/* remove this */ Blogger Widgets /* remove this */

Sunday, July 8, 2012

Suprme Court turn down Bihar Govt. decision regarding Teachers Appointment


Suprme Court turn down Bihar Govt. decision regarding Teachers Appointment


The appointments follow a prolonged legal battle between the job seekers and the state government which began in 2003, when the RJD was in power. The erstwhile government had advertised vacancies for 34,540 primary teachers but proceeded to appoint untrained teachers. Though there were 1.23 lakh applicants, around 29,000 candidates were rejected by the Staff Selection Commission after scrutiny.


The trained teachers challenged the eligibility criterion in the Patna High Court, which subsequently asked the state government to appoint only trained B.Ed teachers. The government appealed against the ruling in the SC. In 2007, the Nitish Kumar government promised in the SC that it would absorb all the trained teachers as more vacancies were available.


But when it started appointing the teachers on a contractual basis on a consolidated salary, the trained teachers moved the SC and demanded that they be appointed on a permanent basis with the prescribed pay scale. The SC again ruled in their favour.



See Judgment :-
Court : Supreme Court of India



Brief
As indicated in our order dated 9th December, 2009, this Contempt Petition has a background of alleged breach of an undertaking given on 18th January, 2006 and the order passed on the basis thereof on 23rd January, 2006 in SLP(C)Nos.22882- 22888 of 2004. The said undertaking related to the commitment made by the State of Bihar to recruit and fill in the vacant posts of teachers in Primary Schools with trained teachers. The undertaking given by the State of Bihar is in that context and reads as follows : “That in the meantime, it has been decided that trained teachers be recruited on the vacant posts available in the State of Bihar. The Bihar Elementary Teachers Appointment Rules, 2003 having been quashed by the Patna High Court, new recruitment rules are contemplated to facilitate recruitment of trained teachers in a decentralized manner, by giving them age relaxation as ordered by the High Court. That Chapters 6 and 7 of the Bihar Education Code relating to oriental education and hostels and messes will be kept in mind, as directed by the Patna High Court, while making recruitment of teachers. That it is respectfully submitted that since the number of available trained teachers in the State is expected to be less than the available vacancies, no test for selection is required to that extent, a reference to this Bihar Public Service Commission for initiating the process of recruitment of trained teachers may not be necessary, and the order of this Hon’ble Court and of the Patna High Court in this regard may be modified”


Citation
Nand Kishore Ojha Vs. Anjani Kumar Singh
Judgement

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 297 OF 2007
IN
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.22882 OF 2004

Nand Kishore Ojha
Vs.
Anjani Kumar Singh

O R D E R

ALTAMAS KABIR, J.

1. As indicated in our order dated 9th December, 2009, this Contempt Petition has a background of alleged breach of an undertaking given on 18th January, 2006 and the order passed on the basis thereof on 23rd January, 2006 in SLP(C)Nos.22882- 22888 of 2004. The said undertaking related to the commitment made by the State of Bihar to recruit and fill in the vacant posts of teachers in Primary Schools with trained teachers. The undertaking given by the State of Bihar is in that context and reads as follows :
That in the meantime, it has been decided that trained teachers be recruited on the vacant posts available in the State of Bihar. The Bihar Elementary Teachers Appointment Rules, 2003 having been quashed by the Patna High Court, new recruitment rules are contemplated to facilitate recruitment of trained teachers in a decentralized manner, by giving them age relaxation as ordered by the High Court. That Chapters 6 and 7 of the Bihar Education Code relating to oriental education and hostels and messes will be kept in mind, as directed by the Patna High Court, while making recruitment of teachers.
That it is respectfully submitted that since the number of available trained teachers in the State is expected to be less than the available vacancies, no test for selection is required to that extent, a reference to this Bihar Public Service Commission for initiating the process of recruitment of trained teachers may not be necessary, and the order of this Hon’ble Court and of the Patna High Court in this regard may be modified”

2. The said application made for withdrawal of the Special Leave Petition was disposed of by this Court on 23rd January, 2006 on the basis of the submissions made therein.

