Both JRT + PRT Counseling Order,

AAJ SAARE DIN BHAR JRT+PRT KEE COUNSELING KE COURT ORDER JAAREE HUE

सैकड़ों की संख्या में जे आर टी + पी आर टी दोनों  में  काउंसलिंग के याचियों को हाई कोर्ट ने अनुमति दी

72825 Teacher Recruitment, 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment, Both JRT + PRT Counseling Order,
Read more: http://joinuptet.blogspot.com/#ixzz3EQkwtaOL

?Court No. - 1

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 53471 of 2014

Petitioner :- Yashpal And 23 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 13 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.K. Singh,V.K. Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., K.P. Singh,Nand Kishore Singh,R.C. Singh,S.K. Chaudhary,S.K. Varma,Sanjay Kumar Srivastava,Sunil Kumar Singh,V.K. Srivastava,Vikram Bahadur Singh

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners has made a request that the matter is urgent as the counselling scheduled is to be held� between 27-30th September, 2014 and in case the matter is not taken up, the petitioners shall suffer irreversible loss to their job prospect.
With the consent of learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is taken on the board.
The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the respondents to permit them to appear in the counselling being conducted for the recruitment of Assistant Teachers (Mathematics & Science) in Senior Basic Schools and Trainee Teachers (Prashikshu Shikshak) in Primary Schools run by the U.P. Board of Basic Education.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners want to participate in the counselling at the districts of respondent nos. 5 to 14. He has placed reliance on an order dated 19.09.2014 passed in Writ-A No. 48111 of 2014 (Mayank Yadav and 6 others v. State of U.P. & 7 others), wherein this Court has issued direction to the respondents to allow the petitioners therein to participate in the counselling for trainee teachers on the basis of their duly attested educational testimonials.
Learned Standing Counsel states that the counselling in respect of female category is over. Therefore, no interim order can be passed at this stage in respect of petitioner no. 8, who is a female candidate. �
Learned Counsel appearing for the respective District Basic Education Officers i.e. respondent nos. 5 to 14, have not disputed the said fact.
Accordingly, a direction is issued upon the respondent nos. 5 to 14 to allow the petitioners (except petitioner no. 8) to participate in the current counselling without insisting to submit their original testimonials. The petitioners (except petitioner no. 8) are permitted to submit their attested educational testimonials. Their selection shall abide by the result of the writ petition.
Reply be filed by all the respondents within six weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
Tag and list this writ petition along with the record of Writ-A No. 48111 of 2014.
This inteirm order will not be applicable in respect of petitioner no. 8.
Order Date :- 26.9.2014
SKT/-

************

?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 53389 of 2014
Petitioner :- Ankur Raza And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 12 Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Prakash Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amit Shukla,R.C. Singh,S.C. Yadav,Shiv Badan Yadav,Sunil Kumar Singh,U.S. Upadhyay,Vijai Kumar Srivastava

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners has made a request that the matter is urgent as the counselling is scheduled to be held between 27-30th September, 2014 and in case the matter is not taken up, the petitioners shall suffer irreversible loss to their job prospect.
With the consent of learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is taken on the board.
The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the respondents to permit them to appear in the counselling being conducted for the recruitment of Trainee Teachers (Prashikshu Shikshak) in Primary Schools run by the U.P. Board of Basic Education.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners want to participate in the counselling at the districts of respondent nos. 3 to 13. He has placed reliance on an order dated 19.09.2014 passed in Writ-A No. 48111 of 2014 (Mayank Yadav and 6 others v. State of U.P. & 7 others), wherein this Court has issued direction to the respondents to allow the petitioners therein to participate in the counselling for trainee teachers on the basis of their duly attested educational testimonials.
Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 3 to 13 i.e. respective District Basic Education Officer have not disputed the said fact.
Accordingly, a direction is issued upon the respondent nos. 3 to 13 to allow the petitioners to participate in the current counselling without insisting to submit their original testimonials. The petitioners are permitted to submit their attested educational testimonials. Their selection shall abide by the result of the writ petition.
Reply be filed by all the respondents within six weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
Tag and list this writ petition along with the record of Writ-A No. 48111 of 2014.
Order Date :- 26.9.2014
SKT/-

***************

?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 53467 of 2014
Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Gautam And 22 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 12 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.K. Singh,V.K. Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav,B.K. Yadav,Harendra Yadav,K.K. Chand,Nishit Yadav,Sanjay Chaturvedi,Sayed Nadeem,Shyam Krishna Gupta

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners has made a request that the matter is urgent as the counselling is scheduled to be held between 27-30th September, 2014 and in case the matter is not taken up, the petitioners shall suffer irreversible loss to their job prospect.
With the consent of learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is taken on the board.
The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the respondents to permit them to appear in the counselling being conducted for the recruitment of Assistant Teachers (Mathematics & Science) in Senior Basic Schools and Trainee Teachers (Prashikshu Shikshak) in Primary Schools run by the U.P. Board of Basic Education.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners want to participate in the counselling at the districts of respondent nos. 5 to 13. He has placed reliance on an order dated 19.09.2014 passed in Writ-A No. 48111 of 2014 (Mayank Yadav and 6 others v. State of U.P. & 7 others), wherein this Court has issued direction to the respondents to allow the petitioners therein to participate in the counselling for trainee teachers on the basis of their duly attested educational testimonials.
Learned Standing Counsel states that counselling in respect of female category is over. Therefore, no interim order can be passed at this stage in respect of petitioner nos. 6, 9, 17, 19, 20, 21 and 23, who are female candidates.
Learned Counsel appearing for the respective District Basic Education Officers i.e. respondent nos. 5 to 13, have not disputed the said fact.
Accordingly, a direction is issued upon the respondent nos. 5 to 13 to allow the petitioners (except the petitioner nos. 6, 9, 17, 19, 20, 21 and 23) to participate in the current counselling without insisting to submit their original testimonials. They are permitted to submit their attested educational testimonials. Their selection shall abide by the result of the writ petition.
Reply be filed by all the respondents within six weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
Tag and list this writ petition along with the record of Writ-A No. 48111 of 2014.
This interim order will not be applicable in respect of petitioner nos. 6, 9, 17, 19, 20, 21 and 23.
Order Date :- 26.9.2014
SKT/-

