UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - जूनियर भर्ती से नियुक्तियों का रास्ता साफ़ -
जूनियर भर्ती से नियुक्तियों का रास्ता साफ़ हो चुका है ।
लेकिन कुछ लोग कई याचिकाओं के नाम बता कर उन पर स्टे होने की बात कहते हैं ,
वास्तव में ये सब याचिकाएं कनेक्टेड याचिकाएं थी और सब में समान बातें थी - प्रमोशन को लेकर ,
दुसरी नीलम की याचिका थी अलग मुद्दे पर
इन याचिकाओं पर स्टे था , और यह स्टे पिछले दो महत्वपूर्ण ऑर्डर्स में हट चुका है , नियुक्तियां दी जा सकती हैं ।
अभ्यर्थी अपने मूल प्रमाण पत्र एक साल पहले जमा करा चुके हैं और मानसिक परेशानियों व् तनाव से गुजर रहे हैं ।
प्रोफेशनल वर्सस नॉन प्रोफेशनल एक अलग मसला है , और फ़िलहाल प्रोफेशनल की सीट्स सुरक्षित रखते हुए अन्य पदों पर आसानी से नियुक्ति दी जा सकती है
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 58520 of 2013
Petitioner :- Arun Kumar & 3 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishi Kant Rai,S. Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.P. Singh
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 62241 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sabarjeet Verma And 3 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.P.Singh,Vishnu Gupta
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.P.Singh
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 55925 of 2013
Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Radha Kant Ojha,Shailesh Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Syed Nadeem Ahmad
With�
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 50787 of 2013
Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Singh And 4 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailesh Upadhyay,Radha Kant Ojha
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sayed Nadeem Ahmad
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 62025 of 2013
Petitioner :- Shashank Mishra
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailesh Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sayyed Nadeem
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 58712 of 2013
Petitioner :- Jayant Kumar Singh And Anr.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Aditya,Ajay Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Deo Dayal
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 57236 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sankarshan Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Chnadra Srivastav,Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 52521 of 2013
Petitioner :- Neelam Kumari Gautam
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Kshetresh Chnadra Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K.Yadav
AND
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 60088 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ajit Pratap Singh & 24 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- P.K. Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mrigraj Singh
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
All these petitions raise more or less similar questions of law and fact, with slight difference on facts in some of the cases. Considering the larger issue involved which is common, all these petitions are clubbed together.
Writ Petition No.58520 of 2013 relates to District Azamgarh. A short counter affidavit has been filed by Sri B.P. Singh, learned counsel for the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Azamgarh which� is taken on record. Sri B.P. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the District Basic Education Officer, Azamgarh in the aforesaid writ petition as well as in Writ Petition No.62241 of 2013 shall file counter affidavit to the averments relating to the factual aspects of the number of vacancies, strength of the cadre and the number of vacancies advertised as also the number of vacancies available for the Assistant Teachers� primary institutions as also the Assistant Teachers Junior High Schools relating to district Azamgarh within three days.
Writ Petition No.55925 of 2013, Writ Petition No.50787 of 2013 and Writ Petition No.62025 of 2013 relate to district Mau. Sri Syed. Nadeem Ahmad, learned counsel appearing for the District Basic Education Officer, Mau shall file counter affidavit to the averments relating to the factual aspects of the number of vacancies, strength of the cadre and the number of vacancies advertised as also the number of vacancies available for the Assistant Teachers primary institutions as also the Assistant Teachers Junior High Schools relating to district Mau within three days.
Writ Petition No.58712 of 2013 relates to district Chandauli. Sri A.K. Aditya, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the initial vacancies of Assistant Teachers Junior High School in Science and Maths stream were notified for promotion from the Assistant Teachers in the primary section. It is also stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are working as Assistant Teachers in primary section and are eligible both educational qualification wise and also experience wise to be promoted. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that by the impugned notification the vacancies for promotion have been cancelled and by a fresh advertisement they have been advertised for being filled up by direct recruitment.
Sri Deo Dayal, learned counsel appearing for the District Basic� Education Officer, Chandauli shall file a counter affidavit giving details of the strength of the cadre of Assistant Teachers primary section, number of Assistant Teachers working in primary section, the vacancies available for Assistant Teachers in Junior High Schools in the Science and Maths stream and the vacancies advertised within three days.
