/* remove this */ Blogger Widgets /* remove this */

Friday, April 6, 2012

UPTET : After fulfilling Demands of TET Candidates by CM Akhilesh, TET candidate filled with Joy and Excitement

मांगें स्वीकार होने पर झूमे टीईटी अभ्यर्थी
(UPTET : After fulfilling Demands of TET Candidates by CM Akhilesh, TET candidate filled with Joy and Excitement )


प्रतापगढ़ : टीईटी अभ्यर्थियों की मांगों को प्रदेश सरकार द्वारा मान लिए जाने से उनमें खुशी की लहर है। उन्होंने एक दूसरे को मिठाई खिलाकर इसका इजहार भी किया

सपा कार्यालय पहुंचे अभ्यर्थियों ने जिलाध्यक्ष भइयाराम पटेल सहित अन्य पदाधिकारियों को मिठाई खिलाई। इस मौके पर अभ्यर्थी विवेक सिंह, विनोद तिवारी, विपिन चंद्र तिवारी, संदीप गुप्ता, आशीष सिंह, चंद्र प्रकाश वर्मा, चंद्रशेखर, अनूप तिवारी आदि ने कहा कि प्रदेश सरकार से हुई वार्ता सफल रही। इस मौके पर मोहम्मद वासिक खान, प्यारे लाल खैरा, अनूप ओझा, विवेक सिंह, आशुतोष पांडेय, मोहम्मद अफसर आदि मौजूद रहे।



News : Jagran (6.4.12)

75 comments:

  1. Once I wrote -
    We shall over come, we shall over come one day;Keep in our hearts, keep in our mind,We shall over come some day.
    Today
    We have forward our step on the first step of stairs.The day of our success is not far enough.

    ReplyDelete

  2. As per information on facebook :
    Division bench ne sachiv basic dwara all bsa ke behaf me vighyapit vigyapti ko sahi mana hai .

    Aur kaha hai ki ek single person ki wajah se 72825 apprentice teachers ko trainee teachers ke training se rokna thik nahi hai unhone jari vighypan ko sikhchak ka vighypan nahi mana hai unka kahna tha ki last appointing body BSA hai aur abhi official appointment nahi ho raha hai steyy galat hai 9 April ko final decision single judge ko lene hai , baki authentic news order copy milne ke bad , apka Ranjeet

    ReplyDelete
  3. main dua karta hu ki cm ka ye faisla atal ho hamari khusi pe koyee garhan na lagee smart cm ka smart faisla thank,s cm

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm also from Pratapgarh & how exiting celebration on here, nobody may understand our inner joy.
    But the great laughter is one that laugh in ending..
    Thanks to all !

    ReplyDelete
  5. mere man ko bhaya to mai kutta kaat ke khaya.
    agar t.e.t. ki merit bani to e baruta phir ek kutta khaega.

    ReplyDelete
  6. <up ke cm ne bahut hi achchha nirnay liye eswar unhen 2014 me kendra me pahunchaye.

    ReplyDelete
  7. naacho gaao khusi manao
    uptet@india.com

    ReplyDelete
  8. kon si maage tet to khud cm ni chate ki cancle ho ni to abi tak 50 fargi case ban gaya hote

    abi bi cm ACD ke pach me hai aur rehenge koi money is power

    ReplyDelete
  9. yr mujhe abi tk y clr ni hua hai k marit k liye cm ne kya kaha agr kisi bandhu ko pta ho to plsss tell me....y btaye k marit kis ki bnegi....

    ReplyDelete
  10. Kal c.m se mulakat ki khabar kaun se newspper me hai? Official statement kaha publish hua hai? Plz inform me..

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ranjitji ap ke muh me ghi shakkr....hurrrrrrrrrrrrrr

    ReplyDelete
  12. Is "s" ko yha se bhagao.ye kuch na kuch ulta hi bol rha hai.ye acd. Supporter hai

    ReplyDelete
  13. are unknown bhai

    jab tum apna naam tak sahi nahi likh sakte

    to dusre ko ulta kyo kah rahe hoo

    ReplyDelete
  14. kya tumhare bugrgo ne tumhara naam

    unknown rakha hai

    nonsence

    ReplyDelete
  15. yah satya hai

    only tet ke adhar par selection nahi ho sakta

    8 din baad achar sahita lag jayegee

    process jo bhee hoga

    june se pahle chalu nahi hogs

    ReplyDelete
  16. aap logo ko to

    31 dec 2011 tak posting milnee thee

    lakin nahi mili

    chunav aa gaye

    aur abhee chunav aane wale hai

    ReplyDelete
  17. Ye baruta kaha hai
    aao na bhaiya aap kaha kho gaye ho aapke bina blog par maja nahi aarha

