/* remove this */ Blogger Widgets /* remove this */

Friday, April 6, 2012

UPTET : Decision on Stay in Highcourt

72 हजार शिक्षकों की भर्ती पर रोक के खिलाफ अपील खारिज
(UPTET : Decision on Stay in Highcourt )

विधि संवाददाता, इलाहाबाद : इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय ने प्रदेश में लगभग 72 हजार सहायक अध्यापकों की नियुक्ति पर लगी रोक के खिलाफ दाखिल विशेष अपील खारिज कर दी है और अपीलार्थी से कहा है कि वह अपना पक्ष एकलपीठ के समक्ष रखे।

यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति यतीन्द्र सिंह तथा न्यायमूर्ति वी अमित स्थालकर की खंडपीठ ने ललित मोहन सिंह व अन्य की अपील पर दिया है। अपील का प्रतिवाद आलोक यादव ने किया। यादव कपिल देव लाल बहादुर की याचिका पर 9 अप्रैल को एकल पीठ के समक्ष सूचीबद्ध है। न्यायालय ने बोर्ड द्वारा सभी बीएसए की तरफ से विज्ञापन निकालने को नियमविरुद्ध मानते हुए रोक लगा दी है। टीईटी चयनित लोगों की नियुक्ति की जानी है

News : Jagran (6.4.12)
*****************

However purpose of appeal (to vacae stay in Highcourt ) is solved. As case extended many times , new date comes again and again without hearing.

Double bench clearly issue dirctives for final decision at the earliest. Possibly decision will go in favor to vacate stay. (Final decison )

And whatever decision comes, But it should come early as it is related to large public interst, Due to a single person who was not directly involved with this case, not a departmental person and his objective is clear - to create obstacle in recruitment process. Court should know such objective behind this issue. If authority concerned has objection then people can understand purpose of it.

Fundamentals to maintain stay is weak and hopfully stay is vacated in court.

58 comments:


  1. @Rahul
    Bilkul Sahee hai kee Supreme Court mein PIL dalnee chahiye, ye roj roj kee chik chik bajee va parshaneeon se bachenge.

    Jo bhee fesla aayega kam kam se kam logo la bhala hoga, Itna time waste hone apne aap mein ek mansik utpeedan va punishment hai.

    Aap log sangathit ho kar Supreme Court mein PIL daal den

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rajesh ji tension to ho hi gaye na.

    ReplyDelete
  3. TO,
    Rajesh Row Alld.
    KYA HOGA IS CASE MAIN AAGE
    SIR
    यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति यतीन्द्र सिंह तथा न्यायमूर्ति वी अमित स्थालकर की खंडपीठ ने ललित मोहन सिंह व अन्य की अपील पर दिया है। अपील का प्रतिवाद आलोक यादव ने किया। यादव कपिल देव लाल बहादुर की याचिका पर 9 अप्रैल को एकल पीठ के समक्ष सूचीबद्ध है। न्यायालय ने बोर्ड द्वारा सभी बीएसए की तरफ से विज्ञापन निकालने को नियमविरुद्ध मानते हुए रोक लगा दी है। टीईटी चयनित लोगों की नियुक्ति की जानी है

    Double bench
    NE TO HUME DAT DIYA HAI..

    ReplyDelete
  4. @ Blog editor ji,
    I was ready to PIL in Supreme Court against stay. But some insocial elements said,
    "Singhaniya is misguiding to them."
    infact as for as I think 9 April's hearing will also postpone and government also want this for changing rules.
    What are you thinking about this ?

    ReplyDelete
  5. danik jagran ka bhuchaal...
    khabar ko thoda hamara khyal rakhkar b to chaap sakta tha

    ReplyDelete
  6. ab kya 9 april k sunwai nahi hogi?????????

