Sarkari Naukri Recruitment Result टीईटी शिक्षक भर्ती TET UPTET BETET Merit/Counselling/Appointment

Tuesday, April 12, 2016

BETET STET Shikshak Niyojan शिक्षक नियोजन SARKARI NAUKRI News - - जाली सर्टिफिकेट पर शिक्षक बने 31 पर निगरानी ने दर्ज कराई प्राथमिकी

BETET STET Shikshak Niyojan शिक्षक नियोजन SARKARI NAUKRI News - -

जाली सर्टिफिकेट पर शिक्षक बने 31 पर निगरानी ने दर्ज कराई प्राथमिकी

NewsApr 11, 2016, 06:24 AM IST
PrintDecrease FontIncrease Font
EmailGoogle PlusTwitterFacebookCOMMENTS0

EmailGoogle PlusTwitterFacebookCOMMENTS
पटना.जाली दस्तावेज के आधार पर शिक्षक बनने वालों पर निगरानी की कार्रवाई शुरू हो गई है। निगरानी विभाग द्वारा प्रमाणपत्रों की जांच के क्रम में अब तक 31 शिक्षकों के नियोजन को फर्जी पाया गया है। इनमें अधिकतर के प्रमाणपत्र फर्जी व कई शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया सही नहीं पाई गई। इन सभी शिक्षकों पर निगरानी ने प्राथमिकी दर्ज करा दी है। कार्रवाई का आदेश...
- शिक्षा विभाग ने भी डीएम समेत तमाम नियोजन इकाइयों को इन शिक्षकों के खिलाफ कार्रवाई करने के लिए कहा है।
- राज्य के नियोजित शिक्षकों के प्रमाणपत्र की जांच चल रही है।
- इसके लिए सभी नियोजन इकाइयों को नियोजित शिक्षकों के शैक्षणिक व प्रशैक्षणिक प्रमाणपत्र का फोल्डर निगरानी विभाग के पदाधिकारी को उपलब्ध कराने का निर्देश दिया गया है।
- गलत प्रमाणपत्र के आधार पर शिक्षक बनने वालों पर निगरानी ने प्राथमिकी दर्ज कराई है।
- इसके बाद शिक्षा विभाग ने संबंधित जिले के जिलाधिकारी, नगर आयुक्त, उप विकास आयुक्त, नगर परिषद व नगर पंचायत के कार्यपालक पदाधिकारी, जिला शिक्षा पदाधिकारी व जिला कार्यक्रम पदाधिकारी को संबंधित शिक्षकों पर कार्रवाई के निर्देश जारी कर दिए हैं।
प्राथमिक स्कूलों में नियोजित तीन जिलों के 10 शिक्षकों पर प्राथमिकी दर्ज कराई गई है। इसके अलावा आठ जिलों के हाईस्कूलों में नियुक्त नौ शिक्षक के प्रमाणपत्र भी गलत पाए गए। आठ जिलों के प्लस टू हाईस्कूलों के 12 शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति या प्रमाणपत्र की गड़बड़ी पाई गई। माध्यमिक शिक्षा निदेशक राजीव प्रसाद सिंह रंजन ने सभी संबंधित जिलों को निर्देश जारी किया है कि जिन शिक्षकों पर प्राथमिकी दर्ज कराई गई है, सबसे पहले उनका वेतन रोका जाए। इसके बाद जिस नियोजन इकाई से वे नियोजित हुए हैं, वहां की प्रक्रिया पूरी करने के बाद उन शिक्षकों पर कार्रवाई की जाए। उन्होंने कार्रवाई के संबंध में शीघ्र निदेशालय को सूचना देने का निर्देश भी दिया है।
प्रारंभिक स्कूल : 10 पर केस
1. रणधीर कुमार ठाकुर, मध्य विद्यालय बरैठा, मुजफ्फरपुर
2. कुमारी सुनैना, मध्य विद्यालय मछड़ा, खगड़िया
3. निर्मला कुमारी, मध्य विद्यालय गौराचक, खगड़िया
4. संजय पासवान, मध्य विद्यालय बहोरवां, खगड़िया
5. प्रतिभा कुमारी, मध्य विद्यालय, कमला गम्हरिया, खगड़िया
6. ललिता कुमारी, मध्य विद्यालय सनोखर, खगड़िया
7. पूनम कुमारी, मध्य विद्यालय, हथवन, खगड़िया
8. ललिता देवी, मध्य विद्यालय, सरकाही, खगड़िया
9. रेखा कुमारी, मध्य विद्यालय, उदनघरारी, खगड़िया
10. अनिता कुमारी, किशनगंज
माध्यमिक स्कूल : 9 पर केस
1. जय प्रकाश सिंह, टाउन विद्यालय आरा, भोजपुर
2. संजय कुमार, उच्च विद्यालय मकरौता, नालंदा
3. राजेश कुमार रंजन, पीडी उच्च विद्यालय नवागांव जमालपुर, मुंगेर
4. मो. अतहर परवेज, हरदेव तुलसी उच्च विद्यालय, जमालपुर, मुंगेर
5. प्रमोद कुमार, पं. देवनाथ पांडेय हाईस्कूल, बारे, भभुआ
6. मो. असलम कामिल, उच्च विद्यालय बीबीगंज, टेढ़ागाछ, किशनगंज
7. विजय बहादुर सिंह, उच्च विद्यालय सोनवर्षा, भोजपुर
8. राकेश कुमार त्रिवेदी, बिंदा हाईस्कूल, मुजफ्फरपुर
9. अवधेश कुमार, जगन्नाथ उच्च विद्यालय, बाढ़, पटना
प्लस टू स्कूल : 12 पर प्राथमिकी
1. प्रमोद कुमार पांडेय, उच्च माध्यमिक विद्यालय, बरांव नोखा, रोहतास
2. संजय कुमार, जगजीवन उच्च माध्यमिक विद्यालय, विष्णुपुर, रोहतास
3. उदय शंकर प्रसाद : पहले ही दे चुके हैं त्यागपत्र
4. धनंजय कुमार शर्मा, उच्च विद्यालय कराय-परसुराय, नालंदा
5. कालीकिंकट कस्तुरी, उच्च विद्यालय लोदीपुर, उस्मानपुर, नालंदा
6. उदय शंकर प्रसाद, हाईस्कूल भगवानपुर, सीवान
7. जय प्रकाश रमण, जीवनी उच्च विद्यालय शाहपुर पटोरी, समस्तीपुर
8. सरिता कुमारी, उच्च विद्यालय नवीनगर, औरंगाबाद
9. वीरेंद्र कुमार तिवारी, उच्च माध्यमिक विद्यालय बसंतपुर, भागलपुर
10. नीतू कुमारी, लोकनाथ उच्च विद्यालय जगदीशपुर, भागलपुर
11. आलोक रंजन, प्लस टू विद्यालय हरवंश चांदी, भोजपुर
12. अरुणेश्वर प्रसाद सिन्हा, गांधी इंटर विद्यालय कोंच, गया