3. Subsequently, when the State of Bihar failed to abide by its commitments and assurances, the petitioner herein, Nand Kishore Ojha, filed Contempt Petition 297 of 2006, which was disposed of on 19th March, 2007 by the following order :
“In view of the categorical statement now made that the priority will be given to the trained teachers in appointment and also the clarification made in paragraphs 19 to 22 of the aforesaid affidavit dated 7.2.2007, we direct the State of Bihar to implement the undertaking given by the State of Bihar earlier and also now by the present affidavit dated 7.2.2007 in letter and spirit by appointing the trained teachers on priority basis.”

4. Once again on the failure of the State Government to appoint trained teachers as Assistant Teachers in the vacant sanctioned posts carrying a pay-scale, in breach of the undertaking and the assurances given by the Government, the present Contempt Petition was filed. Many applications were made in the Contempt Petition by the trained teachers similarly situated, for being impleaded as parties to the proceedings. Ultimately, the learned Attorney General appeared before us on 25th August, 2009 and assured us that it was not the intention of the State of Bihar to resile from the undertaking given on its behalf, but that the situation had changed over the years, since the undertaking had been given and had become much more complex than was thought of at that point of time. Since no workable solution could be suggested which could satisfy the undertaking given by the State Government and, at the same time, to cause minimum amount of disruption in implementing the same, this Court took note of an advertisement for appointment of Primary Teachers, which was published in December, 2003 and had been struck down by the High Court, for the limited purpose of determining the total number of vacancies which were shown as 34,540. In order to put a quietus to the entire issue, we accepted the figure relating to the vacancies to the posts shown in the advertisement to meet the claims of the trained teachers who were, at the relevant point of time, available for being appointed on a regular basis. Accordingly, notwithstanding the number of trained teachers available, this Court directed that the available 34,540 vacancies shown in the advertisement for appoint of Primary Teachers to be filled up with the said number of trained teachers as a one-timemeasure to give effect to the undertaking which had been given on 18th January, 2006 and 23rd January, 2006. This Court also adjourned the Contempt Petition for implementation of the said order passed by us and for a report to be submitted on the next date as to the result of the discussions held between the petitioner and the concerned authorities.

5. Pursuant to the above directions, the matter was taken up on 6th May, 2010, when an Additional Affidavit affirmed by the Contemnor, Shri Anjani Kumar Singh, was shown to us. The deponent indicated that he was the Principal Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Government of Bihar, and it was mentioned in paragraph 4 of the said Affidavit that 34,540 posts of Assistant Teachers had been created as a one-time-measure for appointment in Elementary Schools of the State of Bihar and to facilitate the process of recruitment, the Bihar Special Elementary Teachers’ Recruitment Rules, 2010, had been prepared and had been approved by the State Cabinet on 2nd February, 2010. On the said basis, it was averred that by creating 34,540 posts of Assistant Teachers, the State of Bihar had complied with the directions given by this Court on 9th December, 2009 as a one-timemeasure.

6. Mr. P.K. Shahi, learned Advocate General for the State of Bihar, took us to the Bihar Special Elementary Teachers’ Recruitment Rules, 2010, hereinafter referred to as “the 2010 Rules”, and pointed out that the same had been framed to give effect to the undertakings given by the State of Bihar and the orders passed by this Court from time to time. The learned Advocate General, therefore, submitted that in view of such compliance, the contempt proceedings were liable to be dropped.

7. Appearing for the Petitioners in Contempt Petition No.297 of 2007, Mr. R.P. Bhatt, learned Senior Advocate, submitted that although apparently it would appear that by the creation of 34,540 posts, the undertakings given on behalf of the State of Bihar and the orders passed by this Court had been duly complied with, in real fact, the same did not reflect the true state of affairs in view of the framing of the 2010 Rules which were in breach and not in compliance with the said undertakings. In particular, it was pointed out that Rule 4 of the said Rules provided that only those candidates who had passed training upto 1st December, 2003, could apply, which effectively debarred those trained teachers who passed training thereafter and were intended to be covered by the order of 6th May, 2010, for appointment as primary teachers. It was also submitted by Mr. Bhatt that teachers who had completed physical education training had not been included in the definition of the expression “training”, as provided in Rule 2(iv), although they too were to be covered by the order passed on 6th May, 2010, and the earlier orders.