    ReplyDelete
  18. july ke baad hee kaam chalu ho payega

    kyo kee jaldee ka kaam saitan ka hota hai

    jisko aap bhugat rahe hoo



    aur abhee 3 maheene aur bhugtoge

    apkee dua se

    ReplyDelete
  19. Smart CM,Smart think, Smart faisla.ab thodi khushi mili hai.aur thodi baki hai.. YADAV KAPILDEV LAL BAHADUR phussssssssssssssssssssssss


    Sri,AKHILESH YADAV CM JINDABAD

    ReplyDelete
  20. DOUBLE BENCH TODAY JUDGEMENT:-

    Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 280 of 2012

    Petitioner :- Lalit Mohan Singh And Anr.
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Illigible,K.S. Kushwaha

    Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
    Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.

    1. An advertisement for selection of Apprentice Teachers was published on 30.11.2011 in the primary school run by UP Basic Education Board (the Board). The Apprentice teachers are to be engaged in all districts and this advertisement was on behalf of all District Basic Education Officers of the State of UP.

    2. WP No. 76039 of 2011 has been filed challenging the advertisement. The single Judge has passed an order on 4.1.2012 staying the selection and appointment in pursuance of the advertisement. Hence the present appeal by the two appellants, who claim themselves to be the applicants in the advertisement alongwith application to grant leave to file appeal.

    3. Considering the facts that the appellants are also applicants in the selection of Apprentice Teachers, the leave is granted. The respondents have no objection to condone the delay in filing the appeal. The delay is condoned and it is heard for admission.

    4. The counsel for the appellant submits that:
    By the advertisement, 72825 posts have been advertised. This writ petition is on behalf of only one person and it is not proper to grant interim order in this case;
    The selection process ought not to have been stayed by the single Judge but the single Judge should have permitted the selection process to go on and the selection might have been made subject to decision in the writ petition;
    The reason for grant of stay order was that advertisement was on behalf of District Basic Education Officers of the State. This is not erroneous because the District Basic Education Officers are the appointing authority and one advertisement can always be issued on their behalf together;
    The publication of one advertisement is practical and better way of selecting candidates in the entire district.
    5. The counsel for the petitioner-respondent states that:
    Apart from this writ petition there were other writ petitions that should have been connected with this one;
    There is no interim order in those cases, but it is not correct to say that only one person is challenging the selection.

    6. It is not disputed between the parties that counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged in the writ petition and the writ petition itself is listed before the single Judge for final disposal in the week commencing 9.4.2012. Considering the facts that the number of persons are to be employed, it would be appropriate that the single Judge might consider finally deciding the writ petition at the earliest.

    7. With the aforesaid observations, the special appeal is dismissed.
    Order Date :- 6.4.2012
    SK Singh



    Visit http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/StartWebSearch.do for more Judgments/Orders delivered at Allahabad High Court and Its Bench at Lucknow. Disclaimer

    ReplyDelete
  21. Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 280 of 2012
    Petitioner :- Lalit Mohan Singh And Anr.
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Illigible,K.S. Kushwaha
    Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
    Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
    1. An advertisement for selection of Apprentice Teachers was published
    on 30.11.2011 in the primary school run by UP Basic Education Board (the
    Board). The Apprentice teachers are to be engaged in all districts and this
    advertisement was on behalf of all District Basic Education Officers of the
    State of UP.
    2. WP No. 76039 of 2011 has been filed challenging the advertisement.
    The single Judge has passed an order on 4.1.2012 staying the selection
    and appointment in pursuance of the advertisement. Hence the present
    appeal by the two appellants, who claim themselves to be the applicants in
    the advertisement alongwith application to grant leave to file appeal.
    3. Considering the facts that the appellants are also applicants in the
    selection of Apprentice Teachers, the leave is granted. The respondents
    have no objection to condone the delay in filing the appeal. The delay is
    condoned and it is heard for admission.
    4. The counsel for the appellant submits that:
    ● By the advertisement, 72825 posts have been advertised. This writ
    petition is on behalf of only one person and it is not proper to grant
    interim order in this case;
    ● The selection process ought not to have been stayed by the single
    Judge but the single Judge should have permitted the selection
    process to go on and the selection might have been made subject
    to decision in the writ petition;
    ● The reason for grant of stay order was that advertisement was on
    behalf of District Basic Education Officers of the State. This is not
    erroneous because the District Basic Education Officers are the
    appointing authority and one advertisement can always be issued
    on their behalf together;
    ● The publication of one advertisement is practical and better way of
    selecting candidates in the entire district.2
    5. The counsel for the petitioner-respondent states that:
    ● Apart from this writ petition there were other writ petitions that
    should have been connected with this one;
    ● There is no interim order in those cases, but it is not correct to say
    that only one person is challenging the selection.
    6. It is not disputed between the parties that counter and rejoinder
    affidavits have been exchanged in the writ petition and the writ petition
    itself is listed before the single Judge for final disposal in the week
    commencing 9.4.2012. Considering the facts that the number of persons
    are to be employed, it would be appropriate that the single Judge might
    consider finally deciding the writ petition at the earliest.
    7. With the aforesaid observations, the special appeal is dismissed.
    Order Date :- 6.4.2012
    SK Singh

