/* remove this */

Monday, April 28, 2014

72825 Teacher Recruitment : Old Advertisement of 2011 with some important Details

72825 Teacher Recruitment : Old Advertisement of 2011 with some important Details




Purane Vigyapan Ke Baare Mein Ikatthi Kee Gayee Jankaree , Va Logon Dwara Suchna Ke Aadhaar Par :


Pramanikta Ke Liye Sambandhit Vibhag kee Jaankaree Ko Dekhen, Va Upyog Mein Layen.
Yahan Dee Gayee Jankaree Matra Suchnarth Hai, Aur Typing Vagerah Kee Truti Ho saktee Hai
Vacancies in descending order - helpful to candidates : -
सीतापुर 6000 ,लखीमपुर 6000 , गोण्डा 4000 ,बहराइच 3600 ,कुशीनगर 3600 .हरदोई 3000
शाहजहॉपुर 2800 ,महराजगंज 2500 ,आजमगढ़ 2500 ,गाजीपुर 2400 ,सिद्धार्थ नगर 2000 ,
बलरामपुर 1700 , मीरजापुर 1650 , बदायूं 1600 , इलाहाबाद 1500 , जौनपुर 1500 , सुल्तानपुर 1400
बरेली 1400 , सोनभद्र 1250 , पीलीभीत 1200 , चन्दौली 1200 , कौशाम्बी 1000 ,श्रावस्ती 900 .
मुरादाबाद 900 , संत कबीर नगर 800 , ललितपुर 800 , बॉदा 800 , महोबा 800 ,भीमनगर 800
रामपुर 800 , संतरविदासनगर 800 , रायबरेली 800 , सहारनपुर 800 , देवरिया 800 ,
एटा 700 , काशीरामनगर 700 , उन्नाव 700 , अम्बेडकरनगर 500 , प्रतापगढ़ 500 ,
इटावा 500 , गोरखपुर 500 , बस्ती 400 , जालौन 400 , बाराबंकी 400 ,
फर्रुखाबाद 400 , कन्नौज 400 , हमीरपुर 300 , फैजाबाद 300 , हाथरस 300 ,
चित्रकूट धाम 250 , बिजनौर 200 , ज्योतिबाफुलेनगर 200 , मऊ 200 , मुजफरनगर 200 ,
प्रबुद्धनगर 200 , बुलन्दशहर 195  ,बागपत 100 , आगरा 100 , मैनपुरी 100 , अलीगढ़ 100
वाराणसी 100 , झॉसी 50 , कानपुरदेहात 50 , फिरोजाबाद 48 , गौतमबुद्धनगर 12 ,
गाजियाबाद 12 , पंचशीलनगर 12 , मथुरा 12 ,छत्रपति साहू जी महराज 12 ,
फतेहपुर 12 , कानपुरनगर 12 , औरैया 12 , लखनऊ 12 , बलिया 12 ,मेरठ 12 
योग 72825


जनपदवार रिक्तियों की संख्या
Total Gen OBC SC ST
सीतापुर 6400 3200 1728 1344 128
लखीमपुर 6200 3100 1674 1302 124
बह‌राइच 4000 2000 1080 840 80
कुशीनगर 4000 2000 1080 840 80
गोंडा 4000 2000 1080 840 80
हरदोई 3200 1600 864 672 64
शाहजहाँपुर 2800 1400 756 588 56
महाराज गंज 2500 1250 675 525 50
आजमगढ 2000 1000 540 420 40
गाजीपुर 2000 1000 540 420 40
मिर्ज़ापुर 2000 1000 540 420 40
सिध्दार्थनगर 2000 1000 540 420 40
ब‌लरामपुर 1800 900 486 378 36
बदायूँ 1600 800 432 336 32
सॊनभद्र 1600 800 432 336 32
चन्दौली 1400 700 378 294 28
श्राव‌स्ती 1200 600 324 252 24
पीलीभीत 1200 600 324 252 24
जौनपुर 1000 500 270 210 20
मुरादाबाद 1000 500 270 210 20
संभल 1000 500 270 210 20
बरेली 1000 500 270 210 20
इलाहाबाद 1000 500 270 210 20
बाँदा 1000 500 270 210 20
रायबरेली 900 450 243 189 18
कौशाम्बी 800 400 216 168 16
महॊबा 800 400 216 168 16
संत कबीर नगर 800 400 216 168 16
रामपुर 800 400 216 168 16
संत रविदास नगर 800 400 216 168 16
कासगंज 700 350 189 147 14
एटा 700 350 189 147 14
इटावा 600 300 162 126 12
सहारनपुर 600 300 162 126 12
ललितपुर 600 300 162 126 12
जालौन 600 300 162 126 12
अमेठी 500 250 135 105 10
सुलतानपुर 500 250 135 105 10
देवरिया 500 250 135 105 10
प्रतापगढ 417 209 113 87 8
कन्नौज 400 200 108 84 8
फर्रूखाबाद 400 200 108 84 8
अलीगढ 400 200 108 84 8
चित्रकूट 400 200 108 84 8
हाथरस 400 200 108 84 8
बस्ती 400 200 108 84 8
गोरखपुर 300 150 81 63 6
फैज़ाबाद 300 150 81 63 6
हमीरपुर 300 150 81 63 6
उन्नाव 300 150 81 63 6
मैनपुरी 300 150 81 63 6
बिजनौर 300 150 81 63 6
अम्बॆडक‌र न‌ग‌र 200 100 54 42 4
अमरोहा 200 100 54 42 4
बुलन्दशहर 200 100 54 42 4
मथुरा 200 100 54 42 4
बाराबंकी 200 100 54 42 4
आगरा 200 100 54 42 4
मऊ 100 50 27 21 2
फतॆहपुर 100 50 27 21 2
मुजफफरनगर 100 50 27 21 2
शामली 100 50 27 21 2
वाराणसी 100 50 27 21 2
झांसी 50 25 13 11 1
कानपुर देहात 50 25 13 11 1
औरय्या 12 6 3 3 0
गौतम बुद नगर 12 6 3 3 0
बागपत 12 6 3 3 0
लखनऊ 12 6 3 3 0
गाजियाबाद 12 6 3 3 0
फिरोजाबाद 200 100 54 42 4
बलिया 12 6 3 3 0
कानपुर नगर 12 6 3 3 0
मेरठ 12 6 3 3 0
हापुड़ 12 6 3 3 0

*********************
A candidate / visitor posted a comment about vacancy details through UPTET  -
(Note - Details may have discrepancy/typo error etc. Therefore you are advise to visit relevant website OR contact concerned authority for verification )

जनपदवार रिक्तियों की संख्या

  जिला-Total Gen OBC SC ST
सीतापुर 6400 3200 1728 1344 128
लखीमपुर 6200 3100 1674 1302 124
बह‌राइच 4000 2000 1080 840 80
कुशीनगर 4000 2000 1080 840 80
गोंडा 4000 2000 1080 840 80
हरदोई 3200 1600 864 672 64
शाहजहाँपुर 2800 1400 756 588 56
महाराज गंज 2500 1250 675 525 50
आजमगढ 2000 1000 540 420 40
गाजीपुर 2000 1000 540 420 40
मिर्ज़ापुर 2000 1000 540 420 40
सिध्दार्थनगर 2000 1000 540 420 40
ब‌लरामपुर 1800 900 486 378 36
बदायूँ 1600 800 432 336 32
सॊनभद्र 1600 800 432 336 32
चन्दौली 1400 700 378 294 28
श्राव‌स्ती 1200 600 324 252 24
पीलीभीत 1200 600 324 252 24
जौनपुर 1000 500 270 210 20
मुरादाबाद 1000 500 270 210 20
संभल 1000 500 270 210 20
बरेली 1000 500 270 210 20
इलाहाबाद 1000 500 270 210 20
बाँदा 1000 500 270 210 20
रायबरेली 900 450 243 189 18
कौशाम्बी 800 400 216 168 16
महॊबा 800 400 216 168 16
संत कबीर नगर 800 400 216 168 16
रामपुर 800 400 216 168 16
संत रविदास नगर 800 400 216 168 16
कासगंज 700 350 189 147 14
एटा 700 350 189 147 14
इटावा 600 300 162 126 12
सहारनपुर 600 300 162 126 12
ललितपुर 600 300 162 126 12
जालौन 600 300 162 126 12
अमेठी 500 250 135 105 10
सुलतानपुर 500 250 135 105 10
देवरिया 500 250 135 105 10
प्रतापगढ 417 209 113 87 8
कन्नौज 400 200 108 84 8
फर्रूखाबाद 400 200 108 84 8
अलीगढ 400 200 108 84 8
चित्रकूट 400 200 108 84 8
हाथरस 400 200 108 84 8
बस्ती 400 200 108 84 8
गोरखपुर 300 150 81 63 6
फैज़ाबाद 300 150 81 63 6
हमीरपुर 300 150 81 63 6
उन्नाव 300 150 81 63 6
मैनपुरी 300 150 81 63 6
बिजनौर 300 150 81 63 6
अम्बॆडक‌र न‌ग‌र 200 100 54 42 4
अमरोहा 200 100 54 42 4
बुलन्दशहर 200 100 54 42 4
मथुरा 200 100 54 42 4
बाराबंकी 200 100 54 42 4
आगरा 200 100 54 42 4
मऊ 100 50 27 21 2
फतॆहपुर 100 50 27 21 2
मुजफफरनगर 100 50 27 21 2
शामली 100 50 27 21 2
वाराणसी 100 50 27 21 2
झांसी 50 25 13 11 1
कानपुर देहात 50 25 13 11 1
औरय्या 12 6 3 3 0
गौतम बुद नगर 12 6 3 3 0
बागपत 12 6 3 3 0
लखनऊ 12 6 3 3 0
गाजियाबाद 12 6 3 3 0
**फिरोजाबाद 12 6 3 3 0
बलिया 12 6 3 3 0
कानपुर नगर 12 6 3 3 0
मेरठ 12 6 3 3 0
हापुड़ 12 6 3 3 0
Total 72637 36319 19609 15259 1450
 *********************
 