Writ Petition No.57236 of 2013 relates to district Kushinagar which may be put up in the additional cause list on 17.12.2013.
Writ Petition No.52521 of 2013 relates to� District Jaunpur. Sri B.P. Singh, Advocate representing Secretary, Basic Education Board has filed a short counter affidavit in Writ Petition No.58520 of 2013, Arun Kumar and 3 others vs.� State of U.P. and others. Sri B.P. Singh states that the short counter affidavit contains answers to the queries raised in the order dated 23.10.2013 passed in Writ Petition No.52521 of 2013, Neelam Kumari� Gautam vs. State of U.P. and 2 others.A copy of the said affidavit has been provided to Sri K.C. Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in the case of Neelam Kumari Gautam. Sri Shukla states that as there are no factual dispute raised in this petition, any specific counter affidavit may not be necessay. He further states that he may be allowed three days time to examine the short counter affidavit filed today referred to above.Time prayed for is granted.
Writ Petition No.60088 of 2013 also relates to District Jaunpur. In this petition there are specific averments relating to number of vacancies available and the number of vacancies which are going to be filled up by the Government by direct recruitment which may jeopardize the rights of the teachers working in the primary institution in District Jaunpur, as according to the petitioner if number of posts advertised is filled up the petitioner who possessed the eligibility of educational qualifications as also the experience for promotion as Assistant Teachers in Junior High Schools of Science and Maths stream would be denied and deprived of their rights of promotion. The averments requires specific reply from the District Basic Education Officer. Sri Mirg Raj Singh, and Sri B.P. Singh learned counsels representing the District Basic Eduction Officer and also the Secretary Basic Education Board may file counter affidavits within three days.
As prayed by the learned counsels for the parties put up all the cases in the additional cause list on 17.12.2013.
Sri� Sanjay� Sinha, Secretary, Basic Education Board is present. As he has filed an appropriate affidavit about the questions posed in the order dated 23.10.2013, his personal appearance for the time being is exempted. However as and when required he would again remain present before this Court for proper adjudication of the controversy raised. The interim order granted earlier to continue till Tuesday i.e. 17.12.2013.
Order Date :- 11.12.2013
RPS
**********************************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 58520 of 2013
Petitioner :- Arun Kumar & 3 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishi Kant Rai,K.C.Shukla,S. Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.P. Singh,Mrigraj Singh
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
As prayed, list in the next cause list.
Interim order, if in operation will continue till the next date of listing.
Order Date :- 23.4.2015
VPC
***********
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 57236 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sankarshan Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Chnadra Srivastav,Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
As prayed, list in the next cause list.
Interim order, if in operation will continue till the next date of listing.
Order Date :- 23.4.2015
VPC
**********************
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 58520 of 2013
Petitioner :- Arun Kumar & 3 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishi Kant Rai,S. Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.P. Singh
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 62241 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sabarjeet Verma And 3 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.P.Singh,Vishnu Gupta
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.P.Singh
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 55925 of 2013
Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Radha Kant Ojha,Shailesh Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Syed Nadeem Ahmad
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 50787 of 2013
Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Singh And 4 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailesh Upadhyay,Radha Kant Ojha
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sayed Nadeem Ahmad
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 62025 of 2013
Petitioner :- Shashank Mishra
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailesh Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sayyed Nadeem
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 58712 of 2013
Petitioner :- Jayant Kumar Singh And Anr.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Aditya,Ajay Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Deo Dayal
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 57236 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sankarshan Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Chnadra Srivastav,Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 52521 of 2013
Petitioner :- Neelam Kumari Gautam
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Kshetresh Chnadra Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K.Yadav
AND
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 60088 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ajit Pratap Singh & 24 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- P.K. Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mrigraj Singh
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
Sri B. P. Singh, Advocate, has filed a supplementary counter affidavit in Writ Petition No.58520 of 2013. The same is taken on record.
Sri K. C. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, has filed a short rejoinder affidavit in Writ Petition No.52521 of 2013. The same is taken on record.
Sri Deo Dayal, learned counsel representing the District Basic Education Officer, Chandauli, has filed a short counter affidavit in Writ Petition No.58712 of 2013. The same is taken on record.
