HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?A.F.R.
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 30875 of 2013
Petitioner :- Jaswant Saini And 3 Ors.
Respondent :- Basic Shiksha Adhikari And 5 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- J.S.Pandey,V.Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Chaubey for the respondent No.1 and Sri Awadhesh Kumar for the respondent No.2.
The petitioners have all qualified the Central Teacher Eligibility Test conducted by the Central Board of Secondary Education. They belong to the Other Backward Caste Category. They have obtained 82 marks out of 150. Consequently, the percentage of their marks works out to be 54.67.
According to the guidelines framed by the National Council for Teacher Education on 11.2.2011 read with the clarification issued on 1.4.2011, a candidate appearing in the test will be treated to have passed the test provided he scores 60% or more marks in the test. This percentage is reduced by 5% in relation to the reserved category candidates.
The purpose of providing these minimum marks have been indicated in clause 9 of the Notification dated 11.2.2011. It provides that even in the recruitment process weightage has to be given to the TET scores.
The petitioners contend that they have been declared to have passed the CTET with only 82 marks and, therefore, according to the U.P. Basic Education Teachers Service Rules, 1981, they should be treated to be eligible as they possess the essential qualification of Teacher Eligibility Test.
However, the forms for applying to the post of Assistant Teacher which have to be uploaded on online basis, for which the last date is today, the minimum marks required for the reserved category candidate is indicated as 83 out of 150 which is 55.43%.
Sri V. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, contends that if the petitioners have been declared to have qualified the Teacher Eligibility Test conducted by the Central Board of Secondary Education, then such eligibility should also be included in respect of such candidates, who have obtained 82 marks out of 150. He submits that there can be no discrimination, as the percentage of the petitioner which is 54.67% should be read as 55%.
He contends that no candidate can obtain any fraction of marks because every question has one mark allotted in the answer-book. Consequently, if a candidate gets 82.6 marks, then only he will be able to score 55% and, therefore, on account of this anomaly existing, the Central Board of Secondary Education took a decision to treat such candidates to have qualified, who have obtained 82 marks. The reasons appears to be that no candidate can get half a mark or any fraction as on evaluation one gets full one marks or none. Thus, the CBSE which is the examining body has treated 82/150 = 54.67% as the pass percentage to qualify in the examination. Sri Singh, therefore, submits that the same criteria should be adopted by the State of U.P. while offering appointment to Assistant Teachers under the 1981 Rules.
Having considered the aforesaid submissions raised, primarily this is an issue of policy which has to be decided by the National Council for Teacher Education and it does not fall within the authority of the Central Board of Secondary Education to give any such decision in relation to calculation.
The reason is very simple inasmuch the National Council for Teacher Education is the Academic Authority defined and entitled to lay down the norms of minimum qualifications as per Section 23 of the the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The power, therefore, vests in the Academic Authority and not in the Central Board of Secondary Education.
There is nothing on record to indicate that the National Council for Teacher Education has considered this anomaly to be read in favour of the petitioners. In such a situation, the petitioners ought to have approached the National Council for Teacher Education for the redressal of their grievances.
I am not inclined to issue any mandamus as prayed for in view of the fact that the existing norms clearly require the possession of 55% or more marks in relation to the reserved category candidates. The score of 82 out of 150 does not amount to 55% or more and the principles of rounding off will not be available in view of the fact that the prescription in clause 9 of the guidelines dated 11.2.2011 clearly recites, the minimum percentage or more as the score, which has to be obtained by a candidate. In such circumstances, less than 55% is not contemplated therein.
Accordingly, the writ petition is consigned to records with liberty to the petitioners to approach the National Council for Teacher Education for any such clarification.
Order Date :- 29.5.2013
Irshad
JAIL WAALI KE LIYE
ReplyDelete.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Aankhon mein rehne wale ko yaad
nahi karte,Dil mein rehne wale ki
baat nahi karte,Hamari to ROOH me
bas gaye ho aap,Tabhi to milne ki
FARIYAD nahi karte.
