Diwali Discount Flipkart : Sparx CRUISE RIDE Men Running Shoes (Black, Grey)

Diwali Discount Flipkart : Sparx CRUISE RIDE Men Running Shoes  (Black, Grey)

Best Deal FLIPKART SNAPDEAL AMAZON on Mobile , Laptop and Other Clothing, Home Furnishing and Gift Accesories - http://flipkartsaleonline.blogspot.com Flipkart Best Deal

Read more...

News - शिक्षक पति पत्नी को ट्रांसफर के जरिये साथ रहने के लिए कोर्ट के एक और राहत भरा ऑर्डर -

News - शिक्षक पति पत्नी को ट्रांसफर के जरिये साथ रहने के लिए कोर्ट के एक और राहत भरा ऑर्डर - 


******************
पति पत्नी / व  अन्य आधारों समेत नियम व कोर्ट ऑर्डर की जानकारी यहाँ देखें :-https://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.in/search/label/Husband%20Wife%20Posting%20Same%20Place
*********************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 17 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 41950 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Sneh Lata And Another 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rateesh Singh 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhanu Pratap Singh 

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. 
Petitioner no. 1 is an Assistant Teacher in a Basic School situated in Block Mirzapur, District Azamgarh run by the Board of Basic Education, Uttar Pradesh. Petitioner no. 2, who claims to be husband of petitioner no. 1, is also an Assistant Teacher in a Basic School run by the Board of Basic Education in district Bahraich. Both the petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the second respondent to consider their transfer at the same place, so that they, who are wife and husband, can live together. 
It is contended by the petitioners that the Secretary, Board of Basic Education, U.P. in pursuance of the Government orders has framed a policy for inter-district transfer of the teachers. In pursuance of the said Government order, online applications were invited by the Board of Basic Education. However, the grievance of the petitioners is that one of the conditions in such online application is that the candidate must have three years' experience. However, it is mentioned under Rule 8(2)(d) of the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) (Posting) Rules, 2008 (for short, the "Rules, 2008") that in the special circumstances the applications for inter-district transfers in respect of female teachers would be entertained to the place of residence of their husband or in law's district. Rule 8(2)(d) of the Rules, 2008 reads as under: 
"(d) In normal circumstances the applications for inter-district transfers in respect of male and female teachers will not be entertained within five years of their posting. But under special circumstances, applications for inter-district transfers in respect of female teachers would be entertained to the place of residence of their husband on in law's district." 
It is further contended on behalf of the petitioners that their transfer can be made in terms of Rule 8(2)(d) of the Rules, 2008, as there is no such condition for the couple posting. 
This Court in the cases of similarly placed persons in several writ petitions has granted liberty to the petitioners therein to make representation before the Secretary, Board of Basic Education, U.P. for consideration of their cause in the light of Rule 8(2)(d) of the Rules, 2008. 
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent and Sri B.P. Singh, learned counsel for the second to fourth respondents. 
In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction upon the second respondent to consider the grievance of the petitioners and pass the appropriate order in accordance with law within two months from the date of communication of this order. 
No order as to costs. 
Order Date :- 11.9.2017 
SKT/- 

पति पत्नी / व  अन्य आधारों समेत नियम व कोर्ट ऑर्डर की जानकारी यहाँ देखें :-https://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.in/search/label/Husband%20Wife%20Posting%20Same%20Place

 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

Read more...

Breaking News - यू पी के शिक्षक महिलाओं, विधवा शिक्षिकाओं को ससुराल या पति के स्थान पर ट्रांसफर देने में कोर्ट से मिली विशेष राहत , सरकारी सेवा में कार्यरत पति पत्नी को भी एक दुसरे के स्थान पर ट्रांसफर पोस्टिंग में मिली कोर्ट से बड़ी राहत , न्यूनतम सेवा काल जरुरी नहीं रहा , देखें तीन फैसले -

Breaking News - यू पी के शिक्षक महिलाओं, विधवा शिक्षिकाओं  को ससुराल या पति के स्थान पर ट्रांसफर देने में कोर्ट से मिली विशेष राहत ,
सरकारी सेवा में कार्यरत पति पत्नी को भी एक दुसरे के स्थान पर ट्रांसफर पोस्टिंग में मिली कोर्ट से बड़ी राहत , न्यूनतम सेवा काल जरुरी नहीं रहा , 

देखें  तीन फैसले   - 

1. विधवा महिला को ट्रांसफर देने में कोर्ट का राहत भरा निर्देश :-
2. महिला को ससुराल के नजदीक ट्रांसफर में मिली राहत 
3.सरकारी सेवा में कार्यरत पति पत्नी को एक स्थान पर ट्रांसफर पोस्टिंग में मिली राहत 

*********************************
1. विधवा महिला को ट्रांसफर देने में कोर्ट का राहत भरा निर्देश :-
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 17 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 31322 of 2017 
Petitioner :- Sakshi Chaudhary 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shantanu Khare,Ashok Khare 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amit Shukla,Shivam Yadav 