    ReplyDelete
  7. Good comment on Joinuptet.blogspotin :

    ham log kahin kuch bhool to nahi rahe? yaad hoga ki T.E.T. pr sawal q uthne shuru hue the? wo log jinhone U.P.T.E.T. ka question paper banaya tha or jinhone uski answer sheet banai thi, kya wo log is yogy hai ki wo apne pdon pr bane rahen? agar wo log apni zimmedari theek se nibhate to shyad t.e.t. pr ye ladai kabhi shuru hi nahi hoti. kya un logon ke khilaf court me apeel nahi honi chahiye? kya unhe koi sza nahi di jani chahiye? kya un adhikariyon ko seva mukt nahi kiya jana chahiye?
    By Sunil Singh on Another Article By Blog Visitor Mr. Shyam Dev Mish... at 8:32 PM

    ReplyDelete
  8. Good comment :
    All TET candidates
    PIL in supreme court is best option

    "requested to nitin mehta and vivekanand ji please filled a pil in supream court otherwise we all tetiens will gone mad.ye bhartiya toh itihas ke panno me darj hona chahti.es daur me gov. Naukari etni aasani se milna bahut muskil hai.yeh bhartiya hum logo ko pata nahi kab tak sukh aur dukh ke pher me dale rahengi.mujhe etna toh maloom hai ki ess kahani me abhi saikdo mod aane baki hai.time ke sath-2 dekhna abhi tet fail bhi kahenge ki akhilesh ji ne humlogo se doka dekar vote liya aur tet nirsat bhi nahi kiya.aur acedmic wale bhi court jayege par unke pass paiso ki koi kami nahi hogi kyoki unko nakal mafiao se paisa bhi mil jayega.aur ant me en vacencio ka ko radd hi kar diya jayega.i hertly requested to all the president of tet sangarsh morch to filled a pil in supream court .take a one strong step and free from all tansion.i know for the fight of truth we all contributed money too much that after win a case we all will eat ladoo with that money.
    By Rahul supp. Tet on UPTET : Allahabad Highcourt Double Bench Pass an O... at 8:57 PM "

    Whatever decision comes in supreme court, it will not be challenged furthur.
    Else you may face many cases in the middle of process.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ye kya ho raha hai? Mind kaam nahi kar raha hai. Koi kehta hai hum jeet gaye, news keh rahi hai hum har gaye. Aakhir such kya hai koi bataeyga.

    ReplyDelete

  10. Be unite :
    And contact to your leader/ group of leader to act intellegently and in right direction.

    PIL in supreme court.

    You can open a common account / jointly operated by leaders.
    And objectives / agenda of account in writing , you can publish in media also.

    After that act on agenda/objectives is the best way to proceed.

    You can give receipt of donation. On receipt objectives can clearly define.

    So that no person can make allegation of cheating of money etc.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @Arpan,

    Aap case ko dhyan se read karenge to payenge aap jeet gaye hain.

    Chahe jo bhee decision aaye, case court se vacate ho jayega.
    99% positive,
    1% neative bhee aata hai to aap appeal dakhil kar sakte hain.

    Pata nahin uske baad bhee kab tak case chalenge.

    Islleiye behtar hoga Supreme Court mein PIL dakhil kee jaye.

    ReplyDelete
  12. sc mai kis liye pil krni h ..for what? plz explain it,,,,,v r rady

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thanks @Blog editor ji mai bhi yahi samajh raha tha. Lekin dainik jagran ne main bat chupa kar confusion create kar diya tha.

    ReplyDelete
  14. i hpe sc mai hc ke decision ko cheleng kiya jata h ,,,to plz bato kis liye pil krni h

    ReplyDelete
  15. Supreme Court mein PIL, RTE implemenation va jald niyukti ke leeye rakh sakte hain.

    large Public Interest se jude mamle seedhe SC mein PIL ke jariye dakhil keeye ja sakte hain

    ReplyDelete
  16. ap log itni tension kyu le rhe ho blog par court ki carbon copy h jagran ny news ko apne word me chapa h jbki decision to 9 ko ana dosto tension mat lo

    ReplyDelete
  17. Muskan ji ye batayiye ki double bench ne vigyapan ko sahi mana hai ki nahi?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Muskan ji kya final descision 9 ko aa jayega ya date extend hogi?