Shayad Firozabad mein 200 Seats  Hain, Kuch Typo Error Huee Lagteee Hai
 
 
Pramanikta Ke Liye Sambandhit Vibhag kee Jaankaree Ko Dekhen, Va Upyog Mein Layen.
Yahan Dee Gayee Jankaree Matra Suchnarth Hai, Aur Typing Vagerah Kee Truti Ho saktee Hai
 
 
 
 
 
 
As per advertisement-
(ड.) अभ्यर्थियों से प्राप्त आवेदन पत्र में, जो सूचनाएं अंकित होंगी, उन्हीं के आधार पर श्रेष्ठता सूची तैयार की जायेगी । आवेदन पत्र के साथ उत्तर प्रदेश शासन द्वारा आयोजित अध्यापक पात्रता परीक्षा (कक्षा 1 से 5 के लिए) उत्तीर्ण का अंकपत्र, हाईस्कूल, इण्टरमीडिएट, स्नातक परीक्षा एवं बी0एड0 परीक्षा के अंक पत्र तथा सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा निर्गत जाति प्रमाण पत्र, विशेष आरक्षण प्रमाण पत्र की स्व-प्रमाणित छाया प्रतियां संलग्न की जायेंगी

 
 


Read more...

72825 Teacher Recruitment : शिक्षकों के 100 पद फॉर्म 39000 आए

72825 Teacher Recruitment : शिक्षकों के 100 पद फॉर्म 39000 आए





UPTET, 72825 Teacher Recruitment, Counseling of 72825 Teacher as per Supreme Court Order
UPTET PASS GIRL CANDIDATE can JOIN THIS GROUP : https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetgirlsgroup/

UPTET PASS CANDIDATE can JOIN this GROUP :https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetteachersgroup



Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com/#ixzz3091uoHM7

My Facebook Page for UPTET Information : https://www.facebook.com/UptetPrt?ref=hl


तीन महीने में भर्ती करने के आदेश के बाद काम शुरू

डायट कार्यालय पहुंच कर अभ्यर्थी कर रहे जानकारी

72825 Teacher Recruitment, Counseling of 72825 Teacher as per Supreme Court Order, UP-TET 2011,

आगरा: सुप्रीम कोर्ट के आदेश के बाद प्राथमिक शिक्षकों की भर्ती का रास्ता साफ हो गया है। पूरे प्रदेश में 72,825 शिक्षकों की भर्ती होनी है, इसमें आगरा जिले में 100 पदों पर 39 हजार अभ्यर्थियों के बीच मुकाबला है। यानी हर पद के लिए 390 अभ्यर्थियों के बीच मुकाबला है। 1शिक्षक बनने का तीन साल से सपना संजोए 39 हजार अभ्यर्थियों का हर दिन इंतजार में कट रहा है। डायट कार्यालय में रोज 10 से 15 अभ्यर्थी भर्ती प्रक्रिया की जानकारी लेने पहुंच रहे हैं। कार्यालय में भी भर्ती प्रक्रिया का काम शुरू हो गया है। दो साल से कोने में पड़े आवेदन पत्र और फाइलों को निकाल लिया गया है। मेरिट लिस्ट तैयार है। शासन के ओर से निर्देश मिलने का इंतजार हो रहा है। वैसे बसपा सरकार ने शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा (टीईटी) की मेरिट पर 72,825 शिक्षकों की भर्ती निकाली थी। इसके लिए पूरे आगरा जनपद में भी 100 पदों पर शिक्षकों की भर्ती होनी थी। इसके लिए 39 हजार से ज्यादा आवेदन आए थे। डायट कार्यालय ने भर्ती प्रक्रिया जोरों पर थी। मेरिट भी तैयार कर ली गई थी। मगर, फाइनल मुहर लगने से पहले विधानसभा चुनाव की आचार संहिता लग गई थी। इसके बाद सरकार बदलने पर अखिलेश सरकार ने भर्ती प्रक्रिया पर रोक लगाते हुए शैक्षिक योग्यता के आधार पर भर्ती करने का फरमान जारी किया। हाल में ही सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने तीन महीने में टीईटी मेरिट से ही भर्ती करने का निर्णय दिया है

News Source / Sabhaar : Jagran (28.04.2014)


Read more...

72825 Teacher Recruitment : जुटाई जा रही टीईटी 2011 की जानकारी

72825 Teacher Recruitment : जुटाई जा रही टीईटी 2011 की जानकारी



UPTET, 72825 Teacher Recruitment, Counseling of 72825 Teacher as per Supreme Court Order
UPTET PASS GIRL CANDIDATE can JOIN THIS GROUP : https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetgirlsgroup/

UPTET PASS CANDIDATE can JOIN this GROUP :https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetteachersgroup

Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com/#ixzz3091uoHM7




UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment, Counseling of 72825 Teacher as per Supreme Court Order,

टीईटी अभ्यर्थियों में जागी भर्ती की उम्मीद
ड्राफ्ट वापस लेने वालों की भी मांगी सूचना
ड्राफ्ट वापसी की भी मांगी जानकारी
शासन ने अन्य सभी जानकारी के साथ ही ड्राफ्ट वापस लेने वाले अभ्यर्थियों की सूचना भी मांगी है। जिसके चलते पहले ड्राफ्ट वापस ले चुके अभ्यर्थियों में भी उम्मीद की किरण जाग गई है। उन्हें उम्मीद है कि भर्ती प्रक्रिया में वह भी शामिल हो सकेंगे।

अलीगढ़। वर्ष 2011 टीईटी की भर्ती प्रक्रिया जोर पकड़ने लगी है। शासन ने सभी जिलों से अभ्यर्थियों को जानकारी मांगी है। दो दिन में जानकारी शासन को भेजने के निर्देश दिए गए हैं। साथ ही ड्राप्ट वापस लेने वाले अभ्यर्थियों की संख्या भेजने के निर्देश सभी बीएसए को दिए गए हैं।
कोर्ट और सरकार के पाले में झूल रही टीईटी 2011 की प्रक्रिया जोर पकड़ने लगी है। टीईटी परीक्षा में शामिल हुए अभ्यर्थियों को भर्ती की एक किरण दिखाई देने लगी है। हाल ही में एक संबंध में एक वीडियो कांफ्रेंसिंग हुई थी। जिसमें सभी एडी बेसिक और बीएसए को दिशा-निर्देश जारी किए गए थे।

News Source / Sabhaar : अमर उजाला ब्यूरो (28.04.2014)

Read more...

Sunday, April 27, 2014

EXCEL DATA OF UP-TET 2011 CANDIDATES, Compiled by Mr Vipin ( I don't its authenticity, Data kee Pramanikta ke Baare Mein Mujhe Nahin pata )

EXCEL DATA OF UP-TET 2011 CANDIDATES, Compiled by Mr Vipin ( I don't its authenticity, Data kee Pramanikta ke Baare Mein Mujhe Nahin pata )

Mr Vipin ne UPTET 2011 Passed Logon ka Result Ikattah Kiya hai, aur Facebook par iskaa link diyaa/Share hai.