BETET / STET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment / Shikshak Niyojan / शिक्षक नियोजन News
http://betet-bihar.blogspot.com/
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

BETET STET Shikshak Niyojan शिक्षक नियोजन SARKARI NAUKRI News - - फर्जी शिक्षक के खिलाफ ग्रामीणों ने जनता दरबार में की शिकायत

BETET STET Shikshak Niyojan शिक्षक नियोजन SARKARI NAUKRI News - -

फर्जी शिक्षक के खिलाफ ग्रामीणों ने जनता दरबार में की शिकायत

बांका। डीएम जनता दरबार में गुरुवार को एनपीएस अजमतुल्ला महादलित टोला के ग्रामीणों ने प्राथमिक विद्यालय के एक फर्जी शिक्षक के खिलाफ शिकायत की है। आवेदन में कहा है कि मनोज कुमार पिता जनार्दन यादव पिछले दो साल से अपना नाम व पता बदलकर विद्यालय में कार्यरत है।
जबकि मनोज का असली नाम अमर कुमार पिता घनश्याम है। फर्जी शिक्षक का पता भी फर्जी है। अमर कुमार का वास्तविक घर रजौन थाना क्षेत्र के कठरंग में है। संजय यादव, धनेश्वर यादव व अन्य ग्रामीणों का कहना है कि शिक्षा विभाग के लचर व्यवस्था के कारण ऐसे फर्जी शिक्षकों की चांदी कट रही है। जो, अपना नाम पता बदलकर सरकारी खजाने को लूट रहा है। ग्रामीणों ने बताया कि जिस विद्यालय का शिक्षक ही फर्जी है, वे छात्रों को अच्छी शिक्षा नहीं दे सकता। डीएम डॉ. निलेश देवरे ने ग्रामीणों को जांच कर कार्रवाई का आश्वासन दिया है।