    ReplyDelete
  22. kayede kee baat


    teacher banane ke liye

    gradution 50% must
    b.ed 50% must
    tet 60% must

    jab teeno jaroori hai to tet ke adhar par section kyo

    kyo
    kyo
    kyo
    kyo
    kyo
    kyo
    kyo

    rank teeno ko milakar honee chahiye

    nahi to milanee


    tarikh par tarikh
    tarikh par tarikh
    tarikh par tarikh
    tarikh par tarikh
    tarikh par tarikh
    tarikh par tarikh

    टीईटी के आधार पर भर्ती मामले में जवाब तलब
    (UPTET : Allahabad Highcourt : Seeking Clarification for Recruitment of PRT on the Basis of TET Exam)

    लखनऊ : इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय में शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा टीईटी के आधार पर शिक्षकों की भर्ती किए जाने संबंधी राज्य सरकार के शासनादेश को चुनौती देने वाली जनहित याचिका पर राज्य सरकार से जवाब तलब किया है। अगली सुनवाई नौ जनवरी को होगी। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति प्रदीपकांत व न्यायमूर्ति रितुराज अवस्थी की खंडपीठ ने याची कुलदीप श्रीवास्तव की ओर से दायर जनहित याचिका पर दिए हैं। जनहित याचिका में कहा गया कि राज्य सरकार द्वारा जारी शासनादेश विधि विरुद्ध हैं। इसे रद किया जाए। कहा गया शिक्षकों की भर्ती उत्तर प्रदेश बेसिक शिक्षक अध्यापक सेवा नियमावली के तहत की जानी चाहिए। याचिका में तर्क दिया गया है कि टीईटी केवल अध्यापकों की पात्रता तय करने के लिए है
    News : Jagran (05.1.12)
    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 1

    Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 25 of 2012

    Petitioner :- Kuldeep Srivastava [P.I.L.] Civil
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko. Petitioner Counsel :- In Person
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

    Hon'ble Pradeep Kant,J.
    Hon'ble Ritu Raj Awasthi,J.
    As prayed, list on Monday i.e. 9.1.2012, as fresh.
    Order Date :- 4.1.2012 MFA
    ****************

    3.SELECTION on TET or TET+ACD


    Misc. Bench : 25 of 2012 [Lucknow]
    Petitioner: KULDEEP SRIVASTAVA [P.I.L.] CIVIL
    Respondent: STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDU. LKO.
    Counsel (Pet.): IN PERSON
    Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
    Category: Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book-Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book
    Date of Filing: 02/01/2012
    Last Listed on: 22/02/2012 in CJ Court
    Next Listing Date (Likely):-----

    ReplyDelete
  23. jai bajrang bali
    jai bajrang bali
    jai bajrang bali
    jai bajrang bali
    jai bajrang bali

    ReplyDelete
  24. 1.
    acc merit me ekrupta nahin ha.
    2.
    teacher banne ki age 21-40 hai.
    3.
    tet merit b.ed. exams k bad ban rahi hai jabki b.ed. me test se selektion hua tha to fir agle test(tet) me acc merit kyon?
    4.
    tet kewal patrta hai to kewal 90 marks hi den uske bad koi mrks dene ki kya jarurat hai.
    5.
    tet ka importance uski merit se hi hai.
    6.
    peon se lekar judge tak ka seletion exam base par hota hai to peon se lekar judge banane wale ka selection acc se kyon?????????????

    ReplyDelete
  25. 1.
    acc merit me ekrupta nahin hai.
    2.
    teacher banne ki age 21-40 hai.
    3.
    tet merit b.ed. exams k bad ban rahi hai jabki b.ed. me test se selektion hua tha to fir agle test(tet) me acc merit kyon?
    4.
    tet kewal patrta hai to kewal 90 marks hi den uske bad koi marks dene ki kya jarurat hai.
    5.
    tet ka importance uski merit se hi hai.
    6.
    peon se lekar judge tak ka seletion exam base par hota hai to peon se lekar judge banane wale ka selection acc se kyon?????????????

