KVS (Kendriya Vidhyalaya Sangathan) TGT / PRT Recruitment : Candidates called for Interview on the Basis of CTET Exam and Preliminary Exam
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan will be conducting interviews for the posts of Trained Graduate Teachers (English, Hindi, Social Studies, Science, Sanskrit and Maths) for the year 2011-2012. The interviews for the posts of Trained Graduate Teachers (English, Hindi, Social Studies, Science, Sanskrit and Maths) will be held from 12th March, 2012 to 16th March, 2012 . The candidates have been short-listed on the basis of their performance in the Preliminary written examination held on 12th February, 2011 and Central Teachers Eligibility Test (CTET) held on 26th June, 2011. The shortlisted candidates are requested to appear for an interview as per the interview schedule. The venue for the Interviews is “Kendriya Vidyalaya, J.N.U. Campus, Baba Gang Nath Marg, New Delhi-110067”. The interview letters for the post of Trained Graduate Teachers (English, Hindi, Social Studies, Science, Sanskrit and Maths) have been sent to the shortlisted candidates through Registered post. If any candidate does not receive the interview letter, he / she may report at the interview venue as per the interview schedule alongwith Educational original testimonials / certificates / Original Marksheet and Certificate of Central Teacher Eligibility Test (CTET) held on 26th June, 2011.
The candidature of the candidates appearing for the interview is purely provisional, subject to verification of their eligibility and CTET mark sheet / Certificate at the time of interview. The candidates belonging to OBC category are required to bring latest OBC certificate issued by the compitent authority in the proforma prescribed by Govt. of India.
See Details of Candidates List for Interview here -http://kvsangathan.nic.in/EmployementNotice.aspx
Notice - http://www.kvsrolucknow.org.in/images/downloads/tgt.pdf
KVS Cut-off Marks Details on the Basis of CTET Exam
http://kvsangathan.nic.in/EmploymentDocuments/inter-28-02-2012.PDF
biju dev ji kya ap pls judgement ki copy send kr skte hai????
ReplyDeleteshilpi.jain20@gmail.com
pawan ji kya ap pls bta skta hai ki main exam ka notice kb tk aa jayega n exam kb hone ki umeed hai???????
ReplyDeletePawan Saraswat ji kya aap judgement ki copy send kar sakte hain??????
ReplyDeletekynki aap bahut hi vishwas se bol rhe h to usski copy ko issi link par paste kar dijiye taki sabhi ko pta chal jaye..............
will you??????????????
dosto big good news kvs main paper oct. ke first week me kra rha h Have a milk day. 8003789883
ReplyDeletedoston abhi fanal judgement nhi aya h to kisi natije par pahunchna jaldbaji hogi so wait till 12 sep..........
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteplz agar kisi ke pass koi information hai to plz comment karo iss year ke end tak to atleast procedure complete hona chahiye jinke pass judgement ki cpoy hai vo yahan comment mein copy paste kar dein ya kisi ke pass koi or information hai to comment karo
ReplyDeleteMr Pawan why you are giving wrong information about the case when you dont even know the basic thing. I have asked KVS office they are going to conduct any main exam. Secondly Even I have checked in your news paper there is no such News that kV has lost the case.
ReplyDeleteso guys kep cools and wait tell kvs make some result.
Mr Pawan why you are giving wrong information about the case when you dont even know the basic thing. I have asked KVS office they are going to conduct any main exam. they said its going to take some more time. Secondly Even I have checked in your news paper there is no such News that kV has lost the case.
ReplyDeleteso guys kep cools and wait tell kvs make some result.
Mr. Ravi U don't have knowledge about kv. Therefore u shouldn't say anything to Pawan. He has all information regarding the whole recruitment process. So plz don't criticize him. whatever he said he has proof. he is trying to give latest update whatever happening in the kvs. But some people continuously criticize him. That's not fair.
ReplyDeleteThe person who picked up ur call he almost nothing information regarding this. those are counter specialist not to provide any information to the public or candidates.
DILEEP KUMAR
Dear friends did you think about new exam of prt tgt pgt 2012-13 &
ReplyDelete2013-14 main exam. kvs have no time to conduct an old 2011-12 main exam and then interview. Because this process take at least 7 more months thats why think and then comment
There is no main exam only new recruitment process will take in October
Only possible result is
1 cancellation of whole process
2 interview of remaining candidates
3 court case and new recruitment will take simultanously
4 result will come.
