/* remove this */ Blogger Widgets /* remove this */

Friday, January 4, 2013

Appearing Candidate of UPTET 2013(Future Exam) Demand Provisional Selection in 72825 Teacher Rectt. Advt. and request that later s/he will clear UPTET 2013 Exam

Appearing Candidate of UPTET 2013(Future Exam) Demand Provisional Selection in 72825 Teacher Rectt. Advt. and request that later s/he will clear UPTET 2013 Exam


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

?Court No. - 20

Case :- MISC. SINGLE No. - 7492 of 2012

Petitioner :- Umesh Kumar Verma
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Basic Education U.P. & 5 Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Vinay Misra
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Illigible,M.M. Asthana

Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Arora,J.
Notices on behalf of opposite parties no. 1,3 and 4 have been accepted by learned Chief Standing Counsel, Shri Manish Mishra, Advocate has accepted notice on behalf of opposite parties no. 2 and 5, while Shri M.M. Asthana, Advocate has accepted notice on behalf of opposite party no. 6.
By means of present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus for commanding the opposite parties to permit the petitioner to apply for the post of trainee teacher so advertised in pursuance of the government order dated 05.12.2012 by ignoring the requirement of TET (Teachers Eligibility Test) certificate for the time being and instead permitting the petitioners to obtain the same when the test is held in January, 2013, in the interest of justice. Petitioner is further seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus for commanding the opposite parties to permit the petitioner to provisionally appear in the counseling after his form is accepted and considered and training may only be imparted to him once he clear the TET exam, which is scheduled to be held in January, 2013. 
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner has already approached the Secretary, Basic Education, Government of U.P., Lucknow by means of representation dated 15.12.2012 (Annexure no. 5 to the writ petition) and confines his prayer that direction may be issued to the Secretary, Basic Education, U.P. to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within time frame fixed by this Court.
Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner.
Taking into consideration the innocuous prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner, without entering into the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Secretary, Basic Education, Government of U.P., Lucknow to consider and decide the representation dated 15.12.2012 of the petitioner (Annexure no. 5 to the writ petition) in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 21.12.2012
Suresh/


Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2277706



78 comments:

  1. THANKS RATNESH JI TET KO S COURT ME LE JANE KE LYE.RATNESH JI AB UP GOV.YAH PROVE KARNE ME LAGJAGI KI TETME DHANDLI HUI BUT THERE NO ANS KI 1.DHANDLI KE SABUT KYA HE KEVAL AK ADHIKARI KO ARREST KARNESE DHANDLI SABIT NAHI HOTI 2.AAJ TAK UN STUDENT KE AGIANST KYA KARVAI KI JO IS DHANDLI ME LIPT THE 3 TANDAN JI NE BHI MANA KI UP ME EDUCATIN EK BUSINESS HE( IX & XI KE REGST. KE SUNVAI ME) 4.KYA KARAN HE SP SHASAN ME HE BUMPER RESULT AATA HE M MENE SELF CENTER PAR DEHKA HE KI KIS KADAR BOARD PAR PAPER SOLVE KARYA JATA.TAB ACD KESE SHAI HE 5. TET ME 100 SE KAM & ASD ME 60 PLUS INME SE ADHKTAR 2003 SE 2006 KE HE. YADI KISI KO MERE VICHAR BURE LAGO TO APNA KRODH AMANSINGHJAN2013@GMAIL.COM PAR NIKAL SAKTA

    ReplyDelete
  2. MENE PHELE HE AAPKO SUCHNA DI THI KI GEN. & OBC KI MERIT 60 SE KAM JA HE NAHI JA SAKTI AB AMAN SINGH KE BLOG SE YAH OR SATYA HOTA KI MERIT HIGH JAYGI. JAB OTHERS JOB KE LEY EXAM PASS KARNA HOTA TO TEACHER KE LEY KYO NAHI.

    ReplyDelete
  3. UMESH BAHANCHOD ISI BHARTI ME APNI MA CHODWANA CHAHTA HAI. JAI HO

    ReplyDelete
  4. KAMAL KI BAAT HAI DOSTO!!!!!! ,,,, KAISE KAISE LOG JUDGE JAISE VISHVASNNYA POST PAR TAINAT HO GYE HAI. ALL FOOL WANT TO BECOME JUDGE OF ALLAHABAD H.C TO LOOK INTO THE 72825 VACANCIES . IT IS AN EASY TO TO GET PUBLICATION

    ReplyDelete
  5. MAINE AAP SAB SE PAHLE HI KHA THA KI BHATI PAR AANTIM FAISLA SUPREME COURT HI KAR SAKTA HAI. YE H.C KI SUB KI BAAT NHI HAI.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Phir to 2015 tak ke exam ki bhati bhi uptet 2012 se kara do umesh Jill.........plagal pan jayada aur bhati kam............these r those people who don't want to computer this recruitment processsssdqsdd"........please now no writs.......