Sri Mrigraj Singh, learned counsel representing the District Basic Education Officer, Jaunpur has filed a short counter affidavit in Writ Petition No.60088 of 2013. The same is taken on record.
Sri Syed Nadeem, Advocate, representing District Basic Education Officer, Mau, has filed short counter affidavit in Writ Petition No.50787 of 2013. The same also taken on record.
Learned counsel representing the District Basic Education Officers in the other petitions have prayed for three days time to file their affidavits as required vide order dated 11.12.2013. Further learned counsel for the petitioners, who have received the supplementary counter affidavit, have prayed for a week's time to file reply to the same.
List on 8th January, 2014.
The interim order granted earlier to continue till the next date of listing.
Order Date :- 17.12.2013
SS
**********************
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 58520 of 2013
Petitioner :- Arun Kumar & 3 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishi Kant Rai
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.P. Singh
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
For orders see orders of date passed on WRIT - A No. - 52521 of 2013, Neelam Kumari Gautam vs. State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Order Date :- 7.11.2013
pk
**************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 57236 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sankarshan Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Chnadra Srivastav,Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
Similar matters led by Writ Petition No.52521 of 2013 are fixed for 26.11.2013. This petition may also be listed alongwith aforesaid writ petition.
Order Date :- 13.11.2013
RPS
***********
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 57236 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sankarshan Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Chnadra Srivastav,Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
For orders, see order of date passed on Writ -� A No.58520 of 2013 - Arun Kumar and others Vs. State of U.P. and others.
Order Date :- 17.12.2013
SS
************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 57236 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sankarshan Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Chnadra Srivastav,Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J.
Sri B.P. Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 3 prays for and is granted four weeks time to file detailed counter affidavit to which the learned counsel for the petitioner may file rejoinder affidavit within two weeks thereafter. Respondent no.4 is represented by Sri Sunil Kumar Singh , Advocate, who� may also file� a detailed � counter affidavit within four weeks to which learned counsel for the petitioner may also file rejoinder affidavit within two weeks thereafter.�
List on 3.4.2014.
Interim order already granted in this case will continue to remain in operation till then.
Order Date :- 11.2.2014
aks
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
जूनियर भर्ती से नियुक्तियों का रास्ता साफ़ हो चुका है ।
लेकिन कुछ लोग कई याचिकाओं के नाम बता कर उन पर स्टे होने की बात कहते हैं ,
वास्तव में ये सब याचिकाएं कनेक्टेड याचिकाएं थी और सब में समान बातें थी - प्रमोशन को लेकर ,
दुसरी नीलम की याचिका थी अलग मुद्दे पर
इन याचिकाओं पर स्टे था , और यह स्टे पिछले दो महत्वपूर्ण ऑर्डर्स में हट चुका है , नियुक्तियां दी जा सकती हैं ।
अभ्यर्थी अपने मूल प्रमाण पत्र एक साल पहले जमा करा चुके हैं और मानसिक परेशानियों व् तनाव से गुजर रहे हैं ।
प्रोफेशनल वर्सस नॉन प्रोफेशनल एक अलग मसला है , और फ़िलहाल प्रोफेशनल की सीट्स सुरक्षित रखते हुए अन्य पदों पर आसानी से नियुक्ति दी जा सकती है
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 58520 of 2013
Petitioner :- Arun Kumar & 3 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishi Kant Rai,S. Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.P. Singh
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 62241 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sabarjeet Verma And 3 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.P.Singh,Vishnu Gupta
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.P.Singh
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 55925 of 2013
Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Radha Kant Ojha,Shailesh Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Syed Nadeem Ahmad
With�
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 50787 of 2013
Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Singh And 4 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailesh Upadhyay,Radha Kant Ojha
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sayed Nadeem Ahmad
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 62025 of 2013
Petitioner :- Shashank Mishra
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailesh Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sayyed Nadeem
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 58712 of 2013
Petitioner :- Jayant Kumar Singh And Anr.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Aditya,Ajay Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Deo Dayal
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 57236 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sankarshan Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Chnadra Srivastav,Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 52521 of 2013
Petitioner :- Neelam Kumari Gautam
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Kshetresh Chnadra Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K.Yadav
AND
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 60088 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ajit Pratap Singh & 24 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- P.K. Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mrigraj Singh
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
All these petitions raise more or less similar questions of law and fact, with slight difference on facts in some of the cases. Considering the larger issue involved which is common, all these petitions are clubbed together.