BETET / STET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment / Shikshak Niyojan / शिक्षक नियोजन News
http://betet-bihar.blogspot.com/
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

PSTET :CTET Qualification can take place of PSTET / other state tet qualification

PSTET :CTET Qualification can take place of PSTET / other state tet qualification

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Harpreet Kaur vs State Of Punjab And Others on 16 March, 2016
SAILESH RANJAN
2016.03.16 18:33
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP No.14597 of 2012
Reserved on:23.02.2016
Decided on :16.03.2016

Harpreet Kaur
... Petitioner
Versus

State of Punjab & others ... Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA

Present: Mr. Vikas Kuthiala, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Avinit Avasthi, AAG, Punjab.

****

G.S. Sandhawalia , J.
Petitioner seeks consideration in the counselling, which was to be held on 02.08.2012, in pursuance of the advertisement dated 07.05.2011 (Annexure P1), for the post of Master Cadre. Prayer has also been made for quashing the public notice dated 24.07.2012 (Annexure P2), clarifying the earlier advertisement that only candidates who had cleared the Punjab State Teachers Eligibility Test, (for short, 'PSTET') were eligible.

The case of the petitioner is that he is a bright student of his stream-Mathematics and had applied in pursuance of the advertisement dated 07.05.2011 whereby 3442 posts of Master Cadre had been advertised. As per the advertisement, the cut-off date was 30.05.2011 and it was mandatory to have passed the Teachers Eligibility Test, as per the guidelines of the National SAILESH RANJAN 2016.03.16 18:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Council for Teachers Education (for short, the 'NCTE'). It is pleaded that the State of Punjab itself was conducting the said PSTET for the first time, on 03.07.2011, after the cut-off date and therefore, candidates who had passed the Central Teachers Eligibility Test (for short, the 'CTET') were eligible to apply, the petitioner, being one such candidate. It was further averred that this Court in CWP-21301-2011 titled Gurjinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab & others, decided on 13.02.2012, had directed that since the cut-off date was 30.05.2011 and the Test was being conducted on 03.07.2011 and the result was to be declared on 30.07.2011, the authorities should look into the matter and take appropriate decision, within 2 months. The petitioner had cleared the CTET held on 05.05.2012, the result of which was declared on 29.05.2012 (Annexure P3), but was not called for counselling. The subsequent advertisement dated 24.07.2012, giving last chance to candidates who had applied and restricting the chance only to those who had passed the PSTET-2, was not correct.

It is pertinent to mention that the petitioner, vide the interim orders of this Court dated 01.08.2012, in view of the above facts, had been allowed to apply for the post of Math Mistress and permitted to participate in the process of counselling. However, the result of the petitioner was not to be declared, without the leave of the Court. The said order was further modified on 05.12.2012 that one post of Math Mistress shall not be filled up.

SAILESH RANJAN 2016.03.16 18:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document State, in its written statement, has defended the action on the ground that the CTET is to apply to the private schools which are under the domain of the U.T. Administration and where the State is conducting the TET, the candidate has to possess the said certificate. The guidelines of the NCTE were only clarificatory and not mandatory. One of the eligibility conditions was that the students who had passed the TET held on 03.07.2011, the result of which was declared on 30.07.2011, were eligible to apply. The petitioner having passed the TET from CBSE was ineligible candidate. The additional affidavit also came to be filed that the appointment letter had been issued to the petitioner, which was as per the interim orders of this Court and charge-sheets had been issued to the delinquent officers and that corrective measures would be taken. Permission was also sought to withdraw the appointment letter issued to the petitioner.