    ReplyDelete
  7. BREAKING BEWS!!!!!!!!!!!

    UP GOVT.NE AGLE VIDHAN SABHA CHUNAV YANI 2016 TAK B.ED/D.ED/B.EL.ED/BTC AADI KARNE WALO YA KEWAL CHAHNE WALO KO ISI BHATI ME AAWWDAN KE LIYE CHOOT DE DI HAI. SO DONT WASTE TIME INTER ME PADNE WALE BHI APPLY KAR SAKTE HAI UNHE KEWAL EK AFFIDAVIT DENA HOGI KI WO SAMAY SE AAKAR APNA APNA SALARY LE JAYENGE.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Tet merit walo, time tumhara kharb hai aur tension acd walo ko de rahe ho, kahi bhi jao laut kr gov k pas hi awoge... HC k result k baad bhi kuch samjh nhi aya bewkufo ko...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ab jhandu tere tet me numbar kam he tabi to morkho ki tarah bharti hona chata he .

      Delete
  9. Ratnesh tu to gaya . Sale tait fail kyo logo ki life ke sath khel raha hai. Bahut paisa barbad ho gaya hai. Ager kuch bhi galat hua to mai tujhe beech chaurahe per nanga kerke marunga. Sale garib longo ka bahut rupya barbad hua hai.

    ReplyDelete
  10. TET KO KAM SE KAM 30% WETEZ TO MILNA HI CHAHIYE

    ReplyDelete
  11. Govt.ko chahiye ki use 2012 ka. Tet june me karaye tab bharti kare yeh . Tet tostart se 420 tha kyonki paise se results sahi huye the

    ReplyDelete
  12. Mai abhi inter pass kiya hi hamko bhi up prt ki bharti me shamil jiya jae bad me mai BA BED TET CLEAR kar duga agar aisa nahi hua to mai tandan se bat karuga

    ReplyDelete
  13. पहले सर्वर डाउन अब शट डाउन
    मुरादाबाद : पहले सर्वर डाउन और अब शट डाउन। प्रशिक्षु अध्यापक भर्ती की आनलाइन आवेदन प्रक्रिया अभ्यर्थियों को रास नहीं आ रही है। आवेदन की राह में बिजली संकट का रोड़ा खड़ा हो गया है। बिजली कटौती के कारण आवेदन की प्रक्रिया रफ्तार नहीं पकड़ पा रही है। पारा गिरने के साथ ही बिजली संकट गहराने लगा है। इसका खामियाजा प्रशिक्षु अध्यापक भर्ती के लिए आवेदन करने वालों को भुगतना पड़ रहा है। पहले सर्वर डाउन होने के कारण चार दिनों तक आवेदन प्रक्रिया ठप रही। सूबे भर के अभ्यर्थियों ने इसकी शिकायत दर्ज कराई तो बेसिक शिक्षा मंत्री ने आवेदन की तिथि बढ़ाई। सर्वर ने रफ्तार पकड़ी तो बिजली कटौती की समस्या आड़े आ रही है। ठंड के कारण साइबर कैफे भी पूर्वाह्न 11 बजे के बाद खुल रहे हैं। आवेदन प्रक्रिया शुरू होते ही बिजली का शट डाउन हो जाता है। इससे आवेदन की प्रक्रिया रफ्तार नहीं पकड़ पा रही है। साइबर कैफे संचालकों का कहना है कि पहले दिन भर में तीन सौ आवेदन तक भर जाते थे, मगर बिजली कटौती के कारण पूरे दिन कैफे खोलने के बाद भी बमुश्किल 60-70 फार्म भरे जा पा रहे हैं। बिजली कटौती के कारण पंजीयन और फार्म भरने के लिए लाने वाले अभ्यर्थियों को परेशानी का सामना करना पड़ रहा है। बिजली आए तो भरें फार्म बिजली कटौती से त्रस्त अभ्यर्थियों का कहना है कि बिजली आए तो फार्म भरें। आशियाना की संगीता सिंह आवेदन के लिए साइबर कैफे गई, बिजली न आने के कारण उन्हें बैरंग लौटना पड़ा। मूंढापांडे से बुध बाजार स्थित आवेदन के लिए आए राकेश सिंह, रघुवीर सैनी, इम्तियाज अहमद को भी बिजली न आने के कारण कैफे से बैरंग लौटना पड़ा। अभ्यर्थियों ने दिन और शाम के समय बिजली कटौती न करने की मांग उठाई है