Writ Petition No.58520 of 2013 relates to District Azamgarh. A short counter affidavit has been filed by Sri B.P. Singh, learned counsel for the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Azamgarh which� is taken on record. Sri B.P. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the District Basic Education Officer, Azamgarh in the aforesaid writ petition as well as in Writ Petition No.62241 of 2013 shall file counter affidavit to the averments relating to the factual aspects of the number of vacancies, strength of the cadre and the number of vacancies advertised as also the number of vacancies available for the Assistant Teachers� primary institutions as also the Assistant Teachers Junior High Schools relating to district Azamgarh within three days.
Writ Petition No.55925 of 2013, Writ Petition No.50787 of 2013 and Writ Petition No.62025 of 2013 relate to district Mau. Sri Syed. Nadeem Ahmad, learned counsel appearing for the District Basic Education Officer, Mau shall file counter affidavit to the averments relating to the factual aspects of the number of vacancies, strength of the cadre and the number of vacancies advertised as also the number of vacancies available for the Assistant Teachers primary institutions as also the Assistant Teachers Junior High Schools relating to district Mau within three days.
Writ Petition No.58712 of 2013 relates to district Chandauli. Sri A.K. Aditya, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the initial vacancies of Assistant Teachers Junior High School in Science and Maths stream were notified for promotion from the Assistant Teachers in the primary section. It is also stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are working as Assistant Teachers in primary section and are eligible both educational qualification wise and also experience wise to be promoted. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that by the impugned notification the vacancies for promotion have been cancelled and by a fresh advertisement they have been advertised for being filled up by direct recruitment.
Sri Deo Dayal, learned counsel appearing for the District Basic� Education Officer, Chandauli shall file a counter affidavit giving details of the strength of the cadre of Assistant Teachers primary section, number of Assistant Teachers working in primary section, the vacancies available for Assistant Teachers in Junior High Schools in the Science and Maths stream and the vacancies advertised within three days.
Writ Petition No.57236 of 2013 relates to district Kushinagar which may be put up in the additional cause list on 17.12.2013.
Writ Petition No.52521 of 2013 relates to� District Jaunpur. Sri B.P. Singh, Advocate representing Secretary, Basic Education Board has filed a short counter affidavit in Writ Petition No.58520 of 2013, Arun Kumar and 3 others vs.� State of U.P. and others. Sri B.P. Singh states that the short counter affidavit contains answers to the queries raised in the order dated 23.10.2013 passed in Writ Petition No.52521 of 2013, Neelam Kumari� Gautam vs. State of U.P. and 2 others.A copy of the said affidavit has been provided to Sri K.C. Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in the case of Neelam Kumari Gautam. Sri Shukla states that as there are no factual dispute raised in this petition, any specific counter affidavit may not be necessay. He further states that he may be allowed three days time to examine the short counter affidavit filed today referred to above.Time prayed for is granted.
Writ Petition No.60088 of 2013 also relates to District Jaunpur. In this petition there are specific averments relating to number of vacancies available and the number of vacancies which are going to be filled up by the Government by direct recruitment which may jeopardize the rights of the teachers working in the primary institution in District Jaunpur, as according to the petitioner if number of posts advertised is filled up the petitioner who possessed the eligibility of educational qualifications as also the experience for promotion as Assistant Teachers in Junior High Schools of Science and Maths stream would be denied and deprived of their rights of promotion. The averments requires specific reply from the District Basic Education Officer. Sri Mirg Raj Singh, and Sri B.P. Singh learned counsels representing the District Basic Eduction Officer and also the Secretary Basic Education Board may file counter affidavits within three days.
As prayed by the learned counsels for the parties put up all the cases in the additional cause list on 17.12.2013.
Sri� Sanjay� Sinha, Secretary, Basic Education Board is present. As he has filed an appropriate affidavit about the questions posed in the order dated 23.10.2013, his personal appearance for the time being is exempted. However as and when required he would again remain present before this Court for proper adjudication of the controversy raised. The interim order granted earlier to continue till Tuesday i.e. 17.12.2013.