8. Mr. L. Nageshwar Rao, learned Advocate, who appeared for some of the Special Leave Petitioners, submitted that the provision for reservation in Rule 6 of the aforesaid Rules would also result in the exclusion of a large number of trained teachers from the general category, since it was not expected that the total number of posts reserved would be filled from amongst trained teachers belonging to the reserved category. Mr. Rao also pointed out that the provision of Rule 9 were also prejudicial to the Petitioners, who even after their appointment would not be paid their salaries unless their certificates were found to be correct. Mr. Rao Submitted that such a condition could result in an indefinite delay in paying the salaries of the persons appointed.

9. Some of the other learned Advocates appearing for the other Petitioners and those candidates who had been permitted to intervene in these proceedings on the basis of their various applications, echoed the submissions made by Mr. Bhatt and Mr. Rao. All of them in one voice have reiterated the submission that all the 34,540 posts which have been created would have to be filled up without leaving any vacancies on the plea of reservation, as had been undertaken by the learned Advocate General for the State of Bihar, Mr. Shahi.

10. We have carefully considered the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties with regard to the affidavit of compliance filed on behalf of the State of Bihar and have also considered the submissions of the learned Advocate General for the State of Bihar with regard to the 2010 Rules.

11. While we appreciate the fact that the number of posts shown in the advertisement published in 2003 amounting to 34,540 have been created to be filled up by trained teachers, it must be said that it was never our intention that the conditions of the advertisement itself, which had been struck down by the High Court, were to be followed by the Bihar State Government. We had made it very clear in our order that we had referred to the advertisement only for the purpose of determining the number of vacancies which would be required to be filled up from amongst the trained teachers. It was very clearly our intention that all the 34,540 posts were to be filled up with trained teachers who were waiting for appointment, in order of seniority. The question of keeping some of the posts vacant on account of non-availability of reserved candidates was never the criterion in the order passed by us on 9th December, 2009. We must add that we are not for a moment suggesting that candidates from the reserved category should not be accommodated as per the reservation policy. What we intended was that after the number of candidates from the reserved category had been accommodated, the rest of the posts were to be filled up from amongst the candidates from the general category.

12. Having regard to the above, we once again direct that the said 34,540 posts, which have been created, be filled up from amongst the trained teachers in order of seniority after providing for appointment of candidates belonging to the reserved category as a one-time measure as indicated in our earlier orders and as also mentioned in the additional affidavit affirmed on behalf of the State of Bihar.

13. We would like it to be appreciated by the State of Bihar that these directions should be complied with within 31st August, 2010, without further delay. Let this matter stand adjourned till 8th September, 2010 at 3.30 p.m. for filing of compliance report.

…………………………………………J.
(ALTAMAS KABIR)
…………………………………………J.
(H.L. DATTU)
New Delhi
Dated : 12.05.2010

Information Source : http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/judiciary/Nand-Kishore-Ojha-Vs-Anjani-Kumar-Singh-2066.asp

*************************
HC directs to appoint teachers in varsities in Bihar


Patna High Court has asked Bihar Government and the Chancellor's secretariat to take steps to fill up all vacant posts of teachers in various universities in the state within 90 days.
A division bench comprising Justices Prakash Chandra Verma and Ahsanuddin Amanullah directed the secretariat of the Chancellor, who is also governor of Bihar, and the state human resource department to make the appointments.
The court acted on a PIL filed by one Vinay Kumar Singh who had pleaded for the court's direction to fill up over 3000 vacant posts of teaching staff in all the universities of Bihar in three months.
The petitioner in his PIL filed in January last year, had alleged that the present crisis of teaching staff in various universities of the state was because of bureaucratic red tape.


News Source : http://www.indianexpress.com/news/hc-directs-to-appoint-teachers-in-varsities-in-bihar/814745/
Indian Express (8.7.11)
*******************************

Bihar Board 34540 Teachers Recruitment 2012

The recruitment process for 34540 teachers will be completed within the time bound manner.Further details are as under:
  •  Publication of district wise list of candidates on website : www.educationbihar.in – 21/01/2012
  •  Verification of original documents  in allotted district for Urdu & Physical Education Subject Candidates – 23 to 25/01/2012
  •  Verification of original documents in allotted district for General  Subject Candidates – 30/01/2012 to 03/02/2012
  • Distribution / Dispatch of Recruitment Letters : (I) Urdu & Physical Education Subjects -  30 to 31/01/2012, and (II)  General Subjects – 06 to 07/02/2012



54 comments:

  1. yadi up gov. ne bhi is bharti mai koi anyaypurn kary kiya to up ki tet bharti mai bhi aapko eaisa hi hc ka faisla sunne ko milega.ashish rajvanshi mzn tet sangharsh morcha jindabad

    ReplyDelete
  2. tet merit se bharti nahi to sc chalo

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tet merit jindabad sc male sci acd 215 tet 103

    ReplyDelete
  4. sc mai jane se abhi koi fayada nahi.pahle soch samajh kar nirnay lo bad me kuch karna

    ReplyDelete
  5. Agar barti is vigyapan se nahi hui to 21000 tet pass over age hone ke karan bharti se out ho jayenge

    ReplyDelete
  6. Phir wo 21000 Sc jaynge aur 100% barti latak jaygi

    ReplyDelete
  7. शिक्षक भर्ती: टेट में 60% से कम अंक तो सामान्य वर्ग
    के पदों पर नहीं होगा चयन जयपुर.थर्डग्रेड टीचर भर्ती (लेवल वन) में हाईकोर्ट ने
    सामान्य वर्ग के पदों पर आरक्षित वर्ग के उन
    अभ्यर्थियों के चयन व नियुक्ति पर रोक लगा दी है,
    जिनके आरटेट परीक्षा में साठ प्रतिशत से कम अंक थे।
    अदालत ने प्रमुख शिक्षा सचिव व प्रमुख पंचायत
    सचिव को नोटिस जारी कर जवाब मांगा है। न्यायाधीश एम.एन.भंडारी ने यह अंतरिम आदेश
    प्रेरणा जोशी की याचिका पर दिया। इसमें कहा गया है
    कि थर्ड ग्रेड टीचर भर्ती परीक्षा के लेवल वन में ऐसे
    अभ्यर्थियों का चयन सामान्य वर्ग में
    किया गया जिनके आरटेट में साठ प्रतिशत से कम अंक
    हैं, जबकि आरक्षित वर्ग के अभ्यर्थियों को सामान्य वर्ग में आरक्षण का लाभ नहीं दिया जा सकता। तृतीय श्रेणी पीटीआई के लिए सीपीएड धारक
    ही योग्य : हाई कोर्ट हाई कोर्ट ने तृतीय श्रेणी पीटीआई (शारीरिक
    शिक्षक) के लिए सीपीएड धारक
    अभ्यर्थियों को ही योग्य माना है। यह आदेश पीटीआई
    भर्ती 2008 को लेकर दिया गया है। अदालत ने परिणाम भी नए सिरे से जारी करने के
    निर्देश दिए हैं। कोर्ट ने सेवा नियमों में संशोधन की 9
    दिसंबर, 2011 को जारी अधिसूचना को भी इस भर्ती में
    मानने से इनकार कर दिया। इस अधिसूचना में सरकार ने
    बीपीएड व डीपीएड धारकों को भी तृतीय
    श्रेणी पीटीआई के लिए योग्य माना था। न्यायाधीश एम.एन. भंडारी ने यह आदेश प्रकाशचन्द
    मीणा व अन्य की याचिकाओं पर दिया। आरपीएससी ने
    3 सितंबर 08 को द्वितीय व तृतीय श्रेणी पीटीआई के
    567 पदों के लिए आवेदन मांगे थे। ये सभी पद एससी और
    एसटी वर्ग के बैकलॉग के थे।

    ReplyDelete
  8. dushyant sir where r u,,
    Ab aage ki planning ke bare me soche aur ... Amal me lane ka pryas kare thanks...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Doston,
    Bihar Primary Teacher bharti me aakhir Supreme Court ne nyay kiya.
    Islie aap nirash na ho aur dugune utsah se aandoln ki taiyaari karen. Dosto nischay hi high court ka faisla hmare pach me aayega ab jarurat hai U.P.gov. pr dabav banane ki jis se 6AUG ko phir U.P. Gov. koi badmaasi na kre. Is liye 12 JULY se LKNW me hone vale maha aandoln me bhaari sankhya me phuche aur gov. Pr dabav banae. Maan ligie ki agar H.C. ka faisla hmare pach me nhi aata hai to hm is k khilaaf S.C. me appeal krenge aur S.C. se hme zarur nyay milega.
    Aapka Saathi...
    ALOK JAUNPURI

    ReplyDelete
  10. yadi sarkar sabhi paheluo per thande dimag se vichar karegi to uski samajh me aajayega ki tet merit se achha koi vikalp nahi he.