Tick one and pl. comment on this....
proof to kisi k paas nahi hai na hi kvs main mera kabhi phone laga hai na hi judgement ki copy kisi k paas hai kyonki abhi tak CAT court ne judgement public main declare nahi ki hai sep ist week main judgement aayegi...
ReplyDeleteDileep I think you and Pawan are one and the same person with different id's. So many times we ask you for a proof for what you say but u never shown. It simply shows you shoot a arrow in the air.
ReplyDeleteso plz stop giving baseless decisions and information.
anyone have any information................??????????????
ReplyDeletelatest news kvs ki ye hai ki
ReplyDeletehey hurray th ahonble CAT HAS SAID THE INTERVIEW CONDUCTED BY KVS iv illegal to restart the procedure conducting main exam pls all of you refer to cat jugment ,date of judgement on 25/07/2012 you will come to know
ReplyDeletehey hurray the honble CAT HAS SAID THE INTERVIEW CONDUCTED BY KVS iv illegal and to restart the procedure by conducting main exam pls all of you refer to cat jugment ,date of judgement on 25/07/2012 you will come to know .
ReplyDeletecan u mention the case number
ReplyDeletecan u mention the case number plz
ReplyDeletecourt cases no. hai 764/2012 ok u can go the website of CAT COURT then go for judgement insert that case no. u will get the judgement of cat abt kvs........
ReplyDeleteGuys there is nothing like that to happen I have asked in KVS office. KVS said they never lost the case since that was mentioned in the advertisement of recruitment that at any stage the kvs can make any change in selection procedure and even can cancell the exams.
ReplyDeleteso finally the case is dismissed. kvs is NOT GOING TO CONDUCT ANY MAIN EXAM. They are just holding the results for 1 month as per courts direction since if anyone wants to appeal further can get time for that nothing more.
there is nothing illegal in that. kvs after the time period mentioned by court will directly put up the final list thats all.
i think mr ravi is the person who trying to fool people. he is so funny man who is not aware of cat and its judgement dear ravi open CAT and ask for judgement you will know the truth .dont even dare to tell or suggest people with wrong information take care of your health .
ReplyDelete@Mr.Biju : if you are so much confident about what you say so why dont you provide the link or attachment for them. You can't bcoz you dont have anything with you...right!!!! But what I say everyone can verify from KVS office. KVS is not going to conduct any main exam its just waiting for one months time as per courts direction.
ReplyDeleteIts true , i have read the CAT's decision anyone can read it from its site. It has declared the interviews illegal its in the 32 para ... but KV is not giving true information about the matter to anyone... 99% chances are for the Main Exams but 1% chances are that KV may take the matter to a higher court but there also chances of kv winning the case are very less.
ReplyDeleteI also gave interview but its true that the CAT tribunal has declared the interviews illegal they have given valid reasons too.. KV is not giving any true information regarding the matter I too called the delhi office they say 99% chances are in favour of Main exams and 1% chances are that KV may move to the Higher court..but there also chances of kv winning the case are less..the judgement is on CAT's site.
ReplyDeleteand kv is not holding results but court gives one month time to the parties to move to the higher court so kv is just lingering the time.
ReplyDeleteWe find that none of the persons who were selected and whose appointments were set aside by the High Court had been imp leaded as a party-respondent. It appears that a public notice was given in a representative capacity only with regard to the appointment to the post of Assistant Sericulture Officer. The direction of the High Court, however, is not confined to that post alone and it is the appointments to he other posts also which have been set aside. This could not be done. The principles of natural justice demanded that any person who was going to be adversely affected by the order should have had an opportunity of being heard. That apart, one would have expected the High Court to have considered the report submitted under Section 65 on its merits and then decided whether the said report should be accepted or not.
ReplyDeletec) The CAT has failed to appreciate that though under the National Council for Teacher Education (Determination of Minimum Qualifications for Recruitment of Teachers in Schools), Regulations 2001, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Regulations') have been framed for recruitment of teachers it only prescribes the minimum academic and professional qualification. There is no bar under the Act or the Rules which prescribe any other qualification in addition to the minimum qualification prescribed in the regulation. In the advertisement, the candidates possessing B.Ed. were also made eligible for applying to the post of primary teacher. Therefore, the petitioners were entitled to apply and be considered to the said post .
