मांगें स्वीकार होने पर झूमे टीईटी अभ्यर्थी
(UPTET : After fulfilling Demands of TET Candidates by CM Akhilesh, TET candidate filled with Joy and Excitement )
प्रतापगढ़ : टीईटी अभ्यर्थियों की मांगों को प्रदेश सरकार द्वारा मान लिए जाने से उनमें खुशी की लहर है। उन्होंने एक दूसरे को मिठाई खिलाकर इसका इजहार भी किया।
सपा कार्यालय पहुंचे अभ्यर्थियों ने जिलाध्यक्ष भइयाराम पटेल सहित अन्य पदाधिकारियों को मिठाई खिलाई। इस मौके पर अभ्यर्थी विवेक सिंह, विनोद तिवारी, विपिन चंद्र तिवारी, संदीप गुप्ता, आशीष सिंह, चंद्र प्रकाश वर्मा, चंद्रशेखर, अनूप तिवारी आदि ने कहा कि प्रदेश सरकार से हुई वार्ता सफल रही। इस मौके पर मोहम्मद वासिक खान, प्यारे लाल खैरा, अनूप ओझा, विवेक सिंह, आशुतोष पांडेय, मोहम्मद अफसर आदि मौजूद रहे।
News : Jagran (6.4.12)
(UPTET : After fulfilling Demands of TET Candidates by CM Akhilesh, TET candidate filled with Joy and Excitement )
प्रतापगढ़ : टीईटी अभ्यर्थियों की मांगों को प्रदेश सरकार द्वारा मान लिए जाने से उनमें खुशी की लहर है। उन्होंने एक दूसरे को मिठाई खिलाकर इसका इजहार भी किया।
सपा कार्यालय पहुंचे अभ्यर्थियों ने जिलाध्यक्ष भइयाराम पटेल सहित अन्य पदाधिकारियों को मिठाई खिलाई। इस मौके पर अभ्यर्थी विवेक सिंह, विनोद तिवारी, विपिन चंद्र तिवारी, संदीप गुप्ता, आशीष सिंह, चंद्र प्रकाश वर्मा, चंद्रशेखर, अनूप तिवारी आदि ने कहा कि प्रदेश सरकार से हुई वार्ता सफल रही। इस मौके पर मोहम्मद वासिक खान, प्यारे लाल खैरा, अनूप ओझा, विवेक सिंह, आशुतोष पांडेय, मोहम्मद अफसर आदि मौजूद रहे।
News : Jagran (6.4.12)
Congrats.
ReplyDeleteOnce I wrote -
ReplyDeleteWe shall over come, we shall over come one day;Keep in our hearts, keep in our mind,We shall over come some day.
Today
We have forward our step on the first step of stairs.The day of our success is not far enough.
ReplyDeleteAs per information on facebook :
Division bench ne sachiv basic dwara all bsa ke behaf me vighyapit vigyapti ko sahi mana hai .
Aur kaha hai ki ek single person ki wajah se 72825 apprentice teachers ko trainee teachers ke training se rokna thik nahi hai unhone jari vighypan ko sikhchak ka vighypan nahi mana hai unka kahna tha ki last appointing body BSA hai aur abhi official appointment nahi ho raha hai steyy galat hai 9 April ko final decision single judge ko lene hai , baki authentic news order copy milne ke bad , apka Ranjeet
main dua karta hu ki cm ka ye faisla atal ho hamari khusi pe koyee garhan na lagee smart cm ka smart faisla thank,s cm
ReplyDeleteI'm also from Pratapgarh & how exiting celebration on here, nobody may understand our inner joy.
ReplyDeleteBut the great laughter is one that laugh in ending..
Thanks to all !
mere man ko bhaya to mai kutta kaat ke khaya.
ReplyDeleteagar t.e.t. ki merit bani to e baruta phir ek kutta khaega.
<up ke cm ne bahut hi achchha nirnay liye eswar unhen 2014 me kendra me pahunchaye.
ReplyDeletenaacho gaao khusi manao
ReplyDeleteuptet@india.com
kon si maage tet to khud cm ni chate ki cancle ho ni to abi tak 50 fargi case ban gaya hote
ReplyDeleteabi bi cm ACD ke pach me hai aur rehenge koi money is power
yr mujhe abi tk y clr ni hua hai k marit k liye cm ne kya kaha agr kisi bandhu ko pta ho to plsss tell me....y btaye k marit kis ki bnegi....