    ReplyDelete
  11. दोस्तों
    सरकार की मंशा कोर्ट में टी ई टी पर धांधली बता कर भर्ती को रोकने की है हमें आपसी झगडा छोड़ कर
    साथ साथ मिलकर 12 जुलाई को लखनऊ पहुंचना चाहिए नहीं तो सरकार हमें लड़ाकर टी ई टी 2012 करवा देगी
    और नए बी एड वालों के आने से हमसब टी ई टी 2011 के उम्मीदवारों की नौकरी खतरे में पड़ जाएगी
    हम सब चाहे टी ई टी मेरिट समर्थक हो या एकेडमिक समर्थक सभी सरकार से प्रदेश में खाली 2.56 लाख पदों पर भर्ती की मांग करेगें
    जिससे हमारे लगभग सभी टी ई टी पास 2.70 भाई/बहने सरकारी नौकरी प् सकें तो तैयार हो जाये
    12 जुलाई सुबह 9 बजे चारबाग लखनऊ

    ReplyDelete
  12. specially for alok singh
    do you belong reservation cast you understand my tet mark under 110 then this your wrong think because i have obtain 117 mark in tet but i am acd supporter because i have done work hard during acd period and got 269 acd merit .
    I JUST NOT 3RD DEGREE AS YOU

    ReplyDelete
  13. is prakar tet 100% radd hogi aur primery tet 1 jan 2012 ke bad b.ed. Walo ke liye n.c.t.e. Se permission lena hoga jo bahut hi muskil ya kahe tet nahi hogi.

    ReplyDelete
  14. acd ko log nakal ki merit kahte hai kisi ek tet pass condidate ko savit karke dhikhao to tet merit ke ham sath honge. Tet merit ek tukka tatga shiksha mafio ke vajah se bhi aa gai hai. Jo tet me 130 se 140 paya uski acd merit bhi achchhi hogi.

    ReplyDelete
  15. yadi 2012 me job pana hai to 12 july ko lucknow jarur jana hai.

    ReplyDelete
  16. niymawali me sansodhan ka pratav ban gaya hai c.m. Ko bahar se aate hi cabinet me pass ho jayega kyoki gov. Bahumat me hai tet merit wale voate ke hi samay unke sath nahi the.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Replies
    1. Ha pure jankari to accd supporter k pas hi hai tbhi to puri accd me jugad lga k no. Liya hai.. Arey jis din up board ki comparison cbse icse board se hui up board k accd supporter khud ki aukat pta chal jayegi

      Delete
  18. nokia5233 ye apko kaise pta chala

    ReplyDelete
  19. Mr.nokia wo nai bharti k liye hogi present recruitment to tet merrit se hi hogi

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anoop ji blog pr comeant parne se pata chl raha hai

    ReplyDelete
  21. yadi ye sarkar apna total acd ka faisla nahi badlegi aur tet ko koi imprtance nahin degi to ye vacancy 100% latakni tay hai aur yadi koi result chahiye to 12 ko lucknow jaaiye.

    ReplyDelete
  22. tum swati ji kya chahati ho tumhe apane swart ko bhoolakar v in sab bato se upar uth kar sochana chahiye .tum ladaki hokar esa sochati ho tum mae comman sence nahi he kal parso paraheye ghar jana he kuch lakshan sikh lo tik rahega.
    age ke liye.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Alok kannauj acd best trika h jo log acd aitraaj h s.c chale jaye kuch power cm k pass h jo log tet support h wo log agar tet mein ache mark la skte h to acd merit bhi acchi honi chahiye ek bar tukka lag jane se noukri ki mang krne lage so i think act merit is best jo ki hoke rhega sp jindabad

    ReplyDelete

  24. Nokia 5233 ji,

    Mene apke comments pade, Aur mujhe behad nirasaha huee, jab aapne kaha ki TET ek patrta pariksha hai.
    Aapke kuch comments is prkar hai -
    *********
    " nokia 5233 said...
    Gov.acd merit banaye ya tet radd kare"

    nokia 5233 said...
    is prakar tet 100% radd hogi aur primery tet 1 jan 2012 ke bad b.ed. Walo ke liye n.c.t.e. Se permission lena hoga jo bahut hi muskil ya kahe tet nahi hogi.
    ************


    Aap ek 3rd Grade Principal/Teacher honge, jinhe NCTE ke rules kee hee jaan karee nahin hai.
    Pata nahin hai bhee kee nahin.