    ReplyDelete
  14. रकम डूबी, भविष्य भी लगा दांव पर
    कार्यालय संवाददाता, मुरादाबाद : प्रशिक्षु अध्यापक भर्ती की आनलाइन प्रक्रिया में संशोधन का कोई प्रारूप न होने से हजारों अभ्यर्थियों का आवेदन निरस्त होने का खतरा उत्पन्न हो गया है। कारण आवेदन में मामूली चूक। गलती का संशोधन न होने से अभ्यर्थियों को परेशानी का सामना करना पड़ रहा है। रोजाना सैकड़ों अभ्यर्थियों को इस समस्या से दो-चार होना पड़ रहा है। आवेदकों का कहना है कि आवेदन की प्रक्रिया इतनी जटिल है कि सावधानी से आवेदन के बाद भी कोई न कोई चूक हो जाती है, अगर संशोधन का कोई कॉलम होता तो गलती दुरूस्त की जा सकती थी। कैफे संचालक राकेश सक्सेना की मानें तो रोजाना दर्जनों आवेदक के आवेदन में गड़बड़ी होती है। इससे न केवल आवेदक की रकम डूब रही है, बल्कि आवेदन भी निरस्त होने का खतरा है। बेसिक शिक्षा की वेबसाइट पर जारी नियमावली के मुताबिक आवेदन में मामूली चूक होने पर भी आवेदन निरस्त कर दिए जाएंगे। एक जिले में आवेदन का शुल्क पांच सौ रुपये है। ऐसे में मामूली गलती होने पर आवेदन के पांच सौ रुपये डूबने के साथ ही उस जिले में आवेदन नहीं कर पाएंगे। अभ्यर्थियों ने शासन को पत्र भेजकर आवेदन में संशोधन की मांग उठाई है।

    ReplyDelete
  15. Mere pados main ek sajjan rahte hai.unka kahna hai ki up gov tatha anya gov jo acd vagara se barti kar rahi hai usse hamare bachho ko yogya teacher nahi mil payege,tatha esse samanta ke molik adhikar ka bhi hanan hota hai esse siksha ke star par bhi bura asar padta hai.esko lekar vo supreme court main janhit yachika dalne ja rahe hain.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Mere pados main ek sajjan rahte hai.unka kahna hai ki up gov tatha anya gov jo acd vagara se barti kar rahi hai usse hamare bachho ko yogya teacher nahi mil payege,tatha esse samanta ke molik adhikar ka bhi hanan hota hai esse siksha ke star par bhi bura asar padta hai.esko lekar vo supreme court main janhit yachika dalne ja rahe hain.

    ReplyDelete
  17. HI,

    WHAT IS THE TIME THE PEOPLE WHO ARE FAILURE IN UP TET OR C.TET THEY ARE ALSO DEMANDING TEACHER'S JOB. THEY SHOULD CAME SHAME, THEY SHOULD DIE IN A CHULLU WATER.

    ReplyDelete
  18. YAHI TO HOGA JAB TET KO MATR PATRTA BANAYA JAYEGA APPEARING WALE KAHENGE PAHLE JOB DO TET TO FIR KAR HI LENGE 90 NUMBER HI TO LANA HAI.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Lagta he up me aage ab bharti teachers k sath sath or kisi ki bhi nahi hogi
    isliye 2013 to kam he 2063 tak bhavisya me aage hone vale sabhi tet candidate ko rajya sarkar isi bharti me samil kare

    jay ho up ke berojgaron ki gandi (sadi hui gatar ki tatti jesi) mansikta ki

    jo dusre ka bura sochta he uska khud ka bhala kabhi nahi hota

    ReplyDelete
  20. Are bewakufo ye bharti nahi hone doge kya.kyo writ pe writ kar rahe ho.pahle tet pass kar be uske bad avedan kar.abhi se dimag mat laga bhosri ke.bahanchod sale.