The respondents may have taken the decision to adopt the marks of CTET in place of conducting the declared Main Examination, which had been proposed to be held by them, not only in order to save them time and costs, but that was only an after thought. As is quite apparent from the highlighted portion Para-3 of the letter dated 20.04.2011 issued by the respondent KVS, (reproduced in para-10/above), even upto that stage of April 2011, the intention of the respondent KVS was only to get the candidates before them to fulfill the statutory requirement of passing CTET, and for that they had to ask the candidates who had qualified in the Preliminary Examination/Screening Test held on 12.02.2011 to also apply for, appear at, and qualify the CTET scheduled to be held by the CBSE on 26.11.2011, thereby becoming eligible for the Main Examination to be conducted subsequently by the KVS for the advertised posts. Therefore, it is obvious that even as on the date of 20.04.2011, there was no intention on the part of the respondent KVS to do away with the Main Examination, the conduct of which had been notified in the Recruitment Notification advertisement itself, at Para-8(ii), as re-produced in para-6/above. The direction to the candidates, who had already qualified at the Preliminary Examination/Screening Test held on 02.02.2011, to apply for, appear at, and qualify the CTET (i.e. with 60% marks as per Rule-8 of the CTET Rules, 2011), was only prescribed and felt necessary so that the statutory requirement of the Right to Education Act could be met by the Teachers selected for the respondent KVS also.
ReplyDeleteAlthough the candidates included in the panel showing their provisional selection do not get vested right to appointment, they will be surely interested in protecting and defending the select list. It is the admitted position that before the Tribunal the successful candidates whose names were included in the panel of selection were not made parties. The argument of the learned Counsel that since the names and particulars of the successful candidates included in the panel were not given, they could not be made parties, has no force. The applicants before the Tribunal could have made efforts to get the particulars; at least they ought to have imp leaded some of the successful candidates may be in a representative capacity; if the large number of candidates were there and if there was any difficulty in service of notices on them, they could have taken appropriate steps to serve them by any one of the modes permissible in law with the leave of the Tribunal. This Court in Prabodh Verma and Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. has held that in writ petitions filed against the State questioning the validity of recruitment of a large number of persons in service could not be proceeded with to hear and take decision adverse to those affected persons without getting them or their representatives imp leaded as parties. In para 50 of the said judgment, summarizing the conclusions this Court in regard to impleading of respondents has stated that:
ReplyDeleteA High Court ought not to hear and dispose of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution without the persons who would be vitally affected by its judgment being before it as respondents or at least some of them being before it as respondents in a representative capacity if their number is too large to join them as respondents individually, and, if the petitioners refuse to so join them, the High Court ought to dismiss the petition for non-joinder of necessary parties.
14. This Court in para 4 of the judgment in A.M.S. Sushanth and Ors. v. M. Sujatha and Ors. has stated thus:
We find that none of the persons who were selected and whose appointments were set aside by the High Court had been imp leaded as a party-respondent. It appears that a public notice was given in a representative capacity only with regard to the appointment to the post of Assistant Sericulture Officer. The direction of the High Court, however, is not confined to that post alone and it is the appointments to he other posts also which have been set aside. This could not be done. The principles of natural justice demanded that any person who was going to be adversely affected by the order should have had an opportunity of being heard. That apart, one would have expected the High Court to have considered the report submitted under Section 65 on its merits and then decided whether the said report should be accepted or not.
ReplyDeletec) The CAT has failed to appreciate that though under the National Council for Teacher Education (Determination of Minimum Qualifications for Recruitment of Teachers in Schools), Regulations 2001, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Regulations') have been framed for recruitment of teachers it only prescribes the minimum academic and professional qualification. There is no bar under the Act or the Rules which prescribe any other qualification in addition to the minimum qualification prescribed in the regulation. In the advertisement, the candidates possessing B.Ed. were also made eligible for applying to the post of primary teacher. Therefore, the petitioners were entitled to apply and be considered to the said post .
(Emphasis supplied).
But it appears to us that this judgment of the Hon ble Delhi High Court does not assist the cause or the case of the respondent-KVS. It is imperative that they ought to have only a single policy to be followed for the recruitments planned to be made by them through the Recruitment Advertisement, and they cannot create two sub-sets of candidates for the same process of recruitment. After passing the first Preliminary Examination conducted by KVS, only a single class or set of Preliminary Examination qualified candidates had been created. The others as well as the applicants of these O.As had acquired as much right to appear at the Main Examination and the Interviews to be conducted by the KVS, equal to that of those who were allowed to appear at the Interviews held in March, 2012, in respect of some candidates, without holding the Main Examination already notified to be conducted by the KVS, before short-listing candidates for the Interviews. Therefore, in terms of the settled law in this regard, the present applicants not impleading those persons who were Interviewed by the KVS in March, 2012, cannot be held to be fatal to these O.As, as all of them belong to the single class or set of Preliminary Examination qualified candidates, with equal vested rights, if any, to appear at the Main Examination and the Interviews.