    ReplyDelete
  26. Yogeshji, my ques. Is that if 50% is compulsory in grad. Then what is the need of b.ed. Entrance exam. It should also be on high school+inter+grad. Merit.
    Did you raise any ques. At that time?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Sir, Good Evening....Blog Editors Sir kya koi aajki jo highcourt ki tarikh thi ki kuch khabar hai kya

    ReplyDelete
  28. @Yogesh tere kahne se ab kuchh nahi hoga.kya tet fail hai?ya marks kam laya hai.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I think that its the time to make teacher selection criteria modern and more transparent . So tet merit is best. Other teacher vacancies are also being filled by its merit. For ex. In kvs and jnv which are considered to be the highest and toughest exams in INDIA

    ReplyDelete
  30. arpit jee iska jabab
    apko jaldee govt ki taraf se mil jaye ga

    ReplyDelete
  31. sunil ji me aapki bato se sehmat hu you are right

    ReplyDelete
  32. @ ARPIT JI & SUNIL JI,

    AB MERIT KO LEKAR KOI BAHAS KARNE SE KOI FAYADA NAHI IS PAR ALREADY BAHUT BAHAS HO CHUKI HAI, AUR TO AUR COURT NE BHI IS MATTER KO KHARIJ KAR DIYA,

    FILHAL TO KHUSI MANAIYE,

    ReplyDelete
  33. govt nahi dege to double bench tet merit ke khilf special apeal dali hai jo abhee

    dismissed nahi hue hai

    9 nov 2011 tak kisi ko pata tha ki tet merit lagegee

    nahi

    ye janhit yachika hai bouble bench mai

    dhyam se pad lena

    टीईटी के आधार पर भर्ती मामले में जवाब तलब
    (UPTET : Allahabad Highcourt : Seeking Clarification for Recruitment of PRT on the Basis of TET Exam)

    लखनऊ : इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय में शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा टीईटी के आधार पर शिक्षकों की भर्ती किए जाने संबंधी राज्य सरकार के शासनादेश को चुनौती देने वाली जनहित याचिका पर राज्य सरकार से जवाब तलब किया है। अगली सुनवाई नौ जनवरी को होगी। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति प्रदीपकांत व न्यायमूर्ति रितुराज अवस्थी की खंडपीठ ने याची कुलदीप श्रीवास्तव की ओर से दायर जनहित याचिका पर दिए हैं। जनहित याचिका में कहा गया कि राज्य सरकार द्वारा जारी शासनादेश विधि विरुद्ध हैं। इसे रद किया जाए। कहा गया शिक्षकों की भर्ती उत्तर प्रदेश बेसिक शिक्षक अध्यापक सेवा नियमावली के तहत की जानी चाहिए। याचिका में तर्क दिया गया है कि टीईटी केवल अध्यापकों की पात्रता तय करने के लिए है
    News : Jagran (05.1.12)
    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 1

    Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 25 of 2012

    Petitioner :- Kuldeep Srivastava [P.I.L.] Civil
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko. Petitioner Counsel :- In Person
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

    Hon'ble Pradeep Kant,J.
    Hon'ble Ritu Raj Awasthi,J.
    As prayed, list on Monday i.e. 9.1.2012, as fresh.
    Order Date :- 4.1.2012 MFA
    ****************

    3.SELECTION on TET or TET+ACD


    Misc. Bench : 25 of 2012 [Lucknow]
    Petitioner: KULDEEP SRIVASTAVA [P.I.L.] CIVIL
    Respondent: STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDU. LKO.
    Counsel (Pet.): IN PERSON
    Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
    Category: Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book-Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book
    Date of Filing: 02/01/2012
    Last Listed on: 22/02/2012 in CJ Court
    Next Listing Date (Likely):-----

    ReplyDelete
  34. cm ne mamala suljhane ko kaha hai...

    court ne special appeal dismiss kar di hai....

    akhir log itena khus kayo ho rahe hain...

    ReplyDelete
  35. @manoj ji,

    manoj ji ap aur hum se mil kar hi sab banta jab hum sabhi milkar ek ray honge (jis tarah kal huye the)
    tabhi sarkar bhi hamari sunegi.

    warna kya ho raha tha ye ap jante hi hain.