Aap Logo ki Jaankaree Ke Liye Link Yaha De rahe Hain



UPTET, 72825 Teacher Recruitment, Counseling of 72825 Teacher as per Supreme Court Order
UPTET PASS GIRL CANDIDATE can JOIN THIS GROUP : https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetgirlsgroup/

UPTET PASS CANDIDATE can JOIN this GROUP :https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetteachersgroup


Mr Vipin naam ke ek person ne Facebook par TET candidates ka data share kiya hai Jo log UPTET 2011 mein pass hue hain.

Mere khyaal se data mein kuch kamee hai ya fir poora nahin hai Ya sahee nahin hai (ek do naam check kiye vo nahin mile. par kafee saare naam mile bhee hain with sahee data)

Excel Sheet Download karke Data khud Check kar len-
See data link provied by him - https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5BGixim4XMBTGliRkdlR3phOFk/edit  
************************

San 2011 mein hamaare blog ne bhee sample survey kiya thaa
 Uska link hai - http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.in/2011/12/statistical-figures-of-uptet.html
Aur Jab Mr Vipin Dwara copiled excel sheet mein ye data check kiyaa to usmen

ye naam with same roll number milaa. aise hee  aur bhee details matched huee hain. halanki hamaare dwara compiled data ke doraan HC ke aadesh ke tehat marks thoda badal rahe the. to isleeye marks mein thodaa sa fark dikh raha hai

Excel sheet ka data :-

Sr No. Rank Category SpecialReservation Name DOB TETRollNo TETMaxMarks ObtainedMarks TETPercentage
2685 2007 GENERAL - BIKRAM SINGH SHISHODIA 1/12/1973 1006057 150 127 84.67

Data kee Pramanikta Ke Baare Mein Ham Kuch Nahin Keh Sakte

Read more...

RTE ACT NEWS : RIGHT TO EDUCATION ACT IMPLEMENTATION FAILURE

RTE ACT NEWS : RIGHT TO EDUCATION ACT IMPLEMENTATION FAILURE
Various News of RTE Act and Its Implementation in India :-



जागरूकता के अभाव में परवान नहीं चढ़ा आरटीई
RTE did not go through due to lack of awareness
नागौर।जरूरतमंद एवं असहाय बच्चों को निजी स्कूलों में नि:शुल्क प्रवेश देकर अच्छी शिक्षा देने के लिए वर्ष 2010 में लागू किया गया शिक्षा का अधिकार अधिनियम उदासीनता के चलते परवान नहीं चढ़ पाया है। एक्ट को लागू किए हुए चार वर्ष पूरे हो रहे हैं, लेकिन आज भी इसकी स्थिति संतोषजनक नहीं है।


आरटीई के नियमों में पेचिदगियां इतनी है कि खुद अधिकारी भी समझ नहीं पाए हैं। आरटीई एक्ट को लेकर जागरूकता नहीं होने का परिणाम यह है कि जिले में 1600 से अधिक निजी स्कूलों के 10 हजार बच्चों को भी नि:शुल्क प्रवेश नहीं मिल रहा है, जबकि हर स्कूल को पहली कक्षा में 25 प्रतिशत बच्चों को नि:शुल्क प्रवेश देना अनिवार्य है। नियमानुसार कोई भी व्यक्ति, जिसकी मासिक आय 20 हजार 700 रूपए तक है, अपने बच्चे को क्षेत्र के निजी स्कूल में नि:शुल्क प्रवेश दिला सकता है। जहां उसके बच्चे को नि:शुल्क शिक्षण के साथ किताबें, स्कूल यूनिफॉर्म आदि भी फ्री दिए जाने हैं।

नियमावली स्पष्ट नहीं
आरटीई एक्ट की नियमावली खुद शिक्षा विभाग के अधिकारियों के लिए पहेली बनी हुई है। निजी स्कूल जरूरतमंद बच्चों को नि:शुल्क प्रवेश तो दे रहे हैं, लेकिन नियमों को लेकर गफलत होने से पुनर्भरण राशि नहीं मिल रही है। यह विडम्बना ही है कि आरटीई के एपीसी का पद साल भर से रिक्त है। जिले की स्थिति यह है कि निजी स्कूलों के संस्था प्रधानों को नियमों के मकड़जाल में फंसा रखा है। पुनर्भरण में भी अधिकारी अपनी मनमर्जी चला रहे हैं। - विनेश शर्मा, सचिव, निजी स्कूल एसोसिएशन, नागौर


नियमों की जटिलता बनी बाधक

एक्ट के नियमों की जटिलताओं का अंदाजा इसी से लगाया जा सकता है कि निजी स्कूलों द्वारा पुनर्भरण राशि के लिए पेश किए गए आवेदनों में से आधे तो ब्लॉक अधिकारियों के भौतिक सत्यापन में फर्जी घोषित हो रहे हैं।
एक्ट के अनुसार नि:शुल्क प्रवेश में वार्ड के बच्चे को वरियता दी जानी है। इसके बावजूद पूरे प्रवेश नहीं हो तो दूसरे वार्ड के बच्चों को प्रवेश दिया जाना चाहिए। इस वर्ष ऑनलाइन व्यवस्था होने से नि:शुल्क प्रवेश में स्कूल व बच्चे का वार्ड बदलते ही प्रवेश निरस्त मान लिया गया है। हाईकोर्ट के आदेश हैं कि किसी भी बच्चे को नि:शुल्क प्रवेश देकर बाहर नहीं निकाल सकते।


सरकार ने शिक्षण शुल्क, किताबें, यूनिफॉर्म व बस किराया मिलाकर पुनर्भरण की फीस 11 हजार 900 रूपए तय किए। इसके बाद शिक्षा विभाग ने निजी स्कूलों से शिक्षण शुल्क की जानकारी मांगी, स्कूलों ने भी केवल शिक्षण शुल्क की जानकारी दे दी। अब उन्हें पुनर्भरण का भुगतान भी मात्र शिक्षण शुल्क का ही हो रहा है, जबकि किताबें, यूनिफॉर्म व बस किराया भी देना चाहिए। इसी गफलत में बच्चों को बाकी का खर्चा उठाना पड़ रहा है

News Source / Sabhaar : rajasthanpatrika.patrika.com (26.04.2014/ Sat, 26 Apr 2014 01:48:06)
*******************************

PIL: Rajasthan failed to implement RTE properly

 RTE properly|Rajasthan|PIL|
RELATED
JAIPUR: The Rajasthan High Court has issued a notice to the state government on the tardy implementation of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act in the state.

A bench of Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice J K Ranka issued the notice on a PIL filed by Prof Rajiv Gupta and others. The government was asked to respond within four weeks. According to petitioner's counsel Pratik Kasliwal, the RTE Act came into force in April 2010 and a three-year time was given to all schools to improve basic infrastructure. However, even after three years, most of the schools are lacking basic infrastructure.

Also, all the aided and unaided private schools are under obligation to provide 25% reservation to children belonging to weaker sections and disadvantaged groups by virtue of Section 12 of RTE Act, 2009. Here too the state government failed to fulfill its legal duties properly, it was pointed out. The petition claims that the state government had failed to give wide interpretation to the term "children belonging to disadvantaged groups" as it only includes children of SC/ST/group having less than Rs 2.5 lakh annual income.

"There are many others like street kids, migrants, children in conflict regions, children of manual scavengers, sex workers and even those girls of upper caste and majority religion(s) who are not allowed to undergo education due to conservatism, patriarchy and orthodox beliefs, who are facing serious disadvantages too."


The state government vide notification dated March 29, 2011 specified the category of "children belonging to disadvantaged groups" but did not include the above categories of children, which is essential if the spirit of inclusiveness embedded in the RTE Act has to be followed.

The petition pointed out that the state government had failed to provide free pre-school education which would create a strong foundation for the children belonging to weaker sections and disadvantaged groups in order to stand at par with other children of same age group.

It pleaded the court to ensure that schools which have pre-school education and are making fresh admission in pre-primary and Class 1 will have to conform to 25% reservation at all levels wherever fresh admissions are there. The admission process by lottery system should be conducted in front of all parents who have applied for such admission and in the presence of a functionary of the education department among others, it demanded.

News Source : http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com (24.04.2014) / P J Joychen,TNN | Apr 24, 2014, 03.18 AM IST
**************************

Only 4% EWS parents aware of reservation under RTE Act: Study


The report was released at a Delhi state-wide conference on the Right to Education Act by Indus Action — an NGO.


