
    Sri radhe keeje kripa ki kor

    ReplyDelete
  84. Net
    facebook
    twitter
    aadi ke jriye pure uttar pradesh mai ye msz de do
    "72825 vacancy na bharne pr 2 lakh 70hjar nhi 2 cr 70 lakh vote mayawati ke khilaf dale jayenge aur use hr kimat pr hrakr chodenge"

    ReplyDelete
  85. friends,
    kya sabhi logo ko aapati lagana hoga
    jinke 121,125, 142,
    question ka answer galat hai
    aur court k decision k bad sabhi ko
    fayada hai?
    ya sabko alag se bhej na hai 100/ rs
    thanks

    ReplyDelete
  86. Kiya यूपीटीईटी-2011 की आपत्तियां Se Related Application form Ka Praroop Mil Sakta hai Net Par................??chy

    ReplyDelete
  87. koi batayega ki kon se question cancel ho gaye hai.please tell me

    agam

    ReplyDelete

Please do not use abusive/gali comment to hurt anybody OR to any authority. You can use moderated way to express your openion/anger. Express your views Intelligenly, So that Other can take it Seriously.
कृपया ध्यान रखें: अपनी राय देते समय अभद्र शब्द या भाषा का प्रयोग न करें। अभद्र शब्दों या भाषा का इस्तेमाल आपको इस साइट पर राय देने से प्रतिबंधित किए जाने का कारण बन सकता है। टिप्पणी लेखक का व्यक्तिगत विचार है और इसका संपादकीय नीति से कोई संबंध नहीं है। प्रासंगिक टिप्पणियां प्रकाशित की जाएंगी।