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. 
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel and Shri Kamlesh Kumar Jaiswal on behalf of Basic Education Officer. 
The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher, she is working in the Primary School Pajaba, Development Block Puranpur, district Pilibhit. Development made in this regard, she is widow, she has made an application for� transfer to District Meerut. It is contended on her behalf that the petitioner has some personal difficulties, which she has mentioned in para 9 to 11 of the writ petition in this regard. She has made a representation for her transfer. Such representation is on record as Annexure 6 to the writ petition. 
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the Rules, 2008, there is condition requiring three years experience for the transfer. 
I have heard counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Amit Shukla for the Basic Education Officer. 
The Rule 8(2)(d)� has been considered by this Court in Bibha Singh Vs. U.P. Basic Education Board and others, Writ-A No. 30808 of 2017. 
In the present case, the petitioner, who is a widow and her father has also died, is seeking her transfer on the ground of her personal difficulties and for redressal of her grievance she has made a representation to the second respondent, a copy of the same is on the record. 
Having due regard to the fact that the petitioner is a widow and she has small child, in my view, her application be considered in terms of Rule 8(2)(d) of the Appropriate Authority. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by issuing a direction upon the third respondent to consider the cause of the petitioner and pass the appropriate order in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably� within two months from the date of communication of this order. 
Order Date :- 5.9.2017 

A.P. Pandey 
****************************
2. महिला को ससुराल के नजदीक ट्रांसफर में मिली राहत :
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 17 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 43071 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Vineeta Ajwani(Vineeta Gangwani) 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Majahar Ali 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shashi Kant Verma,Sunil Kumar Singh 

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. 
The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher in a Basic School at Farrukhabad managed and conducted by the U.P. Board of Basic Education. She is stated to have been appointed on 14.8.2014. Due to her medical condition, the petitioner sought medical leave from 21.11.2015 to 14.3.2016. 
Her grievance is that her husband is working in District Kanpur hence she may be transferred at the same place. Earlier, when her representation was not considered, the petitioner preferred Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 2958 of 2017, which was disposed of on 20.1.2017 by issuing a direction to the competent authority to consider the petitioner's request for transfer. In compliance thereof, the respondent authority by the order impugned dated 12.7.2017 has rejected the claim of the petitioner on the ground that since the petitioner has not completed three years services as she was appointed on 14.8.2014 hence she is not entitled for the benefit of Government Order dated 23.6.2016, wherein it is provided that the request for the transfer can be considered only when the teacher has completed three years services on or before 31.3.2016.� 
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Rule 8(2)(d) of the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers)(Posting) Rules, 2008 (for short, "the Rules, 2008) provides certain contingencies in which applications for inter-district transfers of female teachers can be entertained. It is further stated that the Government Order dated 23.6.2016 cannot override statutory provisions. He has placed reliance on the orders of this Court passed in similar facts in the case of Gunjan Chaturvedi v. State of U.P. & others, Writ-A No. 35370 of 2017 and Poonam and others v. State of U.P. & others, Writ-A No. 32028 of 2017. 
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, Sri S.K. Verma, learned Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 2 and 3, and Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned Advocate who has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no. 4. Since no factual aspect is involved in the matter which requires reply from the respondents, hence with the consent of learned counsel for the parties the writ petition is being disposed of finally at this stage in terms of the Rules of the Court. 
From the facts of this case it is evident that the petitioner's husband is working in District Kanpur and the petitioner is posted at Farrukhabad. 
Rule 8(2)(d) of the Rules, 2008 which deals with the posting of teachers reads thus: 
"8(2)(d) In normal circumstances the applications for inter- district transfers in respect of male and felmale teachers will not be entertained within five years of their posting. But under special circumstances, applications for inter-district transfers in respect of female teachers would be entertained to the place of residence of their husband or in law's district." � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� ����������������������������������������������������� (emphasis supplied) 
The aforesaid Rule does not require that husband of the petitioner must be a teacher or in Government employment. It simply mentions the place of residence of husband or in-laws' district. To my mind the intention of the Rule-making Authority is that the couple may remain at same place. In the policies of Central Government as well as State Government, it is provided that an endeavour shall be made that husband and wife may be posted at the same place. 
Regard being had to the fact that in Rule 8(2)(d) of the Rules, 2008 in addition to place of residence of husband, in laws' district has also been included which makes the intention of the Rule-making Authority very clear and obvious.� 
In the case at hand this aspect has not been considered by the authority concerned and he has simply rejected the representation of the petitioner on the ground that she has not completed requisite number of years as mentioned in the Government Order dated 23.6.2016. 
This Court in the case of Writ-A No. 30808 of 2017, Bibha Singh Kushawaha Vs. U.P. Basic Education Board and others has considered this issue and has held that the Government Order dated 23.6.2016 shall not override statutory provisions of U.P. Basic Education (Teachers)(Posting) Rules, 2008.� 
After careful consideration of the matter, for the reasons mentioned above, I find that the reasons mentioned in the impugned order dated 12.7.2017 are contrary to law laid down by this Court in the aforementioned cases. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 12.7.2017 is set aside. The matter is remitted to the second respondent-Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad to consider the matter afresh and pass appropriate order in the light of the observations made herein-above, expeditiously, preferably within two months from the date of communication of this order. 
The writ petition is, accordingly, allowed. 
No order as to costs. 
Order Date :- 14.9.2017 