    ReplyDelete
  21. don t worry old and new dono ad par bharti hogi just imagine recruitment on around 145000posts .

    ReplyDelete
  22. don t worry old and new dono ad par bharti hogi just imagine recruitment on around 145000posts .

    ReplyDelete
  23. Bharti rokwane ke peche pade ho.tum agar samne ajao to wo hal karunga ki bhikh mangne layak nahi rah jaoge.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Bharti rokwane ke peche pade ho.tum agar samne ajao to wo hal karunga ki bhikh mangne layak nahi rah jaoge.

    ReplyDelete
  25. aman ji u realy said well bcoz ur words r authentic n awesome.u tried to show the real picture of this SP government.this gvrnt is doing only drama in the name of these vacancies... AMAN ji people like u should come n share thier view.thanks

    ReplyDelete
  26. aman ji u realy said well bcoz ur words r authentic n awesome.u tried to show the real picture of this SP government.this gvrnt is doing only drama in the name of these vacancies... AMAN ji people like u should come n share thier view.thanks

    ReplyDelete
  27. will some one share with me , ki agar ye teacher ki job lag jati hai to , teacher ki salary kitni hogi in a month ?

    ReplyDelete
  28. mera ladka paida hone wala hi kya wo bhi apply kar sakta hi......?

    ReplyDelete
  29. सभी भर्तियाँ प्रतियोगिता की मेरिट के आधार पर ही होना चाहिये क्योँकि अकाडमिक आपकी स्थाई योग्यता का निर्धारण नहीँ करता बल्कि प्रतियोगिता आपकी वर्तमान योग्यता बताता है, अतः टीईटी अंकोँ के वरीयता क्रम से चयन ही सर्वश्रेष्ठ है ।

    ReplyDelete
  30. सभी भर्तियाँ प्रतियोगिता की मेरिट के आधार पर ही होना चाहिये क्योँकि अकाडमिक आपकी स्थाई योग्यता का निर्धारण नहीँ करता बल्कि प्रतियोगिता आपकी वर्तमान योग्यता बताता है, अतः टीईटी अंकोँ के वरीयता क्रम से चयन ही सर्वश्रेष्ठ है ।

    ReplyDelete
  31. Court No. - 33
    Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 2296 of 2011
    Petitioner :- Mithai Lal And Others
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- Abhishek Srivastava
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Ajeet Kr. Singh,R.A. Akhtar
    Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli,J.
    Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J.
    We have heard the learned counsel for the appellants, learned counsel for
    N.C.T.E. and the learned State Counsel.
    Candidates who had done their B.Ed. course through distance learning mode
    were considered eligible by the N.C.T.E. to take the T.E.T. Examination but
    the State Government was not permitting the same. The writ petition was
    filed by the appellants seeking permission to appear in the T.E.T.
    Examination. The learned Single Judge by the impugned order dismissed the
    writ petition on the ground that because of the current employment of the
    appellants they were exempted and therefore not required to take the T.E.T.
    examination.
    In this appeal an interim order was passed permitting the appellants to
    provisionally appear in the T.E.T. examination.
    Therefore, the above two questions arise for adjudication after exchange of
    pleadings in this appeal.
    All parties including the appellants are agreed that the nature of current
    employment was not such as would exempt the appellants from the T.E.T.
    Examination. Therefore, the issue does not survive.
    So far as, the distinction between a normal classroom mode and distance
    learning mode is concerned that controversy has also been laid to rest by the
    decision of this Court in the case of Gyanendra Kumar Sharma and others
    vs. State of U.P. and others being Special Appeal No. 1271 of 2007 decided
    on 03.10.2007. It has been laid down by this Court that there is no difference
    between the two modes of acquiring the B.Ed. qualification.
    In the circumstances, the appeal is finally allowed. The appellants result of
    the T.E.T. Examination in which the appellants had appeared provisionally
    would be declared and relevant mark-sheet/certificate issued forthwith,
    treating the provisional appearance to be regular appearance.
    Order Date :- 3.1.2013
    S.Prakash
    (Naheed Ara Moonis,J.) (Sushil Harkauli,J

