UPTET : Allahabad High Court Cases Club All Cases Related to UP Primary Teacher Recruitment Through TET Exam
See Details : -
64. DF 76039/2011 YADAV KAPILDEV LAL BAHADUR ALOK KUMAR YADAV
RAJESH YADAV
Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS C.S.C.
K.S. KUSHWAHA
WITH WRIA- 76355/2011 SARASWATI SRIVASTAVA SAROJ YADAV
Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHE C.S.C.
-RS C.N.TRIPATHI
R.A.AKHTAR
WITH WRIA- 76392/2011 SHIVANI ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA
Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHE C.S.C.
-RS RAJEEV JOSHI
C.N.TRIPATHI
WITH WRIA- 76595/2011 SABA ANJUM & OTHERS INDRASEN SINGH TOMAR
AMIT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER C.S.C.
K.S. KUSHWAHA
WITH WRIA- 1442/2012 VASUDEV CHAURASIA & OTHERS RAVINDRA PRAKASH SRIV.
Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS C.S.C.
AKHILESH KUMAR
R.A. AKHTAR
WITH WRIA- 75392/2011 VIJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI & ANOTHER AJOY KUMAR BANERJEE
Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS C.S.C.
K.A. USMANI
WITH WRIA- 2614/2012 MAHESH CHANDRA BHUPENDRA PAL SINGH
Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS C.S.C.
S.S. BHADAURIYA
WITH WRIA- 2608/2012 MOHD. SADAB SYED IRFAN ALI
MOHD. NAUSHAD
Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS C.S.C.
ILLEGIBLE
WITH WRIA- 6826/2012 VIMLESH KUMAR ALOK KUMAR YADAV
Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS C.S.C.
R.S. PRASAD
R.A. AKTAR
WITH WRIA- 51336/2010 SMT. MINTOO KUMARI NARENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS C.S.C.
K.S. KUSHWAHA
Case Status - Allahabad
Pending | |
Writ - A : 76039 of 2011 [Varanasi] | |
Petitioner: | YADAV KAPILDEV LAL BAHADUR |
Respondent: | STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS |
Counsel (Pet.): | ALOK KUMAR YADAV |
Counsel (Res.): | C.S.C. |
Category: | Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Primary Education (teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Appointment |
Date of Filing: | 21/12/2011 |
Last Listed on: | 02/05/2012 in Court No. 33 |
Next Listing Date (Likely): | 15/05/2012 |
This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).
Source : http://allahabadhighcourt.in/casestatus/caseDetailA.jsp?type=WRIA&num=76039&year=2011
*********************
?Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 76355 of 2011
Petitioner :- Saraswati Srivastava
Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Saroj Yadav
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,C.N.Tripathi,R.A.Akhtar
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Sri C.N. Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondents no. 3 to 5 prays for and is allowed a week's time to seek instruction, whether advertisement in question would cover the candidates who possess educational qualification mentioned in regulation framed by N.C.T.E. eligible for appointment of primary teachers are not.
2. List on 09.01.2012.
Order Date :- 2.1.2012
AK
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1605269
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 76355 of 2011
Petitioner :- Saraswati Srivastava
Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Saroj Yadav
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,C.N.Tripathi,R.A.Akhtar
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Connect with Writ Petition No.76039 of 2011 and put up on the date fixed in the aforesaid matter.
In the meantime, respondents may file counter affidavit.
Order Date :- 11.1.2012
KA
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1627319
*********************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 76392 of 2011
Petitioner :- Shivani
Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Abhishek Srivastava
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,C.N.Tripathi,Rajeev Joshi
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Connect with Writ Petition No.76039 of 2011 and put up on the date fixed in the aforesaid matter.
In the meantime, respondents may file counter affidavit.
