Without Amendment in U.P. Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High Schools) (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Teachers) Rules, 1978, How TET Qualified Candidates are eligible for Junior Highschool
If I am correct, then above inference is derived from below Case details (Hearing shall be on 1st Feb 2012) -
-------------------
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 54362 of 2011
Petitioner :- Indrasan Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- R.P.Dubey,Manoj Kumar Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,V.K.Kushwaha
Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
The Secretary of Education (Basic), U.P. Government at Lucknow may file an affidavit categorically disclosing as to how because of issuance of the Government Order dated 7th December, 2011 with reference to TET examination, it is being contended on behalf of the State that no appointment in a recognized and aided junior high schools can be made unless the candidate has passed his TET examination, when there has been no amendment in the statutory rules framed regulating the conditions and qualification for appointment of teachers in a recognized institution, namely, U.P. Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High Schools) (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Teachers) Rules, 1978, more so when, no power has been given to the State Government under the Rules, 1978 to amend the qualifications by Executive Order. He shall also explain as to how merely because certain qualifications have been laid down by the National Council for Teachers Education in the matter of appointment of teachers, the State can insist when appropriate amendment in the statutory rules.
Statutory� qualifications are� binding qua� appointment on the post of teachers in recognized institution. The process for recruitment had been initiated much prior to the issuance of the Government Order.
List this matter on 1st February, 2012.
(Arun Tandon, J.)
Order Date :- 12.1.2012
Sushil/-
---------------
If visitors have any updates of rules on such matters OR any better explanation, then you can give it through comments.
Ab ye kya musibat gale pad gayi.
ReplyDeleteGhar se nikle the hausla karke
Ghar laut aaye khuda khuda karke.
@Navedji,
ReplyDeleteProvide NImavali details for Junior Highschool, And it is amended for TET Qualified candidates or not ?
Muskan ji junior high school me ab tak koi vacancy nahi nikli h phir amendment ki kya jarurat h jab vacancy niklegi u sse pahle amendment kar liya jayega.please explaine
ReplyDelete@Nitooji,I felt -
ReplyDelete"When UPTET conducted, TET exam was also conducted for class VI-VIII,
But may be its niyamavali not amended.
Question is how TET qualified candidates can be eligible for Junior Highschool teacher."
And u people can also read case and give explanation.
Through this case another point is (Ifelt )-
ReplyDeleteTET examination conducted before G.O. of 7th Dec.
then -
TET Qualified candidates (for VI-VIII) are eligible for Upper PRT or not
----------
Another prob.
Koi baat nahin,
ReplyDeletecase TET qualified valon ke favour main hee hoga.
Ye poochna chaihe tha ki, NCTE ko aisa niyam kaise jaree kia kee TET qualified log hee patr hain PRT , Upper PRT ke liye.
Jab UP mein niyam hee sansodhan nahin hua.
Koi baat nahin,
ReplyDeletecase TET qualified valon ke favour main hee hoga.
Ye poochna chaihe tha ki, NCTE ko aisa niyam kaise jaree kia kee TET qualified log hee patr hain PRT , Upper PRT ke liye.
Jab UP mein niyam hee sansodhan nahin hua.
(Agar case is niyam ke liye hai )
Muskan ji kya amendment se pahle prapt ki gyi degree valid nahi hogi.mujhe confirm nahi h 1996 me prt me sayad pahli bar bed liye gye the kya amendment se pahle bed holder select nahi hue the.mera manna h tet alag prakriya h aur recruitment alag.iska matalab to ye hua ki ek tet karane ke bad koi bhi gov 5 sal tak amendment nahi kar payegi kyonki crtfikt ki validity 5 sal h.aur kabhi bhi nahi kar payegi kyoki tet hr 6 mahine bad organise hoga.muskan ji adalat kanun ke sath sath tarko ke aadhar par decision deti h.aur in sabse bhi upar h judge ka apna vivek.koi bhi judge apne vivekanusar sakshyo ke viprit decision de sakta h.aap kisi bhi lawyer se confirm kar sakte h.
ReplyDeleteye baat pakki hai ki aaj nahin to kal bina tet ke koi teacher para nahin payega school chahe sarkari ho ya pvt. doosri baat hc ne aadesh diya hai ki manrega main majdooron ko pradesh sarkar dwara state main nirdharit min. majdoori denihogi. kabhi yesa bhi hoga tet paas wale chahe govt. school main parayen ya pvt main salary barabar hogi.
ReplyDeletemaidam kya hamare upper tet k marksheet/digree per v sankat k badal aa gae kya??? jara khol k batane ka kast kare.. thanks!!!
ReplyDeletehamse kya bhool huai jo a saza hum komili band pad gai teacher banane ki sari gali, hum se kya bhool huai jo a saz.....
ReplyDeleteAnju ji where are you from? Can tell abt faizabad tet crft available
ReplyDeleteBarutha ji aap to village jane wale the?
ReplyDeletebaruta ji aapse sprem vinti h ki aap apani bhasha ka primarjan kare.kyonki pata nahi aap humesa majak ke mood me kyo rahte h
ReplyDeleteprogram cancel hogaya! neeetoo ji majak to gov. ne banaya hai.
ReplyDelete@ Muskan ji
ReplyDelete(January 27, 2012 7:47 PM)
ur doubt is correct the niyamawali is partially amended.