    ReplyDelete
  19. dear blog editor i m totally confuse with this news please make me understand what this news wants to say

    ReplyDelete
  20. yar news kuch aur keh ri h par dophar me kuch aur tha pl explain it editor ji..........sath me koi is baruta ko dimaaaaaagi ilaj de shayad is ki bibi padosi k sath bhaag gai h

    ReplyDelete
  21. JAGRAN KE REPORTE YA TO GADHE HAI YA MAHA GADHE HAI INHONE CHHAPA KI BENCH NE YACHIKA KHARIJ KAR DI PAR YE NAHI CHHAPA KI BENCH NE VIGYAPAN KO SAHI MANA AUR KAHA KI STAY LAGANA GALAT HAI SELECTION JARI RAHNA CHAHIYE AAP LOG CONFUSE NA HO SPECIAL APPEAL NE APANA KAM KAR DIYA HAI AB HAMARE PAKSH KO BHI SINGLE BENCH ME RAKHANE KI CHHOOT MIL GAYI MUSKAN JI AGAR HO SAKE TO JUDGEMENT KO HINDI ME TRANSLATE KAR DE

    ReplyDelete
  22. आज उच्च न्यायालय कि division bench ने माननीय सेवानिवृत न्यायाधीश सुधीर अग्रवाल द्वारा दिए गये स्थगन आदेश को गलत ठहराया हैऔर single bench को निर्देश दिया है कि इस मामले से प्रभावित लोगों किइतनी बडी संख्या को देखते हुए जल्द से जल्द निपटाया जाए |साथ ही सचिव द्वारा BSAs की तरफ से जारी एक ही विज्ञप्ति को व्यवहारिक माना गया है|
    संक्षेप में कहा जाए तो हम जीत गये....सुधीर अग्रवाल ने stay देने में अनावश्यक जल्बाजी का परिचय दिया | division bench ने कहा है कि सुधीर अग्रवाल को चाहिए था कि वे selectionprocess को जारी रहने देते और अंतिमनियुक्ति को याचिका के निस्तारण तक रोक सकते थे |

    ReplyDelete

  23. Aap sabhee log apnee pareshanee seedhe Post Card se Supreme Court Bhej sakte hain.

    Vo isko apne aap PIL mein convert kar sunvaee kar sakta hai.

    Mera lates Blog Post, dhyan se paden

    ReplyDelete

  24. Usmein bata sakte hain, kee har aaye din court mein naye case padte rehte hain.

    Akhir TET candidates kee kya galtee hai , jo recruitment process start nahin ho rahee hai.

    kaee log age/umr ke antim padav par hain, aur un logon kee aakhiri aasha hai.

    Agar koee dhandhlee huee hai to usmein doshee logon ko saja dee jaye ne kee sabhee logon ko
    etc.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Muskan ji aap pls is appeal par double bench ke decision ko sidhi bhasha me samjhaye

    ReplyDelete
  26. wah maja a gaya hurrey hurerey hur hurr hurrey bana lo ab tet ki merit.. Meri bt man lo merit acd ki banegi

    ReplyDelete
  27. dear blog editor kya aap is baruta ko delete nahe kar sakte hai plz delete this nonsense

    ReplyDelete
  28. Advertisement 9 apr ko radd ho jayega aisa HC ke ek senior vakeel ka kahna hai

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Meenu ji adalat bhi 270000 logo ko future ke sath khilwad nahi kar sakti hai.agar usne aisa kiya to supream court ka rasta khula hai.agar hamara vakil accha hai to viquapan 99 parcents radd nahi ho sakta.

      Delete
  29. @sonu
    sachchai se daro mat,sachchai ka saamna karo

    ReplyDelete
  30. Jitenge bhai jitenge acd merit wale jitenge

    ReplyDelete
  31. baruta ,bahut bolte ho, jab gov change hui tab se ab tak jo tension tha 50 % ,ab majil dur nahi nov-dec. me maine kaha tha ki court jaye lekin sabhi me unity nahee thi but ab unity h so muskan is right, 1pal ke liye mane ki gov. apne rukh se palat kar faisela leti h to ...............?

    ReplyDelete
  32. kuch budhimano ne thek he kaha he ke bhais ke age been nahi bajane chaheye

    ReplyDelete
  33. meenu ..baruta...singhania aur...in charon ka jitna cheap naam hai soch bhi utnee hi ghatiya hai....aur inko paida karke to inke parents bhi pachta rahe honge...