ReplyDeleteKal c.m se mulakat ki khabar kaun se newspper me hai? Official statement kaha publish hua hai? Plz inform me..
ReplyDeleteRanjitji ap ke muh me ghi shakkr....hurrrrrrrrrrrrrr
ReplyDeleteGood move.............
ReplyDeleteIs "s" ko yha se bhagao.ye kuch na kuch ulta hi bol rha hai.ye acd. Supporter hai
ReplyDeleteare unknown bhai
ReplyDeletejab tum apna naam tak sahi nahi likh sakte
to dusre ko ulta kyo kah rahe hoo
kya tumhare bugrgo ne tumhara naam
ReplyDeleteunknown rakha hai
nonsence
yah satya hai
ReplyDeleteonly tet ke adhar par selection nahi ho sakta
8 din baad achar sahita lag jayegee
process jo bhee hoga
june se pahle chalu nahi hogs
aap logo ko to
ReplyDelete31 dec 2011 tak posting milnee thee
lakin nahi mili
chunav aa gaye
aur abhee chunav aane wale hai
Ye baruta kaha hai
ReplyDeleteaao na bhaiya aap kaha kho gaye ho aapke bina blog par maja nahi aarha
july ke baad hee kaam chalu ho payega
ReplyDeletekyo kee jaldee ka kaam saitan ka hota hai
jisko aap bhugat rahe hoo
aur abhee 3 maheene aur bhugtoge
apkee dua se
Smart CM,Smart think, Smart faisla.ab thodi khushi mili hai.aur thodi baki hai.. YADAV KAPILDEV LAL BAHADUR phussssssssssssssssssssssss
ReplyDeleteSri,AKHILESH YADAV CM JINDABAD
DOUBLE BENCH TODAY JUDGEMENT:-
ReplyDeleteCase :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 280 of 2012
Petitioner :- Lalit Mohan Singh And Anr.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Illigible,K.S. Kushwaha
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
1. An advertisement for selection of Apprentice Teachers was published on 30.11.2011 in the primary school run by UP Basic Education Board (the Board). The Apprentice teachers are to be engaged in all districts and this advertisement was on behalf of all District Basic Education Officers of the State of UP.
2. WP No. 76039 of 2011 has been filed challenging the advertisement. The single Judge has passed an order on 4.1.2012 staying the selection and appointment in pursuance of the advertisement. Hence the present appeal by the two appellants, who claim themselves to be the applicants in the advertisement alongwith application to grant leave to file appeal.
3. Considering the facts that the appellants are also applicants in the selection of Apprentice Teachers, the leave is granted. The respondents have no objection to condone the delay in filing the appeal. The delay is condoned and it is heard for admission.
4. The counsel for the appellant submits that:
By the advertisement, 72825 posts have been advertised. This writ petition is on behalf of only one person and it is not proper to grant interim order in this case;
The selection process ought not to have been stayed by the single Judge but the single Judge should have permitted the selection process to go on and the selection might have been made subject to decision in the writ petition;
The reason for grant of stay order was that advertisement was on behalf of District Basic Education Officers of the State. This is not erroneous because the District Basic Education Officers are the appointing authority and one advertisement can always be issued on their behalf together;
The publication of one advertisement is practical and better way of selecting candidates in the entire district.
5. The counsel for the petitioner-respondent states that:
Apart from this writ petition there were other writ petitions that should have been connected with this one;
There is no interim order in those cases, but it is not correct to say that only one person is challenging the selection.
6. It is not disputed between the parties that counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged in the writ petition and the writ petition itself is listed before the single Judge for final disposal in the week commencing 9.4.2012. Considering the facts that the number of persons are to be employed, it would be appropriate that the single Judge might consider finally deciding the writ petition at the earliest.
7. With the aforesaid observations, the special appeal is dismissed.
Order Date :- 6.4.2012
SK Singh
Visit http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/StartWebSearch.do for more Judgments/Orders delivered at Allahabad High Court and Its Bench at Lucknow. Disclaimer
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 280 of 2012
ReplyDeletePetitioner :- Lalit Mohan Singh And Anr.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Illigible,K.S. Kushwaha
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
1. An advertisement for selection of Apprentice Teachers was published
on 30.11.2011 in the primary school run by UP Basic Education Board (the
Board). The Apprentice teachers are to be engaged in all districts and this
advertisement was on behalf of all District Basic Education Officers of the
State of UP.