Counsel for the petitioner has, thus, argued that the State had itself not held the Test and fixed the cut-off date and the clause was not clear regarding the instructions whether the Test had to be passed, which had to be held by the State or by the CTET and therefore, the petitioner is entitled for the benefit of the CTET, having passed the said Test on 29.05.2012. It is further submitted that even the appointment letter dated 22.11.2012 had been issued, in pursuance of the interim orders and therefore, the petitioner, having worked for more than last 3 years, is entitled to SAILESH RANJAN 2016.03.16 18:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document continue with the job.

State Counsel, on the other hand, opposed the said prayer and submitted that the State Test had been held and placed reliance upon the Division Bench judgment in CWP-346-2013 titled Antim Kumari Vs. State of Haryana & others, decided on 29.04.2015, wherein it has been held that candidates who had cleared the CTET were not eligible to claim eligibility for the posts advertised, since they had not qualified the State Test held.

The Division Bench has categorically held that candidates who had passed the CTET were not entitled to claim eligibility for the advertised posts when no such Teachers Eligibility Test was held. Relevant portion of the reasoning reads as under:

"We have already noticed above that as per Section 23 of the RTE , a person to be appointed as a teacher in an elementary school is required to possess such minimum qualification as is prescribed by the academic authority to be notified by the Central Government. The National Council for Teachers Education has been notified as such authority by the Central Government. Vide notification dated 23.08.2010 issued in accordance with Section 23(1) of the RTE Act, the National Council for Teachers Education specified that passing of a teachers eligibility test to be conducted by the appropriate Government would be one of the essential qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as a teacher in classes I to VIII.
As per Section 2 of the RTE Act, the State Government is the appropriate Government in relation to a school established within the territory of the State Government other than a school established, owned or controlled by the Central Government. Thus, for SAILESH RANJAN 2016.03.16 18:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document recruitment of Primary Teachers for State Government Schools, the State Government is the appropriate Government. And as prescribed by the NCTE, which is the academic authority in terms of the mandate of the RTE Act, passing of a teachers eligibility test to be conducted by the State Government is one of the essential qualifications for eligibility for appointment as Primary Teacher. The NCTE has in its affidavit referred to above clarified that the guidelines relied upon by the Ld. Counsel for the petitioners are directory in nature.
Thus, there is no force in the argument of the Ld. Counsel for the petitioners that as HTET test was not conducted in the year 2012, the petitioners should be held eligible on the basis of their having qualified the CTET. The petitions in this set are thus dismissed."
Resultantly, it does not lie in the mouth of the petitioner to submit that she was entitled to claim any eligibility on the basis of having passed the CTET.

However, one issue remains as, admittedly, the State itself had not specified whether the passing of the State Test was mandatory or whether the Central Test would also be a good criteria. Relevant clause in the advertisement reads as under:

"COMMON ELIGIBILITY - TEST For the abovementioned posts, the candidates should have passed T.E.T. Test as per N.C.T.E. guide lines under R.T.I. Act."
It is not disputed that in pursuance of the directions issued by this Court on 13.02.2012, to re-look into the issue, the State, thereafter, gave a chance to those candidates who had passed the PSTET, 2011, result of which was declared on SAILESH RANJAN 2016.03.16 18:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 30.07.2011, after the cut-off date. Counsel for the petitioner is, thus, well justified in pointing out that once such an appointment had been made, under the interim orders of this Court, it should be protected and the petitioner should be allowed to continue in the post on humanitarian ground. Reliance has been placed upon the judgment of the Apex Court in H.C.Puttaswamy & others Vs. The Hon'ble Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court, Bangalore & others 1990 (Supplementary 2) SCR 552. In the said case, the appellants were in service for the last 10 years and had become overage and were protected by the Apex Court. Relevant portion of the judgment reads as under:

