उत्तर प्रदेश राजकीय कॉलेज एल टी ग्रेड शिक्षकों के पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट के अतिरिक्त अंक सम्बन्धी याचिका

उत्तर प्रदेश राजकीय कॉलेज एल टी ग्रेड शिक्षकों के पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट के अतिरिक्त अंक सम्बन्धी याचिका



L T Grade, LT Grade, LT Grade Teacher Recruitment UP, LT Grade Teacher Uttar Pradesh, 

उत्तर प्रदेश में एल टी ग्रेड शिक्षकों की भर्ती में पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट करने वालों को 15 अतिरिक्त अंको का चयन में बी=वेटेज दिया जा रहा था ,
लेकिन बहुत से लोग ऐसे भी थे जिन्होंने पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट किसी और विषय से किया था , और भर्ती  में ग्रेजुएट विषय के शिक्षक बनने का लाभ उठा रहे थे ,

उदाहरणार्थ - किसी ने बी एस सी - गणित विषय  ( गणित , भौतिकी , रसायन ) से किया और बाद में पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट किसी और विषय - भौतिकी , रसायन ,आर्ट्स , पत्रकारिता, कंप्यूटर, प्रोफेशनल कोर्सेस आदि  आदि से कर लिया


ऐसे में सामान विषय में ग्रेजुएशन , पोस्ट ग्रेजुएशन करने वालों को नुक्सान हो रहा था, और वे लोग कोर्ट गए , और उसकी याचिका की कार्यवाही इस प्रकार है , 25 July 2013 ya iske baad kee karyvahee ka pata nahin chal paa raha hai : -

(इस से पहले महिला जी जी आई सी एल टी ग्रेड भर्ती में ग्रेजुएट , पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट विषय अलग अलग होने पर भी ग्रेजुएट विषय के टीचर बनने की बहुत सारी बातें सामने आयी थी ,, भर्ती कई राउंड में चली थी , और पता नहीं चला की भर्ती पूर्ण रूप से कम्प्लीट हुई की नहीं )
Important Point happens in Court is : -








even in the case of Science subject if the requirement is of a bachelors degree with Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics or Biology then in that event a post graduation degree in Arts will not be a degree against which quality point marks could be awarded under the Appendix - D. 




for example a candidate possessing a post graduate decree in Urdu against the post of a subject in Science will be able to score higher quality point marks thereby eliminating a candidate who actually belongs to the same subject.


नोट: नयी एल टी ग्रेड शिक्षकों की भर्ती में पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट विषय के अतिरिक्त अंको को समाप्त कर दिया गया है

****************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6333 of 2013

Petitioner :- Ravindra Babu Shriwas And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Radha Kant Ojha
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,J.H. Khan

Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J.
Ref: Civil Misc. Impleadment Application No. 113669 of 2013
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is allowed two weeks time to file rejoinder-affidavit to the impleadment application.
List this petition for admission before appropriate Court on 25.07.2013. When the petition is listed next, the name of Sri Vasistha Tiwari will be shown as one of the counsel for the respondents.
Order Date :- 11.7.2013
Sunil Kr Tiwari 

 ***********
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 30

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6333 of 2013

Petitioner :- Ravindra Babu Shriwas And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Radha Kant Ojha
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
Sri Upendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel states that a counter affidavit as desired by this Court is under preparation in respect of other reasons as well so as to provide complete information with regard to status of selections.
Put up on Tuesday next.
Order Date :- 12.3.2013
Manish


 http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2439902
 ****************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Court No. 30

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6333 of 2013
Ravindra Babu Shriwas & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr.
With

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6835 of 2013
Gaurav Tiwari & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
With

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 8847 of 2013
Ashutosh Sharma Vs. State of U.P. & Anr.
With

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52188 of 2012
Km. Neelam Singh Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
With

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 34343 of 2011
Pratibha Singh & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr.
With

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 34698 of 2011
Smt. Madhuri Devi & Anr. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.

*****

Hon'ble A.P. Sahi,J.

These batch of writ petitions relate to an issue that was earlier raised in writ petition no. 34698 of 2011 and has again been raised in the other writ petitions which has been noted in the order passed in writ petition no. 6333 of 2013 on 8.2.2013. The dispute in short relates to the award of quality point marks as against the possession of a post graduate degree as per Rule 15(2) read with Appendix - D of the Uttar Pradesh, Subordinate Educational Service Rules, 1983.