Digamber 
*******************************3.सरकारी सेवा में कार्यरत पति पत्नी को एक स्थान पर ट्रांसफर पोस्टिंग में मिली राहत , ऑनलइन आवेदन जरुरी नहीं :

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 17 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 30808 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Bibha Singh Kushawaha 
Respondent :- U.P.Basic Education,Board,Allahabad And 3 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Indra Raj Singh,Adarsh Singh,Arvind Kumar Singh 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjay Chaturvedi,Sunil Kumar Singh 

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. 
The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher. She is presently posted at Junior Basic School, Umar Khan-Ka-Tola, Padrauna, District Kushinagar. Her husband is posted at Junior Basic School, Ekwari, Gadhwara, Ballia. Both the institutions are conducted and run by the U.P. Board of Basic Education (for short, "the Board"). She has made a representation for her transfer from Kushinagar to Ballia, where her husband is posted as Assistant Teacher. A copy of her application is on the record as annexure-4 to the writ petition. 
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) (Posting) Rules, 2008 deals with the posting and transfer of the teachers working in Junior Basic Schools and Senior Basic Schools run by the Board. 
The Rule 8(d) of the Rules, 2008 provides that in normal circumstances the applications for inter-district transfers can be entertained of only those teachers who have completed five years of their posting, however, the exception is provided that an application of a female teacher for her transfer at the place of her husband or in-laws would be entertained.� 
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that in case the petitioner is directed to submit on-line application in terms of Government Order dated 3.5.2017, in that event the petitioner would not be eligible for transfer as she has not completed five years of requisite service.� 
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on a judgment of Full Bench of this Court in the case of R.B. Dixit v. Union of India and others, (2005) 1 UPLBEC 83. 
Sri Sanjay Chaturvedi, learned Advocate, who has put in appearance on behalf of the District Basic Education Officer submits that the State Government has issued guidelines on 13.6.2017 in respect of inter-district transfer of the assistant teachers of Junior Basic Schools and Senior Basic Schools for the session 2017-18. He further submits that on-line applications would be accepted from 7th to 20th August, 2017 and the procedure has been laid down under the said guidelines. 
I have heard learned counsel for the parties. With their consent the writ petition is being disposed of finally at this stage in terms of the Rules of the Court. 
The Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) (Posting) Rules, 2008 have been framed under Section 19(1) of the U.P. Basic Education Act, 1972. The Rule 8(d) provides as under: 
"(d) In normal circumstances the applications for inter-district transfers in respect of male and female teachers will not be entertained within five years of their posting. But under special circumstances, applications for inter-district transfers in respect of female teachers would be entertained to the place of residence of their husband or in law's district." 
From a reading of the aforesaid Rule it is evident that under the special circumstances an application of a female teacher can be entertained for her transfer at the place of residence of her husband or in-law's district. In such cases the requirement of five years of posting has been relaxed. 
It is a well settled law that the Government Order cannot supplant the law, it can only supplement it. Indisputably, an executive order cannot override the Rules which have been framed by the rule making authority in exercise of powers conferred upon it by the Act. In case of any inconsistency with the delegated legislation, executive instructions or the Government Order, the Rule cannot be ignored. The same issue fell for consideration before a Division Bench of this Court in R.B. Dixit (supra) in the following terms: 
"6. We have held in Smart Chip v. State of U.P., 2002 (49) ALR 419, that in every legal system there is a hierarchy of norms as noted by the eminent jurist Kelson in his Pure Theory of Law. In the Indian Legal System this hierarchy is as follows: 
1. The Constitution. 
2. Statutory law, which may either be made by the Parliament or by the State legislature. 
3. Delegated legislation, which may be either in the form of Rules, Regulations or Statutes made under the Act. 
4. Executive instructions or Government Orders. 
7. In the above hierarchy if there is conflict between a higher law and a lower law then the higher law will prevail. The executive instructions are part of the fourth layer in the hierarchy, which is at the lowest level, whereas an Act is part of the second layer and the Statutes made under the Act are delegated legislation and hence part of the third layer. The letters dated 31.8.1998 and 30.3.1999 are only executive instructions and hence they belong to the fourth layer. Hence they are neither Act nor Statutes. Hence in our opinion the age of retirement of an employee of the Indian Institute of technology is 60 years and not 62 years vide Section 13(2). We, therefore, respectfully disagree with the decision in Raja Ram Verma's case." 
This issue has been considered by this Court in the case of Sarita Gupta v. State of U.P. & Others, Writ-A No. 7096 of 2010, decided on 30.7.2010. The Court had occasion to deal with the similar arguments and at that time a Government order was issued imposing certain restrictions on transfer. The Court has expressed its view in the following terms: 
"The ban is general in nature. However, the provision of transfer for the purposes of placing husband and wife in the same district is a special provision which will normally prevail upon general temporary restriction on transfer. 
Accordingly, writ petition is allowed. Impugned order is set aside. Secretary, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad is directed to decide the matter ignoring the ban order dated 6.6.2009. The decision shall be taken positively within three weeks from today."� 
It is trite that in most of the services of the Central Government and the State Governments, there is provision in their transfer policy that an endeavour should be made that husband and wife may be posted at the same place. In view of the said principle, under the Rules 2008 the provision of the couple posting has been incorporated. 
The intention of rule making authority is very clear and it needs no elaboration.�Relevant it would be to mention that in transfer policy of State Government for Government employees there is provision only for husband and wife but in Rule 8(d) of the Rules, 2008 the in-laws of the female teachers have also been included. Hence, in my view, in spite of the Government Order dated 3.5.2017 a female teacher's application for her transfer on the ground of couple posting or in-laws can be entertained notwithstanding some of the contrary provisions of the said Government order. 
For the above-mentioned reasons, there is no legal bar in considering the representation of the petitioner in terms of Rule 8(d) of the Rules, 2008. 
Accordingly, a direction is issued upon the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner in the light of the observations made herein-above and pass appropriate order expeditiously, preferably within six weeks from the date of communication of this order. 
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.� 
No order as to costs. 
Order Date :- 19.7.2017 
Digamber 
*********************************