"12. Having reached the conclusion about the invalidity of the impugned appointments made by the Chief Justice, we cannot, however, refuse to recognise the consequence that involves on uprooting the appellants. Mr. Gopala Subramanayam, counsel for the appellants while highlighting the human problems involved in the case pleaded for sympathetic approach and made an impassioned appeal for allowing the appellants to continue in their respective posts. He has also referred to us several decisions of this Court where equitable directions were issued in the interests of justice even though the selection and appointments of candidates were held to be illegal and unsupportable.
13. There is good sense in the plea put forward for the appellants. The human problem stands at the outset in these cases and it is that problem that motivated us in allowing the review petitions. It may be recalled that the appellants are in service for the past 10 years. They are either graduates or double graduates or post graduates as against the minimum qualification of S.S.L.C. required for SAILESH RANJAN 2016.03.16 18:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Second Division Clerks in which cadre they were originally recruited. Some of them seem to have earned higher qualification by hard work during their service. Some of them in the normal course have been promoted to higher cadre. They are now overaged for entry into any other service. It seems that most of them cannot gel the benefit of age relaxation under Rule 6 of the Karnataka Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1977. One could only imagine their untold miseries and of their family if they are left at the mid stream. Indeed, it would be an act of cruelty at this stage to ask them to appear for written test and viva voce to be conducted by the Public Service Commission for fresh selection. (See : Lila Dhar v. State of Rajasthan, 1981 (1) SCR 320 at 326."
In similar circumstances, in Mohinder Sain Garg Vs. State of Punjab & others 1991 (1) SCC 662 and Vikram Singh & another Vs. The Subordinate Services Selection Board, Haryana & others 1991 (1) SCC 686, the selection made was not set aside as the said candidates had joined the posts long time back. In Inder Parkash Gupta Vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir & others 2004 (6) SCC 786, a period of 10 years had elapsed and the Apex Court held that it would be appropriate that the appointments are sustained. Similarly, in Krishan Gopal & others Vs. State of Haryana & others 2010 (1) RSJ 658, where persons had been working for 14 years, it was held by this Court that it would not be appropriate to interfere, at that stage.

Resultantly, this Court is of the opinion that since the petitioner has been working for a period of over 3 years, now, and SAILESH RANJAN 2016.03.16 18:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document on account of the lack of clarity in the advertisement by the State and the petitioner having been issued an appointment order, in pursuance of having qualified the CTET, it would not be fair to disturb the appointment letter already issued to her.

At the time of pronouncement, counsel for the petitioner submits that after the arguments of both sides were heard and the judgment was reserved on 23.02.2016, the petitioner has also been regularized in service on 29.02.2016. Copy of the said order has been placed on record as Annexure P-C.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of, by confirming the interim orders passed by this Court and allowing the petitioner to continue, on the strength of the appointment letter dated 28.01.2013, which had been issued to her on the strength of being eligible and having qualified the CTET.

(G.S. SANDHAWALIA)
MARCH 16, 2016 JUDGE

sailesh

PSTET / Punjab Teacher Eligibility Test / Recruitment News

PSTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS / SARKARI NAUKRI News

http://pstet.blogspot.com

http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com/#ixzz36cV9AUCl

UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - Himanshu Rana Ab JRT Bhrtee ko TET Merit se Karane Ke Leeye JRT Bhrtee ke Case mein Shamil -

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - Himanshu Rana Ab JRT Bhrtee ko TET Merit se Karane Ke Leeye JRT Bhrtee ke Case mein Shamil -

Halanki Puducheri, Tamilandu , Kerala ke Ek Bhrtee maamle mein Court ne Spasht Kiya hai ki Alag Alag TET ki tulna saheee nahhin hai, Aur Puducheri (Union Territory ) mein TNTET, APTET, CTET, KTET sabko qualifying maankar aavedan ka moka deeya thaa.

UPTET 2011, CTET, UPTET 2013 ki marking mein antar hai.
Aur state ke haaath mein TET ki minimum qualification tay karne ke adhikaar hai.