Only four per cent of parents from economically weaker sections (EWS) are aware about the availability of 25 per cent seats under EWS category in the capital’s private schools, under the RTE Act, a study has shown.
The study also found that only half of these four per cent parents have managed to navigate through bureaucratic and psychological barriers to apply.
The report was released at a Delhi state-wide conference on the Right to Education Act by Indus Action — an NGO working exclusively towards implementation of Section 12(1)(C) clause of the RTE Act — with support from Central Square Foundation.
“The Right to Education has opened up many opportunities for children from economically weaker sections. Yet, despite the best efforts to spread awareness, eligible families seem to have little knowledge about the policy. Section 12(1)(c) of RTE Act has the potential to put roughly 10 million children across India on a different path in the next five years, making it the single largest opportunity seat scheme in the world. But we need a better state-wide implementation plan for that to happen,” Tarun Cherukuri, founder, Indus Action, said.
The report details on-ground implementation of the mandatory 25 per cent reservation for EWS children and those who are socially disadvantaged. It is based on responses from 350-odd families in South, Southeast, Southwest, North, Northeast and Central Delhi.
Section 12(1)(c) of the RTE Act mandates that private unaided schools reserve 25 per cent of their seats in entry-level classes for EWS students and those from disadvantaged groups.
Even though awareness levels are low, the report states that eligible families were adequately equipped to apply.
“ 94.8 per cent people had at least one of the birth proof certificates. 96.85 per cent people had at least one of the accepted documents for address proof. And 82.8 per cent people had at least one of the accepted documents for proof of income,” the report states.
Yet, families chose not to apply, with the exception of four per cent families who did — high fees being a major concern discouraging them from applying to private schools.
The report notes that families did not approach government officials for information, relying instead on help from other families ( 29 per cent) and employers (28 per cent)
News Source : indianexpress.com (26.04.2014)
*******************
RTE कोटे से ऑनलाइन ऐडमिशन का हुआ आगाज
Apr 11, 2014, 08.30AM IST
Tweet
मुंबई:ऑनलाइन ऐडमिशन के जरिए भले ही सरकार गरीब वर्ग के बच्चों को शिक्षण सुविधा मुफ्त में देने की बात कही है पर, व्यावहारिक तौर पर देखें तो मुंबई स्थित 304 स्कूलों में से पंजिकृत हुए 282 स्कूलों में बच्चों को ऐडमिशन मिलना किसी चुनौती से कम नहीं है। अभिभावकों का आरोप है कि राइट टू एजुकेशन (RTE) के तहत जब स्कूलों में आवेदन करते हैं, तो अधिकतर स्कूल्स द्वारा उनके बेवसाइट पर RTE के बारे में कुछ जानकारी ही उपलब्ध नहीं है। इसके चलते अभिभावकों में उलझन हैं। इसके चलते ऑनलाइन ऐडमिशन का पहला दिन ही अभिभावकों के लिए परेशानी भरा रहा। गौरतलब है कि RTE को लेकर बीएमसी और शिक्षण विभाग में अनबन चल रही है। इस वजह से RTE के मुद्दे पर दोनों विभाग एक दूसरे पर लापरवाही का आरोप लगाते हुए आधिकारिक बयान से देने से कन्नी काट रहे हैं। 8 हजार सीटें के लिए 30 अप्रैल तक आवेदन किया जा सकता है। इस बाबत अनुदानित शिक्षा बचाव समिति के अध्यक्ष एस. एम. परांजपे द्वारा बीएमसी शिक्षणाधिकारी शुभांगी जोग से मुलाकात करने की बात समिति ने कही है।
-------------------------
पंजिकृत स्कूल: 282
हेल्प सेंटर्स:26
क्लास: नर्सरी, केजी, फर्स्ट क्लास

News Source / Sabhar : economictimes.indiatimes.com (11.04.2014)

Read more...

UP teacher News : प्रधानाचार्य बने बीएसए, छात्रों की पढ़ाई पर संकट

UP teacher News : प्रधानाचार्य बने बीएसए, छात्रों की पढ़ाई पर संकट


UPTET  / टीईटी / TET Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment News   



UPTET PASS GIRL CANDIDATE can JOIN THIS GROUP : https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetgirlsgroup/

UPTET PASS CANDIDATE can JOIN this GROUP :https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetteachersgroup

लखनऊ (ब्यूरो)। पढ़ाने की जिम्मेदारी लेने वाले ही जब खिसक जाएं तो स्कूलों का भगवान ही मालिक है। प्रदेश के राजकीय इंटर कॉलेजों का ऐसा ही हाल है। राजकीय इंटर कॉलेजों के लिए चयनित हुए अधिकतर प्रधानाचार्य बेसिक शिक्षा अधिकारी बनकर जिलों में मजे मार रहे हैं और इनमें पढ़ने वाले छात्रों की शिक्षा भगवान भरोसे चल रही है। प्रदेश में मौजूदा समय 567 इंटर कॉलेजों में अधिकतर में कार्यवाहक प्रधानाचार्य के सहारे काम चलाया जा रहा है।
राजकीय इंटर कॉलेजों में प्रधानाचार्यों के 50 फीसदी पदों पर लोकसेवा आयोग से चयन होता है और 50 फीसदी पदों को पदोन्नति से भरा जाता है। प्रदेश में मौजूदा समय 567 राजकीय इंटर कॉलेज हैं। राजकीय इंटर कॉलेज के प्रधानाचार्यों को बेसिक शिक्षा अधिकारी, जिला शिक्षा एवं प्रशिक्षण संस्थान (डायट) में वरिष्ठ प्रवक्ता और जिलों में एसोसिएट डीआईओएस के पद पर तैनाती दी जा सकती है। प्रधानाचार्य बनने वाले का शुद्ध काम बच्चों की शिक्षा पर ध्यान देना होता है। डायट में वरिष्ठ प्रवक्ता का काम बीटीसी का प्रशिक्षण देना होता है, जबकि बीएसए और एसोसिएट डीआईआएस के पद पर तैनाती पाने वाले मजे मारते हैं। इसलिए आयोग से चयनित होने वाले काफी संख्या में प्रधानाचार्य जुगाड़ के सहारे बीएसए या फिर प्रभारी डीआईओएस बने हुए हैं। इसके चलते राजकीय इंटर कॉलेजों की पढ़ाई भगवान भरोसे चल रही है।


567 कॉलेजों में अधिकतर में कार्यवाहक प्रधानाचार्य
दस वर्षों से डीपीसी नहीं
राजकीय इंटर कॉलेज के कुल पदों में आधे पर सीधी भर्ती होती है और आधे को पदोन्नति के माध्यम से भरा जाता है। प्रदेश में आखिरी बार वर्ष 2003 में विभागीय पदोन्नति कमेटी (डीपीसी) की बैठक बुलाई गई थी। इसके बाद से डीपीसी नहीं हुई है। विभागीय जानकारों की मानें तो मौजूदा समय 400 से अधिक राजकीय इंटर कॉलेजों में कार्यवाहक प्रधानाचार्य हैं। इससे राजकीय इंटर कॉलेजों में छात्रों की पढ़ाई प्रभावित हो रही है।
नहीं हो रही सुनवाई
राजकीय इंटर कॉलेजों में प्रधानाचार्य के रिक्त पदों को भरने के लिए डीपीसी की मांग लगातार की जा रही है। शासन ने इस संबंध में लोकसेवा आयोग को पत्र लिखकर डीपीसी की बैठक बुलाने के लिए समय मांगा था, लेकिन समय नहीं दिया जा रहा है। दस वर्षों से डीपीसी न होने की वजह से साल दर साल प्रधानाचार्य रिटायर होते जा रहे हैं और कार्यवाहक की तैनाती हो रही है। इससे पढ़ाई पर असर पड़ रहा है। पारस नाथ पांडेय, अध्यक्ष राजकीय शिक्षक संघ


Read more...