 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

Read more...

Breaking News - पति पत्नी आधार पर ट्रांसफर या ससुराल के नजदीक महिलाओं के ट्रांसफर में कोर्ट के एक निर्णय में मिली जीत के आधार पर तमाम याचिकाएं दाखिल हुई , सभी फैसलों में पति पत्नी को एक ही स्थान पर पोस्टिंग देने के लिए निर्णय लेने के आदेश दिए , 5 वर्ष की न्यूनतम सेवा जरुरी नहीं , विशेष राहत कोर्ट द्वारा , देखें तमाम फैसले -

Breaking News - पति पत्नी आधार पर ट्रांसफर या ससुराल के नजदीक महिलाओं के ट्रांसफर में कोर्ट के  एक निर्णय में मिली जीत के आधार पर तमाम याचिकाएं दाखिल हुई , सभी फैसलों में पति पत्नी को एक ही स्थान पर पोस्टिंग देने के लिए निर्णय लेने के आदेश दिए , 5 वर्ष की न्यूनतम सेवा जरुरी नहीं , विशेष राहत कोर्ट द्वारा , देखें तमाम फैसले - 



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 17 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 43071 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Vineeta Ajwani(Vineeta Gangwani) 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Majahar Ali 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shashi Kant Verma,Sunil Kumar Singh 

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. 
The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher in a Basic School at Farrukhabad managed and conducted by the U.P. Board of Basic Education. She is stated to have been appointed on 14.8.2014. Due to her medical condition, the petitioner sought medical leave from 21.11.2015 to 14.3.2016. 
Her grievance is that her husband is working in District Kanpur hence she may be transferred at the same place. Earlier, when her representation was not considered, the petitioner preferred Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 2958 of 2017, which was disposed of on 20.1.2017 by issuing a direction to the competent authority to consider the petitioner's request for transfer. In compliance thereof, the respondent authority by the order impugned dated 12.7.2017 has rejected the claim of the petitioner on the ground that since the petitioner has not completed three years services as she was appointed on 14.8.2014 hence she is not entitled for the benefit of Government Order dated 23.6.2016, wherein it is provided that the request for the transfer can be considered only when the teacher has completed three years services on or before 31.3.2016.� 
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Rule 8(2)(d) of the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers)(Posting) Rules, 2008 (for short, "the Rules, 2008) provides certain contingencies in which applications for inter-district transfers of female teachers can be entertained. It is further stated that the Government Order dated 23.6.2016 cannot override statutory provisions. He has placed reliance on the orders of this Court passed in similar facts in the case of Gunjan Chaturvedi v. State of U.P. & others, Writ-A No. 35370 of 2017 and Poonam and others v. State of U.P. & others, Writ-A No. 32028 of 2017. 
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, Sri S.K. Verma, learned Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 2 and 3, and Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned Advocate who has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no. 4. Since no factual aspect is involved in the matter which requires reply from the respondents, hence with the consent of learned counsel for the parties the writ petition is being disposed of finally at this stage in terms of the Rules of the Court. 
From the facts of this case it is evident that the petitioner's husband is working in District Kanpur and the petitioner is posted at Farrukhabad. 
Rule 8(2)(d) of the Rules, 2008 which deals with the posting of teachers reads thus: 
"8(2)(d) In normal circumstances the applications for inter- district transfers in respect of male and felmale teachers will not be entertained within five years of their posting. But under special circumstances, applications for inter-district transfers in respect of female teachers would be entertained to the place of residence of their husband or in law's district." � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� ����������������������������������������������������� (emphasis supplied) 
The aforesaid Rule does not require that husband of the petitioner must be a teacher or in Government employment. It simply mentions the place of residence of husband or in-laws' district. To my mind the intention of the Rule-making Authority is that the couple may remain at same place. In the policies of Central Government as well as State Government, it is provided that an endeavour shall be made that husband and wife may be posted at the same place. 
Regard being had to the fact that in Rule 8(2)(d) of the Rules, 2008 in addition to place of residence of husband, in laws' district has also been included which makes the intention of the Rule-making Authority very clear and obvious.� 
In the case at hand this aspect has not been considered by the authority concerned and he has simply rejected the representation of the petitioner on the ground that she has not completed requisite number of years as mentioned in the Government Order dated 23.6.2016. 
This Court in the case of Writ-A No. 30808 of 2017, Bibha Singh Kushawaha Vs. U.P. Basic Education Board and others has considered this issue and has held that the Government Order dated 23.6.2016 shall not override statutory provisions of U.P. Basic Education (Teachers)(Posting) Rules, 2008.� 
After careful consideration of the matter, for the reasons mentioned above, I find that the reasons mentioned in the impugned order dated 12.7.2017 are contrary to law laid down by this Court in the aforementioned cases. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 12.7.2017 is set aside. The matter is remitted to the second respondent-Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad to consider the matter afresh and pass appropriate order in the light of the observations made herein-above, expeditiously, preferably within two months from the date of communication of this order. 
The writ petition is, accordingly, allowed. 
No order as to costs. 
Order Date :- 14.9.2017 
Digamber 
****************************************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 17 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 34080 of 2017 
Petitioner :- Smt. Sarvada Yadav 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Singh 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhola Nath Yadav 