    ReplyDelete
  36. BHAIYO AAP LOG PARESAANN NA HO AGAR STAY HATA TO BHARTI TET MERIT SE HI HOGI AUR ABHI HOGI KOI BHI AACHAR SANHITA KA PRABHAV NHI PADEGA KU KI YE COURT KA AADESH HOGA JO KI RECORD HOTA HAI AUR USME KOI BHI KUCH NHI KAR SAKTA AGAR BHARTI SE ROK 9 KO HATI TO JALDI HI SARE AGLE FAISLE HOO JAYENGE AUR LAGBHAG KGHATAM HO JAYENGE


    BTC 2001 ME MORE THAN 300 CASE EK HI DIN ME KHARIJ HUE THE THIK USI TARAH TAMAM SABOOT HAI IS BAAT KE AUR YE BHARTI KOI AISA PRABAHV NHI DALNE JA RHI HAI RESULT PE NIKAY CHUNAV KE IS LIYE PARESAAN NA HO

    YE JO LOG KUCH BLOG PE HAI WO BAHUT HI FRUSTATE HAI AUR AB KYA KARE MAR TO JAYENGE NHI BECHAARE INKI ATMA KO SHANTI MILE AUR INTZAAR KARE YE LOG INKA BHI NO. AAYEGA KABHI NA KABHI HO SAKTA HAI CM MAHODAY INKE UPAR DAYA KHAYE AUR JALDI HI TOPPER LOGO PE REHAM KI BHEEK DE KU KI YE TOP BHI BAHUT KIYE HAI AUR MARKS BHI NHI LA PAYE HAI TET ME KUI BHAI LOGO SAHI KEH RHA HU NA


    RK

    ReplyDelete
  37. SELECTION KA BASE CHAHE ACC/TET HO LEKIN SELECTION HONA CHAHIYE.

    PLEASE NOTE :

    HAMARI KHUSI SE SABSE JYADA DUKHI AMAR UJALA HAI.

    ReplyDelete
  38. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  39. are sweta darling

    ahee picther baki hai

    double bench lucknow mai


    darling marrige nahi hue to marrige kara lo nahi to over age ho jaogee

    tet ke chakkar mai

    news old jaroor hai

    lakin govt ne abhee jabab nahi diya hai


    read this cairfully

    sweta mam

    टीईटी के आधार पर भर्ती मामले में जवाब तलब
    (UPTET : Allahabad Highcourt : Seeking Clarification for Recruitment of PRT on the Basis of TET Exam)

    लखनऊ : इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय में शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा टीईटी के आधार पर शिक्षकों की भर्ती किए जाने संबंधी राज्य सरकार के शासनादेश को चुनौती देने वाली जनहित याचिका पर राज्य सरकार से जवाब तलब किया है। अगली सुनवाई नौ जनवरी को होगी। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति प्रदीपकांत व न्यायमूर्ति रितुराज अवस्थी की खंडपीठ ने याची कुलदीप श्रीवास्तव की ओर से दायर जनहित याचिका पर दिए हैं। जनहित याचिका में कहा गया कि राज्य सरकार द्वारा जारी शासनादेश विधि विरुद्ध हैं। इसे रद किया जाए। कहा गया शिक्षकों की भर्ती उत्तर प्रदेश बेसिक शिक्षक अध्यापक सेवा नियमावली के तहत की जानी चाहिए। याचिका में तर्क दिया गया है कि टीईटी केवल अध्यापकों की पात्रता तय करने के लिए है
    News : Jagran (05.1.12)
    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 1

    Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 25 of 2012

    Petitioner :- Kuldeep Srivastava [P.I.L.] Civil
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko. Petitioner Counsel :- In Person
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

    Hon'ble Pradeep Kant,J.
    Hon'ble Ritu Raj Awasthi,J.
    As prayed, list on Monday i.e. 9.1.2012, as fresh.
    Order Date :- 4.1.2012 MFA
    ****************

    3.SELECTION on TET or TET+ACD


    Misc. Bench : 25 of 2012 [Lucknow]
    Petitioner: KULDEEP SRIVASTAVA [P.I.L.] CIVIL
    Respondent: STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDU. LKO.
    Counsel (Pet.): IN PERSON
    Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
    Category: Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book-Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book
    Date of Filing: 02/01/2012
    Last Listed on: 22/02/2012 in CJ Court
    Next Listing Date (Likely):-----

    ReplyDelete
  40. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  41. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  42. special Appeal me ye kaha gaya hai ki writ A 76039 ka shighrta se niptara kiya jaye...aur ye kahakar appeal ko dismiss kar diya hai..

    ReplyDelete
  43. special Appeal me ye kaha gaya hai ki writ A 76039 ka shighrta se niptara kiya jaye...aur ye kahakar appeal ko dismiss kar diya hai..

    ReplyDelete
  44. bhai pahle information ko study kar liya karo....
    aaj ke case me pratipakshi wakil ne kaha hai ki 9-4-12 se start hone wale week me final decisin hone wala hai(
    12-4-12 ki date jo ab 19-4-2012 ho gayi hai)

    mamala sidhe dismiss hai..
    baat wahi ki wahi hain jaha thi..