UPPSC RESULT : जून तक घोषित होंगे आयोग के सभी रिजल्ट

UPPSC RESULT : जून तक घोषित होंगे आयोग के सभी रिजल्ट
सबसे पहले लोअर-2009 मुख्य परीक्षा का घोषित होगा परिणाम


इलाहाबाद। पीसीएस-2013 प्रारंभिक परीक्षा के रिजल्ट में देरी तथा इसको लेकर लगाई जा रहीं अटकलों पर जल्द ही विराम लगेगा। योजना सफल हुई तो पीसीएस-2013 ही नहीं समीक्षा अधिकारी / सहायक समीक्षा अधिकारी तथा लोअर सबऑर्डिनेट के रिजल्ट भी जून तक घोषित हो जाएंगे। फिलहाल लोअर सबऑर्डिनेट-2009 मुख्य परीक्षा के रिजल्ट का इंतजार है। इसका परिणाम अगले महीने घोषित होने की उम्मीद है। आयोग सूत्रों के मुताबिक इसी वजह से अभी तक इस साल होने वाली परीक्षाओं का कै लेंडर भी जारी नहीं किया गया है।
उत्तर प्रदेश लोक सेवा आयोग की पीसीएस-2013 प्रारंभिक परीक्षा पिछले साल जून में हुई थी लेकिन अभी तक रिजल्ट घोषित नहीं किया गया है। इसको लेकर प्रतियोगियों में कई तरह की चर्चा है। उनका कहना है कि आयोग ने आरक्षण की त्रिस्तरीय व्यवस्था लागू करने की एक बार फिर योजना बनाई है। इंतजार लोकसभा चुनाव समाप्त होने का है। इसी वजह से रिजल्ट घोषित नहीं हो रहा। हालांकि आयोग के अफसर इसका खंडन कर रहे हैं। सूत्र के अनुसार आयोग ने अब सत्रवार रिजल्ट घोषित करने की योजना बनाई है। इसके तहत सबसे पहले लोअर सबऑर्डिनेट-2009 मुख्य परीक्षा का रिजल्ट घोषित करने की तैयारी है। इससे पहले लोअर सबऑर्डिनेट-2008 का फाइनल रिजल्ट घोषित होने की उम्मीद है। इसका इंटरव्यू जारी है। इनके बाद पीसीएस-2013, समीक्षा अधिकारी / सहायक समीक्षा अधिकारी-2013 तथा लोअर सबऑर्डिनेट-2013 प्रारंभिक परीक्षा के रिजल्ट घोषित किए जाएंगे। अफसरों का कहना है कि जून तक सभी रिजल्ट घोषित किए जाने की तैयारी है। उनका यह भी कहना है कि मार्च 2015 से पहले इन भर्तियों के फाइनल रिजल्ट घोषित करने की भी योजना है।

News Source / Sabhaar : Amar Ujala (27.04.2014)
Read more...

Ordnance Factory Kanpur Recruitment 2014 Apply www.ofkanpur.gov.in 267 Posts

Sarkari Naukri Damad India. Latest Upadted Indian Govt Jobs - http://sarkari-damad.blogspot.com

Ordnance Factory Kanpur Recruitment 2014 Apply

 Ordnance Factory, Kanpur
Group-C Various Posts Recruitment 2014 Apply
Official Website: www.ofkanpur.gov.in


Indian Ordnance Factories, kanpur have declared a latest notification of Group C jobs and the organization is looking for the candidates who have Industrial Training Institute (ITI) in the relevant field of Turner, Fitter, Machinist. According to Ordnance Factory Kanpur Recruitment 2014, the organization is inviting applications from Indian citizens to fill up Fitter – 45, Machinist- 160 and Turner – 45 and who had posses ITI Certificates, Engineering in Diploma, Degree in Engineering. To get more information on Ordnance Factory Kanpur Notification 2014, the candidates are requested to visit the official site www.ofkanpur.gov.in.
The official notifications also mention the age details of the applying candidates, i.e., 18 to 33 years. The application fee for General and Unreserved Category should have to pay Rs.50/- and there is a fee exemption of SC/ ST / Ex-Serviceman/ Physically challenged & Women. The applied candidates will be strictly selected based on Written Test and Personal Interview. The mode of payment for IOF Kanpur ITI vacancies 2014 of application fee should be paid via online only by visiting www.ofkanpur.gov.in before the enclosed date 09th May 2014. The aspirants would download the application form from an official site www.ofkanpur.gov.in and fill up the entire details of the applicant along with all Testimonials and should be forwarded to the official address which is given in the notification “The Sr. General Manager,Ordnance Factory, Kalpi Road, Kanpur (UP) Pin-208 009″.

No. of Posts: 267
S.No Name of the Post No. of Vacancies
01 Fitter 45
02 Machinist 160
03 Turner 45


Name of the Organization: Ordnance Factory, Kanpur
Name of the Post: Group-C Various Posts
Total Number of Posts: 267 Posts
Name and Number of Posts:
1. Fitter General: 45 Posts
2. Machinist: 160 Posts
3. Turner: 62 Posts
Age Limit: Candidates age should be between 33 to 35 yrs. age relaxation as per government rules.
Educational Qualification: Candidates must have possess Engineering Degree, Engineering Diploma, Matriculation and NCTVT Certificate from recognized university/board.
Application Fee: Unreserved category candidates will have to pay the fee for Rs.
Pay Scale: Rs.5200/- to Rs.20200/- with grade pay Rs.1800/-
Selection Process: Candidates selection should be based on the performance in written examination and Trade Test.
How to Apply: Eligible or Interested candidates can apply through online official website www.ofkanpur.gov.in. Required to send their application forms with all documents following given below address on or before 9th May 2014.
Address:
The Sr. General Manager,
Ordinance Factory, Kalipi Road,
Kanpur (UP) PIN-2008 009.
Important Dates:
Starting Date for submission of online application: 17-04-2014
Closing Date for submission of online application: 09-05-2014
Last Date for receipt of application: 15-05-2014
Read more...

Saturday, April 26, 2014

News : लूटने के लिए नहीं है सरकारी फंड’

News : लूटने के लिए नहीं है सरकारी फंड’


यूपी में राष्ट्रीय स्वास्थ्य बीमा योजना में करोड़ों की हेराफेरी के बारे में हाईकोर्ट ने की टिप्पणी

कोर्ट ने केंद्र सरकार के तर्क को खारिज करते हुए कहा कि अगर केंद्र सरकार के हाथ बंधे हुए हैं तो किसके हाथ खुले हैं? यह आपकी योजना है। अगर आपके हाथ बंधे हैं तो इसे बंद कर दीजिए।

नई दिल्ली। सरकारी फंड लूटने के लिए नहीं होता। यह तल्ख टिप्पणी हाईकोर्ट ने उत्तर प्रदेश में राष्ट्रीय स्वास्थ बीमा योजना के करोड़ों रुपयों की हेराफेरी के संबंध में की है। कोर्ट ने केंद्र सरकार को सरकारी फंड की लीकेज रोकने का निर्देश दिया है।
जस्टिस मनमोहन की पीठ ने निर्देश जारी करते हुए कहा कि अगर अगली सुनवाई तक सरकारी फंड की लीकेज नहीं रुकी तो स्वास्थ्य सचिव के खिलाफ अवमानना की कार्रवाई शुरू की जाएगी। मामले की अगली सुनवाई 11 नवंबर को होगी।
पीठ ने सरकार को फटकार लगाते हुए कहा कि आपकी योजना का दुरुपयोग हो रहा है। आप अपनी आंखें बंद नहीं कर सकते। सरकारी फंड की लूट को रोकिए। अगर आप ऐसा नहीं कर सकते तो फंड वापस ले लीजिए।
केंद्र सरकार व बीमा कंपनियों को निर्देश जारी करते हुए पीठ ने कहा कि करोड़ों रुपये लीक हो चुके हैं। इसे रोकने के लिए केंद्र सरकार व बीमा कंपनियों को कदम उठाना है। यह जानकारी स्वास्थ सचिव को दें।
कोर्ट का यह निर्देश यूपी सरकार की उस रिपोर्ट के बाद आया है जिसमें इस योजना में धांधली की पुष्टि जांच में हुई है। यूपी सरकार ने योजना में घोटाले की जांच के लिए पैनल बनाया था जिसने अपनी रिपोर्ट में घोटाले की बात कही है।
यूपी सरकार ने कोर्ट को बताया कि इस बाबत 22 मार्च को उन लोगों के खिलाफ मुकदमा दर्ज किया गया है जो फर्जी कार्ड जारी के लिए जिम्मेदार थे।
हलफनामे में यह भी कहा गया है कि योजना को लागू करने में सरकार को पेश आ रही परेशानियों की जानकारी पत्र द्वारा केंद्र सरकार को भेज दी गई हैं। केंद्र सरकार ने अपना पक्ष रखते हुए कहा कि उसके हाथ बंधे हुए हैं। इस मामले में जिम्मेदार लोगों के खिलाफ कार्रवाई करना राज्य सरकार की जिम्मेदारी है।
कोर्ट ने केंद्र सरकार के तर्क को खारिज करते हुए कहा कि अगर केंद्र सरकार के हाथ बंधे हुए हैं तो किसके हाथ खुले हैं? यह आपकी योजना है। अगर आपके हाथ बंधे हैं तो इसे बंद कर दीजिए



News Source / Sabhaar : Amar Ujala / अमर उजाला ब्यूरो / http://epaper.amarujala.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20140426a_004101007&ileft=129&itop=357&zoomRatio=130&AN=20140426a_004101007(26.04.2014)
Read more...

