UPTET : टीईटी मोर्चा लखनऊ में 12 से छेड़ेगा आंदोलन
फतेहपुर। टीईटी उत्तीर्ण एकता मोर्चा की रविवार को नहर कालोनी में हुई बैठक में शैक्षिक योग्यता के आधार शिक्षकों की चयन व्यवस्था पर नाराजगी जताई गई। बैठक में सरकार के फैसले को न्यायालय की अवमानना करार दिया गया। मोर्चा ने टीईटी की मैरिट के आधार पर शिक्षकों का चयन न कराए जाने पर 12 जुलाई से लखनऊ में आंदोलन करने का निर्णय लिया गया ।
बैठक की अध्यक्षता करते हुए संगठन के जिलाध्यक्ष राजेद्र चौधरी ने कहा सरकार ने शैक्षिक योग्यता के आधार पर शिक्षकों के चयन की बात कही है, जो सरासर गलत है। इस मामले को कोर्ट पहले ही रद्द कर चुका है। कोर्ट ने साफ कहा था कि एनसीटीई का उल्लंघन शिक्षक चयन में कतई नहीं किया जा सकता है।
उन्होंने कहा कि शिक्षकों का चयन टीईटी की मैरिट के आधार पर ही किया जाना चाहिए। उन्होंने आरोप लगाया राज्य सरकार शिक्षक भर्ती चयन प्रक्रिया शुरू करने को लेकर कतई गंभीर नहीं है। ऐसी हालत में टीईटी अभ्यर्थी बार-बार आंदोलन करने के लिए मजबूर हो रहे हैं। अगर 11 जुलाई तक सरकार टीईटी अभ्यर्थियों की भर्ती को लेकर कोई ठोस कदम नहीं उठाती है, तो 12 जुलाई से लखनऊ में एक बार फिर प्रदेशव्यापी आंदोलन किया जाएगा। बैठक में अनिल, कपिल मनीष, फूल सिंह, योगेंद्र, राजकुमार, राजेश सैनी, संतोषपाल, अरुण कुमार, संदीप आदि मौजूद रहे।
News Source : http://www.amarujala.com/city/Fatehpur/Fatehpur-85039-36.html / Amar Ujala ( 9.7.12)
********************************
See also - 9(b) should give weightage to the TET scores in the recruitment process;
however, qualifying the TET would not confer a right on any person for recruitment/employment as it is only one of the eligibility criteria for
appointment
टी ई टी अंकों के सुधार / वृद्धी हेतु , अभ्यर्थी पुन : परीक्षा में बैठ सकते -
See :
Frequency of conduct of TET and validity period of TET certificate :-
11 The appropriate Government should conduct a TET at least once every year. The Validity Period of TET qualifying certificate for appointment will be decided by the appropriate Government subject to a maximum of seven years for all categories. But there will be no restriction on the number of attempts a person can take for acquiring a TET Certificate. A person who has qualified TET may also appear again for improving his/her score.
अगर ये ये पात्रता परीक्षा है, तो अंकों के सुधार का क्या मतलब
***************************
इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट ने साफ शब्दों में कहा कि -
टी ई टी अंकों से चयन , एन सी टी ई के नियमानुसार है व एक बार प्रक्रिया निर्धारित होने के बाद उसका बदला जाना पक्षपात पूर्ण है (जब गेम / प्रक्रिया शुरू हो चुकी हो
See :http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.in/2011/12/uptet-allahabad-highcourt-dismissed.html
9. So far as making of qualifying examination basis of selection is concerned, it is always permissible to the rules framing authority to determine the criteria for selection which may base on the merits of the candidate possessed in various academic qualifications or qualifying test or any other criteria which may otherwise be valid and once it is so determined, unless it can be said that the same amendment in the rule is contrary to any statutory provision or otherwise ultra vires or vitiated in law, the same cannot be interfered.
10. In the result, writ petition lacks merit. Dismissed.
*******************
1. Learned counsel for petitioner, despite repeated query could not clarify as to why he has filed this writ petition and in what manner he intend to challenge the notification dated 7.9.2011 issued by Secretary, U.P. Government, Lucknow(Annexure 2 to writ petition). He contended that Teachers Eligibility Test conducted by Board of Secondary Education has not been conducted in accordance with guidelines laid down by National Council of Teachers Education along with its letter dated 11.2.2011
a generalized and vague manner said that all the persons who have passed the examination are neither qualified nor suitable candidates. This is clearly a derogatory remark not only against the examining body but also against lacs of people who participated in the examination and passed the same. The statement is made in a most careless and reckless manner which, in my view, clearly amounts to abuse of process of laws and, therefore, the writ petition must be dismissed with exemplary cost.
4. Since petitioner is not only guilty of making unfounded aspersions against examining body, but also against the persons who have passed the examination, he must pay exemplary cost. I quantify the cost to Rs. 4.5 lacs.
5. The aforesaid amount shall be paid by petitioner to respondent no. 3 who, after receiving the amount, shall distribute the same amongst all the candidate who have passed the examination finally paying Rs. 1/- to each successful candidate.
5. The aforesaid amount shall be paid by petitioner to respondent no. 3 who, after receiving the amount, shall distribute the same amongst all the candidate who have passed the examination finally paying Rs. 1/- to each successful candidate.
*****************
12th Amendment is illegal, inasmuch as, it makes the marks obtained in Teacher Eligibility Test (hereinafter referred to as "T.E.T.") as the basis for including a person in the list to be prepared by the appointing authority after advertisement issued for appointment which is to be submitted to the Selection Committee though T.E.T. is only eligibility qualification and cannot be a basis for making selection.
who have applied for appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher, shall be prepared and in that preparation of list, T.E.T. marks shall be the criteria. It is like a guideline for ascertaining zone of
consideration and field of eligibility but by itself does not provide any guarantee for appointment.
consideration and field of eligibility but by itself does not provide any guarantee for appointment.
The Rules thus cannot be said to be contrary to NCTE
guidelines.
***********************
