/* remove this */ Blogger Widgets /* remove this */

Friday, December 23, 2011

UPTET - Allahabad Highcourt dismissed petitions against TET merit

Highcourt : No objection on TET Merit for selection in Primary Teacher (PRT) of UP Edu. Dept.





See judgement
************************
This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Deputy Registrar(Copying).
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 71558 of 2011
Petitioner :- Seeta Ram
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare, Ashok Khare
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C., Suresh Singh

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.
1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Advocate, and perused the record.
2. Petitioner is challenging advertisement dated 29/30.11.2011 as also Rule 14 (3) of U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as "Rules, 1981"). It is contended that National Council for Teachers Eduction (hereinafter referred to as "NCTE") provided minimum qualification for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher in Primary Schools and passing of Teacher Eligibility Test (hereinafter referred to as "TET") conducted by appropriate Government in accordance with the guidelines given by NCTE was made essential qualification. Pursuant thereto the State Government conducted TET on 13.11.2011 result whereof was declared on 25.11.2011. Petitioner passed said test. In the meantime, Rules,1981 were amended by notification dated 9.11.2011 vide U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service (Twelfth Amendment) Rules, 2011 which came into force at once. It made amendment in Rules 8, 14, 27 and 29. Rule 8 was with reference to qualifications and Rule 14 with reference to procedure to be followed for recruitment for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher in Primary Schools. The amendment incorporates TET as a part of essential qualification besides others and Rule 14 (3) provides that a list of the candidates of such persons who appear to possess prescribed academic qualification and eligible for appointment shall be prepared wherein their names shall be arranged in such manner that their names are placed in the descending order on the basis of marks in Teacher Eligibility Test conducted by Government of Uttar Pradesh. Pursuant to the said amendment in the Rules, an advertisement was published on 29/30.11.2011 for selection for appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher in Primary School which is consistent to the said amendment in the Rules. Sri Khare submitted that TET is one of the qualifying examination prescribed by NCTE and the process of such examination commenced before 13.11.2011 pursuant whereto the examination was held on 13.11.2011 and the result was declared on 25.11.2011. For the purpose of making selection and appointment as Assistant Teacher the said qualification cannot be made a basis/foundation particularly considering the process of the said test as it amounts to change of rules of the game when the game has already commenced and in support thereof placed reliance on judgements of this Court in K. Manjusree Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and another (2008) 3 SCC 512 and Hemani Malhotra Vs. High Court of Delhi (2008) 7 SCC 11.
3. He further submitted that a qualifying test cannot be made sole basis for selection to the post of Assistant Teacher and in this regard placed reliance on a Full Bench Judgement in Uma Shankar Singh & others Vs. Chairman, Public Service Commission (1994) 2 UPLBEC 1412 and Apex Court decision in Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission Vs. Baloji Badhavath & others (2009) 5 SCC 1.
4. However, I find no force in the submission.
5. The examination held by State Government, i.e. TET, 2011 is pursuant to Regulations framed by NCTE under the provisions of Right to Education Act, 2009 and it only confers a qualification upon a candidate so as to make him eligible to participate in the process of recruitment whenever it commences for appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher. The advertisement dated 29/30.11.2011 is not a commencement of the process of recruitment pursuant to Rules, 1981(as amended) for appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher. Training prescribed therein i.e. six months special training is pre appointment training contemplated under the Regulations framed by NCTE and has nothing to do with the process of recruitment in service. It shall commence with the advertisement published as contemplated in Rule 14 of Rules, 1981. It is in these circumstances, it cannot be said that rules of the game have been changed afterwards inasmuch the two processes cover different fields and operate totally differently.
6. In K. Manjusree (supra) a selection was held but during the process of selection, criteria for selection was changed. It is in these circumstances, the Apex Court said that the Rules of game cannot be changed afterwards i.e. after the interview was over. Similar was the position in Hemani Malhotra (supra) and both the judgements, therefore, have no application to the facts of this case.
7. In Uma Shankar Singh (Supra), it was clearly prescribed that the preliminary examination is a mere screening test and that being so this Court held that it cannot be included for the purpose of final examination. The judgement has no application to the present case.
8. In Baloji Badhavath (supra), it was held that a procedure evolved for laying down mode and manner for consideration of a right to be considered for appointment can be interfered with only when it is arbitrary, discriminatory or wholly unfair, which learned counsel for petitioner failed to prove in the case in hand and, therefore, reliance placed thereon is totally misconceived.
9. So far as making of qualifying examination basis of selection is concerned, it is always permissible to the rules framing authority to determine the criteria for selection which may base on the merits of the candidate possessed in various academic qualifications or qualifying test or any other criteria which may otherwise be valid and once it is so determined, unless it can be said that the same amendment in the rule is contrary to any statutory provision or otherwise ultra vires or vitiated in law, the same cannot be interfered.
10. In the result, writ petition lacks merit. Dismissed.
Dt. 12.12.2011
**********************************