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. 
The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher in a Junior Basic School run by the Uttar Pradesh Board of Basic Education, Allahabad. Her grievance is that her husband is also working as Assistant Teacher in a Senior Basic School, Bada Gaon, Mawana Road, Meerut, therefore, they may beposted at the same place. 
It is stated that the petitioner has some family problems, therefore, she has made an application to the effect that she and her husband may be posted at the same place in terms of Rule 8(d) of the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers)(Posting) Rules, 2008. However, the State Government has notified that an online application in terms of Government Order dated 03.05.2017 may be moved for seeking transfer, but in the said Government Order, one of the conditions mentioned is that the applications of only those teachers will be considered who have five years experience. It is stated that the said condition is in conflict with the statutory rules i.e. Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers)(Posting) Rules, 2008, wherein no such condition is provided. 
This Court has earlier considered the identical issue in the case of Bibha Singh Kushawaha vs. U.P. Basic Education Board Allahabad And 3 others, Writ -A No. 30808 of 2017, wherein a detailed order has been passed on 19.07.2017. The relevant part of the order is extracted herein below :- 
"It is trite that in most of the services of the Central Government and the State Governments, there is provision in their transfer policy that an endeavour should be made that husband and wife may be posted at the same place. In view of the said principle, under the Rules 2008 the provision of the couple posting has been incorporated. 
The intention of rule making authority is very clear and it needs no elaboration. Relevant it would be to mention that in transfer policy of State Government for Government employees there is provision only for husband and wife but in Rule 8(d) of the Rules, 2008 the in-laws of the female teachers have also been included. Hence, in my view, in spite of the Government Order dated 3.5.2017 a female teacher's application for her transfer on the ground of couple posting or in-laws can be entertained notwithstanding some of the contrary provisions of the said Government order. 
For the above-mentioned reasons, there is no legal bar in considering the representation of the petitioner in terms of Rule 8(d) of the Rules, 2008. 
Accordingly, a direction is issued upon the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner in the light of the observations made herein-above and pass appropriate order expeditiously, preferably within six weeks from the date of communication of this order. 
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of." 
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms. 
However, it is directed that the application of the petitioner be considered within six weeks. 
Order Date :- 2.8.2017 

sailesh 
**************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 17 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39962 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Smt. Alka Chaudhari 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Pranesh Kumar Mishra 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Brij Bhushan Prasad Shriv,Yogendra Singh Bohra 

