/* remove this */ Blogger Widgets /* remove this */

Sunday, October 29, 2017

महिलाओं , बच्चों की तकलीफें देखते हुए तमाम संस्थाएं और नियमावली महिलाओं के ट्रांसफर पर प्राथमिकताएं देती आयी हैं, नेशनल कमीशन फॉर वीमन ने भी वर्किंग वीमन की तकलीफों को देखते हुए पति पत्नी को एक ही स्थान पर पोस्टिंग की केन्दीय सेवा की नियमावली को लिखा है

महिलाओं , बच्चों की तकलीफें देखते हुए तमाम संस्थाएं और नियमावली महिलाओं के ट्रांसफर पर प्राथमिकताएं देती आयी हैं, नेशनल कमीशन फॉर वीमन ने भी वर्किंग वीमन की तकलीफों को देखते हुए
पति पत्नी को एक ही स्थान पर पोस्टिंग की केन्दीय सेवा की नियमावली को लिखा है

http://ncw.nic.in/pdfreports/gender%20justice%20forging%20partnership%20with%20law%20enforcement.pdf

(Page No. 37)


Working for women in civil services, the Department of Personnel and Training (DOPT) jointly
with United Nations Development Program (UNDP) has developed a capacity-building project for civil services. DOPT has introduced special provisions for women in Central services, like relaxation of age limits for widows, women separated from their husbands, exemption from requirement of educational qualifications in respect of widows of deceased Government servants, employment on compassionate grounds to posts of peons, guidelines for posting of husband and wife at the same station, maternity and paternity leave benefits, guidelines for provision of day-care facilities for working women, allowing cadre change in respect of members of All India Services on the ground of marriage and creation of harassment-free environment by issuing guidelines on dealing with cases of sexual harassment. The
Fifth Pay Commission has in fact broken new ground by suggesting possibilities like career grades,
flexi-time, combining the leave of husband and wife by creating an earned leave bank which could be
used by both, and other progressive measures. However, the representation of women in the three All
India Services, IAS, IPS and IFS, as on 1.1.99 was hardly 10.45%, 3.44% and 3.18% respectively. We still have a long way to go.

**********************

In Rosy Jacob v. Jacob A. Chakramakkal26, the Court ruled that
the children are not mere chattels, nor are they mere playthings for their
parents. Absolute right of parents over the destinies and the lives of
their children has, in the modern changed social conditions, yielded to
the considerations of their welfare as human beings so that they may
grow up in a normal balanced manner to be useful members of the
society and the guardian court in case of a dispute between the mother
and the father is expected to strike a just and proper balance between
the requirements of welfare of the minor children and the rights of their
respective parents over them



******************

. In Vikram Vir Vohra v. Shalini Bhalla27, the Court took note of
the fact that the learned Judge of the High Court had personally
interviewed the child who was seven years old to ascertain his wishes.
The two Judges of this Court also interacted with the child in the
chambers in the absence of his parents to find out about his wish and
took note of the fact that the child was aged about 10 years and was at
an informative and impressionable stage and eventually opined that the
order passed by the High Court affirming the order of the trial Court
pertaining to visitation rights of the father had been so structured that it
was compatible with the educational career of the child and the rights of
the father and the mother had been well balanced. It is common
knowledge that in most of the cases relating to guardianship and
custody, the Courts interact with the child to know her/his desire
keeping in view the concept that the welfare of the child is paramount.

***********