The rules read with the appendix make a provision that a candidate has to be awarded quality point marks in accordance with the calculation given in the said appendix and if a candidate possesses a post graduate decree for appointment against Trained Graduate Teaching Post, then for first division marks fifteen quality point marks will be awarded, for second division, ten quality point marks will be awarded and for third division, five additional marks will be awarded.

The petitioners in all these writ petitions contend that this award of a post graduate degree weightage should be in respect of the subject concerned for which the selection is being made and not in any other subject. For illustration, if the selection is being made of a science teacher and he has subsequently obtained a post graduate degree in Arts then the same should not be counted for the purpose of weightage.
The learned Standing Counsel for the State had been granted time to file a counter affidavit whereafter the learned Additional Advocate General, Sri C.B. Yadav had appeared and had made a request that the matter be adjourned to enable him to obtain instructions in the matter.

The Government Order obtained through the Director of Education on 4th of March, 2013 is as follows:-

^^QSDl@le;c)
la[;k&368 @15&2&2013
isz"kd]
jktsUnz izlkn]
la;qDr lfpo]
mRrj izns'k 'kkluA
lsok esa]
f'k{kk funs'kd ¼ek0½
mRrj izns'k] y[kuÅA
f'k{kk vuqHkkx&2 y[kuÅ fnukad 4 ekpZ] 2013
fo"k;& fjV la[;k&6333@ 2013 Jh johUnz ckcw Jhokl o vU; ds laca/k esa ek0 U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 08-02-13 ds laca/k essa fnukad 05-03-13 dks izfr'kiFk&i= nkf[ky fd;s tkus laca/k esaA
egksn;]
mi;qZDr fo"k;d vkids i= la[;k&fu;qfDr¼,y0Vh0½ @2343@ 2012&13] fnukad 01-03-13 ds lanHkZ esa eq>s ;g dgus dk funsZ'k gqvk gS fd jktdh; ek/;fed fo|ky;ksa esa izf'kf{kr Lukrd osrudze ¼iq:"k 'kk[k½ dh HkrhZ m0iz0 v/khuLFk f'k{kk ¼izf'kf{kr Lukrd Js.kh½ lsok fu;ekoyh 1983 ¼;Fkk la'kksf/kr½ ¼izFke la'kks/ku½ lsok fu;ekoyh&1992 rFkk f}rh; la'kks/ku lsok fu;ekoyh] 2010 rFkk vf/klwpuk la[;k&05@15&2&27¼268½@ 2008 fnukad 03-01-2012 esa fufgr fu;ekoyh ds vUrxZr fu;e& 8] 14 rFkk fu;e& 15¼2½ ds vUrxZr ,oa ifjf'k"V&Mh ds vk/kkj ij vH;fFkZ;ksa ds p;u dh izfdz;k lEikfnr dh xbZ gSA fu;e& 15¼2½ ds vUrxZr ifjf'k"V&Mh esa fufgr fu;ekoyh esa LukrdksRrj mikf/k/kkjdksa dks dze'k% izFke Js.kh esa 15] f}rh; Js.kh esa 10 rFkk r`rh; Js.kh esa 05 vad fn;s tkus dh O;oLFkk fo|eku gSA
vr% mDr O;oLFkk ds vUrxZr ek0 mPp U;k;ky; dh vis{kkuqlkj fLFkfr Li"V djrs gq, izfr'kiFk&i= nkf[ky fd;s tkus dh dk;Zokgh lqfuf'pr djus dk d"V djsaA

¼jktsUnz izlkn½
la;qDr lfpo^^

Sri C.B. Yadav however inspite of these instructions which clearly indicate that the selections are being held as per Rules contends that if the argument of the petitioners is accepted then the court can proceed to correlate the possession of the post graduation degree to the subjects which have been mentioned in the qualification at the graduation level to be possessed by the candidate.