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. 
The petitioner is an assistant teacher in junior basic school namely Primary School Dhobiha, Block Jamunha, Shravasti. She is seeking her transfer to Aligarh, besides other grounds, that (i) her husband is in Govt. job posted at Aligarh and (ii) her father-in-law is suffering from heart ailment. There are other hardships also. 
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the State Govt. has taken a policy decision for intra district transfer on certain grounds. However, in the Govt. Order issued a condition has been imposed� that only those teachers can apply who have minimum three years experience. Contention of the learned counsel is that said condition is onerous and contrary to the statutory rule. He has drawn attention of the Court to Rule 8(2)(d) of U.P. Basic Education (Teachers)(Posting) Rules, 2008. He further submits that a Govt. Order cannot override statutory provision. 
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel, Sri Y.S. Bohra appearing for respondent no. 4 and Sri B.B.P. Srivastava, appearing for respondent no. 2 and 3. 
Rule 8(2)(d) of the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers)(Posting) Rules, 2008 which deals with posting of teachers, provides thus : 
"In normal circumstances the applications for inter- district transfers in respect of male and female teachers will not be entertained within five years of their posting. But under special circumstances, applications for inter-district transfers in respect of female teachers would be entertained to the place of residence of their husband or in law's district."� 
Under the said rule, application for transfer in respect of a female teacher� shall be entertained to the place of her husband or in-law's district. 
It is well settled law� that executive instructions can supplement the statutory provision� but cannot supplant it. Rule 8(2)(d) is clear and categorical in respect of lady teachers if she wants transfer on the grounds mentioned therein.
This aspect has been considered by this Court in Writ-A No. 30808 of 2017, Bibha Singh Kushawaha Vs. U.P. Basic Education Board and others, wherein the same issue fell for consideration before the Court wherein� after considering abovementioned Rule 8(2)(d), the Court has held that a Govt. Order would not override the statutory provision, hence in spite of the Government Order dated 3.5.2017, application of a female teacher for her transfer on the ground of couple posting can be entertained notwithstanding some of the contrary conditions in the said Government order and there is no legal bar in considering the representation of the petitioner in terms of Rule 8(d) of the Rules, 2008. 
Having due regard to the facts of the case, the matter is squarely covered by the judgment of the Court in Bibha Singh's case (supra) and the petitioner's cause needs to be considered by the appropriate authority in the light of Rule 8(2)(d). 
Accordingly, The writ petition is disposed of finally by granting liberty to the petitioner to make a representation alongwith certified copy of the order to respondent no. 2, who shall pass appropriate thereon in accordance with law expeditiously within two months from the date of communication of the order. 
With the above direction, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs. 
Order Date :- 31.8.2017 

SNT/ 





 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

Read more...

UP Teacher Transfer - - पति पत्नी आधार पर स्थानांतरण के लिए हाल में राहत वाले निर्णय इस आधार पर दिए गे , उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार की न्यूनतम 5 वर्ष सर्विस की बाध्यता विशेष परिस्थतियों के लिए लागु नहीं , निर्णय का आधार बना केस न 7096 / 2010

UP Teacher Transfer - - 

पति पत्नी आधार पर स्थानांतरण के लिए हाल में राहत वाले निर्णय इस आधार पर दिए गे , उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार की न्यूनतम 5 वर्ष सर्विस की बाध्यता 
विशेष परिस्थतियों के लिए लागु नहीं , निर्णय का आधार बना केस न 7096 / 2010 


आज कल तमाम महिलाएं दूर दराज के जिलों में पोस्टेड हैं और उनके पति कहीं अन्यत्र कार्यरत हैं , ऊपर से बच्चों की  भी देखरेख करना होता है , इन परिस्थतियों को देखते हुए केंद्र व राज्य सरकार ने पति पत्नी को एक ही जगह पोस्टिंग देने की नीति बना रखी है | 
बेसिक शिक्षा परिषद् ने एक कदम आगे बढ़ते हुए महिलाओं को ससुराल के नजदीक पोस्टिंग करने की नीति भी बना दी थी | 

लेकिन कई लोगो के सामने समस्या थी की सेवाकाल न्यूनतम 5 वर्ष की अवधि , जिसको पूरा करने पर ही स्थानांतरण पर विचार होता | 

लेकिन कोर्ट ने हाल में 2 क्रम बद्ध निर्णय (WRIT - A No. - 30808 of 2017, WRIT - A No. - 35382 of 2017) दिए , जिसमे महिलाओं को पति के स्थान पर पोस्टिंग को विशेष परिस्थिति में माना गया , और 5 वर्ष की न्यूनतम सेवा 
की बाध्यता इस निर्णय (WRIT - A No. - 7096 of 2010 ) के आधार पर ख़ारिज  की :-


इस आदेश में कोर्ट ने महिला के पक्ष में निर्णय देते हुए सचिव को उसके स्थानांतरण आवेदन पर फैसला लेने को कहा , लेकिन सचिव ने स्थानांतरण पर बताया था की सरकार ने order dated 6.6.2009  के आधार पर  स्थानांतरण पर रोक लगा रखी है , लेकिन कोर्ट ने तर्क ख़ारिज करते हुए ट्रांसफर मसले को पोज़िटिवली 3 हफ्ते में निर्णय करने को कहा 

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 23 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7096 of 2010 

Petitioner :- Sarita Gupta 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others 
Petitioner Counsel :- Awadhesh Tiwari 
Respondent Counsel :- Chandra Narayan Tripathi 

Hon'ble Sibghat Ullah Khan,J. 