***********************
However authority have many rights but it is very less likely chances to SELECTION PROCEDURE.

If any of visitors having more information , Kindly UPDATE through comment.

69 comments:

Anonymous said...

yessssssssssssssssssssssss,hum jeet gaye tet pass karne wale.cheers now.good luck.

Anonymous said...

jeet hamesha sachaiye ki hi hoti hai.

Anonymous said...

This is totally aunfair judgement as lots of cahges were already done in the UPTET and now all this court is silent and not opposing the TET merit. This is totally shamefull and shows how currupt the India's are. The court is playing with the future's of India as well the hard working student, who did not gave money to any one to got High marks in UPTET2011. Uptet is totally a money game.

Kaatil Jatt said...

Lagta Hai Aapke No. Kam Aaye Hain Jo Is Tarah Ki Baatein Kar Rahe Ho. TET Merit Is Best. Kya Aap Nahi Jante Ki Aapke So Called Merit Holder Jo Academic Base Me Topper The Is Simple Se Test Me Bhi Fail Ho Gaye. So Plz Do Not Against TET.

sonu said...

bhaiyon jayda khush hone ki baat nahi hai.kyonki election ki declaration ho chuki hai. baad mein kiski sarkar banti hai kuch pata nahi agar mulayam ki bani to yeh bharti nahi hogi. kuch hi dino mein sab election mein busy ho jayenge.bharti talni hi hai. 100%

manoj said...

news update bhari aage badhegi april tak

seema said...

election declaration bharti cancle

Anonymous said...

Court ka koi bhi decision evidences par adharit hota hai,is case me bhi court ne kaha hai ki exam me agar koi dhandhali hui hoti to alag bat hoti
yani writ dalne wale ne sirf ye demand kiya hai ki tet merit base na ho par agar wo sath me ye bhi kahta ki uptet ke exam se ab tak kitni bar result change huye hai aur evidence bhi deta to yahi judgement tet merit ke agaist me chala jata

Anonymous said...

governor ke haathon se degree lene wale tet main fail.aisa kaise ho gaya kaha gaya inka dimaag jo top karata tha.ab tet bhi nahi paas kara paya.kuch to kala hai inke record main.

Anonymous said...

abe agar accha soch nahi sakte to bura bhi mat socho. nahi to NARAK me bhi kutte ko tumse pehle jagah milegi

Anonymous said...

abe agar accha soch nahi sakte to bura bhi mat socho. nahi to NARAK me bhi kutte ko tumse pehle jagah milegi. ye comment TET ke against walon ke liye hai

kamal said...

100% bharti aage badhegi. electio is declared

brajesh said...

ye kya ho raha h? tet high rankers ka kya hoga?