Filhal Maamla uljhaa hua hai

Himanshu Rana
7 hrs ·
सुप्रभात साथियों ,
उत्तरप्रदेश शासन काल में 20 नवंबर 2013 के पश्चात हुई समस्त भर्तियों को नीचे उल्लेखित याचिका में मेरे द्वारा चैलेंज किया है परंतु अचानक मेन मेटर श्रीकांत दुबे वाला जिस पर सीजे साहब लास्ट टाइम फाइनल बहस के लिए बोले थे कॉज लिस्ट में चला गया है ।
मेरा मेटर 18 न. पर as a fresh आज सीजे साहब की बेंच में लगा है जिसमे मुख्य बिंदु हैं :-
1) जब 2013 के पश्चात सरकार विशेष अनुज्ञा याचिका वर्तमान में सिविल अपील लेकर गई थी तो बारम्बार 15वे संशोधन पर स्टे रिजेक्ट हुआ है और 12वे पर भर्ती का अंतरिम आदेश हुआ है तो इस प्रकार भर्ती कैसे की जा सकती है बिना निर्णीत हुए उस विवाद के ?
2) शिव प्रकाश शर्मा जो कि फुल बेंच निर्णय के अगेंस्ट गए थे उनकी विशेष अनुज्ञा का खारिज होना ।
3) समस्त भर्ती जिनके शासनादेश में हमेशा मेटर को अंतरिम तौर पर माननीय उच्चत्तम न्यायालय के अधीन करने के बावजूद भर्ती 15वे पर की गई ।
4) ट्रिपल बेंच निर्णय जिसमे 11 फरवरी 2011 को जारी हुई टीईटी की गाइडलाइन्स में clause 9(b) की व्याख्या है कि टीईटी होना अनिवार्य ही नहीं इसके अंकों को बिना वरीयता देते हुए भर्ती नहीं हो सकती है।
5) special appeal defective 237/2013 में जब नवंबर 2011 में स्थापित नियमावली को नवम्बर 2013 में खंडपीठ ने सही ठहराया है तो सरकार द्वारा समस्त शासनादेश ख़त्म हैं और आज के समय में वही नियमावली मान्य है।
चूँकि मेन मेटर कॉज लिस्ट में भेज दिया गया है तो अन्य पैरवीकार आज अपने अधिवक्ताओं को जब मेरा मेटर लगा हो तो अवश्य भेज दें और श्रीकांत दुबे में हुए पिछले आदेश का उल्लेख करते हुए बहस अवश्य कराए वरना कुछ नहीं होगा आज के बाद और ये मेटर भी शिक्षा मित्रों की तरह हो जाएगा।
हर हर महादेव
धन्यवाद
आपका
हिमान्शु राणा
टीईटी 2011 उत्तीर्ण संघर्ष मोर्चा , उत्तरप्रदेश

UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News -Junior Bhrtee Case Update , Next Hearing on 18th April 2016 -

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News -Junior Bhrtee Case Update , Next Hearing on 18th April 2016 -

Sachin >>>>>>>>>>>
आज का अपडेट
हिमांशु राणा और योगेन्द्र कुमार दोनों की रिट दीपक शर्मा की spl appeal से कनेक्ट कर दी गयी है.जिसकी सुनवाई cj bench में 18 को dcl में होनी है.
हिमांशु की रिट 20 nov 2013 के बाद हुई accadmic बेस की सभी भर्तियों को रद्द कराने को लेकर है और योगेन्द्र कुमार की रिट में appointment g.o.,np और salary आदि सब पर stay लेने की prayer की गयी है.मामला गंभीर होता दिख रहा है इसलिए अब हमें भी 9 may को होने वाली sc की hearing पर अपना फोकस करना है.वही से कुछ राहत मिल सकती है.इसलिए जो लोग सैलरी पाकर मदमस्त हो गए है और ये मान चुके है की अब हमारा कोई कुछ नहीं होने वाला तो वो लोग आँख नाक कान मुँह सब खोल ले और मोर्चे को अपनी तैयारी करने के लिए अपनी सैलरी से कुछ अंश निकाल कर सहयोग कर दे और जिनकी सैलरी नहीं भी मिली है वो भी सहयोग करें.नहीं तो भगवान ही मालिक है.

UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - - Junior Bhrtee Professional Case :-

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - -

Junior Bhrtee Professional Case :-

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Deputy Registrar(Copying).
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 21
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 261 of 2016
Appellant :- Pradeep Kumar
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others
Counsel for Appellant :- Syed Faiz Hasnain
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav, Anoop Trivedi, Vibhu Rai
Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumark Birla,J.
Pradeep Kumar is assailing before us the judgement dated 11.09.20.15 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 39466 of 2014 ( Satyendra Kumar Singh and 4 others Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) wherein following order has been passed:-
" 5. Shri Shailendra, learned counsel appearing for petitioners contended that the issue raised is not the same as has been decided by this Court in Shiv Kumar Pathak and others (Supra). Therein the issue was, as to whether the candidates possessing degree in professional courses can be said to possess graduate degree or not and that was decided. However, in some of the professional courses the candidates did not have as a subject Science and Mathematics which was an essential qualification required to be possessed by a candidate in order to become eligible for appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher in Senior Basic Schools (Mathematics and Science subjects).
6. I find substance in what is submitted by Shri Shailendra. The issue raised in this petition was not raised in earlier petition and, therefore, it cannot be said that this writ petition is covered by the judgment dated 18.08.2015 passed in Shiv Kumar Pathak and others (Supra).
7. However, the short submission is that as per the advertisement in order to become eligible, the candidates must possess graduation degree with one of the subject (Mathematics and Science) in the said course.
8. It is contended that in some of the professional courses the subjects Mathematics and Science did not form part of syllabus and therefore, such candidates possessing such professional courses are not eligible.
9. In my view, this is a factual dispute and cannot be examined by this Court, at this stage, since it requires investigation of an individual case of the candidates called for counseling. Let this examination be made by the concerned authorities at the time of counseling or in any case before making appointment. I leave it open to petitioners to raise this plea before the respondents. Further, I direct the Competent Authority to examine the eligibility of each and every candidate possessing professional course degree as to whether, he is eligible in terms of advertisement or not, i.e., whether Science and Mathematics was one of the subject in graduation course, and, thereafter only it will allow counseling. In any case the same exercise would be done by the Competent Authority before appointment, if not already done, at the time of counseling and no person ineligible shall be appointed.
10. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of".�
Sri Kapil Tyagi, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Syed Faiz Hasnain, Advocate, learned counsel for the appellant submitted with vehemence that various incumbents of professional degree holders have been allowed for counseling, who are not� at all eligible as per Government Order and advertisement and the authorities on the spot areflouting the terms and condition of Government Order and advertisement, as such� present Special Appeal deserves to be allowed.
Arguments raised, has been resisted by learned Standing Counsel by contending that whatever action has been taken on the spot at the point of time of counseling, same is strictly in consonance with the terms and conditions of the Government Order; advertisement as well as per the� terms and conditions of the order dated 11.09.2015. As far as order dated 11.09.2015 is concern, said order clearly asks the authority concern to see and ensure that only such candidates are called for counselling, who fulfil the terms and conditions as has been described in the Government Order and advertisement and further in order to become eligible candidates have to possess Science and Mathematics as one of the subject in graduation course and accordingly such exercise is required to be undertaken as to whether incumbent is eligible as per the terms and conditions� by having Science and Mathematics as one of the subject in graduation course.
The directives issued by the learned Single, is not at all liable to be interfered with, but we certainly make it clear that in case the incumbents who have been called for counseling� they do not fulfil the terms and conditions of the Government Order; Advertisement as well as terms and condition of the order dated 11.09.2015, then it is always open to the appellant to raise such grievance with all material particular before the authority concern� and the authority concern on the basis of record would try to rectify/remedy the situation after providing opportunity of hearing to the incumbent against whom such a complaint has been made.
Consequently, present Special Appeal is dismissed. This order has been passed in presence and with due assistance of Sri� Vibhu Rai, Advocate as well as Sri A.K. Yadav, Advocate, counsel for the respondents.
Order Date :- 6.4.2016

T.S.

UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - - जूनियर भर्ती कोर्ट केस अपडेट

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - -

जूनियर भर्ती कोर्ट केस अपडेट

हिमांशु राणा भी जूनियर भर्ती के बेस ऑफ़ सेलेक्शन केस में कूदे

इंदीवर जी के अनुसार :-

Indiver Kumar >>>>>>>>>>>

Court update....
By.;;;;;;;
morcha.legal team
Himanshu rana tag wth... dcl bunch cases... khud rana ke lawyer ne tag karaya case fresh to dcl....
Yogender kumar nxt Monday at appropriate bench....