Order Date :- 11.12.2013
RPS
**********************************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 58520 of 2013
Petitioner :- Arun Kumar & 3 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishi Kant Rai,K.C.Shukla,S. Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.P. Singh,Mrigraj Singh
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
As prayed, list in the next cause list.
Interim order, if in operation will continue till the next date of listing.
Order Date :- 23.4.2015
VPC
***********
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 57236 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sankarshan Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Chnadra Srivastav,Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
As prayed, list in the next cause list.
Interim order, if in operation will continue till the next date of listing.
Order Date :- 23.4.2015
VPC
**********************
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 58520 of 2013
Petitioner :- Arun Kumar & 3 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishi Kant Rai,S. Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.P. Singh
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 62241 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sabarjeet Verma And 3 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.P.Singh,Vishnu Gupta
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.P.Singh
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 55925 of 2013
Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Radha Kant Ojha,Shailesh Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Syed Nadeem Ahmad
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 50787 of 2013
Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Singh And 4 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailesh Upadhyay,Radha Kant Ojha
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sayed Nadeem Ahmad
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 62025 of 2013
Petitioner :- Shashank Mishra
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailesh Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sayyed Nadeem
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 58712 of 2013
Petitioner :- Jayant Kumar Singh And Anr.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Aditya,Ajay Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Deo Dayal
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 57236 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sankarshan Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Chnadra Srivastav,Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
With
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 52521 of 2013
Petitioner :- Neelam Kumari Gautam
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Kshetresh Chnadra Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K.Yadav
AND
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 60088 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ajit Pratap Singh & 24 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- P.K. Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mrigraj Singh
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
Sri B. P. Singh, Advocate, has filed a supplementary counter affidavit in Writ Petition No.58520 of 2013. The same is taken on record.
Sri K. C. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, has filed a short rejoinder affidavit in Writ Petition No.52521 of 2013. The same is taken on record.
Sri Deo Dayal, learned counsel representing the District Basic Education Officer, Chandauli, has filed a short counter affidavit in Writ Petition No.58712 of 2013. The same is taken on record.
Sri Mrigraj Singh, learned counsel representing the District Basic Education Officer, Jaunpur has filed a short counter affidavit in Writ Petition No.60088 of 2013. The same is taken on record.
Sri Syed Nadeem, Advocate, representing District Basic Education Officer, Mau, has filed short counter affidavit in Writ Petition No.50787 of 2013. The same also taken on record.
Learned counsel representing the District Basic Education Officers in the other petitions have prayed for three days time to file their affidavits as required vide order dated 11.12.2013. Further learned counsel for the petitioners, who have received the supplementary counter affidavit, have prayed for a week's time to file reply to the same.
List on 8th January, 2014.
The interim order granted earlier to continue till the next date of listing.
Order Date :- 17.12.2013
SS
**********************
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 58520 of 2013
Petitioner :- Arun Kumar & 3 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishi Kant Rai
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.P. Singh
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
For orders see orders of date passed on WRIT - A No. - 52521 of 2013, Neelam Kumari Gautam vs. State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Order Date :- 7.11.2013
pk
**************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 57236 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sankarshan Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Chnadra Srivastav,Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
Similar matters led by Writ Petition No.52521 of 2013 are fixed for 26.11.2013. This petition may also be listed alongwith aforesaid writ petition.
Order Date :- 13.11.2013
RPS
***********
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 57236 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sankarshan Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Chnadra Srivastav,Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
For orders, see order of date passed on Writ -� A No.58520 of 2013 - Arun Kumar and others Vs. State of U.P. and others.
Order Date :- 17.12.2013
SS
************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 57236 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sankarshan Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Chnadra Srivastav,Abhishek Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J.
Sri B.P. Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 3 prays for and is granted four weeks time to file detailed counter affidavit to which the learned counsel for the petitioner may file rejoinder affidavit within two weeks thereafter. Respondent no.4 is represented by Sri Sunil Kumar Singh , Advocate, who� may also file� a detailed � counter affidavit within four weeks to which learned counsel for the petitioner may also file rejoinder affidavit within two weeks thereafter.�
List on 3.4.2014.
Interim order already granted in this case will continue to remain in operation till then.
Order Date :- 11.2.2014
aks
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,
29334
junior teacher vacancy in up latest news,
Upper
Primary Teacher Recruitment UP, UPTET, SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