    ReplyDelete
  32. Court No. - 33
    Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 2296 of 2011
    Petitioner :- Mithai Lal And Others
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- Abhishek Srivastava
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Ajeet Kr. Singh,R.A. Akhtar
    Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli,J.
    Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J.
    We have heard the learned counsel for the appellants, learned counsel for
    N.C.T.E. and the learned State Counsel.
    Candidates who had done their B.Ed. course through distance learning mode
    were considered eligible by the N.C.T.E. to take the T.E.T. Examination but
    the State Government was not permitting the same. The writ petition was
    filed by the appellants seeking permission to appear in the T.E.T.
    Examination. The learned Single Judge by the impugned order dismissed the
    writ petition on the ground that because of the current employment of the
    appellants they were exempted and therefore not required to take the T.E.T.
    examination.
    In this appeal an interim order was passed permitting the appellants to
    provisionally appear in the T.E.T. examination.
    Therefore, the above two questions arise for adjudication after exchange of
    pleadings in this appeal.
    All parties including the appellants are agreed that the nature of current
    employment was not such as would exempt the appellants from the T.E.T.
    Examination. Therefore, the issue does not survive.
    So far as, the distinction between a normal classroom mode and distance
    learning mode is concerned that controversy has also been laid to rest by the
    decision of this Court in the case of Gyanendra Kumar Sharma and others
    vs. State of U.P. and others being Special Appeal No. 1271 of 2007 decided
    on 03.10.2007. It has been laid down by this Court that there is no difference
    between the two modes of acquiring the B.Ed. qualification.
    In the circumstances, the appeal is finally allowed. The appellants result of
    the T.E.T. Examination in which the appellants had appeared provisionally
    would be declared and relevant mark-sheet/certificate issued forthwith,
    treating the provisional appearance to be regular appearance.
    Order Date :- 3.1.2013
    S.Prakash
    (Naheed Ara Moonis,J.) (Sushil Harkauli,J

    ReplyDelete
  33. abe salo kyon bharti rokna chahte ho aur koi kam nhi h kamino tum par

    ReplyDelete
  34. salon kyon bharti ko rokna chahte ho aur koi kam nhi tum pe

    ReplyDelete
  35. kyon bharti ki aisi tasi mare ho salo

    ReplyDelete
  36. will some one share with me ? ek teacher ki salary in hand kitni hogi ? ab jo appoint honge tet wale

    ReplyDelete
  37. EVERAGE 100000 FORM PER DISTRICT 1000 form par merit ===60.67 see http://myshoppy.co.in/uptet/merit_list.php

    ReplyDelete
  38. HI....
    DOSTO AB TO UPTET SUPERME COURT ME KHARA HAI... DEKHO AB KYA HOTA HAI

    ReplyDelete
  39. aao tm bhi a jao 2013 wale tmhari kami hi reh gayi thi is bharti me... nursery kg walo ko bi shamil krlo.

    ReplyDelete
  40. ao tm logo ki hi kami reh gyi thi is bharti me 2013 walo.tm bi ao apne rishtedaro ko bi bula lo.me to kehti hu nurssery or KG walo ko bhi is bharti me shamil kr lo.yaar hadd hoti hai kisi baat ki.......

    ReplyDelete
  41. Up me uptet ke exam apr or nov me hoge

    ReplyDelete
  42. Up me uptet ke exam apr or nov me hoge

    ReplyDelete
  43. Supreme court ki writ ki defects khatm ho gayi hai aur ab under scrutiny hai.

    ReplyDelete
  44. kya awedan k baad ka domocile manyahoga

    ReplyDelete
  45. mera domocile ab bna h kya ye manya hoga

    ReplyDelete
  46. koi to batae kya mera domocile chalega mere paas purana bhi h pr wo internet ka nhi h

    ReplyDelete
  47. ab jo cort jayenge sarkar un logo pe sarkari kam me wevadhan dalne ke khilaf cec karegi aur bharsak un logo pe 50000 se 100000 rs ka jurmana lag sakta hai acarding to say ramgovind chaudhari.

    ReplyDelete
  48. ab jo log writ dalene jara soch samjh kar dale nahi to sarkar un logo ke khilaf veses ces dalne ki yojna bana rahi hai un logo pe sarkari kam me wewdhan dalne ke khilaf aur unpar50000se 100000 Rs ka jurmana lag sakta hai acording to say
    ramgovind chaudhari .

    ReplyDelete
  49. ab jo log writ dalene jara soch samjh kar dale nahi to sarkar un logo ke khilaf veses ces dalne ki yojna bana rahi hai un logo pe sarkari kam me wewdhan dalne ke khilaf aur unpar50000se 100000 Rs ka jurmana lag sakta hai acording to say
    ramgovind chaudhari .