Mere Pyaare Mitron UP Govt Ne
ReplyDeleteUPTET 2013 Mein Achchha Result
Dene Ki Taiyyari Ker Li Hai Jismein
Fail Hone Waale Abhaage Honge Fir
Bhi Unki Sankhyaa UP Board K
Intermediate Mein Fail Hone Waalon
Se Kam Hogi. Apne Hi District Mein
Centre Hone Ka Faayda Jyaada Se
Jyaada Log Prapt Ker Sakenge. Jin
Logon Ko Sirf Iss Exam Ko Pass
Kerke Job Turant Milni Hogi Wo
Lakshmi Ji K Saath Jugaad Lagaana
Shuru Ker Chuke Honge. Jitne Jyaada
Log Pass Honge Utne He Jyaada
Aapas Mein Gaali Deker Ladne Waale
Groups Banenge UPTET 2011 Ki
Tarah Aur Ek Doosre Ki Maan Tatha
Bahen Ko Gaaliyon Se Vibhooshit
Karenge Aur Govt Ko Khush Kerenge
Aur Aisi Govt Ko Aur Chaahiye He
Kya ?.
yeh sarkar to
ReplyDeleteatankvadiyo ko bhi jail se
bahar karna chahti
muslimo ko khush karne
ke liye lekin court ne
unhe aisa karne se rok
diya ab to tum jaan gaye
honge ki sarkar ki taquat
badi hai ya court ki agar
ve atankvadi chhot jaate
to tum ya koi bhi chain ki
neend na so pata phir
kahan gayi sarkar ki
taquat aur tum kahte ho
ki base of selection tay
karne ka adhikar sarkar
ko hota hai to mayavati
sarkar ne jis samay tet
merit se ghosna ki thi tab
wo kya sarkar nahin
thi????
BTC AUR VBTC
ReplyDeleteKO CHHOD DIYA JAYE TO
KAHIN PAR BHI AISE
VYAVASTA NAHIN JAHAN
PAR ACADEMIC KI BASE
PAR SELECTION HOTA HAI
CHAHE KISI BHI JOB KE
SELECTION KO UTAKAR
DEKH LO PHIR JAB AAP
ITNE BADE ACADEMIC KE
SAMARTHAK HO TO UN
SELECTION COMMITTEES
KO BHI ACADEMIC MERIT
KE FAAYDE BATA DO KYA
JAANE VE BHI APKI
BAATO SE SANTUSHT
HOKAR IAS/ PCS JAISE
EXAMS MEIN PRE/MANIS/
INTERVIEWS KE ESTHAN
PAR ACADEMIC BASE PAR
HI IAS/PCS BANANA
SHURU KAR DE.
AAP LOG
ReplyDeleteKAHTE HAI KI PAHLE
ACADEMIC MERIT KE
AADHAR PAR SELECTION
HOTE THE APKI BAAT
BILKUL SAHI HAI KINTU
PAHLE TET MERIT KI
VYAVASTHA NAHIN THI
AUR GOVT KE PASS EK
MATRA VIKALP ACADEMIC
MERIT THA KINTU AB TET
KE ANIVARYA HO JAANE
SE TEACHER SELECTION
KA EK ACHCHA VIKALP AA
GAYA HAI JISSE UTTAM
TEACHERS DESH KO
MILENGE TRIPLE BENCH
KE JUDGES NE BHI KAHA
HAI KI TET MERIT KE
WEIGHAGE KO KOI BHI
RAJYA SARKAR ANDEKHA
NAHIN KAR SAKTI HAI
VAISE BHI YEH MAMLA
DOUBLE BENCH MEIN
VICHARDHIN HAI AUR
JUDGES HUMSE JYADA
KANOON KE BAARE MEIN
JANTE HAI LEKIN MAIN EK
BAAT SPAST KARNA
CHAHOONGA KI JAB KOI
ACHCHA PRODUCT AATA
HAI TO SAB LOG USKO
APNA LETE HAI JAISE
PAHLE BAAT KARNE KE
LIYE LANDLINE PHONE KA
USE KARTE THE AAJ
MOBILE KA USE KARTE
HAI KOI YEH NAHIN
KAHTA HAI KI BHAI
PAHLE TO HUM
LANDLINE KA USE KARTE
THE HUM TO USI KA USE
KARENGE MOBILE KA USE
NAHIN KARENGE
AUR.ACADEMIC MERIT KI
SABSE BADI KAMI YAH
HAI KI YAH SABHI
BOARDS/UNIVERSITIES/
SYLLABUS/MARKING
PATTERN AADI KI DHYAN
MEIN RAKHE BINA SABKO
EK HI TARAJOO MEIN TOL
DETI HAI .