***********



?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 53399 of 2014
Petitioner :- Kalpana Yadav And 7 Ors
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 11 Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.K. Singh,V.K. Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav,Deo Dayal,R.P. Singh
WRIT - A No. - 53367 of 2014 at Allahabad : Brijendra Kumar Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 53410 of 2014 at Allahabad : Vishwa Mohan Rai Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Ors
WRIT - A No. - 53394 of 2014 at Allahabad : Ganga Sagar And 7 Ors Vs. State Of U.P. And 8 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 53342 of 2014 at Allahabad : Chandra Prakash And Another Vs. State Of U.P. And 6 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 53366 of 2014 at Allahabad : Rashmi Sahu Vs. State Of U.P. And 5 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 53060 of 2014 at Allahabad : Swatantra Kumar Gautam And 9 Ors Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 53017 of 2014 at Allahabad : Mohammad Suhail Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Ors
  WRIT - A No. - 52911 of 2014 at Allahabad : Anil Kumar Parihar Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Ors
  WRIT - A No. - 52982 of 2014 at Allahabad : Ram Krishna Shukla And 3 Ors Vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 53100 of 2014 at Allahabad : Virendra Singh And Another Vs. State Of U.P. And 5 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 52699 of 2014 at Allahabad : Santosh Kumar Nayak Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 53111 of 2014 at Allahabad : Manoj Kumar Prajapati Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 53163 of 2014 at Allahabad : Amit Dubey Vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Ors

 WRIT - A No. - 53421 of 2014 at Allahabad : Madhu Kant Yadav And 3 Others Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Others

 WRIT - A No. - 52977 of 2014 at Allahabad : Sushil Kumar Yadav Vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 52975 of 2014 at Allahabad : Karunesh Yadav Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 53442 of 2014 at Allahabad : Raghubar Kumar & Another Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Others

  WRIT - A No. - 53486 of 2014 at Allahabad : Arun Kumar Vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Ors

 WRIT - A No. - 53505 of 2014 at Allahabad : Ghan Shyam Yadav & Another Vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Others

 WRIT - A No. - 53542 of 2014 at Allahabad : Sandeep Kumar Pathak And Anr. Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Ors

 WRIT - A No. - 53176 of 2014 at Allahabad : Krishna Kant Vs. State Of U.P. And Another
 WRIT - A No. - 53380 of 2014 at Allahabad : Prashant Singh Yadav And Another Vs. State Of U.P. And 5 Ors
 MISC. SINGLE No. - 6342 of 2014 at Lucknow : Satya Bhama Vs. State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Basic Education & 3 Others
 MISC. SINGLE No. - 6313 of 2014 at Lucknow : Sunil Kumar Vs. State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Basic Education Govt. Of U.P. & 4

 SERVICE SINGLE No. - 5594 of 2014 at Lucknow : Neetu Tiwari & 5 Ors. Vs. State Of U.P. Through Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. & Ors.
 SERVICE SINGLE No. - 5657 of 2014 at Lucknow : Rajneesh Kumar Srivastava & 2 Ors. Vs. State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. & Ors.

 SERVICE SINGLE No. - 5659 of 2014 at Lucknow : Fehmina Fatima Vs. State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. & Ors.
 SERVICE SINGLE No. - 5658 of 2014 at Lucknow : Sharad Kumar Kushwaha Vs. State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. & Ors.
 SERVICE SINGLE No. - 5606 of 2014 at Lucknow : Sandeep Kumar Singh & Another Vs. State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. & Ors.
 SERVICE SINGLE No. - 5561 of 2014 at Lucknow : Preeti Kashyap Vs. State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Deptt. Lko. & O
 WRIT - A No. - 52909 of 2014 at Allahabad : Smt. Priyanka Mishra @ Priyanka Dubey Vs. State Of U.P. And 5 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 53154 of 2014 at Allahabad : Sadhana Singh Vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Ors

 WRIT - A No. - 53502 of 2014 at Allahabad : Jyoti Awasthi Vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Others

 WRIT - A No. - 53404 of 2014 at Allahabad : Anita Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 53522 of 2014 at Allahabad : Poonam Pal Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 52913 of 2014 at Allahabad : Ms Aradhana Pandey Vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 53415 of 2014 at Allahabad : Shilpee Srivastava Vs. State Of U.P. And 5 Ors
 WRIT - A No. - 53474 of 2014 at Allahabad : Preeti Bhartiya Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Others
 WRIT - A No. - 53482 of 2014 at Allahabad : Smt. Jyoti Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Others

 WRIT - A No. - 53477 of 2014 at Allahabad : Shaheen Parveen Vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Others
 MISC. SINGLE No. - 6369 of 2014 at Lucknow : Sunil Kumar Mitra Vs. State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Basic Education Govt. Of U.P.& 3ors
 WRIT - A No. - 53420 of 2014 at Allahabad : Anubha Kesarwani And Another Vs. State Of U.P. And 5 Ors