Anonymous said...

abe bevkooph pehle bhartiya samvidhan padh aur nahi padh sakta to muskan ji ke comment hi padh le

Anonymous said...

jo keh rahe hai bharti cancel wo pagal hai. kyoki yahi bharti saaf suthri hogi bina paise ke baki main paisa chalega kyoki nayi govt. sabse paisa basulegi aur ab bharti karana diet ka karya hai naki chunav aayog ka.to pareshan hone ki jarurat nahi hai sabhi form bhejkar diet's ka sehyog kare aur teacher bane.

Rajendra said...

Paisa to acedemic lavel par hi diya ja raha hai tabhi to accha % ban raha hai! Thanks high court aapne sachchai ka sath diya . Hum varisth b.ed. Berojgar apko naman karte hain....
Rajendra singh
varisth b.ed. Berojgar (tet 116 art obc) jhansi

Anonymous said...

Plz aap log negative baatein na kare... Kunki election declaration ka vacancies pr asar nahi padta hai,agar process start ho chuka hai...
So be posstive..

Anonymous said...

sonu ji, tere maa ka sakinaka !!! kyu app tet fail apni ma bahin karane aa jatey ho???

Best Answer said...

Abhi tak Election kee data nahin aayee hai.निर्वाचन आयोग पांच राज्यों में होने वाले चुनाव की तारीखों की घोषणा आज या कल कर सकता है। पर आयोग ने चुनाव के लिए खाका पूरी तैयार कर लिया है। सूत्रों से जो खबर प्राप्त हो रही है उसके अनुसार, उत्तरप्रदेश विधानसभा चुनाव को आयोग पांच चरणों में कराना चाहता है। हालांकि तिथि पर आधिकारिक घोषणा अभी नहीं हुई है

utkarsh said...

high court bhi sarkar ke liye hi kam karta h abhi tak suna tha lekin aj dekh bhi liya tet ki merit se hi bharti hogi ye to confirm ho gaya h na muskan ji ya abhi bhi kuch baki h

Anonymous said...

Double bench mai vishesh yachika daalenge sheetkalin holday mai b vishesh court khula hai.

Anonymous said...

abto tet k adhar pr hi bharti hogi

Anonymous said...

bahut acha hua jo tet ki merit banigi,ye fail or kam no. wale halla macha rhe hain.jor se bole jai hunuman

SINGHANIYA said...

मेरे मित्र उवैश ने 128 अंक अर्जित किया है तथा मैने 127 अंक, अब मुख्य समस्या यह है कि अभी तक हम दोनो ने फार्म नही भेजे है क्योकि हम लोग समस्त परिवर्तन एंव सुधार के अन्त होने की प्रतीक्षा मे है ।
क्या करे फार्म भेजे अथवा कुछ दिन और प्रतीक्षा करेँ ?

utkarsh said...

thanks dear ap doble bench pr yachika kare hum sab apke sath h

Rajendra said...

Thanks high court
hum varisth b.ed berojgaron ko mauka dene ka......
Rajendra singh tet 116 marks obc art
jhansi

SONU said...

bhaiya bharti gayi kaam se election 2 feb se hai. kuch dino mein sab electio mein busy ho jayenge. apne no apni fle mein rakh lo

utkarsh said...

muskan ji apne phle kis adhar pr bola tha ki tet merit holdaro par pani phir sakta h

B.K.Pal said...

mskan ji ye btayn ki maine purane marks ke adhar pr 5 form dal diye hain ab nay form kya sabhi diets me bade marks par dalne padenge

Anonymous said...

Itni baar result rivised double bench mai kahenge kyunki eska sabut dene ki jarurat n h.kaise tet per faith kare.

kamal said...

BHAIYA KOI PAISE VAPIS KARNE KE LIYE CORT MEIN CHALO BHARTI AB BHOOL JAAO KAHI ELECTION KE BAAD PAISE BHI NA FAS JAAYE. BHARTI TO KHATAI MEI HAI HI. AGAR SARKAR BADALTI HAI TO BHARTI CANCLE

mayank said...