Order Date :- 11.1.2012
KA
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1627315
****************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 76392 of 2011
Petitioner :- Shivani
Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Abhishek Srivastava
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,C.N.Tripathi,Rajeev Joshi
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Sri C.N. Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondents no. 2 and 5 prays for and is allowed a week's time to file affidavit specifically stating, whether the present advertisement is confined only for six months teachers training and whether after completion of this training any process of recruitment in accordance with U.P. Basic Education Teachers Services Rules, 1981 shall further be made or not.
2. List on 09.01.2012.
Order Date :- 2.1.2012
AK
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1605289
***************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 76595 of 2011
Petitioner :- Saba Anjum & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another
Petitioner Counsel :- Indrasen Singh Tomar,Amit Kumar Srivastava
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.S. Kushwaha
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Connect with Writ Petition No.76039 of 2011 and put up on the date fixed in the aforesaid matter.
In the meantime, respondents may file counter affidavit.
Order Date :- 11.1.2012
KA
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1627320
*******************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 76595 of 2011
Petitioner :- Saba Anjum & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another
Petitioner Counsel :- Indrasen Singh Tomar,Amit Kumar Srivastava
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.S. Kushwaha
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
As prayed, put up on 09.01.2012 to enable learned counsel for the respondents to seek instructions, whether the qualification provided in N.C.T.E. regulation would be treated to be a valid qualification for considering eligibility of candidates for appointment and training as Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools.
Order Date :- 3.1.2012
AK
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1607771
*******************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1442 of 2012
Petitioner :- Vasudev Chaurasia & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Ravindra Prakash Sriv.
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Akhilesh Kumar,R.A. Akhtar
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Connect with Writ Petition No.76039 of 2011 and put up on the date fixed in the aforesaid matter.
In the meantime, respondents may file counter affidavit.
Order Date :- 11.1.2012
KA
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1627284
******************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 75392 of 2011
Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Tripathi & Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Ajoy Kumar Banerjee
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.A. Usmani
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 prays for and is allowed a week's time to file an affidavit and inform whether candidates possessing requisite qualification prescribed in Regulation framed by NCTE are all entitled or only candidates having B.Ed. qualification would be considered for the purposes of six months' training in question.
List/put up on 09.01.2012.
Order Date :- 2.1.2012
KA
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1605749
*****************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 75392 of 2011
Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Tripathi & Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Ajoy Kumar Banerjee
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.A. Usmani
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Connect with Writ Petition No.76039 of 2011 and put up on the date fixed in the aforesaid matter.
In the meantime, respondents may file counter affidavit.
Order Date :- 11.1.2012
KA
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1627318
*****************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2614 of 2012
Petitioner :- Mahesh Chandra
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Bhupendra Pal Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,S.S. Bhadauriya
Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh,J.
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that identical writ petition no. 76039 of 2011is coming on 01.02.2012.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, put up this matter as fresh on 01.02.2012.
Order Date :- 16.1.2012
PKB
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1636181
**************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2614 of 2012
Petitioner :- Mahesh Chandra
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Bhupendra Pal Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,S.S. Bhadauriya
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Connect and list along with Writ Petition No.76039 of 2011.
Order Date :- 1.2.2012
KA
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1663614
****************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2608 of 2012
Petitioner :- Mohd. Sadab
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Syed Irfan Ali,Mohd. Naushad
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Illegible
Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh,J.
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that identical writ petition no. 76039 of 2011is coming on 01.02.2012.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, put up this matter as fresh on 01.02.2012.
Order Date :- 16.1.2012
PKB
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1636184
*************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2608 of 2012
Petitioner :- Mohd. Sadab
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Syed Irfan Ali,Mohd. Naushad
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Illegible
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Connect and list along with Writ Petition No.76039 of 2011.
Order Date :- 1.2.2012
KA
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1663613
************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6826 of 2012
Petitioner :- Vimlesh Kumar
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Alok Kumar Yadav
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,R.A. Aktar,R.S. Prasad
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Put up alongwith Writ Petition No. 76039 of 2011 on the date fixed, i.e., 10.02.2012.
