29334 72825 Teacher Recruitment, UPTET :जूनियर में काउंसलिंग कराने के बाद एफिडेविट दे कर ओरिजिनल डाक्यूमेंट्स निकाल कर प्राइमरी में काउंसलिंग कराने वाले कैंडिडेट्स का अभ्यर्थन बकरार

जूनियर में काउंसलिंग कराने के बाद एफिडेविट दे कर ओरिजिनल डाक्यूमेंट्स निकाल कर प्राइमरी में काउंसलिंग कराने वाले कैंडिडेट्स का अभ्यर्थन बकरार




लो / कम मेरिट वालों को दोनों भर्तियों ( जूनियर व प्राथमिक ) में  तगड़ा नुक्सान
 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment, 72825  Teacher Recruitment, UPTET,

फ़िलहाल जूनियर की पांचवी काउंसलिंग में इनके स्थान पर सीट नहीं भरी जाएंगी ,
वहीं दुसरी तरफ सचिव ने बगैर ओरिजिनल डाक्यूमेंट्स के सिर्फ अटेस्टेड फोटोकॉपी से काउंसलिंग कराने का आदेश जारी कर दिया है ।


अंतिम फैसला अगली सुनवाई में होगा , फ़िलहाल अभ्यर्थन बकरार रखा गया है , लेकिन कोर्ट की कार्यवाही व नीचे लिखे ऑर्डर से साफ़ झलक रहा है कि
अंतिम फैसला दोनों में पात्रता बनाये रखेगा


ऐसे में अब कैंडिडेट्स दोनों भर्तियों में अपनी काउंसलिंग आसानी से करा सकते हैं :-

Prima facie, I am of the opinion that in the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioners rightly contend that their claim for appointment on the post of Assistant teachers (Maths and Science) in Senior Basic Schools, can not be forfeited. As such, interest of justice would be served in providing that the claim of the petitioners for appointment on the post of Assistant teachers (Maths and Science) in Senior Basic Schools, shall remain alive till further orders of this Court.



See Court Order :--->>>>

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

?Court No. - 8

Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 6013 of 2014

Petitioner :- Aditya Kumar Gupta & 7 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. & Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Mishra,Prashant Verma
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajay Kumar,Ghaus Beg,Neeraj Chaurasiya,Sandeep Kumar Yadav,Vindhyawashini Kumar

Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
Heard counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 & 5 to 9, Sri Neeraj Chaurasiya for respondent Nos. 4 & 14, Sri Vindhyawashini Kumar for respondent No. 12, Sri S.K. Yadav for respondent No. 10, Sri Ajay Kumar for respondent No. 13 and Sri Ghaus Beg on behalf of respondent No. 11.
They pray for and are granted four weeks for filing counter affidavit. The petitioners shall have two weeks thereafter to file rejoinder affidavit.
List immediately thereafter.
The petitioners herein have applied for appointment on the post of Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in Senior Basic Schools (for short SBS). They were called for counselling. At the time of counselling, they submitted their original testimonials. In the meantime, the petitioners received intimation for counselling, as trainee teachers in Primary Schools, pursuant to another advertisement, for filling up vacancies of Assistant teachers in Primary Schools, run by the Board. In the said counselling, the condition was that the candidate has to submit his original certificates and testimonials. In order to participate in the said counselling, the petitioners requested the authorities, who have held the selection SBS to return their original testimonials. For returning the documents, the authorities imposed a condition for submitting affidavit to the effect that the petitioners will not stake claim for appointment in SBS. The case of the petitioners is that under compelling circumstances, they have furnished such an undertaking and whereupon, their original testimonials were returned to them. It is the admitted case of the petitioners that, thereafter, they have participated in the counselling for the trainee teacher in Primary Schools, where they had deposited their original testimonials.
In the meantime, a number of writ petitions were filed before this Court wherein, several directions were issued, one of which dated 26th September 2014 in Writ Petition No. 6390 (S/S) of 2014 - Neha Singh Versus State of U.P., mandated the Principal Secretary, Basic Education, to issue direction to Principals, DIET and District Basic Education Officers of the State to permit the candidates to participate in the counselling for trainee teachers on the basis of attested testimonials. The case of the petitioners is that pursuant to the said directions, the Principal Secretary, Basic Education, U.P. had issued a Circular, entitling the candidates to appear in the counselling for trainee teachers on basis of attested testimonials.
The petitioners, after having come to know of such general direction issued by this Court and the Circular issued in this regard by the Principal Secretary, Basic Education, U.P., has approached this Court by way of instant writ petition for a mandamus directing the respondents to consider their candidature for appointment as Assistant teachers in SBS on basis of counselling already held.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 & 4 submitted that the petitioners have already appeared in the counselling for appointment in SBS and have thereafter submitted their affidavit, giving up their claim. Now, they can not resile from the undertaking given by them.
It is not disputed that under the general direction issued by this Court on 26th September 2014 in Writ Petition No. 6390 (S/S) of 2014, the Principal Secretary, Basic Education, U.P. has issued a Circular whereunder, the candidates are now being permitted to participate in the counselling for the post of trainee teachers on basis of certified testimonials. Evidently, the petitioners have submitted their affidavit under compelling circumstances. Prima facie, I am of the opinion that in the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioners rightly contend that their claim for appointment on the post of Assistant teachers (Maths and Science) in Senior Basic Schools, can not be forfeited. As such, interest of justice would be served in providing that the claim of the petitioners for appointment on the post of Assistant teachers (Maths and Science) in Senior Basic Schools, shall remain alive till further orders of this Court. Such of the petitioners as are willing to appear in the next round of counselling, shall be permitted to appear provisionally, on the basis of attested testimonials, without prejudice to their rights. The selection made, in the meantime, shall be subject to the decision of the writ petition .

(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 17.10.2014
AM

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=3673550

UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  / SARKARI NAUKRI News

UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com

http://joinuptet.blogspot.com

UPTET 72825 Latest News In Hindi | Join UPTET

Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling |

UPTET 29334 Latest News In Hindi | Join UPTET

Uptet | Uptet news |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet |  29334  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi |  29334  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling |

Thoda Fun Always :-
माँ : दूध पी लो।
हम : अभी नहीं, रात को देना, नहीं तो पढ़ते समय नींद आने लगेगी।
माँ : क्यों किसी डॉक्टर नें बताया है क्या?
हम : नहीं, मगर दूध में एमिनो एसिड होता है जो मस्तिष्क को नींद के लिए प्रेरणादायक रसायन सेरोटोनिन और मेलाटोनिन के उत्पादन के लिए उत्तेजित करता है। सेरोटोनिन मस्तिष्क को अच्छा अनुभव कराने वाला रसायन है जो तनाव को कम करता है। मस्तिष्क सेरोटोनिन को दूध के कैल्सियम की सहायता से मेलाटोनीन में बदलता है जिससे अच्छी नींद आती है।
माँ : 😮 😇