Kisi bhi merit ke hazar
ReplyDeletebaar jay karne se kuchh
nahin hoga kyoki triple
bench ke 52 page ke
faisle mein page 43 ko
dhyan se study karo to
tumhe judges ke rujhaano
ka pata chal jayega
unhone saaf kaha ki ncte
ki guidelines mein tet ko
weightage dene ki baat
kahi gayi hai to koi bhi
rajya sarkaar usko undeka
nahin kar sakti hai is baat
ke kya maayne hai aap
khud hi andaja laga sakte
ho vaise bhi harkauli ji ke
stay ka aadhar bhi base
of selection ko lekar laga
hai kyonki unka manna
that ki agar koi nai sarkar
ka gathan hota to wo
manchahe tarike se base
of selection change nahin
kar sakti hai ab to aap
sab academic samarthak
bandu samajh hi gaye
honge ki kon si merit se
selection hona tay hai.
NYAY SE BADKAR KOI
ReplyDeleteBHI SARKAR NAHIN
SANJAY DUTT KO
BACHANE KE LIYE
POLITICAL LEADERS NE
NICHE TAK KE JOR LAGA
LIYE MAGAR KYA HUA JAIL
KI HAWA KHA RAHA
HAI...USI PARKAR SE
SACH KO JHOOT NAHIN
BANAYA JA SAKTA HAI
NCTE KI GUIDELINES
MEIN SAAF SAAF LIKHA
HAI KI SELECTION
AUTHORITY KO
RECRUITMENE KE SAMAY
TET KA WEIGHTAGE DIYA
JAANA CHAYIE TO KOI BHI
GOVT KI ITNI TAQAT
NAHI KI WO IN
GUIDELINES KO ANDEKHA NAHI
KAR SAKE ISLIYE JAB BHARTI HOGI TET MERIT PAR HI HOGI .
JAY HIND
JAT TET
JAI BHARAT.
UMADEV JI mai aapki baaton ko manta hu aur apka sachcha samarthak bhi hoon.Such me aap dev hi hai.
DeleteUmadev kyo hat kar rahe ho tb ka order dekho
ReplyDeleteRAHUL savita
ReplyDelete................... apni maa Bahan ka vardnn karna chhod de uske liye aur log hain unko bhi mauqa milna chahiye .
tet pass candidate ka acd aadhar par selection ka virodh karane wale bhi acchi
ReplyDeletetaqrah janate hain ki brastachar ujagar hone ke baad tet merit ke aadhar per selection
nahi ho sakata ekin we apne khud ke swarth ke liye ye nahi chahate ki prt ki bharti ho
isliye aise logo se sawadhan,bharti kaise bhi ho tet uttirne hi isme samil honge,
hamara main maksad prt ki bharti ko start karawane se hona chahiye.
Is samay tet merit se bharti ki mang karane wale log non tet wale hai ve janate hai ki agar prakiya badalati hai to bharti puri nahi ho payegi , jab bharti tet merit se ho rahi thi to ye log acd ki bat kar rahe the . Bharti acd se huyi hai ,hogi aur hoti rahegi is saty ko koi jhutala nahi sakata
ReplyDeleteBharti jaise bhi ho,start hone do.Aapas me gaali-galauj karne se kya fayda?