2. WP No. 76039 of 2011 has been filed challenging the advertisement.
The single Judge has passed an order on 4.1.2012 staying the selection
and appointment in pursuance of the advertisement. Hence the present
appeal by the two appellants, who claim themselves to be the applicants in
the advertisement alongwith application to grant leave to file appeal.
3. Considering the facts that the appellants are also applicants in the
selection of Apprentice Teachers, the leave is granted. The respondents
have no objection to condone the delay in filing the appeal. The delay is
condoned and it is heard for admission.
4. The counsel for the appellant submits that:
● By the advertisement, 72825 posts have been advertised. This writ
petition is on behalf of only one person and it is not proper to grant
interim order in this case;
● The selection process ought not to have been stayed by the single
Judge but the single Judge should have permitted the selection
process to go on and the selection might have been made subject
to decision in the writ petition;
● The reason for grant of stay order was that advertisement was on
behalf of District Basic Education Officers of the State. This is not
erroneous because the District Basic Education Officers are the
appointing authority and one advertisement can always be issued
on their behalf together;
● The publication of one advertisement is practical and better way of
selecting candidates in the entire district.2
5. The counsel for the petitioner-respondent states that:
● Apart from this writ petition there were other writ petitions that
should have been connected with this one;
● There is no interim order in those cases, but it is not correct to say
that only one person is challenging the selection.
6. It is not disputed between the parties that counter and rejoinder
affidavits have been exchanged in the writ petition and the writ petition
itself is listed before the single Judge for final disposal in the week
commencing 9.4.2012. Considering the facts that the number of persons
are to be employed, it would be appropriate that the single Judge might
consider finally deciding the writ petition at the earliest.
7. With the aforesaid observations, the special appeal is dismissed.
Order Date :- 6.4.2012
SK Singh
kayede kee baat
ReplyDeleteteacher banane ke liye
gradution 50% must
b.ed 50% must
tet 60% must
jab teeno jaroori hai to tet ke adhar par section kyo
kyo
kyo
kyo
kyo
kyo
kyo
kyo
rank teeno ko milakar honee chahiye
nahi to milanee
tarikh par tarikh
tarikh par tarikh
tarikh par tarikh
tarikh par tarikh
tarikh par tarikh
tarikh par tarikh
टीईटी के आधार पर भर्ती मामले में जवाब तलब
(UPTET : Allahabad Highcourt : Seeking Clarification for Recruitment of PRT on the Basis of TET Exam)
लखनऊ : इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय में शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा टीईटी के आधार पर शिक्षकों की भर्ती किए जाने संबंधी राज्य सरकार के शासनादेश को चुनौती देने वाली जनहित याचिका पर राज्य सरकार से जवाब तलब किया है। अगली सुनवाई नौ जनवरी को होगी। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति प्रदीपकांत व न्यायमूर्ति रितुराज अवस्थी की खंडपीठ ने याची कुलदीप श्रीवास्तव की ओर से दायर जनहित याचिका पर दिए हैं। जनहित याचिका में कहा गया कि राज्य सरकार द्वारा जारी शासनादेश विधि विरुद्ध हैं। इसे रद किया जाए। कहा गया शिक्षकों की भर्ती उत्तर प्रदेश बेसिक शिक्षक अध्यापक सेवा नियमावली के तहत की जानी चाहिए। याचिका में तर्क दिया गया है कि टीईटी केवल अध्यापकों की पात्रता तय करने के लिए है
News : Jagran (05.1.12)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 1
Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 25 of 2012
Petitioner :- Kuldeep Srivastava [P.I.L.] Civil
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko. Petitioner Counsel :- In Person
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kant,J.
Hon'ble Ritu Raj Awasthi,J.
As prayed, list on Monday i.e. 9.1.2012, as fresh.
Order Date :- 4.1.2012 MFA
****************
3.SELECTION on TET or TET+ACD
Misc. Bench : 25 of 2012 [Lucknow]
Petitioner: KULDEEP SRIVASTAVA [P.I.L.] CIVIL
Respondent: STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDU. LKO.
Counsel (Pet.): IN PERSON
Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
Category: Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book-Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book
Date of Filing: 02/01/2012
Last Listed on: 22/02/2012 in CJ Court
Next Listing Date (Likely):-----
jai bajrang bali
ReplyDeletejai bajrang bali
jai bajrang bali
jai bajrang bali
jai bajrang bali
no way
ReplyDelete1.
ReplyDeleteacc merit me ekrupta nahin ha.
2.
teacher banne ki age 21-40 hai.