ReplyDeleteIt is further clear from the Scheme of the two Examinations, the CTET as conducted by the NCTE, and the Main Examination as was notified to be conducted by the respondent-KVS before the start of the selection procession, that the two are not on all fours with each other. This aspect had been most forcefully brought out by the learned counsel appearing for the applicants for the posts of TGT (Maths), who had pointed out that in the Table as reproduced in para-4/above, for the Main Examination for recruitment for the posts of TGT (Science) required Chemistry, Botany and Zoology, and for the posts TGT (Maths) required Maths with any two of the subjects like Physics/Chemistry/Electronics/Computer Science/Statistics, while the CTET combines the selection for the Science and Mathematics Teachers to be together. Therefore, passing of CTET can at best be termed to be a minimum qualification or a condition precedent, but not the sufficient qualification, and the respondents cannot be allowed to base their judgment regarding the selection of Teachers by downgrading the Educational standards from what was prescribed at the beginning of the selection process. Therefore, it is held that CTET could not have been and cannot be a substitute of the Main Examination already notified to be held as per Rule-8 (ii) of the Recruitment Advertisement.
ReplyDelete33. In the result, the interviews held from 12.03.2012 to 26.03.2012 by the respondent-KVS, only on the basis of the marks obtained by the candidates of the CTET, cannot be held to have been conducted within the notified Scheme as per the Recruitment Advertisement-cum-vacancy notification issued by the respondents at the beginning of the selection process in the Employment News of the week 30.10.2010 to 05.11.2010. An examination which prescribes 60% or 50% etc. as the passing marks, but does not give due weightage to any higher marks obtained by candidates above that, and it is stated to be and meant to be only as a qualifying examination for appointment of Primary Teachers and Upper Primary Teachers, cannot provide the sole criteria of marks for selection of Trained Graduate Teachers (TGTs) in the respondent-KVS.
34. Accordingly, all the OAs are allowed, and the interviews held in March, 2012 are declared to be illegal. The respondents are directed to re-start the process of selection, by conducting the already notified Main Examination, allowing all the candidates who had applied for the relevant posts against the Recruitment Advertisement-cum-vacancy notification, and had passed the Preliminary Examination/Screening-Test conducted by the Respondent-KVS on 10.02.2011, and have also thereafter passed and qualified at the statutorily prescribed CTET held on 26.06.2011. Only after the respective merit of the candidates is reflected through the marks obtained by them in the Main Examination conducted by the respondent-KVS, and fresh cut-off marks are determined for each Post-Code for calling the candidates for interviews, those interviews alone would be valid under the process of selection already initiated for being undertaken by the respondents. There shall be no order as to costs.
(Sudhir Kumar) (G. George Paracken)
Member (A) Member (J)
ab main exam kab hoga if any body have some info then tell
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletetnx frnds 4 gving info on kvs. im not only a victim of kvs prt but also of navoday's tgt. i appeared in tgt interview, i got selected as my name n roll no. is displyed in nvs mainwebsite selected candidate's list, but unfortunately denied appointment letter. when i contacted them, they said that im INELLIGIBLE as per their advt. for tgt Sc(Hons)..NVS considers hons degree when its given in third year only where as in my college hons subject starts with second yr itself. i m totally hopeless n clueless wt 2 do now.
ReplyDeleteMs Puja I suggest you to knock court's door at once, you have very strong points for your candidature and there are high chances that the judgement will favour you. Similar cases have happened in past where the candidate finally got selected.
ReplyDeleteye kv ka main exam hona bhi hai ya nhi koi batao jinhone case kiya tha unko koi information hai to update kar do
ReplyDeleteraviji i have no clue how n from wr 2 start this process as i have not got anything in writing fm nvs.
ReplyDeletefirst of all you need to put an RTI to NVS asking them the reason 1. why your candidature was rejected for the said post even after clearing all exams and when it appeared in the final merit list.
ReplyDeleteOnce you get a written revert from NVS, read between the lines of advertisement and their revert and finally challenge your candidature in court of law.
I too am waiting for the declaration of results of the tgt interview conducted by the kvs on march 12th. If anyone knows about the case and its details please let know about it.
ReplyDeleteKVS office said they have no information regarding the fate of this recruitment, said it depends only on higher authority....