ReplyDeleteYe log Loksabha chunav tak kisi tarah bharti ko rokna chahte hai,uske bad bharti cancle kar denge.
Mai 35 Hajar Rupye ka chalan banvaya hu.
TET me 94 marks aur Merit 57.5 hai.
Reply bandhu.....
khuda kare ki duplicate ka maqsad pura ho.
ReplyDeleteaur abhi brashtachaar saabit nahi ho payaa hai.
agar saabit bhi huwa to good part aur bad part waali baat hona tay hai.
jab koi pareshaan hota hai ya niraas hota hai ya apni haar dekhai dene legti hai to vo....
ReplyDelete1-saamne bale ke baat ko galat batata hai.
2-bhonkna suru kr deta hai.
3-or jub eski koi nahi sunta tb galeia dene lugeta hai.
Ajeet patel. Agar sarkar ko tet ya merit se bharti karane me dikkat hai to vo samvida par takh de 10000 rupye me har school par jab HC ka faisla ayega tab dekha jata jo b.ed vale btc vale bekar ghum rahe to usake parivar vale to khush rahte etna paisa laga ke b.ed jo ksrvaye hai
ReplyDeleteMai aapki baaton se sehmat hoo.
DeleteSarkar ko chahiye ki 10000/month sanvida par rakhe.
SAVDHAN SAVDHAN SAVDHAN
ReplyDeleteis maansun ke baad tet merit ka
jordar tufan aane ki prabal
sambhvna....is tufan me acd
samrthak or unke aakawo ke ud jane
ka andesa.....agr un logo ko is
tufaan se bachna hai to tet ki saran
me aa sakte hai....tet samrthak unko
apni saran me lene ke liye taiyar
hai.....jai tet jai old ad j
Tujh sy bicher gyi to marr jaungi..
ReplyDelete.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Kuch Aisey hi thy waady tere...
Kisk vade the kisne aapse vade kiye the,kyon tod diya aapka vada usne.
DeletePlease rply me
Deletehum us mansoon k welcome karne ko tayer hai
ReplyDeleteumadev g/tmntbbn.
hum us mansoon k welcome karne ko tayer hai
ReplyDeleteumadev g/tmntbbn.
Kaun aisa h jo umadevji ka need aur chain chura liya h please yar bata do na hume bhi..
ReplyDeletehi
ReplyDeleteलाखो टेट के फॉर्म निरस्त लेकिन क्यों,, ये फॉर्म भरते समय स्वीकार क्यों किये गए,,, सिर्फ फीस इक्कठ्ठा करने के लिए,, लेकिन अभी भी बहुत कुछ होना बाकी है,, पढ़िए ये खबर 4 दिसम्बर 2011 दैनिक जागरण इलाहबाद में प्रकाशित,, क्या ये लोग फिर से कोर्ट जायेंगे या फिर पूर्व का फैसला मान्य होगा,,,,.......