Karnataka Teacher Eligibility Test 2014: Applications available on official website www.schooleducation.kar.nic.in

Karnataka Teachers Eligibility Test - 2014
K-TET : Karnataka Teacher Eligibility Test 2014: Applications available on official website


Karnataka Teacher Eligibility Test :

Karnataka Teachers Eligibility Test - 2014

Important dates:
Closing date for registration: May 3, 2014
Last date for the payment of the online application fee: May 5, 2014
Availability of admit card: May 16, 2015- May 25, 2014
Date of examination: June 1, 2014


Date for Submission of On-Line Application: 20.04.2014 to 03.05.2014
Last date for submission of On-line Application:03.05.2014



The Government of Karnatka has invited applications from eligible candidates for Karnataka Teachers Eligibility Test 2014. Interested and eligible candidates should apply for the exam before May 3, 2014.

Eligibility criteria:

For Classes 1-5 teachers: Primary stage (Paper I)

The applicant should have passes PUC/ Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50 per cent marks and should have passed or appearing in the final year of the two year Diploma in Elementary Education. Or

The applicant should have passes PUC/ Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50 per cent marks and must have passed or appearing the final year of four year Bachelor of Elementary Education (B.El.Ed). Or

The applicant must have completed his or her Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50 per cent marks and should have passed or appearing in the final year of the two year Diploma in Education. Or

The applicant should have done his or her B.A/ B.Sc Graduation and passed or appearing in the final year of the two year Diploma in Elementary Education.

For Classes 6-8 teachers: Elementary stage (Paper II)

The applicant should have done his or her B.A/ B.Sc Graduation and passed or appearing in the final year of the two year Diploma in Elementary Education. Or

The applicant should have done his or her B.A/ B.Sc Graduation with at least 50 per cent marks and passed or appearing in the one year Bachelor in Education (B.Ed). Or

The applicant should have passes PUC/ Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50 per cent marks and must have passed or appearing the final year of four year Bachelor of Elementary Education (B.El.Ed). Or

The applicant should have passes PUC/ Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50 per cent marks and should have passed or appearing in the final year of the four year B.A/ B.Sc.Ed or B.A. Ed/ B.Sc.Ed. Or

The applicant should have done his or her B.A/ B.Sc Graduation with at least 50 per cent marks and passed or appearing in one year B.Ed.

For class 1-8 teachers: Elementary stage (Paper I and II)

The applicant should have passes PUC/ Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50 per cent marks and must have passed or appearing the final year of four year Bachelor of Elementary Education (B.El.Ed). Or

The applicant should have done his or her B.A/ B.Sc Graduation with at least 50 per cent marks and passed or appearing in the final year of two year Diploma in Elementary Education.

Exam details:

The KARTET exam is of Multiple Choice Type (MCQ). Each correct answer carries one mark and there is no negative marking awarded for a wrong answer. Te exam will be conducted in English and Kannada.

The KARTET consists of two papers:

1.    Paper I: This paper is meant for applicants who wish to be a teacher for Classes 1-5.
2.    Paper II: This paper is meant for applicants who wish to be a teacher for Classes 6-8.

Note: Applicants who wish to teach both levels (classes 1-5 and 6-8) are required to appear for both the papers.

Examination fee:

The applicants are supposed to pay a fee of Rs 500/- for Paper I or II (Rs 250/- for reserved category) and Rs 800/- for both the papers (Rs 400/- for reserved category). The applicants are suppose to make the payment using a computer generated Challan by depositing the prescribed fee in cash in CSC Account in State Bank of Mysore.
Read more...

72825 Teacher Recruitment : 50% Reservation Meaning

72825 Teacher Recruitment : 50% Reservation Meaning


UPTET  / टीईटी / TET Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment News   


UPTET PASS GIRL CANDIDATE can JOIN THIS GROUP : https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetgirlsgroup/

UPTET PASS CANDIDATE can JOIN this GROUP :https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetteachersgroup

72825 Teacher Recruitment, Counseling of 72825 Teacher as per Supreme Court Order, UP-TET 2011,

आजकल सोशल मीडिया लोग भ्रामक प्रचार करने में लगे हुए हैं -
कि ५०% सामान्य का मतलब सिर्फ सामान्य वर्ग

ऐसा नहीं है , 50 % सामान्य जाती की सीटों का मतलब -
मान लो 100 उम्मीदवारों की जगह खाली है तो पहली 50 सीटें (टॉप रेंकर्स की ) सभी जातियों के लिए हैं भले ही वह आरक्षित वर्ग का उम्मेदवार हो ।

यह जरूर हो सकता है की किसी अच्छे जिले में आरक्षित वर्ग की काम कट - ऑफ़ पर अच्छा अवसर मिल जाये
जो भी हो सोच समझ कर आपको फैसला लेना है और बेस्ट ऑप्शन चुनना है, जीवन आपका है , मौका आपका है

यहाँ ध्यान देने की बात है की काउंसलिंग किस प्रकार की होती है - एक सेंट्रलाइज्ड काउंसलिंग या फिर अलग अलग दिनों में अलग अलग जिलों की काउंसलिंग , सारी बात इस पर निर्भर करेगी

यह भी ध्यान देना होगा की प्राथमिक शिक्षक भर्ती जिला संवर्ग की है मतलब जिस  जिले में चयन होगा , उस जिले से बहार पोस्टिंग नहीं मिल पाएगी

अगर उपरोक्त विवरण देने में मुझसे कुछ गलती हो तो सुधर के लिए कमेन्ट के मध्यम से सूचित करें


Read more...

72825 Teacher Recruitment

72825 Teacher Recruitment

सोशल मीडिया पर छाई लखीम पुर खीरी की एक विज्ञप्ति के अनुसार -

UPTET  / टीईटी / TET Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment News   


Teacher Recruitment ke Liye - Document Scanning kee Quotation Mangee Hai :

Please Check & Cross Verify Above Quotation in Relevant / Local News papers / Concerned Department.
Read more...

Friday, April 25, 2014

UP Police SI Sub-Inspector Recruitment : यू पी सरकार के लिए एक और झटका , पुलिस भर्ती 19 मई 2011 के विज्ञापन के अनुसार करनी होगी , एस एल पी ख़ारिज

Shocking News for UP Govt, SLP Dismissed , Police Recruitment Should be completed according to Advertisement 19 May 2011

UP Police, UP Police SI Sub-Inspector Recruitment,




एस एल पी ख़ारिज , अब उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार को पुलिस सब इंस्पेक्टर की भर्ती 19 मई 2011 को निकाले गए विज्ञापन से शीघ्रता से करनी होगी
 

मामला पुलिस भर्ती के अभ्यर्थीयों द्वारा दौड़ की लम्बाई को लेकर है
जिसमें उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार द्वारा दौड़ की लम्बाई 10 किलो मीटर से घटा कर लगभग आधी 4 . 8 किलोमीटर कर दी गयी थी , (कारण किसी अभ्यर्थी की मृत्यु को बताया गया था )
कोर्ट ने बोला की अधिकांश अभ्यर्थीयों ने इस 10 किलो मीटर की दौड़ को पूरा किया और पुलिस भर्ती के लिए अभ्यर्थीयों की शारीरिक दक्षता अच्छी होनी चाहिए , किसी एक अभ्यर्थी की मृत्यु अप्रत्याशित घटना थी
दुसरी सबसे महत्वपूर्ण बात (जिस पर सम्पूर्ण फैसला टिका ) - खेल के नियम बीच में स्वेच्छा से नहीं बदले जा सकते




 Judgment reserved on 27.3.2014
Judgment delivered on 25.4.2014
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE NO.292 OF 2014
State of UP & ors vs. Vindhyavasini Tiwari & ors
Hon'ble Sunil Ambwani, J.
Hon'ble Dr. Satish Chandra, J.
1.
This intra court Special Appeal under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 is directed against the judgment of learned Single Judge dated 9.12.2013 by which he has
quashed the Government Order dated 3.9.2013 and the consequential order dated 24.9.2013 cancelling the entire proceeding of selection/recruitment, initiated vide advertisement dated 19.5.2011 by the UP Police Recruitment and Promotion Board, Lucknow on 3698 substantive posts of Sub Inspector (Civil Police), and 312 posts of Platoon Commander in Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC). Learned Single Judge has directed the State respondents to complete
recruitment commencing from the stage it was stopped, in accordance with the rules as they stood before 5 th Amendment Rules, 2013 expeditiously but not later than three months from the date of
production of a certified copy of the order before the respondents competent authority.

2. We have heard Shri Piyush Shukla, Standing Counsel appearing for the State appellants. Shri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri K.M. Asthana and Shri Seemant Singh
have appeared for the respondents, who were petitioners in the writ petitions.