Order Date :- 7.2.2012
AK
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1675078
**************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 51336 of 2010
Petitioner :- Smt. Mintoo Kumari
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Narendra Pratap Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C. S. C.
Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
��� Learned Standing counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4.
��� Six weeks time is accorded to each one of the respondents to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within next two weeks.
��� List thereafter.
Order Date :- 25.8.2010
Dhruv
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=769769
*************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 51336 of 2010
Petitioner :- Smt. Mintoo Kumari
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Narendra Pratap Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C. S. C.,K.S. Kushwaha
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.
��� List is revised.� Learned counsel for respondent No.4 is not present.
��� List in the next cause list.
Order Date :- 14.7.2011
L.F./12
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1309170
abhi tak ye nahi bataya gaya ki kal third party ka kya roll tha aur nahi to kyun nahi (please tet leaders ya unke pratinidhi jo blog par active hai ke dawara spasht kiya jaye)
ReplyDeletekahi se koi baat clear nahi ho pa rahi hai,janata darbar me kya koi baat hue hai?
ReplyDeletekoi bhi Leader na kucha bolne ko taiyyar hai na samne aane ko.
ReplyDeletesamajh me nahi aata majra kya hai?
ranjeet ji jaise jo leader samne aa rahe hain voh bhi sath chaondne ki baat kar rahe hain.
ReplyDeleteye nyaypalika hi thi jisne ramdev par bhi 25% jurmana laga diya tha jabki unki taraf se ramjethmelani the aur apni taraf se dono vakeel kapil ke saath hai isiliye bina third party ke kuch nahi ho sakta
ReplyDeleteAshok JNV agar aap blog read karo to please call me as soon as possible.
ReplyDeleteTet netao ne sab jilo se rupai jama karae aur hum sab se kaha ki hum case me third parti ban gae hai khare ko vakil banaya hai lekin ab koi yah batane vala nahi ki os vakil ka rol 2may ko kya raha agar aisa raha to age se na to koi chanda dega aur na dharna dega plz koch to espast karo netao.
ReplyDeletetet merrit ke paksha me koi matter english ya hindi me likhkar de mai use zee helpline me doon meri english acchi nahi hai aur mujhe hindi typing nahi aati
ReplyDeleteapane sangatan me pura vishwas rakhe bahakawe me na aye kyoki sangatan kamjor hone par kinare ho jayenge ..bhram na failaye na failane de bharati kewal sangatan /morcha ke majabuti par nirabhar hai use majabut kare hopeless kadapi naho ...
ReplyDeletejit hamari hi hogi...
jai hind...
jai tet merit...
ratnesh tripathi
Tet neta thak kar so gaye hai
ReplyDeleteab koi dharne mai nahi jayega
जब टीईटी मेरिट होल्डर राज्य व केंद्र सरकार के शासनादेश / नियमों के तहत नियुक्ति पाने के हकदार हो गए , तब अंत समय में प्रक्रिया में बदलाव नहीं हो सकता |
ReplyDeleteगेम के नियम शुरू में तय किये जाते हैं न की तब जब गेम समाप्ति की और हो |