The full niyamawali is here:
http://upbasiceducationboard.in/(S(t35ys445cjl5aduyi3xw2u55))/images/GoImage/niyama20.gif
For complete niyamawali put 21,22,23... further on the place of 20 in the above link
How many cases of Kapil Dev Yadav is in court -
ReplyDeletehttp://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1634023
------------------------
This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Deputy Registrar(Copying).
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16279 of 2011
Petitioner :- Kapil Dev Yadav And Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Shri Ashok Khare
Respondent Counsel :- C. S. C.,A.K.Pandey,A.K.Shukla,Manoj Kumar Dwivedi
Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
This Court while entertaining the present writ petition on 29th March, 2011 passed following order:
So many cases filed by the name "Kapil" -
ReplyDeleteHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72657 of 2011
Petitioner :- Kapil Dev Singh & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Awadhesh Kumar
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Rajeshwar Singh
Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J.
The petitioners had earlier filed Writ Petition No. 48261 of 2011 which was disposed of on 25th August, 2011 with the following observations:-
"The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 21st July, 2011 passed by the District Basic Education Officer, Kushi Nagar regarding adjustment/transfer of certain Head Masters of the Primary Schools as Assistant Teachers in the Senior Basic Schools.
It is the contention of learned counsel for the petitioners that under the relevant Government Order they cannot be adjusted as Assistant Teachers in Science in Senior Basic Schools as they are not Science teachers. It is, however, stated that against the aforesaid order, the petitioners have filed a representation before the District Basic Education Officer, Kushi Nagar which is pending. The relief pressed for by learned counsel for the petitioners at the time of hearing of this petition is that the said representation may be decided.
Learned Standing Counsel appears for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, while Sri Rajeshwar Singh appears for respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
Learned counsel for the respondents state that the representation filed by the petitioners shall be decided expeditiously.
In view of the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Basic Education Officer, Kushi Nagar to pass an appropriate order on the representation filed by the petitioners expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is filed by the petitioners.
It is made clear that the Court has not adjudicated upon the merits of the case which shall be examined by the District Basic Education Officer, Kushi Nagar in accordance with law."
It is stated that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the District Basic Education Officer passed an order dated 15th October, 2011 withdrawing the adjustment order but at the same time issued fresh order for transfer of the petitioners to other Institutions.
The petitioners have challenged this order on the ground that such transfer is not permissible.�
A supplementary affidavit has been filed by the petitioners in which the order dated 23rd November, 2011 passed by the District Basic Education Officer has been annexed. This order mentions that if the petitioners withdraw the writ petition and the complaints filed by them, then they shall be retained in the Institution from where they have been transferred.
It is, therefore, the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners that the transfer order had been issued because the petitioners had served copies of the writ petition upon learned counsel appearing for the District Basic Education Officer. He, therefore, submits that the transfer order should be set aside.
Prima facie, the submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners finds support from the order dated 23rd November, 2011 passed by the District Basic Education Officer.
The District Basic Education Officer, who is represented by Sri Rajeshwar Singh, shall file his personal affidavit to explain why such an order could be passed. Detailed counter affidavit may also be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List this petition for admission/hearing in the week commencing 20th February, 2012.
The operation of the order dated 15th October, 2011 to the extent it seeks to transfer the petitioners shall remain stayed till the next date of listing.
Order Date :- 22.12.2011
NSC
----------
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1598344
Please read the amendment at following address and then explain
ReplyDeletehttp://www.scertup.org/Primary_Teacher_Niyukti_niyamawali_12th_sanshodhan.pdf
KANPUR ME JIS JIS CANDIDATE KE FORMS WAPAS AA GAYE HAIN NEECHE DIYE HUYE NUMBERS PE CONTACT KARE...
ReplyDelete9807673084 :: PANKAJ DIXIT
8960732422 :: BRIJESH PRAJAPATI
8574407131 :: SHAILESH BAJPAI
WE NEED SUPPORT YOUR SUPPORT TO GET THE JUSTICE.. TODAY I WENT TO GPO KANPUR .. HEAD POSTY MASTER MR. RAM BHAROSA
TOLD US THAT GIVE AN APPLICATION WITH ALL DETAILS .. WE WILL SURELY GIVE U EXPLAINATION REGARDING YOUR PROBLEM..
AND ALSO HE TOLD US THAT IN 2007 AND IN 2008 DUE TO THE CARELESSNESS OF POSTAL DEPARTMENT .. SOME CANDIDATES GOT THEIR VBTC FORMS BACK ..THEY CAME TO US AND WE GAVE THEM EXPLAINATION AND AFTER GETTING EXPLANATION IN WRITTEN.. THEY WENT TO COURT AND COURT ORDERED DIET TO ACCEPT THEIR FORMS .. SO WE HAVE A CHANCE TO APPLY AGAIN ..
ITS BETTER TO BE A UNIT AND GET THE JUSTICE
THANKXX
Hello friends main arvind kumar s/o Mr. Kirti Prasad BSA(Basic Shiksha Adhikari)
ReplyDeletemujhe papa ne kaha hai ki apne hak ke liye supreme court jana hoga to main bhi SC ja raha hu
please mujhe support karne ke liye mujhe call kare.....
arvind kumar
mob-9458617169