ReplyDelete******जवाब मिला, पर जब हजारों हो गए बाहर*******
Dec 04, 08:28 pm
वरिष्ठ संवाददाता, इलाहाबाद : माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद द्वारा 13 नवंबर को ली गई शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा की विज्ञप्ति में अस्पष्टता के कारण हजारों बीएड अभ्यर्थी परीक्षा से बाहर हो गए। अभ्यर्थी यूपी बोर्ड के अधिकारियों से पूछते रहे कि एमए के आधार पर बीएड करने वाले अभ्यर्थी टीईटी क्यों नहीं दे सकते, पर इसका कोई जवाब नहीं मिला, जबकि एनसीटीई ने माना है कि स्नातक या स्नातकोत्तर में 45 प्रतिशत अंक पाने वाले अभ्यर्थी शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा दे सकते हैं।
दरअसल, इलाहाबाद हाईकोट में मनीष कुमार सिंह द्वारा विशेष अपील 2076 , 2011 की है। याची के स्नातक में 43 प्रतिशत अंक हैं और उसने परास्नातक के आधार पर बीएड किया है। यूपीटीईटी की विज्ञप्ति में न्यूनतम योग्यता स्नातक में 45 प्रतिशत होना अनिवार्य था, ऐसे में हजारों ऐसे अभ्यर्थी, जिन्होंने परास्नातक के आधार पर बीएड किया था वे टीईटी की दौड़ से बाहर हो गए। याची के अधिवक्ता ने एनसीटीई से पूछा था कि आखिर वास्तविक स्थिति क्या है। इसके जवाब में एनसीटीई के अधिवक्ता ने कहा कि टीईटी देने के लिए ऐसे अभ्यर्थी पात्र हैं, जिनके स्नातक या स्नात्कोत्तर में 45 प्रतिशत अंक हैं। स्थिति स्पष्ट होने से एमए के आधार पर बीएड करने वाले अभ्यर्थी अपने को ठगा सा महसूस कर रहे हैं। अभ्यर्थियों का कहना है कि माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद की छोटी सी गलती के कारण हजारों छात्रों का भविष्य अंधकार में है। दुर्भाग्यपूर्ण है कि एनसीटीई द्वारा भी यह जानकारी तब दी गई जब यह मामला कोर्ट में गया। अभ्यर्थियों ने एनसीटीई को भी इस संबंध में पत्र लिखकर जानना चाहा था कि उन्हें टीईटी में क्यों नहीं भाग लेने दिया जा रहा है, जिसका कोई जवाब नहीं दिया गया। अभ्यर्थियों का कहना है कि उनके मानसिक व भावनात्मक उत्पीड़न के लिए आखिर कौन जिम्मेदार है?
Game ka niyam game suru hone se
ReplyDeletepahle banta hai.
so 72825 pad jise b.sp. govt. ne
n.c.t.e. se permission lekar srajit
kiya aur base of selection tet marit
rakkha nhi badal sakta aur bharti
old add ki sart pe hi hogi. haan agar
akal less base badalna chahe to
unhe nye pad srajit karne honge.
सरकार को सद्बुद्धि मिलने से तो रही ईश्वर हमारे वकीलों को सद्बुद्धि दे ताकि वे कोई नया शिगूफा छेड़ने की बजाय ब्रहद पीठ के आदेश के प्रकाश मे हरकौली जी से आदेश देने की प्रार्थना करे और यह मामला यहीं समाप्त हो ।
ReplyDeleteउत्तर प्रदेश में एक नई तरह की राजनीति इन दिनों पनप रही है, क्योंकि सपा सरकार जनहित की आड़ में आतंकवादियों, खूंखार अपराधियों, बलात्कारियों, हत्यारों और लुटेरों के ख़िलाफ़ चल रहे मुक़दमे बंद कराने की साज़िश में लगी है. इतना ही नहीं, समाजवादी पार्टी से जुड़े क़रीब तीन हज़ार लोगों के ख़िलाफ़भी विभिन्न धाराओं में चल रहे आपराधिक मुक़दमों को वापस लेने के लिए पेपर वर्क शुरू हो गया है. इनमें से कुछ के ख़िलाफ़ भले ही पिछली मायावती सरकार ने पक्षपातपूर्ण तरी़के से मुक़दमे ठोंक दिए थे,लेकिन अधिकांश लोगों की छवि साफ़-सुथरी नहीं रही है. हालांकि सपा नेतृत्व को अब यही लगता है कि आतंकवादियों पर दायर मुक़दमे हटाकर वह मुसलमानों का वोट हासिल कर सकती है. इतना ही नहीं, सपा सरकार ब्राह्मणों को लुभाने के लिए बसपा राज में इन पर दर्ज किए गए एससी/एसटी के मुकदमों से छूट देने की बात कर रही है, तो ठाकुरों को ख़ुश करने के लिए पूर्व मंत्री और बाहुबली नेता रघुराज प्रताप सिंह उर्फ राजा भैया जैसे कई क्षत्रिय नेताओं के ख़िलाफ़चल रहे मुक़दमे बंद करने की पहल भी कर चुकी है.