3.
tet merit b.ed. exams k bad ban rahi hai jabki b.ed. me test se selektion hua tha to fir agle test(tet) me acc merit kyon?
4.
tet kewal patrta hai to kewal 90 marks hi den uske bad koi mrks dene ki kya jarurat hai.
5.
tet ka importance uski merit se hi hai.
6.
peon se lekar judge tak ka seletion exam base par hota hai to peon se lekar judge banane wale ka selection acc se kyon?????????????
1.
ReplyDeleteacc merit me ekrupta nahin hai.
2.
teacher banne ki age 21-40 hai.
3.
tet merit b.ed. exams k bad ban rahi hai jabki b.ed. me test se selektion hua tha to fir agle test(tet) me acc merit kyon?
4.
tet kewal patrta hai to kewal 90 marks hi den uske bad koi marks dene ki kya jarurat hai.
5.
tet ka importance uski merit se hi hai.
6.
peon se lekar judge tak ka seletion exam base par hota hai to peon se lekar judge banane wale ka selection acc se kyon?????????????
Yogeshji, my ques. Is that if 50% is compulsory in grad. Then what is the need of b.ed. Entrance exam. It should also be on high school+inter+grad. Merit.
ReplyDeleteDid you raise any ques. At that time?
Sir, Good Evening....Blog Editors Sir kya koi aajki jo highcourt ki tarikh thi ki kuch khabar hai kya
ReplyDelete@Yogesh tere kahne se ab kuchh nahi hoga.kya tet fail hai?ya marks kam laya hai.
ReplyDeleteI think that its the time to make teacher selection criteria modern and more transparent . So tet merit is best. Other teacher vacancies are also being filled by its merit. For ex. In kvs and jnv which are considered to be the highest and toughest exams in INDIA
ReplyDeletearpit jee iska jabab
ReplyDeleteapko jaldee govt ki taraf se mil jaye ga
sunil ji me aapki bato se sehmat hu you are right
ReplyDelete@ ARPIT JI & SUNIL JI,
ReplyDeleteAB MERIT KO LEKAR KOI BAHAS KARNE SE KOI FAYADA NAHI IS PAR ALREADY BAHUT BAHAS HO CHUKI HAI, AUR TO AUR COURT NE BHI IS MATTER KO KHARIJ KAR DIYA,
FILHAL TO KHUSI MANAIYE,
govt nahi dege to double bench tet merit ke khilf special apeal dali hai jo abhee
ReplyDeletedismissed nahi hue hai
9 nov 2011 tak kisi ko pata tha ki tet merit lagegee
nahi
ye janhit yachika hai bouble bench mai
dhyam se pad lena
टीईटी के आधार पर भर्ती मामले में जवाब तलब
(UPTET : Allahabad Highcourt : Seeking Clarification for Recruitment of PRT on the Basis of TET Exam)
लखनऊ : इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय में शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा टीईटी के आधार पर शिक्षकों की भर्ती किए जाने संबंधी राज्य सरकार के शासनादेश को चुनौती देने वाली जनहित याचिका पर राज्य सरकार से जवाब तलब किया है। अगली सुनवाई नौ जनवरी को होगी। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति प्रदीपकांत व न्यायमूर्ति रितुराज अवस्थी की खंडपीठ ने याची कुलदीप श्रीवास्तव की ओर से दायर जनहित याचिका पर दिए हैं। जनहित याचिका में कहा गया कि राज्य सरकार द्वारा जारी शासनादेश विधि विरुद्ध हैं। इसे रद किया जाए। कहा गया शिक्षकों की भर्ती उत्तर प्रदेश बेसिक शिक्षक अध्यापक सेवा नियमावली के तहत की जानी चाहिए। याचिका में तर्क दिया गया है कि टीईटी केवल अध्यापकों की पात्रता तय करने के लिए है
News : Jagran (05.1.12)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 1
Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 25 of 2012
Petitioner :- Kuldeep Srivastava [P.I.L.] Civil
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko. Petitioner Counsel :- In Person
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kant,J.
Hon'ble Ritu Raj Awasthi,J.
As prayed, list on Monday i.e. 9.1.2012, as fresh.
Order Date :- 4.1.2012 MFA
****************
3.SELECTION on TET or TET+ACD
Misc. Bench : 25 of 2012 [Lucknow]
Petitioner: KULDEEP SRIVASTAVA [P.I.L.] CIVIL
Respondent: STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDU. LKO.