TET FAIL KE LIYE KHUSHKHABRI 2 FEB SE ELECTION HAI BHARTI GAYI KAAM SE AB TET KI BATT BANA KAR-------

ranjeet said...

NEWS UPDATE 9 JAN KE BAAD TET KE KAAM BAND. ELECTION KE BAAD DECIDE HOGA KI AAGE KYA KARNA HAI

raj said...

TET BHARTI APRIL TAK AAGE BADHI,NEW SUPDATE ACCORDING TO DIET BAREILLY

Anonymous said...

TET BHARTI THANDE BASTE MEIN. ELECTION DECLARED

utkarsh said...

mayawati ki sarkar to gayi kam se my friends koi bhi vote mat dena is bhrast sarkar ko

Uvaish A. said...

Aakas,
zero road,
allhabad.
Janab ab apna juta utaro aur 100 jute maro apne sir par.
Juta mubarak ho.
Merit tet se hi banegi.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha

Anonymous said...

Jatin sharma says- some candidates who acquired their acadmic qualification with unfair means, don't want others to be selected by tet merit process.Even they couldn't qualify so easy tet test, they r now feeling jealous.Belive in hard study,success will to u.

Anand Pandey said...

Girl : What is Love ??
People talk so much about love but
i don't really know what it is ???
Boy Replied :-
When i get angry on you & you try
to persuade me, that feeling is
Love ♥ ♥ ~
When i don't talk to you & you get
worried about me, that is called
Love ♥ ♥ ~
When you care for me whenever
am sick or in pain, that is Love ♥ ♥
~
And finally when you get scared
even from the thought of us being
apart from each other, this scary
feeling is called LOVE !!! ♥ ♥ ~
For ♥ ♥ ♥ My Beautiful Princess..♥
♥ ♥

Anand Pandey said...

Budha Budhi Ki Kahani
.
1 budha aya
saath me 1 budhiya laya
.
.Hotel me ja k waiter ko bulaya
Dono ne apna-apna order
mangaya
.
Pehle budhe ne khaya
budhiya ne pankha hilaya
.
Fir budhiya ne khaya
budhe ne pankha hilaya
.
Ye dekh k Waiter sharmaya or usne
farmaya
.
Ae Laila Majnu k Maa Baap
Tum dono me itna pyar hy to
khana 1 sath Q nhi khaya
.
Is par budhe ne farmaya
‘Jaani’ tera sawal to theek hai
.
Par hamare pas Daanto ka set sirf
ek hai!

Anonymous said...

Is case ko double bench me reappeal kiya ja sakta hai,
koi bhi achcha advocate easily samajh sakta hai jo judge ne kaha hai..
"appointment can be interfered with only when it is arbitrary, discriminatory or wholly unfair "
tet exam ka result 25 nov.ko nikla tha tab se ab tak 15 bar sansodhan ho chuke hai,iska evidence agar court me pesh kiya gaya to court ye easily man sakti hai ki exam fair nahi hai aur gadbadiya hui hai aur case petitioner ke favour me ja sakta hai

Anonymous said...

Is judgement ko double bench me reappeal karna chahiye kyoki isme judge ne bhi kaha hai ki"appointment can be interfered with only when it is arbitrary, discriminatory or wholly unfair"
aur tet ke exam ko puri tarah se fair nahi kaha ja sakta hai,iske paridam me u.p.board ne darjno bar sansodhan kiya hai aur abhi bhi jari hai,agar sansodhan ke evidence court me prastut kiye gaye to ye case petitioner ke favour me hi jayega

rina said...

Its good if selection is based on tet merit, but as the result has again been revised by the board today......many candidates managed to get high amount of increase in their marks....which makes merit go really very high and it also adversely affected those studens who got an increase of merely 2 or 3 marks. I doubt how 10 or even 20 marks addition is given

Anonymous said...

sadhana. kisi ke pass correct data hai jo bata sake ki science aur art and girls/boys ki merit kitne no ka difference hoga? pls koi to reply karo

Anonymous said...