दिन ढलते जा रहे हैं और अभ्यार्थीयों की बेचेनी बदती जा रही है |
अभी तक राज्य सरकार ने भी स्पष्ट नहीं किया है कि टीईटी अभ्यार्थीयों कब व कैसे होगी |
हालाँकि टीईटी अभ्यार्थीयों की नियुक्ति नियमानुसार मजबूत है क्योंकि सभी नियम उनकी भर्ती को वेध बता रहे हैं |
अभी तक धांधली के आरोप अदलत में साबित हुए हैं की नहीं ये भी पता नहीं चल पाया है |
धांधली का इमानदार अभ्यार्थीयों से क्या सम्बन्ध और सजा के पात्र तो दोषी अभ्यर्थी ही होते हैं , इस समय टीईटी अभ्यार्थी गंभीर मानसिक परेशानी से जूझ रहे हैं और इस सबको उनका परिवार भी भुगत रहा है |
कई अभ्यार्थीयों का तर्क है -
कि पहले तो इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट ने विज्ञापन में संशोधन ( आवेदन ५ जिलों के स्थान पर सभी जिलों में ), रिज़ल्ट में संशोधन का आदेश बहुत जल्दी दे दिया था पर अब
जबकि एक ऐसे व्यक्ति ने याचिका सिर्फ मामले को अटकने के लिये डाली है
१. क्योंकी न तो उसके अधिकारों का हनन हो रहा है (व्यक्ति कोई बी एस ए नहीं )
२. विज्ञापन सचिव निकाले या बी एस ए , उससे उस व्यक्ति को कोई फर्क नहीं पड़ना
तो ऐसे मामले में इतनी देरी क्यों
और अब अभ्यार्थी क्या करें न तो वे विज्ञापन निकलने के अधिकारी थे न ही ईमानदार अभ्यार्थीयों का धांधली से कोई सम्बन्ध |
उनकी पीड़ा समझने वाला कोई नहीं |
मीडिया भी आये दिन भ्रामक ख़बरें दे चुका / रहा है -
कभी खबर आती है कि टीईटी परीक्षा सिर्फ पात्रता है ( जबकी एन सी टी ई ने साफ़ शब्दों में कहा है कि ये परीक्षा चयन का आधार देती है ,और अभ्यार्थी परीक्षा में दोबारा से बेठ सकते हैं अंक वृद्दि हेतु )
कभी खबर आती है कि चयन का आधार बदल जायेगा ( चयन के नियम राज्य व केंद्र सरकार ने तय किये हैं तो जब टीईटी मेरिट होल्डर चयन के पात्र हो चुके हैं तो अब नियम में बदलाव कैसे संभव है )
कभी खबर आती है कि टीईटी परीक्षा में धांधली हुई और टीईटी परीक्षा निरस्त हो जायगी ( अगर कहीं धांधली हुई तो दोषी अभ्यर्थी को सजा दी जायगी या सभी को , अभी तक किसी अभ्यर्थी का दोष साबित हुआ कि नहीं ये भी स्पष्ट नहीं | अगर सजा दोषियों को नहीं मिलेगी तो फिर एक नयी धांधली की सम्भावना नहीं होगी क्या )
maine ye matter zee helpline me bheji hai aur mujhe complain no. ze0316 recieve hua aap log bhi jyada se jyada complain bheje jisse media hamare favour me aaye
sabh tet bhaiyo se nivedan hai
ReplyDeletesangathan ke logo ke sampark me jald se jald ho jaye vijay hamari hi hogi jhothe logo ki bate na sune
ye jan le sarakar ne apane patte nahi khole hai yani koi sarawajanik statement nahi diye hai
ratnesh (robertsganj)
June me court summer vacation k liye off ho jayega. Is case me aur kitni problem aane wali hai.
ReplyDeleteDear Blog Editor,
ReplyDeleteCan we hope that 15/5 will be a judment day.
Or it may be extended further.
TO, MUSKAN BHARAT G APNE WO .JPG YA .PDF POST KARNI CHAHIYE THI NA ,PLZ CONVERT PDF FILE TO JPG FORMAT IS SE SAB KO PURI JANKARI PAD NE KO MILEGI PLZ
ReplyDeleteTo mr. Akshaya g apki himmat tarif k kabil hai ap me ap sabi tet wale sathiyo se vinti karta hu ki ap mr. Akshaya g ki request ko hi copy kar zee news pe past kar sakte hai plz plz plz u can do
ReplyDeleteBhaiyo, jis prakar se ye sarkar saari kosisih karne ke baad TET ko radd nahi kar payee.ushi prakar se ye bharti prakriya bhi nahi rok payegi , time jyada lag sakta hai lekin bharti TET merit per hi hogi. vaise TET merit se hi selection hona chahiye kyoki isme pardarshita nihit hai.
ReplyDelete