Counsel (Pet.): IN PERSON
Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
Category: Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book-Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book
Date of Filing: 02/01/2012
Last Listed on: 22/02/2012 in CJ Court
Next Listing Date (Likely):-----
cm ne mamala suljhane ko kaha hai...
ReplyDeletecourt ne special appeal dismiss kar di hai....
akhir log itena khus kayo ho rahe hain...
@manoj ji,
ReplyDeletemanoj ji ap aur hum se mil kar hi sab banta jab hum sabhi milkar ek ray honge (jis tarah kal huye the)
tabhi sarkar bhi hamari sunegi.
warna kya ho raha tha ye ap jante hi hain.
BHAIYO AAP LOG PARESAANN NA HO AGAR STAY HATA TO BHARTI TET MERIT SE HI HOGI AUR ABHI HOGI KOI BHI AACHAR SANHITA KA PRABHAV NHI PADEGA KU KI YE COURT KA AADESH HOGA JO KI RECORD HOTA HAI AUR USME KOI BHI KUCH NHI KAR SAKTA AGAR BHARTI SE ROK 9 KO HATI TO JALDI HI SARE AGLE FAISLE HOO JAYENGE AUR LAGBHAG KGHATAM HO JAYENGE
ReplyDeleteBTC 2001 ME MORE THAN 300 CASE EK HI DIN ME KHARIJ HUE THE THIK USI TARAH TAMAM SABOOT HAI IS BAAT KE AUR YE BHARTI KOI AISA PRABAHV NHI DALNE JA RHI HAI RESULT PE NIKAY CHUNAV KE IS LIYE PARESAAN NA HO
YE JO LOG KUCH BLOG PE HAI WO BAHUT HI FRUSTATE HAI AUR AB KYA KARE MAR TO JAYENGE NHI BECHAARE INKI ATMA KO SHANTI MILE AUR INTZAAR KARE YE LOG INKA BHI NO. AAYEGA KABHI NA KABHI HO SAKTA HAI CM MAHODAY INKE UPAR DAYA KHAYE AUR JALDI HI TOPPER LOGO PE REHAM KI BHEEK DE KU KI YE TOP BHI BAHUT KIYE HAI AUR MARKS BHI NHI LA PAYE HAI TET ME KUI BHAI LOGO SAHI KEH RHA HU NA
RK
SELECTION KA BASE CHAHE ACC/TET HO LEKIN SELECTION HONA CHAHIYE.
ReplyDeletePLEASE NOTE :
HAMARI KHUSI SE SABSE JYADA DUKHI AMAR UJALA HAI.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteare sweta darling
ReplyDeleteahee picther baki hai
double bench lucknow mai
darling marrige nahi hue to marrige kara lo nahi to over age ho jaogee
tet ke chakkar mai
news old jaroor hai
lakin govt ne abhee jabab nahi diya hai
read this cairfully
sweta mam
टीईटी के आधार पर भर्ती मामले में जवाब तलब
(UPTET : Allahabad Highcourt : Seeking Clarification for Recruitment of PRT on the Basis of TET Exam)
लखनऊ : इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय में शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा टीईटी के आधार पर शिक्षकों की भर्ती किए जाने संबंधी राज्य सरकार के शासनादेश को चुनौती देने वाली जनहित याचिका पर राज्य सरकार से जवाब तलब किया है। अगली सुनवाई नौ जनवरी को होगी। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति प्रदीपकांत व न्यायमूर्ति रितुराज अवस्थी की खंडपीठ ने याची कुलदीप श्रीवास्तव की ओर से दायर जनहित याचिका पर दिए हैं। जनहित याचिका में कहा गया कि राज्य सरकार द्वारा जारी शासनादेश विधि विरुद्ध हैं। इसे रद किया जाए। कहा गया शिक्षकों की भर्ती उत्तर प्रदेश बेसिक शिक्षक अध्यापक सेवा नियमावली के तहत की जानी चाहिए। याचिका में तर्क दिया गया है कि टीईटी केवल अध्यापकों की पात्रता तय करने के लिए है
News : Jagran (05.1.12)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 1
Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 25 of 2012
Petitioner :- Kuldeep Srivastava [P.I.L.] Civil
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko. Petitioner Counsel :- In Person
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kant,J.
Hon'ble Ritu Raj Awasthi,J.
As prayed, list on Monday i.e. 9.1.2012, as fresh.
Order Date :- 4.1.2012 MFA
****************
3.SELECTION on TET or TET+ACD
Misc. Bench : 25 of 2012 [Lucknow]
Petitioner: KULDEEP SRIVASTAVA [P.I.L.] CIVIL
Respondent: STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDU. LKO.