    ReplyDelete
  45. You are right manoj so i an erasing my comments.
    Thanks for advice

    ReplyDelete
  46. @ KUMAR AND YOGESH

    BHAI SAHAB EK BAT BATAO JAB SINGLE BENCH NE NIRNAY DIYA THA TAB AAP KHA THE SUDHIR JI NE AAP LOG BAHUT HI PARESAAN HO AUR NIRAAS BHI IS LIYE JYADA BADI BAT NHI HAI SHAYAD NEXT DAY HI USKA NIRNAY HO JAYEGA AUR BAHUT JALD HI USME KOI CAVAIAT DAKHIL KAREGA

    ReplyDelete
  47. prashan ji faisale ko padhiye aisa kahi nahi kaha gaya hai..

    khare ke jawab me pratipakshi wakil ne kaha hai k mamale ka nistaran 9.4.2012 se suru hone wale hafte me hone wala hai.....

    ReplyDelete
  48. See whole Judgment in my recent post.

    When Double Bench itself suggests,

    Advt. is correct, then almost stay is vacated on 9th April 2012.

    Full chance stay is removed.
    But now Govt. will take how much time to to start its process is another issue.

    For this If court issue directives then it will be good to candidates.

    ReplyDelete
  49. @ravikant ji
    akhir mai bhi janana chahata hu ki
    aaj ke case me court ne aapka kaun sa favour kiya hai..
    come se come faisle ki kisi line ko hi dikhakar batayiye.

    ReplyDelete
  50. UPTET-टीईटी स्टे पर अंतिम सुनवाई 9 -4 -2012 को- हाई कोर्ट डबल बेंच
    VERY GOOD NEWS FOR ALL UPTET HOLDERS:


    टीईटी स्टे पर सुनवाई 19 -4 -2012 se 9 -4 -2012 करने का आदेश हाईकोर्ट डबल बेंच ने दिया
    अब टीईटी पर अंतिम सुनवाई 9 -4 -2012 को होगी ।

    ReplyDelete
  51. Friday, 6 April 2012टीईटी के लिए मुख्य सचिव की अध्यक्षता में समिति
    लखनऊ, जाब्यू : मुख्यमंत्री अखिलेश यादव ने यूपीटीईटी-2011 की परीक्षा के सभी पहलुओं पर विचार करने के लिए मुख्य सचिव की अध्यक्षता में एक समिति गठित करने का निर्देश दिया है। यह समिति तीन सप्ताह में संस्तुति प्रस्तुत करेगी। टीईटी अभ्यर्थियों के एक प्रतिनिधिमण्डल ने गुरुवार को मुख्यमंत्री से उनके सरकारी आवास पर मुलाकात की। इस दौरान मुख्यमंत्री ने आश्वासन दिया कि उनकी समस्याओं का निराकरण जल्द ही किया जाएगा। प्रतिनिधिमण्डल ने मुख्यमंत्री से आग्रह किया कि इस परीक्षा में बैठने वाले लाखों युवाओं के भविष्य को अंधकारमय होने से बचा लें।

    Source- जागरण
    6-4-2012
    Posted by prabhat at 4/06/2012 05:37:00 PM 0 comments Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
    UPTET stay के खिलाफ दायर SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE
    UPTET stay के खिलाफ दायर SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE

    Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 280 of 2012
    Petitioner :- Lalit Mohan Singh And Anr.
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Illigible,K.S. Kushwaha
    Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
    Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
    1. An advertisement for selection of Apprentice Teachers was published
    on 30.11.2011 in the primary school run by UP Basic Education Board (the
    Board). The Apprentice teachers are to be engaged in all districts and this
    advertisement was on behalf of all District Basic Education Officers of the
    State of UP.
    2. WP No. 76039 of 2011 has been filed challenging the advertisement.
    The single Judge has passed an order on 4.1.2012 staying the selection
    and appointment in pursuance of the advertisement. Hence the present
    appeal by the two appellants, who claim themselves to be the applicants in
    the advertisement alongwith application to grant leave to file appeal.
    3. Considering the facts that the appellants are also applicants in the
    selection of Apprentice Teachers, the leave is granted. The respondents
    have no objection to condone the delay in filing the appeal. The delay is
    condoned and it is heard for admission.
    4. The counsel for the appellant submits that:
    ● By the advertisement, 72825 posts have been advertised. This writ
    petition is on behalf of only one person and it is not proper to grant
    interim order in this case;
    ● The selection process ought not to have been stayed by the single
    Judge but the single Judge should have permitted the selection
    process to go on and the selection might have been made subject
    to decision in the writ petition;
    ● The reason for grant of stay order was that advertisement was on
    behalf of District Basic Education Officers of the State. This is not
    erroneous because the District Basic Education Officers are the
    appointing authority and one advertisement can always be issued
    on their behalf together;
    ● The publication of one advertisement is practical and better way of
    selecting candidates in the entire district.
    2
    5. The counsel for the petitioner-respondent states that:
    ● Apart from this writ petition there were other writ petitions that
    should have been connected with this one;
    ● There is no interim order in those cases, but it is not correct to say
    that only one person is challenging the selection.
    6. It is not disputed between the parties that counter and rejoinder

