/* remove this */ Blogger Widgets /* remove this */

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

UPTET : Amazing in HC, petitioner has not qualified the Teachers' Eligibility Test wants compassionate appointment


UPTET : Amazing in HC, petitioner has not qualified the Teachers' Eligibility Test wants compassionate appointment


Kamaaal hai, See -


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH 

?Court No. - 6 
Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 552 of 2013 
Petitioner :- Km. Pankshi Singh 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Its Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sect.Lucknow &Ors 
Petitioner Counsel :- Anurag Srivastava 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C. 

Hon'ble Shabihul Hasnain,J. 
Heard Sri Anurag Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ghaus Beg for opposite party No.s 4 to 6 and learned Standing counsel for the State. 
Petitioner was granted compassionate appointment after the death of his father on the post of Assistant Teacher vide order dated 30.9.2011.
 He says that the same is being sought to be taken away vide annexure No.2 dated 9.7.2012. Counsel for the opposite party says that that the petitioner has not qualified the Teachers' Eligibility Test (in short T.E.T). Petitioner says that once an appointment has been given to her in pursuance of a statutory law, the same can not be taken away. It is further argued that T.E.T. is a written test, which should not be forced upon the petitioner for compassionate appointment.
On the other hand, learned counsel for opposite parties has placed before this Court judgment and order of this Court passed at Allahabad in a petition bearing Writ-A No.33828 of 2012. He says that 
benefit of this appointment can not be given to the petitioner unless he has qualified T.E.T. as has been held in aforesaid judgment. 
Learned counsel for the petitioner has, however, submitted that the said order is under challenge in special appeal and the special appeal is pending before this Court at Allahabad. He says that compassionate appointemnt is a benevolent law which should be interpreted in all possible ways to help a person whose bread earner has been snatched away by the cruel hands of death. The sudden penury which strikes the family is sought to be nullified by the authorities under Dying in Harness Rules. 
Under the circumstances, the petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the opposite parties to consider the case of the petitioner for the compassionate appointemnt on another suitable post for which the petitioner is eligible under Dying in Harness Rules applicable for appointment. The same shall be decided expeditiously, say within a maximum period of one month from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him. 
The termination of petitioner's services shall remain subject to the final decision of the special appeal which is pending before this Court at Allahabad. 
Order Date :- 1.2.2013/RKM. 

*****************************
Meree samjah mein decision nahin aa rahe hain,
Kya Mritak Aashrit ke leeye TET must hai.

Abhee pichle decsion mein to mujhe lagta hai ki TET jarooree nahin batayaa.

Please koee explain kare.
Thanks,

9 comments:

  1. HIGH COURT KE SABHI JUDGES PAHLE EK SAATH BAITH KE... MEETING KAR LE KI TET ME KYA SAHI HAI KYA GALAT??????? FIR KOI DECESION DN KI KAB TET JARURI HAI KAB NAHI.........

    ReplyDelete
  2. up ke koi court ab faisla nahe kar paege sala sab ke sab paise le k faisla dete hai.ab faisla sc double bench me he hoga 2017 me.

    ReplyDelete
  3. madam filter to hata do aap ne b bure vakt me filter laga rakha hai

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jaisa maal vaisa decision, dont be amazed.

    ReplyDelete
  5. BY RAJESH :-THE HCOURT AND HIS JUDGES WHO WILL HEARING THE TET CASE WHY WILL DELAY TO GIVEN THE DECISIONS AND WHY HE LIBERAL TO THE GOVERNMENT AND WHY THEY NOT SEE THE PAIN OF THE STUDENTS WHO WASTEGE A LOT OF MONEY AND TWO YEARS CRUSIAL TIME TO OFF OUR LIFE IN B/W COURT AND GOVERNMENT DESIONS ALL OF THEM TO CUNSERT ANOTHER EXAM AND NOT THE WASTED THE TIME TO TET AND THE APOINMENT IN P.S.GOODDAY

    ReplyDelete
  6. BY RAJESH :-THE HCOURT AND HIS JUDGES WHO WILL HEARING THE TET CASE WHY WILL DELAY TO GIVEN THE DECISIONS AND WHY HE LIBERAL TO THE GOVERNMENT AND WHY THEY NOT SEE THE PAIN OF THE STUDENTS WHO WASTEGE A LOT OF MONEY AND TWO YEARS CRUSIAL TIME TO OFF OUR LIFE IN B/W COURT AND GOVERNMENT DESIONS ALL OF THEM TO CUNSERT ANOTHER EXAM AND NOT THE WASTED THE TIME TO TET AND THE APOINMENT IN P.S.GOODDAY

    ReplyDelete

Please do not use abusive/gali comment to hurt anybody OR to any authority. You can use moderated way to express your openion/anger. Express your views Intelligenly, So that Other can take it Seriously.
कृपया ध्यान रखें: अपनी राय देते समय अभद्र शब्द या भाषा का प्रयोग न करें। अभद्र शब्दों या भाषा का इस्तेमाल आपको इस साइट पर राय देने से प्रतिबंधित किए जाने का कारण बन सकता है। टिप्पणी लेखक का व्यक्तिगत विचार है और इसका संपादकीय नीति से कोई संबंध नहीं है। प्रासंगिक टिप्पणियां प्रकाशित की जाएंगी।