Counsel (Pet.): IN PERSON
Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
Category: Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book-Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book
Date of Filing: 02/01/2012
Last Listed on: 22/02/2012 in CJ Court
Next Listing Date (Likely):-----
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeletespecial Appeal me ye kaha gaya hai ki writ A 76039 ka shighrta se niptara kiya jaye...aur ye kahakar appeal ko dismiss kar diya hai..
ReplyDeletespecial Appeal me ye kaha gaya hai ki writ A 76039 ka shighrta se niptara kiya jaye...aur ye kahakar appeal ko dismiss kar diya hai..
ReplyDeletebhai pahle information ko study kar liya karo....
ReplyDeleteaaj ke case me pratipakshi wakil ne kaha hai ki 9-4-12 se start hone wale week me final decisin hone wala hai(
12-4-12 ki date jo ab 19-4-2012 ho gayi hai)
mamala sidhe dismiss hai..
baat wahi ki wahi hain jaha thi..
You are right manoj so i an erasing my comments.
ReplyDeleteThanks for advice
@ KUMAR AND YOGESH
ReplyDeleteBHAI SAHAB EK BAT BATAO JAB SINGLE BENCH NE NIRNAY DIYA THA TAB AAP KHA THE SUDHIR JI NE AAP LOG BAHUT HI PARESAAN HO AUR NIRAAS BHI IS LIYE JYADA BADI BAT NHI HAI SHAYAD NEXT DAY HI USKA NIRNAY HO JAYEGA AUR BAHUT JALD HI USME KOI CAVAIAT DAKHIL KAREGA
prashan ji faisale ko padhiye aisa kahi nahi kaha gaya hai..
ReplyDeletekhare ke jawab me pratipakshi wakil ne kaha hai k mamale ka nistaran 9.4.2012 se suru hone wale hafte me hone wala hai.....
See whole Judgment in my recent post.
ReplyDeleteWhen Double Bench itself suggests,
Advt. is correct, then almost stay is vacated on 9th April 2012.
Full chance stay is removed.
But now Govt. will take how much time to to start its process is another issue.
For this If court issue directives then it will be good to candidates.
@ravikant ji
ReplyDeleteakhir mai bhi janana chahata hu ki
aaj ke case me court ne aapka kaun sa favour kiya hai..
come se come faisle ki kisi line ko hi dikhakar batayiye.
UPTET-टीईटी स्टे पर अंतिम सुनवाई 9 -4 -2012 को- हाई कोर्ट डबल बेंच
ReplyDeleteVERY GOOD NEWS FOR ALL UPTET HOLDERS:
टीईटी स्टे पर सुनवाई 19 -4 -2012 se 9 -4 -2012 करने का आदेश हाईकोर्ट डबल बेंच ने दिया
अब टीईटी पर अंतिम सुनवाई 9 -4 -2012 को होगी ।
Friday, 6 April 2012टीईटी के लिए मुख्य सचिव की अध्यक्षता में समिति
ReplyDeleteलखनऊ, जाब्यू : मुख्यमंत्री अखिलेश यादव ने यूपीटीईटी-2011 की परीक्षा के सभी पहलुओं पर विचार करने के लिए मुख्य सचिव की अध्यक्षता में एक समिति गठित करने का निर्देश दिया है। यह समिति तीन सप्ताह में संस्तुति प्रस्तुत करेगी। टीईटी अभ्यर्थियों के एक प्रतिनिधिमण्डल ने गुरुवार को मुख्यमंत्री से उनके सरकारी आवास पर मुलाकात की। इस दौरान मुख्यमंत्री ने आश्वासन दिया कि उनकी समस्याओं का निराकरण जल्द ही किया जाएगा। प्रतिनिधिमण्डल ने मुख्यमंत्री से आग्रह किया कि इस परीक्षा में बैठने वाले लाखों युवाओं के भविष्य को अंधकारमय होने से बचा लें।
Source- जागरण
6-4-2012
Posted by prabhat at 4/06/2012 05:37:00 PM 0 comments Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
UPTET stay के खिलाफ दायर SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE
UPTET stay के खिलाफ दायर SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 280 of 2012
Petitioner :- Lalit Mohan Singh And Anr.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Illigible,K.S. Kushwaha
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
1. An advertisement for selection of Apprentice Teachers was published
on 30.11.2011 in the primary school run by UP Basic Education Board (the
Board). The Apprentice teachers are to be engaged in all districts and this
advertisement was on behalf of all District Basic Education Officers of the
State of UP.