ReplyDeleteKVS ek saal se candidate ko sirf pareshaan kar raha hai,
ReplyDeleteKVS last one year se candidates ko sirf pareshaan kar raha hai
ReplyDeleteits hard to understand what kv is planning, the result had to be declared or if not then atleast they should tell what will be the future of that exam as well as interview. i think someone should take the information according to RTI. otherwise they willl not tell anything and keep he pople confused and in a promalatic condition.......
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletehello, im trying to call nvs authority to demand a written reply about my candidature but no body is receiving the phone. wts the process of applying an rti .pl reply
ReplyDelete@puja, I knew they won't respond to phone calls that the reason why I suggest you for RTI. Ask all your queries in that RTI and address it to following:
ReplyDeleteShri S.Chandrasekaran,
Assistant Commissioner (Trg)' and Shri T.Surya Prakash,
Section Officer (Admin.)
on : NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITI
Deptt. of School Education & Literacy, Govt. of India,
B-15, Sector-62
NOIDA (UP) � 201 309
and then see what they say.
kv ke cat case decision ka kya hua. when main exam will get conducted i have heard that kv has moved to high court regarding the appeal for cat decision any info or date of haearing of case in high court??????????????
ReplyDeleteAgar kvs high court gaya to fir 5-6 months aur wait karna padega
ReplyDeletebhai aap me se koi ye batayega ki kvs pgt ka result kab ayega. isame to ctet ka koi matter nhi hai.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteonly from this blog v were geting any info regarding kvs interview result announcment,kvs court case.now nobody worried to update anything,even blog editor not bothered.somebody please update.............................
ReplyDeletekya koi bta skta hai ki kvs prt vacancies ka ab kya chl rha hai??????????
ReplyDeletekya koi bta skta hai kvs prt vacancies ka ab kya chl rha hai??????????
ReplyDeletehas any one got any further news on kvs TGT mains exam. The kvs office says that the case in CAT is yet not finally disposed and judgement is still awaited. CAT website also does not show any judgement in concerned cases.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteyaaar kisi ko bhi abb chinta nahi hai keee un logo ka kya hoga jinhone prt and tgt kaa interview diya hai its a real shame plse i req blogger to do needful and let the people know the current situation
ReplyDeletewhy not someone should put an RTI to KVS to get the present status of recruitment of disputed TGT/PRT
ReplyDeleteThe blog admin. should come forward and respond to the quaries of readers. this was the only source of information about kvs tgt/ prt results... not any more though. please bring the blog to its glory days.
ReplyDeletepeople who hav filed case plz tell that when is hearing in delhi high court regarding recruitment case
ReplyDeletedear all,
ReplyDeleteI have put an RTI to kvs regarding all relevant questions of recruitment process, most probably within 30 days I'll get exact status of this recruitment and kvs stand on this issue and the same thing I'll upload here..so need not to worry..
good thinking brother please upload the information.i think we must do something based on the information.those who attend the interview become fool before others.
ReplyDeleteagar kisi ko koi information hai abt kvs prt exam 2011-12 to please information upload kare.......
ReplyDeleteAny update???????
ReplyDeletekoi news prt kv ki
ReplyDeletekoi news kvs ki
ReplyDeleteA latest information has come from kvs side that the court case of 2011-2012 has dissmissed.now a new recruitment ad has come for session 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 , for detail information see kvs site or write me on devendra2011premnagar@gmail.com
ReplyDeletecan anyone tell what is Performance test? It will of 30% for prt
ReplyDeletefinally kvs has brought new vacancies.but for prt, as per the online application form, only JBT or B.el Ed candidates can apply, its mandatory.Plz clarify if B.Ed pass can appear for prt or not. any idea?
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeletefollowing is the reply I got from KV for the same question.
Primary Teacher
(Post Code-51)
In accordance with the Guidelines framed by the NCTE any one of the following is essential
· 4- Year Bachelor of Elementary Education (B.El.Ed).
or
· 2- Year Diploma in Elementary Education
Candidates pass in CTET but without any one of the above mentioned qualifications will not be eligible for Primary Teacher (Post Code- 51)
ok it means B.Ed is NOT eligible
ReplyDelete.
Court ke decision ke baad 2011~12 ki vaccancy ka kya hua ?
ReplyDeletehi all, check kvs website employment notice, interview notice. there is a message for us. kvs will conduct main exam for us.
ReplyDeleteya...kvs is going to conduct main exam.... but will that be a descriptive or objective...
ReplyDelete@puja Chaurasiya, what happend to your NVS case ??? have you made a appeal in any court? since being a B.Sc HOns doesnt means one cannt apply for science teacher.
ReplyDelete