Is judgement ko double bench me reappeal karna chahiye kyoki isme judge ne bhi kaha hai ki"appointment can be interfered with only when it is arbitrary, discriminatory or wholly unfair"
aur tet ke exam ko puri tarah se fair nahi kaha ja sakta hai,iske paridam me u.p.board ne darjno bar sansodhan kiya hai aur abhi bhi jari hai,agar sansodhan ke evidence court me prastut kiye gaye to ye case petitioner ke favour me hi jayega

tet me gadbadiyo ka ek aur bhi pramad prastut kiya ja sakta hai "cyber hakers ne paridam me jis tarah chedchad ki"aur u.p.board ne us par koi bhi karwahi nahi ki,yahan tak ki f.i.r.tak nahi register karwaya gaya,ye pramad uptet ki visvasniyata ko khatm karne ke liye paryapt honge par inke evidence jarur court me prastut kare

Anonymous said...

साइबर ठगों ने बिगाड़ी टीईटी की फर्जी वेबसाइट
Dec 23, 10:06 pm
बताएं
वरिष्ठ संवाददाता, इलाहाबाद : काम बनाया और चलते बने। साइबर ठगों ने बेरोजगारों के साथ कुछ ऐसा ही किया। नंबर बढ़ाने के नाम पर पैसा वसूला और फर्जीवाड़े का खुलासा होने के बाद टीईटी की नकली वेबसाइट को बिगाड़ दिया। अब यूपीटीईटी2011रिजल्ट्स.कॉम नहीं खुल रही है। विडंबना यह है कि 72 हजार शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति से जुड़ी इस संवेदनशील परीक्षा के डाटा को कॉपी कर उसके साथ छेड़छाड़ की गई, इसके बाद भी माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद के अधिकारियों द्वारा अभी तक कोई तहरीर नहीं दी गई। इससे दाल में कुछ काला होने के संकेत मिल रहे हैं।
साइबर अपराधियों ने टीईटी की वेबसाइटको कॉपी कर एक हूबहू फर्जी वेबसाइट बना ली थी। साइबर ठगों ने बेरोजगारोंकी कमजोरी को पहचाना और इसका भरपूर फायदा भी उठाया। सूत्रों के मुताबिक साइबर ठगों ने इस फर्जीवाड़े में बोर्ड के ही किसी शातिर दिमाग को भी शामिल किया। यूपीटीईटी2011.कॉम को कॉपी करने के बाद शातिरों ने कॉपी किए गए डाटा के आधार पर अभ्यर्थियों को मनचाहे अंक दिए और पैसा वसूला। बेरोजगार भी बोर्ड के चक्कर लगाने औरझंझट में पड़ने से बचने और चयन पक्का करने के पीछे आसानी से ठगों के झांसे में आ गए। यही कारण रहा कि परिषद की वेबसाइट पर फेल बच्चा फर्जी वेबसाइट पर न सिर्फ पास हो गया, बल्कि मनचाहा नंबर भी पा गया। विडंबना यह है कि इस फर्जीवाड़े का खुलासा होने के बाद भी यूपी बोर्ड के अधिकरियों की कुंभकर्णी नींद नहीं टूटी। अभी तक बोर्ड द्वारा एफआइआर नहीं दर्ज कराई गई है। इस बीच अखबारों में खबरें आने और अपने मकसद में कामयाब होने के बाद शातिरों ने फर्जी वेबसाइट में तकनीकीखराबी कर दी। अब यह वेबसाइट नहीं खुल रही है। फिलहाल कुछ भी हो 21 दिसंबर को मामले का खुलासा होने के 48 घंटे बीत जाने के बाद भी अभी तक तहरीर न दिया जाना यूपी बोर्ड की कार्यप्रणाली पर कई सवालिया निशान लगाता है।

himansh said...