    affidavits have been exchanged in the writ petition and the writ petition
    itself is listed before the single Judge for final disposal in the week
    commencing 9.4.2012. Considering the facts that the number of persons
    are to be employed, it would be appropriate that the single Judge might
    consider finally deciding the writ petition at the earliest.
    7. With the aforesaid observations, the special appeal

    is dismissed.

    Order Date :- 6.4.2012
    SK Singh

    ReplyDelete
  52. @blog editor ji..

    faisale ko dhayan se padhi

    pahle ke 4 point wadi wakil ne kahe hain jiske jawab me pratwadi wakil
    ne point 5 6 me apna paksh rakha hai.

    jiske adhar par court me case ko dismissed kar diya hai...

    r i m wrong

    ReplyDelete
  53. is case ki kewal ek hi line hai..

    "court ne special apeal ko khariz kar diya"

    ReplyDelete
  54. kort ne special apeal kharij kar dee hai


    kaha hai ki 9.04.12 ko is mamle ke sunwai ke jai

    bas itna kaha hai


    bade ladoo bat rahe the

    tet rankar

    order ko pado to sahi

    ki vo bhee nahi aata


    abe dismissed likha hai

    ReplyDelete
  55. kumar sahab

    ye tet ke chakkar mai pagal ho choke hai

    inko english padni nahi aati



    ye ghan chakkar hai

    ghochoo

    ReplyDelete
  56. Kumar jee,

    Clear Direction dee gayee hain Single Bench ko with advisory note.

    Issliye is special appeal ko dismiss kiya gaya hai - Kee Double Bench stay ko vacate nahin karte hue single bench ko ye kaam karna hai.
    Special appeal ka purpose solve ho chuka hai.

    ReplyDelete
  57. @yogesh nikhattu kameen jahil 5th class fail dubble bench ki dhamki kya deta hai ham to supreme court bhi jayenge.tu apni soch kahi irsya ki vajah se tu jal mat jana.tujh jaise logo se dusro ki khushi dekhi nahi jati.

    ReplyDelete
  58. tet ke chakkar mai ghar ke rahe naa ghat ke


    mai to bhaiya

    job karne jaa raha hoon

    ReplyDelete
  59. @yogesh ji
    faisale me court ne kahi nahi kaha ki
    9-4-12 ko sunwai kiya jaye.

    faisle ko padhnae par ye dikhai de raha hai ki khare ke pratuttar me
    pratipakshi wakil ne kaha ki mamale
    ki final sunwai 9 april se suru hone wale saptah me hone wali hai...

    shayad mai samajh nahi paa raha hu
    kya aap wo line display karenge
    jisme court ki taraf se aisa kuch kaha gaya hai...

    ReplyDelete
  60. are sweta darling aa gai aap

    very goods

    dekho yadi apke

    acad sahi and tet 100 hai

    to aap acad sahi and tet 100 se sadi kar lo

    in dono ko jodkar

    aapke jindgi kA SAFAR ARAM SE KATEGS

    ReplyDelete
  61. @blog editor ji

    net par avialable faisle se to sari baat spast nahi ho pa rahi hai..
    shayad detail faisle me aisa nirdesh diya gaya ho...

    yadi faisle se sambandhit koi copy mile to use ek baar display kariyega
    taki use detail se dekha ja sake

    ReplyDelete

  62. @Kumar jee,
    Mene bhee vo line padi hai kee week commencing from 9th April,
    Lekin saath hee directive bhee deeya gaya hai - at the earliest.

    Iska matlab hai - kee next hearing mein final decision ho jayega.

    Court ne counsel kee daleel par koee objection nehin deeya hai , jismen usne bataya kee - Advt. technically correct hai aur mass/public interest ko dekhte hue single person dwara stay lagwana galat hai.

    Iska matlab saaf hai - Ye decision earlier advt. ke favor mein jayega.

    Special appeal ka purpose directives issue karva (jiska pustay ko vacate karana tha )
    kar solve ho chuka hai

    ReplyDelete

  63. Special appeal ka purpose directives issue karva (jiska purpose stay ko vacate karana tha )
    kar solve ho chuka hai

    ReplyDelete
  64. JEET SACH KI HOTI HAI. Jai bajrangbali .tet merit best.