Petitioner as well as her husband Shri Anurag Gupta both are teachers in Schools run by Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad. At present petitioner is posted as Assistant teacher in primary school Jhawar Hardopatti, Block ? Lalganj, District, Raibarelly. In February, 2009 petitioner has married with Shri Anurag Gupta who is Assistant teacher in Primary school, Mirzapur, Sunahari Block Purwa District Unnao. Petitioner has applied for her transfer to some school run by Basic Shiksha Parishad situate in district Unnao. Earlier also petitioner had filed a petition for her transfer being writ petition no.63444 of 2009 which was disposed of on 24.11.2009 with the direction to Secretary U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad to decide the matter. 
Secretary rejected the representation through order dated 6.1.2010 on the ground that through order dated 6.6.2009 the government had imposed restriction on transfer. The said order has been challenged through this writ petition. 
Shri C.N.Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for Basic Shiksha Parishad states that except the ban mentioned in the impugned order there is no other hindrance in posting both husband and wife at one place. 
The ban is general in nature. However, the provision of transfer for the purposes of placing husband and wife in the same district is a special provision which will normally prevail upon general temporary restriction on transfer. 
Accordingly, writ petition is allowed. Impugned order is set aside. Secretary, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad is directed to decide the matter ignoring the ban order dated 6.6.2009. The decision shall be taken positively within three weeks from today. 
Office is directed to supply a copy of this order free of cost to Shri C.N.Tripathi, learned counsel for Basic Shiksha Parishad (Chamber No.141) by 3.8.2010. 

Order Date :- 30.7.2010 

RS 





 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

Read more...

UPTET Shiksha Mitra News - - *शिक्षामित्रों की सीएम योगी से मांग, टीईटी पास की लिखित परीक्षा से नहीं ग्रेडिंग से हो भर्ती*

UPTET Shiksha Mitra   News - - 

*शिक्षामित्रों की सीएम योगी से मांग, टीईटी पास की लिखित परीक्षा से नहीं ग्रेडिंग से हो भर्ती*

ब्यूरो/अमर उजाला, लखनऊ
Updated Sun, 08 Oct 2017 07:41 PM IST
टीईटी उत्तीर्ण शिक्षा मित्रों ने मुख्यमंत्री योगी आदित्यनाथ से मुलाकात कर सहायक अध्यापक भर्ती के लिए लिखित परीक्षा से उन्हें मुक्त रखते हुए ग्रेडिंग से ही भर्ती करने की मांग की।
शिक्षा मित्रों ने सात सूत्रीय मांग पत्र सौंपकर मुख्यमंत्री से कहा कि टीईटी उत्तीर्ण करने के बाद सहायक अध्यापक भर्ती के लिए अन्य कोई लिखित परीक्षा कराने का कोई औचित्य नहीं है, इसलिए ग्रेडिंग से ही भर्ती की जाए।
इसके साथ ही, दीपावली से पहले मानदेय का भुगतान कराने, पूर्व में समायोजित 1.37 लाख शिक्षा मित्रों को 1 जनवरी-2016 से 31 जुलाई-2017 तक सातवें वेतनमान अवशेष का नकद भुगतान कराने और 15 अक्तूबर को होने वाली टीईटी का परिणाम जल्द जारी कर सहायक अध्यापक के रिक्त पदों पर नवंबर में ही भर्ती निकालने की मांग की गई।

*कैबिनेट ने पहले ही ‌लिखित परीक्षा के लिए दे दी मंजूरी*

गौरतलब है कि यूपी कैबिनेट ने प्रदेश में 1.37 प्राइमरी शिक्षकों की भर्ती के लिए चयन प्रक्रिया में बदलाव से जुड़े प्रस्ताव को पहले ही मंजूरी दे दी। जिससे अब शिक्षकों की भर्ती लिखित परीक्षा से ही होगी।
इसमें वही अभ्यर्थी आवेदन के पात्र होंगे जिन्होंने टीईटी परीक्षा उत्तीर्ण की होगी। यही व्यवस्था शिक्षामित्रों के लिए भी होगी। अर्थात शिक्षामित्रों को शिक्षक बनने के लिए अब टीईटी पास करने के साथ ही लिखित परीक्षा भी पास करनी होगी।
सरकार ने इस पर बयान देते हुए कहा ‌था कि यूपी बेसिक शिक्षा अध्यापक सेवा नियमावली पुनरीक्षित प्राक्लन एवं उच्च विशिष्टियों का अनुमोदन किया गया है। अब शिक्षक चयन का मापदंड लिखित परीक्षा होगी।
लिखित परीक्षा में उत्तीर्ण अभ्यर्थियों के प्राप्तांक प्रतिशत का 60 प्रतिशत अंक उनके गुणांक के साथ जोड़ा जाएगा। 40 नंबर का शैक्षिक गुणांक होगा। इस तरह लिखित परीक्षा के प्राप्तांक प्रतिशत के 60 प्रतिशत व शैक्षिक गुणांक से मेरिट बनेगी।