    ReplyDelete
  34. ham jitenge hame wiswaas hai. Jia tet morcha

    ReplyDelete
  35. ab to dosto lagta hai ki court b manmani kr raha hai, high court to dusro ke hath ki katputli nazar aa raha hai....khuda hi bachaye is pareshaniyo se...mujhe to lagta hai ki kahi humara koi sathi in pareshniyo me khudkushi na kar le...agr koi aisi halat me khudkushi kr leta hai to uska jummedar kaun hai...UP Govt., High Court, or ya media....media is liye qki jb hum log 4 days ansan pr vidhan sabha ke samne baithte hai to wo kisi news channel pr ya news paper me kuch nahi dikhate or na hi humara sath dete jbki agr media humara sath deta to shayad kuch result nikal jata... lekin agr koi dukh bhari khabar hai ti media use front pr dikhata hai...media aisa q kr raha hai kya us par koi dabaw hai...kya media kisi ke presser me hai...

    ReplyDelete
  36. hum sabhi ko jila star par meeting kar ke lalit mohan ki arthik madad karni chahiye kyoki unhone ye sarahniya kam kiya hai. Aur court se hi hamara bhala ho sakta hai.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Muskan ji, maine kal ke bouble bench ke nirnay se sambandhit ek mail aapko bheja hai. Kripya ise publish karne taki is vishay par faile bhram ko door kiya ja sake. Kynki isme candidates ke liye utna kuchh nahi hai, jitna bataya ja raha hai.

    Dhanyavad,

    SHYAM DEV MISHRA

    ReplyDelete
  38. VIVEKANAND JI, LALIT MOHAN JI AUR RANJIT YADAV JI PLEASE SABHI JILO SE ARTHIK MADAD LE HUM SABHI APKE IS KARY ME TAN MAN DHAN SE SAHYOG KARANA CHAHATE HAI

    ReplyDelete
  39. Muskan ji, maine kal ke bouble bench ke nirnay se sambandhit ek mail aapko bheja hai. Kripya ise publish karne taki is vishay par faile bhram ko door kiya ja sake. Kynki isme candidates ke liye utna kuchh nahi hai, jitna bataya ja raha hai.

    Dhanyavad,

    SHYAM DEV MISHRA

    ReplyDelete
  40. Muskan ji, maine kal ke bouble bench ke nirnay se sambandhit ek mail aapko bheja hai. Kripya ise publish karne taki is vishay par faile bhram ko door kiya ja sake. Kynki isme candidates ke liye utna kuchh nahi hai, jitna bataya ja raha hai.

    Dhanyavad,

    SHYAM DEV MISHRA

    ReplyDelete
  41. Syam Dev mishra ji GM .kal k double bench k nirnay k bare me sthiti saf nhi ho rahi hai. Mamla kya hai?

    ReplyDelete
  42. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  43. mr avkash yadav an open challenge to u to join a school of any medium & take a single class either in english or hindi.teaching is nightmare you canot stand even infront of them reason you r not a TEACHER YOU ARE A BLOODY CHEATER??????//

    ReplyDelete
  44. MR. BLOG EDITOR,
    I HAVE SEND A MALE TO SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURT BOTH .WILL IT BE CONSIDERED AS PLI OR SOME ELSE HAS TO BE DONE?

    ReplyDelete
  45. @Deepak jee,

    Aap Hard copy bhee sign ke saath bhejen,

    Court inhee cheejon ko authentic mante hue karywahee karta hai.

    ReplyDelete

Please do not use abusive/gali comment to hurt anybody OR to any authority. You can use moderated way to express your openion/anger. Express your views Intelligenly, So that Other can take it Seriously.
कृपया ध्यान रखें: अपनी राय देते समय अभद्र शब्द या भाषा का प्रयोग न करें। अभद्र शब्दों या भाषा का इस्तेमाल आपको इस साइट पर राय देने से प्रतिबंधित किए जाने का कारण बन सकता है। टिप्पणी लेखक का व्यक्तिगत विचार है और इसका संपादकीय नीति से कोई संबंध नहीं है। प्रासंगिक टिप्पणियां प्रकाशित की जाएंगी।