    ReplyDelete
  65. order me double bench ne yahi kaha hai ki aane wale saptah ke 9/4/2012 ko single bench dwara labhanwit hone wale logo ki sankhya ko sagyan me rakhte huye swayam sighra nirnay de.sath hi double bench ne yah bhi swikar kiya hai ki vigyapan sahi hai.sabhi zila basic shiksha adhikariyon dwara samuhik rup se vigyapa diya jana kafi saral tarika hai.so dont worry and dont make other sence. either if any other can explain,thats very well,lpease.

    ReplyDelete
  66. MUSKAN JI aise samay aapko sanghars morcha ke jo log waha the aur jo unaka kahana hai use pahle show karni chahiye kyoki unake dwara batayi gayi bat saral aur adhik karagar hota hai logo ko jaldi samajh me aa jati hai.mai un logo se request karta hoon ki aap apane dhang se saral bhasha me aaj ki is khabr ko blog par likhe to accha hoga.

    ReplyDelete
  67. @Dharmendra Pandey jee
    "order me double bench ne yahi kaha hai ki aane wale saptah ke 9/4/2012 ko single bench dwara labhanwit hone wale logo ki sankhya ko sagyan me rakhte huye swayam sighra nirnay de.sath hi double bench ne yah bhi swikar kiya hai ki vigyapan sahi hai.sabhi zila basic shiksha adhikariyon dwara samuhik rup se vigyapa diya jana kafi saral tarika hai.so dont worry and dont make other sence. either if any other can explain,thats very well,lpease "

    Ye baten counsel yanee advocate ne rakhee,
    Lekin special appeal ka uddesya - Stay ko vacate karana tha,

    Iske leeye usne single bench ko directive de deeya hai.

    Hopefully a positive decision comes, you will see.
    Coz Double bench NOT objected any of cousel points it means it can taken positively.

    Next hearing finalize and close the issue.
    And I am sure stay will be vacated.

    ReplyDelete
  68. @ tetmerit
    -----------------
    tet merit sabko ek plateform provide krta hai : isiliye tet merit is the best: aur ye game shuru hone se phle ki shart bhee thee: high school ke different boards aur unversities se leker b.ed tak kahee bhee equal marking system nahee hai:
    intillegent acd wale bhee hai aur tet rankers bhee hain no doubt : but game rule change nahee hona chahiye:
    acadmic wale bhaiyo selfishness chor do aur ghaltia nikalna band karo : tet ko badnaam krna band karo : koi dhandhli wandhli nahee hui hai jitna aap aur media propagate ker rahe hai;sanjay mohan b innocent he hoga kyonki itna bada adhikari aisa bewakufi wala kaam ker he nahee sakta ke court ke order ka paalan na kerte hue ferzi marks badane ka kaam shuru kerde: baki to media ke khel hai jise chahe chor sabit krde;

    ReplyDelete
  69. @kumar & Yogesh utni der se ek word ki dhajjiyan uda rahe ho. Itni si bat samajh nahi ati kya. Jb double bench ne single bench ko jaldi decision dene k liye nirdeshit kar diya to kya uske bad bhi case chalt rahega, isliye court ne dismiss likha.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Hi
    gud eve before night to all.
    yaar what is going on...?
    TET qualified candidate are capable to penetrate national level exam in future.They will not stop on joining
    as a PRT teacher.they will make effort to make great career. Bytheway
    Most of acd wale to chor hi hote hai.free ka no... . wo bas wahi tak rahege...degree batore liya ..bas chale merit per naukari lene. Mai to exam ka suporter hu.. wo chahe jo bhi ho.......If anything hurt u then i am sorry for that.Tet supoter ko supreem ki ladai me full support hamari taraf se bhi milega.
    for any technical quarry ..
    pls contact....
    gyanendrashukla86@gmail.com
    gyanendra@ernet.iitd.ac.in
    research scholar
    IIT Delhi
    110016
    9310209056

    ReplyDelete

Please do not use abusive/gali comment to hurt anybody OR to any authority. You can use moderated way to express your openion/anger. Express your views Intelligenly, So that Other can take it Seriously.
कृपया ध्यान रखें: अपनी राय देते समय अभद्र शब्द या भाषा का प्रयोग न करें। अभद्र शब्दों या भाषा का इस्तेमाल आपको इस साइट पर राय देने से प्रतिबंधित किए जाने का कारण बन सकता है। टिप्पणी लेखक का व्यक्तिगत विचार है और इसका संपादकीय नीति से कोई संबंध नहीं है। प्रासंगिक टिप्पणियां प्रकाशित की जाएंगी।