RTI : Applicant seeking information from PIO, NCTE , And not satisfied with reply filed complaint in CIC
See Details : -
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Room No. 415, 4th Floor,
Block IV, Old JNU Campus,
New Delhi -110 067
Tel: + 91 11 26161796
Decision No. CIC /SG/A/2008/00214/2224
Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2008/00214
Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal:
Appellant : Mr. Ravi Saini
Advocate, Court Compound,
Kashipur, Distt. Uddhamsingh
Nagar, Uttarakhand.
Respondent : The Public Information Officer Northern Regional Committee,
National Council For Teacher EducationA-46, Shanti Path, Tilak Nagar,
Jaipur – 302004.
RTI application filed on : 09/05/2008
PIO transferred : 16/05/2008
PIO’s reply NRCNCT : 4/06/2008
First appeal filed on : 19/08/2008
First Appellate Authority order : 28/08/2008
Second Appeal filed on : 03/10/2008
The appellant had sought following information from NCTE:
1- The Scholar given by Hindi Sahitya Sammelan is recognized by U.G.C., Uttaranchal
2- NCTE has approved B.T.C. training to Shiksha Mitra.
3- Can these graduates and non-graduates allowed to get BTC training without approval of NCTE?
4- Does Uttranchal Government appointed 1000 Shiksha Mitra after BTC training? If not then what action you are going to initiate against these teachers?
5- Does state government is bound to follow NCTE orders?
6- Is it necessary to get approval from NCTE of the Scholars given by Hindi Sahitya Sammelan Allahabad?
7- Can the Uttranchal Government appoint without having permissions form NCTE.
8- Is it necessary to get approval from NCTE by the Deemed Universities?
PIO’s Reply:
The PIO –NCTE, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi forwarded RTI application to
PIO-NCTE, Tilak Marg, Jaipur on 16th May 2008 for necessary action. But PIO NCTE, Jaipur did not replied. Since no reply was received by the PIO-NCTE, Jaipur the appellant fields first appeal
before the First Appellate Authority-NCTE, New Delhi.
The First Appellate Authority ordered:
The First Appellate Authority-NCTE, New Delhi forwarded his appeal to Dr. A.S.Rana, Appellate Authority-NCTE, Jaipur with a request to provide information without any further delay.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:
The following were present.
Appellant : Absent
Respondent : Dr. Prabhu Kumar Yadav PIO NRCNCT
The respondent shows that he has provided the answer on 4 June 2008 and then subsequently in a point-wise manner on 18/12/2008. It appears that the information has been provided.
Decision:
The appeal is disposed.
The information has been provided to the appellant.
This decision is announced in open chamber.
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
16 March, 2009
(In any correspondence on this decision, mentioned the complete decision number.)
(RM
Source : http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/SG-16032009-18.pdf
******************
Some more Teacher / NCTE related cases : -
http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/SG-29122008-05.pdf
http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_DS_A_2011_003280_M_93641.pdf