    ReplyDelete
  50. Hello Ajay, Mai aap ka support karta hu TET ka 50% benifit sabhi ko diya jaye is bat ke liye hum log court me jayege because government ne sabhi degree ka percentage diya hai to TET ka bhi 50% milna chahiye.Please sabhi log mera support karo.
    TET SANGARSH MORCHA JINDABAD

    ReplyDelete
  51. kal 9 jan hai, kal tet weightage walo ke sapne toot jayege

    ReplyDelete
  52. mere kai janne walo k tet me 85 se90 k beech me hi pr unki acd merit 64to 68 hi


    jabki kai logo k tet me 105 to 115 tak hi aor unki acd merit 55 - 56 hi

    mujhe pta hi unhone paisa dekr tet me no nhi laye hi blki mehnt se laye hi
    to bhaiyo btao tet ki merit nhi to kamse kam wetez kyo n diya jaye
    filhal jo bhi hoga wo gov aor cort ki mrji pr hoga pr mine jo poocha hi bs uska ans janna chahta ho
    plz tel me anyone...........

    ReplyDelete
  53. mere kai janne walo k tet me 85 se90 k beech me hi pr unki acd merit 64to 68 hi


    jabki kai logo k tet me 105 to 115 tak hi aor unki acd merit 55 - 56 hi

    mujhe pta hi unhone paisa dekr tet me no nhi laye hi blki mehnt se laye hi
    to bhaiyo btao tet ki merit nhi to kamse kam wetez kyo n diya jaye
    filhal jo bhi hoga wo gov aor cort ki mrji pr hoga pr mine jo poocha hi bs uska ans janna chahta ho
    plz tel me anyone...........

    ReplyDelete
  54. bhiyo upper primary vacancy kab tak aaygi plz tell me

    ReplyDelete
  55. bhiyo upper primary vacancy kab tak aaygi plz tell me

    ReplyDelete
  56. upper primary vacancy kab tak aa rahi h plz tell me

    ReplyDelete
  57. upper primary vacancy kab tak aa rani h plz tell me

    ReplyDelete
  58. upper primary vacancy kab tak aa rani h plz tell me

    ReplyDelete
  59. Kal arun tandan tet ka 50% to 100% wtz dekar nayay kanoon par par bharose ko ,
    satay ki jeet ko kayam rakhenge warna logo ka nayepalika se bhi wishwas uth jayega...
    satye ki vijay ho...
    sataymave jayete...

    ReplyDelete
  60. old adv to bahal hokar hi rahega qki govt ne old adv cancellation ki wajaah new selection process bataya hai (jaisa ki cancellation order mai kaha gaya hai )yei tark bilkul nira dhar hai.s c bhi k manushree wa hemani malhotra ke matter mai keh chuka hai ki selection process ek bar decide hone par change nahi kiya ja sakta hai qki ye constitution ke article 14and 16ke virudh hai (janhit prabhavit karta hai )ab ye dekhna honourable justice tondon g constitution ke rakshak bante hai ya bhakshak .s c se to old adv bahal hohi jayega lekin waha jane ka rasta hc se hokar hi jata hai .anuchit bharti s c nischit rup se cancel kar dega . jaha tak present adv ka sawal hai agar yei rehta hai to ismai tet ka bharank jarur milega qki n c t e guideline bhi isko support karta hai wa iska dusra reason yei hai ki paiso ki bhukhi ye govt tet ko kewal patrata banakar next tet exam mai applicants ki sankhya ko kam karke apna rajaswa kam karna nahi chahegi .

    ReplyDelete

Please do not use abusive/gali comment to hurt anybody OR to any authority. You can use moderated way to express your openion/anger. Express your views Intelligenly, So that Other can take it Seriously.
कृपया ध्यान रखें: अपनी राय देते समय अभद्र शब्द या भाषा का प्रयोग न करें। अभद्र शब्दों या भाषा का इस्तेमाल आपको इस साइट पर राय देने से प्रतिबंधित किए जाने का कारण बन सकता है। टिप्पणी लेखक का व्यक्तिगत विचार है और इसका संपादकीय नीति से कोई संबंध नहीं है। प्रासंगिक टिप्पणियां प्रकाशित की जाएंगी।