frndz ye descision 12 dec ka hai date check kar lo aur iske bad k descision me khud judge ne bola tha ki tet is not a competitive exam aur is news ka source ya link bhi nai diya hai muskan ji ne to plz it is not totally reliable aur abhi mat khush hoiye keep patience aur jb tak vacancy nai poori ho jati tb tak intejar karte hai aur manaiye ki vacancy complete ho chahe jaise bhi

himansh said...

aur anonymous bhia abi nai jeete aap jb vacancy puri ho aur apke hath me joining letter ho tb jeet ki khusi manaiyega asli jeet tbhi hogi hamlogo ki.

Brijesh Rajput said...

Are said bhaiya kaha chale gaye ab tum. ab jawaab do na ki kyo acadmic merit bane. kaha tha tumse jab acadmic merit tumhari etni achhi hai to tet mai kyo nahi dikhaya koe kamaal apne. indian constitution ko pado achchhi tarah se aur jano uske baare mai.govmnt jab chahe jaise chahe bharti kare jo seva ya niyukti niymavali mai process diya hai uske hisaab se to court dakhal nahi deta hai bas apke kisi mool adhikaar ka hanan na ho raha ho....
mai ye nahi kahta ki tet se hi merit banao lekin jab tet exam quality ko maintain karne k liye hai to usmai high merit lane walo ko priority kyo nahi milni chahiye rahi baat result gadbad walo ki to court pahle hi solution de chuka hai....

Brijesh Rajput said...

U.P. ki history mai pahli baar aisa mauka aa raha hai jab yaha kaabil log prt teacher banaye jayenge jo 2 baar state level exam ko qualify karke aa rahe hain ek all up b.ed. entrance aur dusra tet. es se pahle aise log bhi tchr ban gaye jo prt k class 3 ke question solve nahi kar paate hain maine ye khud apni ankho se dekha hai esliye kah raha hun.
maine mahsus kiya hai ki tet mai vo log good perform nahi kar paaye jo up ke baahar se ya management kote se b.ed. kiye hue the. es se saabit hota hai ki vo log tet mai good score karne walo ki tulna mai ayogya hain. kyonki jisne bhi seriously all up b.ed. entrance deke b.ed. kiya hai vo sab lagbhag tet mai good score laaye hain.
"ham jitni mehnat karte hain utna hi fal milta hai"

Anonymous said...

3rd number per jisne comment diya hai uska haal vaisa hi hai jaise khisiyaani billi khamba noche.are bhai tum court se jyada uper ho kya.
high court k khilaaf mat bolo varna ip address se tumhara pata laga kar court ki avmamna ka case thonk diya jayega. jab pahle mana kar rahe the tab to tumhe court hi achchha lag raha tha. etne hi gyani the to es general se exam mai aundhe muh kyo gir gaye. jitno ne bhi tet mai high merit maintain ki hai kya sab paise dekar aye hain. puri india ko kosh rahe ho jab india etna bura hai to desh kyo nahi chhod k chale jaate.
Pakistaan mai bharti academic merit se hoti hai vaha kyo nahi try karte tum.swatch

Anand Pandey said...

हाईकोर्ट एक जनवरी तक बंद
बताएं :
Jagran News Network (JNN),
2011-12-23T18:26:20
इलाहाबाद : इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट में
शुक्रवार से शीतावकाश हो गया है। अदालत
अब नए वर्ष में दो जनवरी 2012 को खुलेगा।
इस आशय की जानकारी रजिस्ट्रार ने दी।

Rajendra said...

Good news
1- bharti tet merit par- h.c.
2-manpasand jilon ka prastav pass
3-bharti ke liye kendra se manga 1 feb tak ka time
....RAJENDRA

Krishna said...