    Mein aap se poochna chahtee hoon, jaisa ki aap iljam laga rahe hain ki TET mein tukke se marks aa gaye honge.

    Tukkbaji itnee successful hotee to IIT, CPMT mein ek exam ke through admisssion nahin hote.

    Aapko pata tha TET Exam kitna important hai, tab bhee aap flop show sabit hue.

    Jab fail ho gaye to kahavat hai na - Naach Na Jane Aangan Teda.

    ***********
    Chaleeye aap Acad. se bhrtee kara ke dikha deejiy, I will give you a gr8 honour.
    *************
    Vaise aapka acad. merit kitna hai.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said blog editor ji. Kya in ladko ko ban nahi kiya ja sakta jo blog par ladkiyaan bn kr aate hain?

      Delete
    2. Ku aap bhi sanjay mohan ko paisa diye the kay

      Delete
    3. madam ji ,aise hai ne hum he aise academic support hai jinho ne TET v mahanet se passd kiya Aur academic v mahanet se passed kiya, aise Nahi hai ke academic me padhi to ke Nahi Aur TET me setting kr ke 125 above number archive kiya ,
      Aur maje ke bate to ya hai ke ya bolg v aise fraud logo ke Sath me hai ke

      Delete
  25. Academic merit kewal tab banai jani chahiye jb 2002 ke baad highschool karne walo ka chayan na kiya jaaye. Yahi wo samay tha mulayam singh yadav ne sthayi kendra kar diya tha. Natiztan uske pahle jo pass % lagbhag 25 to 40 rahta tha wo ekdam sthayi centre k karan more than 60% ho gaya. Har school me nakal hui aur pahle jo topper 75 se 80% paate the wahi 85% se upar ho gaye.
    @Mr. Nokia 5233 i have a question for u.
    1=Apne kaha ki 130 se 140 tet merit waale ka acd bhi achchha hona chahiye. Kya yahi baat acd walo k liye sahi nahi hai? Achchhi acd hona yogyata ki gauarantee nahi hai aur tet me ye baat prove ho chuki hai. Kaushambi, shahjahanpur jaise jile nakal k liye badnaam hain aur har dist. me bahut se aise centre hain jinme nakal hoti hai. Aapko demand karni chahiye ki IAS, IPS, BANKS, RAILWAYS Etc. Me exam ki jagah acd se niyukti ki jaye.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Pradeep ji aap sanjay mohan ko paisa diye the kay jo aap ki sirf tet me merit aaye aur acdm. Me nahi aap acdm.aur tet merit ki baat kr rahe hai to mera acdm. Me 269 hai aur tet me 116 mera to dono me no. Aaya aap ka sirf ek me hi ku

    ReplyDelete
  27. Ms/mrs/mr swati ji ye isliye kyoki mere samay me centre sthayi nahi hota tha. Nakal adhyadesh lagoo tha. www.upmsp.nic.in par jaakar purane varsho k result % dekhiye antar khud samajh aa jayega. Mera highschool 1998 aur inter 2000 ka hai. Acd adhik nahi hone ka yahi reason hai aur kuchh nahi. Maine B. Ed. Bhi waha se kiya hai jaha se k baare me sochkar b logo ko pasine aate hai. Mahatma gandhi gramoday university, chitrakoot in 2008. Us saal entrance se selection hua tha aur other state ki seats lagbhag 750 me hi full ho gayi thi. Practical kewal 100 marks ka hota hai. Meri B. Ed. Theory 66% hai aur total B. Ed. Only 67%. Agar practical kahi 300 ya 400 marks ka hota to km se km 5-6% to badh hi jata aur last bharti me mai b select ho jata. My acd only 241.28 gen science tet in primary 129 and in upper primary 114.
    Aur rahi baat sanjay mohan ko paisa dene ki to shayad wo kanpur ka tha aur lucknow se kanpur jyada dur nahi hai. Am i right? I m frm karwi, chitrakoot (u.p.) also qualified for ibps specialist office exam held on 11th march. My scorecard is on my facebook profile search as 'pradeepagro5683@gmail.com'

    ReplyDelete
  28. Replies
    1. Itna hone ke bad aap ka SSC BANK RLY TGT PGT kahi nahi hua........kahi ye no.