3. Brief facts giving rise to this Special Appeal are that prior to enforcement of U.P. Sub Inspector and Inspector (Civil Police) Service Rules, 2008, and U.P. Pradeshik Armed Constabulary
2 Subordinate Officers Service Rules, 2008, the recruitment to Civil Police and PAC was governed by the executive instructions issued from time to time. The Rules made in the year 2008 separately for
the Sub Inspector and Inspector (Civil Police) and PAC were notified on 2.12.2008. The U.P. Sub Inspector and Inspector (Civil Police) Service Rules, 2008 has thereafter undergone seven amendments upto 11.12.2013, whereas the U.P. Pradeshik Armed Constabulary Subordinate Officers Service Rules, 2008 has undergone four amendments. In this Special Appeal we are concerned with the 1st  Amendment dated 2.4.2009 and the Corrigendum dated 10.6.2009, issued to 1st
Amendment dated 2.4.2009 amending Rule 15 and the 5th Amendment dated 1.3.2013 by relaxing the standard of Physical Efficiency Test in Column No.II (e) in the Rules of 2008; applicable
to recruitment of Sub Inspector and Inspector in Civil Police, whereby the following amendment was carried out:-
(e) Physical Efficiency Test – The candidates who are declared successful in the preliminary written test under clause (d) shall be required to appear in a Physical Efficiency Test of qualifying nature.
The male candidates shall be required to complete a run of 4.8 kilometers in 35 minutes and the female candidates a run of 2.4 kilometers in 20 minutes. The procedure for conducting the Physical
Efficiency Test shall be such as prescribed in Appendix-2.”

4. Similarly the 3rd Amendment dated 6.6.2013 under Rule 18 of the U.P. Pradeshik Armed Constabulary Subordinate Officers Service Rules, 2008, has carried out amendments to the same effect relaxing the criteria for the distance and time of run in the physical efficiency test.


5. An advertisement was published on 19.5.2011 by the State Government through U.P. Police Recruitment and Promotion Board, Lucknow for recruitment of 3698 substantive posts of Sub Inspector (Civil Police) including 1849 posts in General Category; 998 in 3 Other Backward Classes, 777 in Scheduled Castes and 74 in Scheduled Tribes. The advertisement also included recruitment of
312 substantive posts of Platoon Commander in PAC including 156 in General Category, 84 in Other Backwar Classes, 66 in Scheduled Castes, and 6 in Scheduled Tribes.

6. In the second column of the advertisement the recruitment procedure was prescribed to be undertaken in six steps namely (1) Physical Standard Test; (2) Preliminary Written Examination; (3)
Physical Efficiency Test; (4) Main Written Examination; (5) Group Discussion and (6) Medical Examination. The candidates, who meet the minimum of physical standards could appear in the preliminary written examination in which they were required to secure 50% marks to be eligible for the next step for physical efficiency test.

Clause 2.6 of the advertisement provided for the standard of physical efficiency test of qualifying nature. The candidates, who are declared successful in this test, are eligible to appear in the main written examination. Clause 2.6 further provided that male candidates will be expected to complete 10 kilometres race in 60 minutes and female candidates 5 kilometres race in 35 minutes in accordance with the then prevailing Rules of 2008. Steps 1, 2 and 3 are qualifying in nature. The candidates fulfilling the prescribed minimum physical standard; securing 50% marks in the preliminary written examination and completing the physical efficiency test, were eligible to appear in the further steps in the selection.

7. The physical standard test was held and carried out as per advertisement in September-October, 2011 after which the preliminary written test was held on 11.12.2011, in which approximately 2,70,000 candidates appeared. The result of the preliminary written test was declared on 1.1.2013 in which 39,315 candidates qualified to appear in the next qualifying level. The physical efficiency test was scheduled to be held between 5.2.2013 to 22.2.2013.

8. On 18.2.2013 one of the candidates namely Satendra Kumar Yadav, while appearing in the physical efficiency test of the run of 10 kilometres, died while running, before completing the test. The matter was widely published in media, on which on 20.2.2013 an order was issued by the Secretary, Government of UP, to the Chairman of UP Police Recruitment & Promotion Board directing that since one of the candidates had died after he had fallen on the ground, while taking part in the physical efficiency test, the physical efficiency test, which is a part of the selection, is postponed for a period of one month.


9.On a request made by the Chairman, UP Police Recruitment and Promotion Board, Lucknow on 14.3.2012 the Secretary, Government of UP vide his letter dated 11.4.2013 directed him to
complete the selection process according to UP Sub Inspector and Inspector (Civil Police) Service (5
th Amendment) Rules, 2013 notified on 1.3.2013, for the remaining candidates, who had not
completed the test or who were declared unsuccessful or were absent in the physical efficiency test. Consequently a notice/notification was published on 27.6.2013 directing all the candidates, who had not participated in the physical efficiency test or who were declared unsuccessful and were absent to complete the physical efficiency test. The notification provided the revised standards in accordance
with the 5th Amendment to the Rules of 2008, namely that the male candidates will be required to complete a run of 4.8 kilometres in 35 minutes and the female candidates a run of 2.4 kilometres in 20 minutes.


10. A Service Single No.91 of 2013 (Kendra Kunwar vs. State of UP and others) was filed at Lucknow Bench of this Court. The 5 petitioner in the writ petition was declared unsuccessful in the
physical efficiency test. Learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner after participating in the selection was declared unsuccessful in the preliminary written test
and thus he has no right to challenge the procedures adopted in the selection.

11. In another Writ A No. 36383 of 2013 (Rajesh Kumar vs. State of UP & another) challenging the notification by which the 5th Amendment to the Rules of 2008 was carried out on 27.6.2013 with
regard to the standards of physical efficiency test, learned Single Judge passed following orders:-
“Hon'ble Devendra Pratap Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Yadav, Learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents.
Sri Yadav prays for and is granted three weeks further time to file counter affidavit.
The petitioners in this petition and the petitioners of the connected writ petitions had applied for direct recruitment to the post of Sub-Inspector in accordance with the advertisement issued in 2011 under the Uttar Pradesh Sub-Inspector and Inspector (Civil Police) Service Rules,2008. They were subjected to physical standard test and preliminary written test and thereafter in the physical efficiency test and all of them cleared the three stages of recruitment. However, a notification was issued on 27.6.2013 amending the rules with regard to physical efficiency test which has been challenged.
The recruitment to the post of Sub-Inspector is by direct recruitment and from rankers.
It is evident that the recruitment process had been initiated and it is settled law that once recruitment process had begun, rules cannot be amended so far as that recruitment is concerned, as rules of the game cannot be altered midway and the respondents cannot invoke the power of rule 28 so far as the direct recruits are concerned.
Accordingly, the respondents are restrained from proceeding further on the basis of altered physical efficiency criteria. However, it would be open for them to carry on that recruitment on the basis of the old 6 rules or if they are so advised, the entire recruitment may be undertaken in accordance with the new criteria but following the law on the issue.
It is clarified that this interim order does not relate to promotion of rankers to the post of Sub-Inspector.
List after three weeks.
Order Date :- 11.7.2013”



12. On 13.7.2013 in compliance with the interim order passed by this Court on 11.7.2013 in Writ A No.36383 of 2013 (Rajesh Kumar vs. State of UP & another) a decision was taken by the Chairman of the UP Police Recruitment & Promotion Board in a meeting in which Director General of Civil Police, and the Director General of PAC participated, that in view of the incident of death in the physical efficiency test and considering the directions issued by the High Court, in public interest, the selection procedure be started afresh and that the vacancies, which have arisen upto June, 2015 on account of promotion/retirement may also be included in the new notification.


13. In pursuance to the resolution in the meeting of the UP Police Recruitment & Promotion Board, a decision was taken by the State Government on 3.9.2013 to cancel the entire proceedings of
selection/recruitment initiated by the advertisement dated 19.5.2011, and to start the selection process afresh including vacancies upto June, 2015.


14. The Writ Petition No.17372 of 2013 connected with Writ Petition No.36383 of 2013 (Rajesh Kumar vs. State of UP & another) was dismissed as having become infructuous on the ground that the selections have been cancelled. The interim order dated 11.7.2013 merged in the final order.