2. WP No. 76039 of 2011 has been filed challenging the advertisement.
The single Judge has passed an order on 4.1.2012 staying the selection
and appointment in pursuance of the advertisement. Hence the present
appeal by the two appellants, who claim themselves to be the applicants in
the advertisement alongwith application to grant leave to file appeal.
3. Considering the facts that the appellants are also applicants in the
selection of Apprentice Teachers, the leave is granted. The respondents
have no objection to condone the delay in filing the appeal. The delay is
condoned and it is heard for admission.
4. The counsel for the appellant submits that:
● By the advertisement, 72825 posts have been advertised. This writ
petition is on behalf of only one person and it is not proper to grant
interim order in this case;
● The selection process ought not to have been stayed by the single
Judge but the single Judge should have permitted the selection
process to go on and the selection might have been made subject
to decision in the writ petition;
● The reason for grant of stay order was that advertisement was on
behalf of District Basic Education Officers of the State. This is not
erroneous because the District Basic Education Officers are the
appointing authority and one advertisement can always be issued
on their behalf together;
● The publication of one advertisement is practical and better way of
selecting candidates in the entire district.
2
5. The counsel for the petitioner-respondent states that:
● Apart from this writ petition there were other writ petitions that
should have been connected with this one;
● There is no interim order in those cases, but it is not correct to say
that only one person is challenging the selection.
6. It is not disputed between the parties that counter and rejoinder
affidavits have been exchanged in the writ petition and the writ petition
itself is listed before the single Judge for final disposal in the week
commencing 9.4.2012. Considering the facts that the number of persons
are to be employed, it would be appropriate that the single Judge might
consider finally deciding the writ petition at the earliest.
7. With the aforesaid observations, the special appeal
is dismissed.
Order Date :- 6.4.2012
SK Singh
@blog editor ji..
ReplyDeletefaisale ko dhayan se padhi
pahle ke 4 point wadi wakil ne kahe hain jiske jawab me pratwadi wakil
ne point 5 6 me apna paksh rakha hai.
jiske adhar par court me case ko dismissed kar diya hai...
r i m wrong
is case ki kewal ek hi line hai..
ReplyDelete"court ne special apeal ko khariz kar diya"
kort ne special apeal kharij kar dee hai
ReplyDeletekaha hai ki 9.04.12 ko is mamle ke sunwai ke jai
bas itna kaha hai
bade ladoo bat rahe the
tet rankar
order ko pado to sahi
ki vo bhee nahi aata
abe dismissed likha hai
kumar sahab
ReplyDeleteye tet ke chakkar mai pagal ho choke hai
inko english padni nahi aati
ye ghan chakkar hai
ghochoo
Kumar jee,
ReplyDeleteClear Direction dee gayee hain Single Bench ko with advisory note.
Issliye is special appeal ko dismiss kiya gaya hai - Kee Double Bench stay ko vacate nahin karte hue single bench ko ye kaam karna hai.
Special appeal ka purpose solve ho chuka hai.
@yogesh nikhattu kameen jahil 5th class fail dubble bench ki dhamki kya deta hai ham to supreme court bhi jayenge.tu apni soch kahi irsya ki vajah se tu jal mat jana.tujh jaise logo se dusro ki khushi dekhi nahi jati.
ReplyDeletetet ke chakkar mai ghar ke rahe naa ghat ke
ReplyDeletemai to bhaiya
job karne jaa raha hoon
@yogesh ji
ReplyDeletefaisale me court ne kahi nahi kaha ki
9-4-12 ko sunwai kiya jaye.
faisle ko padhnae par ye dikhai de raha hai ki khare ke pratuttar me
pratipakshi wakil ne kaha ki mamale
ki final sunwai 9 april se suru hone wale saptah me hone wali hai...
shayad mai samajh nahi paa raha hu
kya aap wo line display karenge
jisme court ki taraf se aisa kuch kaha gaya hai...
are sweta darling aa gai aap
ReplyDeletevery goods
dekho yadi apke
acad sahi and tet 100 hai
to aap acad sahi and tet 100 se sadi kar lo
in dono ko jodkar
aapke jindgi kA SAFAR ARAM SE KATEGS
@blog editor ji
ReplyDeletenet par avialable faisle se to sari baat spast nahi ho pa rahi hai..
shayad detail faisle me aisa nirdesh diya gaya ho...
yadi faisle se sambandhit koi copy mile to use ek baar display kariyega
taki use detail se dekha ja sake
ReplyDelete@Kumar jee,
Mene bhee vo line padi hai kee week commencing from 9th April,
Lekin saath hee directive bhee deeya gaya hai - at the earliest.