PURANE AAVEDAN HI HONGE MAANYA-
jo abhyarthi apni purani tet marksheet ke sath aavedan kar chuke hain,unhe punah aavedan karne ki aavashyakta nahi hai.madhyamik shiksha parishad ne up basic education board ko naye anko ki cd muhaiya kara di hai.

Poori news ke liye in.jagran.yahoo.com par allahabad aur lucknow sanskaran dekhe.
Thanks

Anonymous said...

Cyber attack kar pure paridam se chedchad kia ja chuka hai,aur u.p.board is par f.i.r.tak nai karta, kahi na kahi ye u.p.board ki neeyat par bhi sak paida karta hai,kyoki ho sakta hai jis private agency ko ye theka diya gaya tha unka hath bhi isme ho sakta hai,aur u.p.board isliye hi dar raha hai ki f.i.r.karne par police janch me ye pol khul sakta hai

ye baate u.p.tet ke viswasniyata ko puri tarah se khatm karti hai,agar in cheejo ko court ke samne evidences ke sath le jaya jaye to court bhi uptet ki viswsnita par ungli lagate hue ise selection ka base manne se inkar kar degi kyoki u.p.board ko bhi nahi pata hai ki cyber attacker ne kis had tak gadbadiya ki hai aur na hi u.p.board ne kisi anya agency se koi janch karne ki jarurat samajhi,is case me u.p.board ko bhi ban kiya ja sakta hai,kyoki unhone ek private agency ki janch(ho sakta hai jisne khud hi chedchad kiya ho)par mamle ko thande baste me daal diya.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Cyber attack lagta hai bahut jalan ho rahi hai.

atri dixit said...

क्या आपने कभी सोचा है कि जब आप अपने घर के किसी बच्चे की टयूसन के लिए किसी अध्यापक को ढूढ़ते हो तो क्या उसकी एकडेमिक क्वालिफिकेसन देखते हैं या फिर उसकी वर्तमान नालिज़!
अगर आप अपने घर के बच्चे के लिए कुछ और सोचते हैं और बाहर के बच्चो के बारे मैं कुछ और तो फिर तो साफ ज़ाहिर होता हैं की आपसे बड़ा स्वार्थी व्यक्ति कोई नहीं है|

Anonymous said...

dekh lena kuch din bad ye siber crime wale jail jate milege aur sath me inse faida uthaye log bhi matam manate huway..kar bura ko ho bura..

Anonymous said...

@ ATRI DIXIT ----BHAI AAP NE EK DAM SAHI AUR 100 AANE KI BAT KAHI HAI MAI AAP SE SEHMAT HU AGAR TET KE KHILAF WALE COURT JA SAKTE HAI TO TET SE MERIT ME UPAR RHNE WALE BHI JA SAKTE HAI BAKI AAP LOG CHINTA NA KARE YE LOG NAKAL KARKE PASS HOTE HAI AUR PHIR CHILLATE HAI KI "TET SE MERIT MAT BANAO"....SAB FAIL WALE CHILLATE HAI KI EXAM GADBAD HUA HAI MAI KEHTA HU KI MERE JITNE MARKS MAINE JODE UTNE HI HAI AB AAP LOG SHANT HO JAYE "ACADEMIC MERIT WALE"

utkarsh said...

frnz bharti ti gayi achar sahinta lag gayi aj se aur kendra sarkar ne abhi time bhi ni badaya h aur na hi badayegi

utkarsh said...

tet me ap bol rahe h ki koi gadbadi ni hui me bata hu kya hua h kanpur me aise kai college h jaha par tet ka pura paper solve karaya gaya frnz ap hi socho jab keval kanpur me kai college h to all u.p. me kitne college honge humare sath ke kai ladke h unke no. bahut acche aye h to unka hi hoga ki hum logo ka

Anonymous said...