      Delete
  29. Mere bhiya ka bhi highschool 1998me GIC LKO se tha aur unka 76 %hai aur voo is samay SBI gonda me PO ke pad pr tainat hai agar aap ka ibps nikla hai to AaP yaha kay kr rahe hai

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. swati ji unke Avhi Tak Kise bank me setting Nahi hue hoge , ya bhul GaI hoge. ke ibps me setting se kam Nahi chale ga Ab bank me v setting karne pade te hai ,

      Delete
  30. SHI ME SWATI NAAM KI KOI LADKI NAHI HAI, SWATI FAKE NAAM HAI BLOG PAR


    I AM DAME SURE

    ReplyDelete
  31. YE ACADEMIC WALE HI BLOG PAR LADKI BAN KAR AATE HAI

    ReplyDelete
  32. in sab problam ka ek hi solution hai ki central govt. apni C.T.E.T.EXAM KO HI ek single exam declare kar de.esse TET ka ek standrd bhi bna rahega. eske alawa koi bhi rajya tet exam nahi karwaye ga nahi to isi trah har state me ye Problem hoti rahegi

    ReplyDelete
  33. madam ji ,aise hai ne hum he aise academic support hai jinho ne TET v mahanet se passd kiya Aur academic v mahanet se passed kiya, aise Nahi hai ke academic me padhi to ke Nahi Aur TET me setting kr ke 125 above number archive kiya ,
    Aur maje ke bate to ya hai ke ya bolg v aise fraud logo ke Sath me hai ke

    ReplyDelete
  34. good swati ji , Aur blog editor ne to academic me v paise khilay Aur TET ke merit. high karwane ke liya paise diya , Nahi to ya editor bank ya ssc me ne hote , TET ke aise taise nahi kr rahe hote,

    ReplyDelete
  35. tet & acd bhaiyo mere blog ka bura n mane hakikat yahi hai jo mene bayan ki.
    rahi bat mere accd. ki to....me TET PRT+ JUNIOR + CTET BHI QUALIFY HUN. lekin me koi bhi bahas acd/tet marks ki nahi karna chahta kyon ki ladege hum aapas me b.ed. bale hi.
    mene B.A. gov.college se kalyan singh k shasan me ki thi. per meri acd. record itna kam nahi mera number to sure hai base koi bhi ho.
    per itna jarur hai ki ye acd bale jo chillate ki acd supoter hai to kya aap k pass koi essi koi yukti hai ki kalyan singh k samay k acd record ko mulayam k samay k acd record ko baraber kar den ( kyoki mulayam ji ne kursi shambhalane k 1 hour bad hi ghoshana kardi ki puri U.P. me sabhi parikshaon me nakal hogi) kya me ye galat kah raha hun.
    aaj bahi mulayam ji k nakal bale hi sabse jyada acd ki mang kar rahe hai.
    agar aap yahi chahte hai to cbse/icse board 78% ki = 65% u.p.se barabari kyon ?
    cbse/icse bale bhi aap ki tarah mahnat karte hai to unki 78% u.p. board k 78% K barabar karbani chahiye.
    par nahin bhai essa mat sochana nahin to U.P.BOARD ka prt teacher all up me kahin bhi dundhane se nahin milega aur sarri acd merit ki kasak nikal jayegi.
    so, best quality is competition....tet is best
    (my think)

    ReplyDelete

Please do not use abusive/gali comment to hurt anybody OR to any authority. You can use moderated way to express your openion/anger. Express your views Intelligenly, So that Other can take it Seriously.
कृपया ध्यान रखें: अपनी राय देते समय अभद्र शब्द या भाषा का प्रयोग न करें। अभद्र शब्दों या भाषा का इस्तेमाल आपको इस साइट पर राय देने से प्रतिबंधित किए जाने का कारण बन सकता है। टिप्पणी लेखक का व्यक्तिगत विचार है और इसका संपादकीय नीति से कोई संबंध नहीं है। प्रासंगिक टिप्पणियां प्रकाशित की जाएंगी।