Learned counsel for the petitioners have not been able to counter this position taken by Sri C.B. Yadav and to the mind of the court the same also appears to be reasonable that the post graduation degree should be correlated to any of the subjects of the candidate for the post in question at the bachelors level, for example, if the requirement at the graduate level is of a bachelors degree in History, Geography, Political Science or Economics for the post of an Assistant Teacher General (History, Geography, Civics, Economics) then the post graduation degree should relate to any of the said four subjects.
***************

Similarly, even in the case of Science subject if the requirement is of a bachelors degree with Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics or Biology then in that event a post graduation degree in Arts will not be a degree against which quality point marks could be awarded under the Appendix - D.  
************



This being the position, the matter could have been disposed of with the aforesaid interpretation in relation to the possession of a post graduation degree for the purpose of quality point marks as per Rule 15,

 but in the meantime during the pendency of these writ petitions, it is informed that some selections have been finalized and candidates have joined on the basis of the selections held. At this juncture it may be relevant to point out that even with regard to previous years selection the order passed by the Court was clearly to the effect that any selections made shall be subject to the result of the writ petition against the advertisement then issued.

In the instant cases of the year 2013 a similar order has been passed on 8.2.2013. Accordingly, it would be appropriate that the State files an affidavit indicating as to the results which have been declared and appointments were made prior to passing of the interim order dated 8.2.2013 alongwith the names of the candidates alongwith their place of posting. It is further provided that the said affidavit shall be filed within a week.

The respondents shall in the light of what has been stated above shall now not proceed to issue any letter of appointment to a candidate who has been extended the benefit of quality point marks on the basis of a post graduate degree other than the subjects at the graduate level until further orders of the court.



Put up on Tuesday next.

A copy of the order may be given to the learned Standing Counsel, Sri Upendra Singh free of charges for communicating it to the authority within 24 hours.

Order date: 5.3.2013
Sahu 

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2419133

 *************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 30

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6333 of 2013

Petitioner :- Ravindra Babu Shriwas And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Radha Kant Ojha
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
Heard Sri R.K. Ojha, learned counsel, for the petitioners and Sri C.B. Yadav, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Upendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel, for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Sri Yadav prays that he will be obtaining his instruction in the matter as this issue has been raised in a large number of petitions and shall be assisting the Court on the legal issues as framed in the order passed in the present writ petition.
He prays that the matter be taken up on Tuesday.
As prayed, put up on Tuesday.
Order Date :- 27.2.2013
Manish 

 http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2408463

 ***************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 30

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6333 of 2013

Petitioner :- Ravindra Babu Shriwas And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Radha Kant Ojha
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
Heard Sri R.K. Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioners.
This writ petition raises an issue on the ground of Article 14 of the Constitution of India whereby the petitioners contend that the criteria for awarding additional marks against the possession of a post graduate decree is irrational, inasmuch as, the selections are being held in particular subjects and therefore the award of marks in the post graduate decree should have a nexus with the subject in which the selections are being made. In short the weightage should be extended provided the post-graduate decree is in the subject concerned.
Sri Ojha submits that the criteria adopted violates Article 14, and as an illustration, Sri Ojha submits that a candidate being a graduate in Science applying against the post of Science, may be having the best qualifications in his subject, but he is likely to be superseded by a lesser meritorious candidate in the event such a candidate has a post graduate decree in a different subject. He therefore submits that for example a candidate possessing a post graduate decree in Urdu against the post of a subject in Science will be able to score higher quality point marks thereby eliminating a candidate who actually belongs to the same subject. The weightage therefore has to relate to the subject for which the post is advertised.
The matter does require scrutiny, inasmuch as, earlier also, writ petition no. 34698 of 2011 was filed in which this Court had called upon the respondent State to file a counter affidavit. A copy of the counter affidavit filed therein, has been placed before the Court but the same does not answer the aforesaid issue at all.
In the aforesaid circumstances, list this writ petition alongwith the connected writ petitions including writ petition no. 34698 of 2011 on 27th of February, 2013 by which time the respondent State shall also file a counter affidavit in the present writ petition as well and answer the issue raised and referred to hereinabove as well.
The selections that are proposed to be held on the basis of the said criteria shall abide by the final outcome of the writ petition. All the connected writ petitions would also be governed by this order.
Order Date :- 8.2.2013
Sahu 

 http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2367049
************

 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 30

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6333 of 2013

Petitioner :- Ravindra Babu Shriwas And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Radha Kant Ojha
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
Put up on Friday i.e. on 8.2.2013 alongwith the records of Writ Petition No. 52188 of 2012 and 24698 of 2011.
Order Date :- 5.2.2013
Sahu

http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2359948