Thnx...

UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

CTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - दिल्ली सरकार का गेस्ट टीचर्स को CTET से एक साल छूट देने का ड्राफ्ट प्लान -

CTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - दिल्ली सरकार का गेस्ट टीचर्स को CTET से एक साल छूट देने का ड्राफ्ट प्लान -

अतिथि शिक्षकों ने किया उपमुख्‍यमंत्री सिसोदिया के आवास पर प्रदर्शन

Updated: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 12:19 PM (IST)

गेस्ट टीचरों का मनीष सिसोदिया के घर के बाहर प्रदर्शन

नई दिल्ली। दिल्ली के विभिन्न स्कूलों में पढ़ा रहे अतिथि शिक्षकों ने आज उपमुख्यमंत्री मनीष सिसोदिया के आवास के बाहर जमकर प्रदर्शन किया। शिक्षकों की मांग है कि उन्हें नियमित किया जाए।

प्रदर्शन कर रहे शिक्षकों की शिकायत है कि विधानसभा चुनाव के दौरान आम आदमी पार्टी ने अतिथि शिक्षकों को नियमित करने का वादा किया था, लेकिन सरकार बनने के एक साल बाद भी इस दिशा में कुछ नहीं किया गया।

आज सुबह तकरीबन डेढ़ सौ अतिथि शिक्षकों ने उपमुख्यमंत्री के आवास के बाहर प्रदर्शन किया। इस दौरान बड़ी संख्या में दिल्ली पुलिस के जवान तैनात थे। गौरतलब है कि आप सरकार अतिथि शिक्षकों को नियमित करने के लिए दिल्ली सरकार एक ड्राफ्ट स्कीम लाई है।

दिल्ली के शिक्षा मंत्री मनीष सिसोदिया ने ट्वीट करके कहा था कि एक और बड़ा वादा पूरा करने की तैयारी, गेस्ट टीचर को परमानेंट करने के लिए ड्राफ्ट पॉलिसी तैयार। सिसोदिया ने इस स्कीम के बारे में पब्लिक से फीडबैक भी मांगा था।

ड्राफ्ट के तहत शिक्षकों को नियमित होने के लिए दिल्ली सबऑर्डिनेट स्टाफ सेलेक्शन कमीशन बोर्ड (डीएसएसएसबी) की ओर से एक परीक्षा आयोजित की जाएगी, जिसे पास करना अनिवार्य होगा। शिक्षा निदेशक के मुताबिक, वे सभी अतिथि शिक्षक इस स्कीम के दायरे में आएंगे जो 2014-15 में स्कूलों में पढ़ा रहे हैं।

वहीं, 2012-13, 2013-14 में जिन टीचर्स ने स्कूल में 90 दिन भी पढ़ाया है, उन्हें भी इस स्कीम का लाभ मिल सकेगा। सर्व शिक्षा अभियान में काम कर रहे कॉनट्रैक्ट टीचर्स भी टेस्ट में हिस्सा ले सकेंगे। असिस्टेंट टीचर (प्राइमरी) और ट्रेंड ग्रेजुएट टीचर्स (TGT) पद के लिए सेंट्रल टीचर एलिजिबिलिटी टेस्ट (सीटीईटी) पास होना जरूरी है, जो टीचर्स डीएसएसएसबी के एंट्रेंस को पास कर जाते हैं, उन्हें तुरंत नियमित कर दिया जाएगा।

वे शिक्षक जो डीएसएसएसबी एंट्रेंस टेस्ट पास कर जाते हैं, लेकिन उनके पास सीटीईटी की डिग्री नहीं होगी, सरकार उन्हें सीटीईटी पास करने के लिए एक साल का समय देगी। अतिथि शिक्षकों को उम्र में छूट का फायदा भी दिया जाएगा।

UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - दो साल से एक ही स्थान पर जाने BSA और BEO हटेंगे -

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - दो साल से एक ही स्थान पर जाने BSA और BEO हटेंगे -