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA TET HAI MERI FANTASY. ACEDMIC WALE TUM HO BADE KHUMMMMMMMMMMAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTT
OOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAAAAAAAAAAAAA OOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.HIGH COURT KI JAI HO PNCH PARMESHWAR KI JAI

Anonymous said...

bhai aap jo bhi ho jab tak aap ko apne marks acche aane ki umeed thi aap kuch nhi bole phir ekdam se kanpur ,lucknow ,sab kahi paper out aur solve hone laga is des ko ANNA KYA BHAGWAN BHI nhi sudhar sakte ....aap log bas......samaj gye honge mai emotions pe control nhi kar pa rha hu mai ye bhi bta du mai koi B.ED. degree holder nhi hu sali .....tet ki bakwas

Anonymous said...

@ UTKARSH aap bahut hi bewkhoof kism ke insaan ho aap to govt. and court sab ko sath me le ke doob rhe ho kehte ho ki court govt. ke liye kam karta hai ab aap se to ANNA hi bachaye kuch to biswas kijeye........waise aap karte kya hai ...aaj kal

Anonymous said...

Chunav aachar sanhita kab se lagegee. Mere female/science/128 marks hain. SALARY KOI keh raha hai kee 21000 milegee koi keh raha hai 7000 milegee.

Anonymous said...

Court ka koi bhi decision evidences par adharit hota hai,is case me bhi court ne kaha hai ki exam me agar koi dhandhali hui hoti to alag bat hoti
yani writ dalne wale ne sirf ye demand kiya hai ki tet merit base na ho par agar wo sath me ye bhi kahta ki uptet ke exam se ab tak kitni bar result change huye hai aur evidence bhi deta to yahi judgement tet merit ke agaist me chala jata or kii ka 1 nu jayada kua hai tho kisi ke 6 nu jayada hua hai ye kis adaar par kiya gaya hai

ajay maurya atraulia azamgarh said...

ka ho master sahab logan ab ka hoi faram bheji ki nahi e sasuri sarkar ta gail ab dekha chacha aihain ki chachi fir laut ke aihain okre bade kuchh hoi hindustan wale kahe ki the last result will not be declear.
jai ho maya ki mayaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

vimal said...

hi i have read all comments. kuch log TET ko adhar man rahe hai kuch log tet kom nahi man rahe hai...
In my opinion TET should be the base for appointment. Hoga kya ki jo creamy student qualify kiye hai they will strenthen the pillar of education base... Agar TET ko base nahi manate hai to hoga kya ki jo student upboard ya jinlogo ne apna high school ,inter graduation 2000 ke aas pass mein kiya hai and really meritous student will not be able to get chance to serve their state.
Rahi bat ki paise de kar pass hone ki to.. 72000 seat mein se kya 72000 ne paise diye hai..
koi 10000 man le ki paise diye hai to 60000 seat per to baki takkar hai na.. then why people are crying.......
Main CBSE board ka student hu.. chahe TET ko base banaya jaye chaye education ko i will be in merit.. i am speaking for the betterment of education system...

ashutosh bhatnagar said...

Shikshako ki bharti tet marrit par hi honi chahiye ye acchi shiksha acchi shiksha prali ke liye bahut aavashyak hai jiske kai karan hai jaise shekshik yogeta mai koi gurvatta nahi hoti,board ke exame ke samay dheke par nakal hona, board paper ke samay nakal mafiao ka raj hona, farji marksheet banna, cbse, icse ki ankpratisatta radev up board se jyada hoti hai, or kisi ki bhi yogeta vartmaan mai aanki jati. bhootkaal ki yageta vartmaan ka aadhar nahi ho sakti, is 2 mahino mai mene akhbaro mai para ke lagbhag 70 sikshak pakre gaye jo jali marksheet ke aadhar par naukari kar rahe thai. Isliliye baccho ke acche bhavisye acchi siksha prarali ke liye tet ki marrit ke aadhar par hi honi, yahi niyaye sangat hai or desh ke hit mai hoga.