CTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - -
CTET only as a qualifying examination for appointment of Primary Teachers
and Upper Primary Teachers, cannot provide the sole criteria of marks for
selection of Trained Graduate Teachers (TGTs) in the respondent-KVS
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL - PRINCIPAL BENCH DELHI PASSED ORDER THAT
TET/CTET IS ONLY A QUALIFYING TEST AND ITS MARKS CAN NOT TAKEN FOR
SELECTION CRIETRIA
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH
OA 764/2012 6. OA 888/2012 11. OA 1137/2012
MA 629/2012 MA 735/2012 MA 1698/2012
MA 630/2012 MA 736/2012
MA 1696/2012 MA 1705/2012
OA 783/2012 7. OA 891/2012
MA 659/2012 MA 1695/2012
MA 1702/2012
OA 824/2012 8. OA 920/2012
MA 688/2012 MA 772/2012
MA 1703/2012 MA 1699/2012
OA 866/2012 9 OA 976/2012
MA 1704/2012 MA 1697/2012
5. OA 985/2012 10. OA 990/2012
MA 1701/2012 MA 1700/2012
marks fixed by KVS in C.T.E.T. category wise
1. TGTS Gen. OBC SC ST OH HH VH
ENG. 104 98 92 83 96 98 85
HINDI 98 95 89 89 88 93 90
SANSKRIT 93 90 85 83 - - 104
MATHS 101 93 87 86 99 - -
SCIENCE 104 100 91 82 94 - -
SOCIAL STUDIES 103 101 95 91 98 95 94
2. PRTs 104 98 92 82 94 82 85
Main Part of Judgement ->>>>>
33. In the result, the interviews held from 12.03.2012 to 26.03.2012 by the
respondent-KVS, only on the basis of the marks obtained by the candidates
of the CTET, cannot be held to have been conducted within the notified
Scheme as per the Recruitment Advertisement-cum-vacancy notification issued
by the respondents at the beginning of the selection process in the
Employment News of the week 30.10.2010 to 05.11.2010. An examination which
prescribes 60% or 50% etc. as the passing marks, but does not give due
weightage to any higher marks obtained by candidates above that, and it is
stated to be and meant to be only as a qualifying examination for
appointment of Primary Teachers and Upper Primary Teachers, cannot provide
the sole criteria of marks for selection of Trained Graduate Teachers
(TGTs)
in the respondent-KVS.
34. Accordingly, all the OAs are allowed, and the interviews held in March,
2012 are declared to be illegal. The respondents are directed to re-start
the process of selection, by conducting the already notified Main
Examination, allowing all the candidates who had applied for the relevant
posts against the Recruitment Advertisement-cum-vacancy notification, and
had passed the Preliminary Examination/Screening-Test conducted by the
Respondent-KVS on 10.02.2011, and have also thereafter passed and qualified
at the statutorily prescribed CTET held on 26.06.2011. Only after the
respective merit of the candidates is reflected through the marks obtained
by them in the Main Examination conducted by the respondent-KVS, and fresh
cut-off marks are determined for each Post-Code for calling the candidates
for interviews, those interviews alone would be valid under the process of
selection already initiated for being undertaken by the respondents. There
shall be no order as to costs.
(Sudhir Kumar) (G. George Paracken)
Member (A) Member (J)
CTET only as a qualifying examination for appointment of Primary Teachers
and Upper Primary Teachers, cannot provide the sole criteria of marks for
selection of Trained Graduate Teachers (TGTs) in the respondent-KVS
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL - PRINCIPAL BENCH DELHI PASSED ORDER THAT
TET/CTET IS ONLY A QUALIFYING TEST AND ITS MARKS CAN NOT TAKEN FOR
SELECTION CRIETRIA
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH
OA 764/2012 6. OA 888/2012 11. OA 1137/2012
MA 629/2012 MA 735/2012 MA 1698/2012
MA 630/2012 MA 736/2012
MA 1696/2012 MA 1705/2012
OA 783/2012 7. OA 891/2012
MA 659/2012 MA 1695/2012
MA 1702/2012
OA 824/2012 8. OA 920/2012
MA 688/2012 MA 772/2012
MA 1703/2012 MA 1699/2012
OA 866/2012 9 OA 976/2012
MA 1704/2012 MA 1697/2012
5. OA 985/2012 10. OA 990/2012
MA 1701/2012 MA 1700/2012
marks fixed by KVS in C.T.E.T. category wise
1. TGTS Gen. OBC SC ST OH HH VH
ENG. 104 98 92 83 96 98 85
HINDI 98 95 89 89 88 93 90
SANSKRIT 93 90 85 83 - - 104
MATHS 101 93 87 86 99 - -
SCIENCE 104 100 91 82 94 - -
SOCIAL STUDIES 103 101 95 91 98 95 94
2. PRTs 104 98 92 82 94 82 85
Main Part of Judgement ->>>>>
33. In the result, the interviews held from 12.03.2012 to 26.03.2012 by the
respondent-KVS, only on the basis of the marks obtained by the candidates
of the CTET, cannot be held to have been conducted within the notified
Scheme as per the Recruitment Advertisement-cum-vacancy notification issued
by the respondents at the beginning of the selection process in the
Employment News of the week 30.10.2010 to 05.11.2010. An examination which
prescribes 60% or 50% etc. as the passing marks, but does not give due
weightage to any higher marks obtained by candidates above that, and it is
stated to be and meant to be only as a qualifying examination for
appointment of Primary Teachers and Upper Primary Teachers, cannot provide
the sole criteria of marks for selection of Trained Graduate Teachers
(TGTs)
in the respondent-KVS.
34. Accordingly, all the OAs are allowed, and the interviews held in March,
2012 are declared to be illegal. The respondents are directed to re-start
the process of selection, by conducting the already notified Main
Examination, allowing all the candidates who had applied for the relevant
posts against the Recruitment Advertisement-cum-vacancy notification, and
had passed the Preliminary Examination/Screening-Test conducted by the
Respondent-KVS on 10.02.2011, and have also thereafter passed and qualified
at the statutorily prescribed CTET held on 26.06.2011. Only after the
respective merit of the candidates is reflected through the marks obtained
by them in the Main Examination conducted by the respondent-KVS, and fresh
cut-off marks are determined for each Post-Code for calling the candidates
for interviews, those interviews alone would be valid under the process of
selection already initiated for being undertaken by the respondents. There
shall be no order as to costs.
(Sudhir Kumar) (G. George Paracken)
Member (A) Member (J)