ReplyDeletelestest news tet ko wintage milne ki ummed lagane walo ko dhere ka jhtka jor se lga..... prt me 10800 pado par acd merit se bhari gayi.....
ReplyDeletetet merit ki mang karne wale total chutia aur naklchi hai, mai prove kr sakta hu........ aakhir jb GIC me gunak se bharti hui to inhone koi aaptti court me nahi dayar ki par ab prt me tet me nakl krk tet merit ki mang krk apne ko yogy kahte hai....... isse ye prove hota hai k ye total chutia logo ki fauz hai......... agar inme talent hota to pahle ye GIC me gunak banne se rokte.......
ReplyDeletesamajwadi parti jindabad....... mulam singh yadav jindabad....... akhilesh yadav jindabad....... kapil dev yadav jindabad...... acd merit jindabad.......
ReplyDeleteYe kya chakkar hai bhi.......ek hath me 2-2 partiyo ke jhande.sahi hai.....aaj ke waqt ki ye hi maang hai tet merit nahin to bharti bhi nahin.....!!!!
ReplyDeleteye tet merit nahi to bharti nahi sab ko bewkoof bana rha hai, ye ek hi hai, ye pagal ho chuka hai.
ReplyDeleteAnamika meet to any doctor because you are becomes mad.
ReplyDeleteanamika G
ReplyDelete........... meri aapko ye salaah hai ki aap fir se B.ed karo
mr. TMNTBBN(duplicate)
ReplyDeletehume aage ki bhartiyon se matlab nahi hai chahe to govt. rikshaw waalon ki bharti kare.
aap apni news ka source den
aur apni spelling theek karen
Anamika Ji dhayan se dekhen.
ReplyDelete(i) g+ Yani TET MERIT NAHI TO BHARTI BHI NAHI(Original)
(ii) e yani TET MERIT NAHI TO BHARTI BHI NAHI(duplicate)
उत्कर्ष जी धन्यवाद
ReplyDeleteउत्कर्ष जी धन्यवाद
ReplyDeleteMere question ka javab nhi diya aapne please reply me.tmntbbn g
ReplyDeleteyogita bali(zindgi zee) naam tha uska.
ReplyDelete.
.
.jine marne ki qasme khayi(1996).
.
.
fir usne zindgi se hi naata tod liya(1999)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDear TET frndz !
ReplyDeleteAap sab kaise hain ?
Aaj hum aap ko kuchh aur bhi important information batana chaahenge !
***********************************************************
High Court ne waise to lagbhag sabhi poits par nirnay de diya hai (Base of selection TET Vs Gudaank ko chhor kar)aur lagbhag sabhi doosri Yaachikaaen khaarij kar di hain un me se kuchh very important hum aap sab ko batana chahenge -----
1- OBC cnddt ke 82/150 marks hone par bhi (54.67%) ko 55% maanne ki yaachika khaarij. Ye cnddts bharti ke liye ahar nahi !
2- TET IInd paper qualified cnddts ko Primary me bharti ke liye ahar maanne ki yachika khaarij. (Ist paper qlfy hona chahiye , IInd paper wale kewal Junior ki vacancies me hi ja sakte hai )
3- NTT(Nursery teacher training) wale cnddts ko bharti me shamil karne ki yaachika khaarij.
4- 2011 me training poori kar chuke cnddts ki TET me na baithne aur vigyapan radd karne ki yaachika khaarij
(July ka intezar kijiye dosto aur dua kijiye k hum sab ki bhi councelling jald ho)
*********************************************************************************
shad8762@gmail.com(FACEBOOK).......cntct - 09307476428 (plz don't call , if u wanna say something u can SMS )