*परीक्षा में बैठने के लिए टीईटी पास होना अनिवार्य*

लिखित परीक्षा में वही अभ्यर्थी बैठ पाएंगे जो स्नातक प्रशिक्षित होंगे और जिन्होंने टीईटी पास की होगी।
यूपी सरकार के अनुसार, सुप्रीमकोर्ट के आदेश के अनुसार शिक्षामित्रों को पूरा लाभ दिया जाएगा। इसके तहत 2.5 अंक भारांक प्रत्येक पूर्ण शिक्षण वर्ष के अनुभव के आधार पर मिलेगा। लेकिन यह भारांक अधिकतम 25 अंक का होगा। बेसिक शिक्षा मंत्री (स्वतंत्र प्रभार) अनुपमा जायसवाल ने बताया कि शिक्षामित्रों को वेटेज 2.5 अंक प्रतिवर्ष अनुभव के आधार मिलेगा।
लेकिन यदि वेटेज 30 नंबर तक होता है तो भी अधिकतम वेटेज 25 नंबर का ही मिलेगा। उन्होंने बताया कि शिक्षामित्रों को 60 वर्ष की अधिकतम उम्र सीमा का लाभ पहले से ही तय है। इसका लाभ उन्हें मिलेगा।




 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

Read more...

Breaking News - - बड़ी राहत -कोर्ट के क्रम बध्द दो आदेश देखें , पति पत्नी को एक ही जगह ट्रांसफर पोस्टिंग, व महिलाओं को ससुराल में पोस्टिंग देने का कोर्ट का सख्त आदेश , 5 वर्ष का सेवाकाल जरुरी नहीं , आदेश देखें :-

Breaking  News - - 

बड़ी राहत  -कोर्ट के क्रम बध्द दो आदेश देखें , पति पत्नी को एक ही जगह ट्रांसफर पोस्टिंग, व महिलाओं को ससुराल में पोस्टिंग देने का कोर्ट का सख्त आदेश , 5 वर्ष का सेवाकाल जरुरी नहीं , आदेश देखें :-


महत्वपूर्ण आदेश पहले ही पोस्ट किया जा चुका है , देखें :- http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com/2017/10/breaking-news-5.html

एक और अन्य आदेश देखें :-

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 17 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 35382 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Priyanka Tiwari 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Pandey 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shesh Chand Upadhyay 

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. 
Counsel for the petitioner prays that he does not want to press prayer no. (i). He is permitted to delete the said prayer. 
The petitioner is an assistant teacher in a junior basic school namely Kanya Poorv Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Pachpahra-H, Block Kabrai, district Mahoba. Her grievance is that her husband is a trained graduate teacher, Science,� and is currently posted at Chitrakoot Inter College, Karvi, Chitrakoot. She has made a representation dated 17.7.2017 to the Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board for her transfer at the place where her husband is posted on the ground of couple posting. 
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that transfer policy of the State Govt. provides that in case the spouse is working at different places, then endeavour shall be made for their posting at the same place. However, the claim of such transfer has been affected by Govt. Order dated 13.6.2017 wherein certain conditions have been imposed for entertaining applications for couple posting. One of the conditions is that application of only those teachers shall be entertained who have completed minimum five years' service on 31st March of the year of application. Learned counsel urges that said Govt. Order is contrary to Rule 8(2)(d) of U.P. Basic Education(Teachers)(Posting) Rules, 2008. 
learned counsel has drawn attention of the Court to an order dated 19.7.2017 of this Court passed in Writ-A No. 30808 of 2017, Bibha Singh Kushawaha Vs. U.P. Basic Education Board and others, wherein same issue fell for consideration before the Court. Relevant part of the said order is extracted below : 
"It is trite that in most of the services of the Central Government and the State Governments, there is provision in their transfer policy that an endeavour should be made that husband and wife may be posted at the same place. In view of the said principle, under the Rules 2008 the provision of the couple posting has been incorporated. 
The intention of rule making authority is very clear and it needs no elaboration. Relevant it would be to mention that in transfer policy of State Government for Government employees there is provision only for husband and wife but in Rule 8(d) of the Rules, 2008 the in-laws of the female teachers have also been included. Hence, in my view, in spite of the Government Order dated 3.5.2017 a female teacher's application for her transfer on the ground of couple posting or in-laws can be entertained notwithstanding some of the contrary provisions of the said Government order. 
For the above-mentioned reasons, there is no legal bar in considering the representation of the petitioner in terms of Rule 8(d) of the Rules, 2008. 
Accordingly, a direction is issued upon the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner in the light of the observations made herein-above and pass appropriate order expeditiously, preferably within six weeks from the date of communication of this order. 
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of." 
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel and Sri Shesh Chand Upadhyay for the BSA.� 
Taking into consideration facts of the present case, I am of the view that petitioner is entitled for benefit of the order extracted hereinabove. 
Accordingly,� a direction is issued upon the third respondent to consider grievance of the petitioner in the light of the judgment extracted above, expeditiously within two months from the date of communication of the order. 
With the above direction, the present writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs. 
Order Date :- 9.8.2017 
SNT/ 



 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

Read more...