15. The State Government has not yet announced the fresh 7 selections so far. In the meantime the petitioners, who are respondents in this Special Appeal filed Writ A No.57576 of 2013 (Vindhyavasini Tiwari and 4 ors vs. State of UP & 2 ors); Writ A No.63093 of 2013 (Manjit Krishna and 16 ors vs. State of UP & 2 ors) and Writ A No.60538 of 2013 (Arvind Kumar vs. State of UP &
2 ors). Learned Single Judge considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the effect of the 5
th Amendment to the Rules of 2008 by which the standard of physical efficiency test were altered and
held that the amendments carried out in the Rules of 2008, do not show that the amended Rules will govern the recruitment. The State Government by Office Memorandum dated 27.6.2013 notified
recommencing of the physical efficiency test on 7.7.2013, providing that besides remaining candidates who were yet to participate in the physical efficiency test in the recruitment process, even failed candidates and absentees would be permitted to complete the physical efficiency test as per amended rules i.e. reduced length of run as also altered period within which the run had to be completed.
While rejecting the challenge to the vires of the amendments made by the 5th Amendment of 2013 and the 3rd Amendment Rules of 2013 for recruitment to Sub Inspector (Civil Police) and Platoon
Commander in PAC, he held that in the matter of recruitment and appointment the recruitment procedure as was available on the date of occurrence of vacancy must be followed to fill in the advertised vacancies, unless and until the changed procedure or alteration or amendment in the rules has been specifically made retrospective, so as to govern the on going recruitment. When a vacancy occurs the general principle is that it must be filled in according to the procedures applicable at the time when the vacancy occurred.


16. Learned Single Judge relied on Y.V. Rangaiah and ors vs. J. Sreenivasa Rao and ors AIR 1983 SC 852; A.A. Calton vs. the Director of Education and another AIR 1983 SC 1143; P.Ganeshwar Rao and others vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and others AIR 1988 SC 2068; B.L. Gupta and another vs. M.C.D.,1998 (9) SCC 223; State of Rajasthan vs. R. Dayal 1997 (10) SCC 419; Arjun Singh Rathore and ors vs. B.N. Chaturvedi and ors (2007) 11 SCC 605; State of Punjab and ors vs. Arun Kumar
Aggarwal and ors 2007 (5) SLR 237 and a Division Bench judgment of this Court, which has followed the aforesaid decisions, in which it was held that the vacancies existing in 2011 in respect
whereof the advertisement was published on 19.5.2011, deserved to be dealt with in accordance with rules as applicable at that time. The subsequent prospective amendments would not govern the selections.
The selections for the vacancies, which have arisen after 2011 may be made in accordance with the rules as amended by 5 th Amendment to the rules in the year 2013 and the 3 rd Amendment to the rules applicable to PAC in the same year of 2013.


17. On the second issue as to whether the competent authority can cancel a recruitment process at any stage unless the decision taken is non-arbitrary and for valid reasons, learned Single Judge held that
the only reason assigned in the case is that of interim order dated 11.7.2013 passed in the Writ Petition No.36383 of 2013 (Rajesh Kumar vs. State of UP & ors). The decision, when analysed in depth would show that the respondents have completely misdirected themselves. They have misread the interim order dated 11.7.2013 in which learned Single Judge added the words “but following law on the issue”. The respondents did not look into nor considered whether it was permissible in law to continue with the recruitment under the old rules, and decided to cancel the entire selections. The decision was not an informed and reasoned decision. He further held that since the interim order gets merged into final order, the decision 9 taken in pursuance to the interim order cannot be accepted.


18.Learned Single Judge also considered the public interest involved, and held that since admittedly more than 39,000 candidates had participated in physical efficiency test, which is the third stage of
recruitment; and in which number of candidates proved their physical efficiency by completing rigorous running test of 10 kilometres for male candidates and 5 kilometres for female candidates successfully as per the old rules, the candidates who have failed had no justification to request for appearing in the re-test; and similarly there was no justification for the candidates, who had failed or had absented in the test to participate in the process.


19. Learned Single Judge thereafter held that those candidates, who have been selected through more rigorous test would be more useful for police force than those who would be selected after reduced standards. In para 57 of the judgement learned Single Judge held as follows:-
“57. Be that as it may, the candidates selected through more rigorous test would be more useful for police force than those who would be selected after reduced standard. It goes beyond comprehension of any person of ordinary prudence how recruitment made with rigorous test, particularly, when the matter relates to uniform force like police, directly responsible besides other for maintenance of
public law and order etc., would be less in public interest than having persons recruited with relaxed or reduced standard.”



20. Learned Single Judge for the aforesaid reasons held that the decision taken by the State Government to cancel the selection process and to re-start the process afresh was entirely arbitrary and against public interest. The argument, that the rigours of the physical efficiency test, were relaxed to save the life of young candidates, was not accepted. He held that the recruitment in question pertains to police force which must answer the best standards of physical 10 strength, endurance, stress, efficiency etc which must be quite higher than the average common man otherwise the members of police force may not be able to perform the kind of job they are supposed to. The
job of a police officer requires courage, valiant, persistent onerous physical stressed duties etc., and therefore, harder standards are needed. These standards have continued for decades together and
have stood the test of time. A large number of candidates have successfully achieved the requisite physical test and when such standards were actually met by large number of candidates, a single
unfortunate incident could not be a ground to cancel the selections.
21.Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State appellants submits that the State Government is competent to frame rules or to make any amendments in the rules. The 5th Amendment to the rules
made in the year 2013 revising the standard of physical efficiency test was not challenged. The State Government did not act arbitrarily in cancelling the selections and to re-advertise the recruitment under the amended Rules. The arbitrariness or unreasonableness by itself was not a ground to challenge the decision of the State Government to cancel the selections. He submits that where the State Government was satisfied that the operation of any rule regulating the conditions of service of persons appointed to service will cause undue hardship in any particular case, it may, notwithstanding anything contained in the rules applicable to the case, by order, dispense with or relax the requirements of that rule to such extent and subject to such conditions as it may consider necessary for dealing with the cases in just and equitable manner.
22.Learned Standing Counsel further submits that the decision of the State Government to cancel the selection process is based on the subjective satisfaction, that it will cause undue hardship in selection
process, where a candidate had died. The relaxation was made in 17 30,000 candidates participated, could not be treated to be rigorous on the death of one candidate. His medical condition was not subjected to any enquiry. The incident, however, was singular and should not have been taken into consideration except for sympathies to his family of the deceased. The incident, without any proper enquiry could not have been taken into account for relaxing the rule by an amendment during the process of selections and for taking a decision to cancel the entire selections in which about 3 lacs candidates had participated.
30. We are informed that on account of delay in the selections and the pendency of the writ petitions, the State Government has not yet started the exercise of making fresh selections causing serious
shortage of police officers at entry level, resulting into deteriorating law and order situation in the State of UP and delay in pending investigations in the criminal cases.
31. In the past the succeeding Governments in the State of UP, have not favoured the recruitment in the police force at the entry level of Constables or Sub Inspectors initiated by the previous Governments. The administration and management of the police force by the Government to their advantage, has been a subject matter of perpetual litigation in courts in the State of UP. The selections of Constables was cancelled twice by succeeding governments in the past resulting into severe shortage of the trained Constables in the State of UP.
32. Every discretionary power in public law has to be structured on objective principles to be exercised with scrupulous care. The powers in public sphere vested in the authorities, for taking administrative decisions is given in order to deal with a case in a just, fair and equitable manner keeping in view the principles of law. The discretion must not be exercised to swallow the objectives for the 18 purposes of which it is vested and to render the basic purpose and object of use of power nugatory.
33.In the case in hand an exercise with more serious consideration and with expert legal advice should have preceded the decision taken by the senior police officers sitting together, to cancel the entire selection. There is nothing to show that they had taken any legal opinion from State Law Officers, on the interim order passed by the Court giving them option to either pursue with the selections under the old rules or to cancel the entire selections. The State appellant has
not placed any material before us that it had taken into consideration the expenditure incurred in the selections advertised in the year 2011, and the public interest to be served in notifying the selections afresh. The expenditure incurred in the selections, the requirement of the police officers at entry level, the aspirations and legitimate expectation of more than 30,000 young men and women of the State,
who had crossed the 3rd  level in the selections, and the absence of any scientific data which was required to be collected from National Sports Colleges or experts in the Sports Medicine has vitiated the decision to cancel the entire selections. The entire exercise is thus held to be wholly arbitrary and unreasonable.
34. We do not find any good ground to interfere with the judgment of learned Single Judge in setting aside the Government Order dated 3.9.2013, and the consequential orders dated 24.9.2013 by which the selections were cancelled.
35. The Special Appeal is dismissed
. The respondents will complete the selection process initiated by advertisement dated
19.5.2011 as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no orders as to cost.
Dt.25.4.2014
RKP/

Source: http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadJudgmentDocument.do?judgmentID=3270056

Read more...

Registered Post Tracking

Registered Post Tracking


  Registered post (starting with "R") can now be tracked just like speed post :

1)Speed post (XX000000000IN)

http://services.ptcmysore.gov.in/Speednettracking/Track.aspx

2)Registered Post (RXXXXXXXXXXIN)

http://services.ptcmysore.gov.in/RNetTracking/


Read more...