Iska matlab hai - kee next hearing mein final decision ho jayega.
Court ne counsel kee daleel par koee objection nehin deeya hai , jismen usne bataya kee - Advt. technically correct hai aur mass/public interest ko dekhte hue single person dwara stay lagwana galat hai.
Iska matlab saaf hai - Ye decision earlier advt. ke favor mein jayega.
Special appeal ka purpose directives issue karva (jiska pustay ko vacate karana tha )
kar solve ho chuka hai
ReplyDeleteSpecial appeal ka purpose directives issue karva (jiska purpose stay ko vacate karana tha )
kar solve ho chuka hai
n
ReplyDeleteJEET SACH KI HOTI HAI. Jai bajrangbali .tet merit best.
ReplyDeleteorder me double bench ne yahi kaha hai ki aane wale saptah ke 9/4/2012 ko single bench dwara labhanwit hone wale logo ki sankhya ko sagyan me rakhte huye swayam sighra nirnay de.sath hi double bench ne yah bhi swikar kiya hai ki vigyapan sahi hai.sabhi zila basic shiksha adhikariyon dwara samuhik rup se vigyapa diya jana kafi saral tarika hai.so dont worry and dont make other sence. either if any other can explain,thats very well,lpease.
ReplyDeleteMUSKAN JI aise samay aapko sanghars morcha ke jo log waha the aur jo unaka kahana hai use pahle show karni chahiye kyoki unake dwara batayi gayi bat saral aur adhik karagar hota hai logo ko jaldi samajh me aa jati hai.mai un logo se request karta hoon ki aap apane dhang se saral bhasha me aaj ki is khabr ko blog par likhe to accha hoga.
ReplyDelete@Dharmendra Pandey jee
ReplyDelete"order me double bench ne yahi kaha hai ki aane wale saptah ke 9/4/2012 ko single bench dwara labhanwit hone wale logo ki sankhya ko sagyan me rakhte huye swayam sighra nirnay de.sath hi double bench ne yah bhi swikar kiya hai ki vigyapan sahi hai.sabhi zila basic shiksha adhikariyon dwara samuhik rup se vigyapa diya jana kafi saral tarika hai.so dont worry and dont make other sence. either if any other can explain,thats very well,lpease "
Ye baten counsel yanee advocate ne rakhee,
Lekin special appeal ka uddesya - Stay ko vacate karana tha,
Iske leeye usne single bench ko directive de deeya hai.
Hopefully a positive decision comes, you will see.
Coz Double bench NOT objected any of cousel points it means it can taken positively.
Next hearing finalize and close the issue.
And I am sure stay will be vacated.
@ tetmerit
ReplyDelete-----------------
tet merit sabko ek plateform provide krta hai : isiliye tet merit is the best: aur ye game shuru hone se phle ki shart bhee thee: high school ke different boards aur unversities se leker b.ed tak kahee bhee equal marking system nahee hai:
intillegent acd wale bhee hai aur tet rankers bhee hain no doubt : but game rule change nahee hona chahiye:
acadmic wale bhaiyo selfishness chor do aur ghaltia nikalna band karo : tet ko badnaam krna band karo : koi dhandhli wandhli nahee hui hai jitna aap aur media propagate ker rahe hai;sanjay mohan b innocent he hoga kyonki itna bada adhikari aisa bewakufi wala kaam ker he nahee sakta ke court ke order ka paalan na kerte hue ferzi marks badane ka kaam shuru kerde: baki to media ke khel hai jise chahe chor sabit krde;
@kumar & Yogesh utni der se ek word ki dhajjiyan uda rahe ho. Itni si bat samajh nahi ati kya. Jb double bench ne single bench ko jaldi decision dene k liye nirdeshit kar diya to kya uske bad bhi case chalt rahega, isliye court ne dismiss likha.
ReplyDeleteJeet ki taraf agla step jai hind tet best
ReplyDeleteHi
ReplyDeletegud eve before night to all.
yaar what is going on...?
TET qualified candidate are capable to penetrate national level exam in future.They will not stop on joining
as a PRT teacher.they will make effort to make great career. Bytheway
Most of acd wale to chor hi hote hai.free ka no... . wo bas wahi tak rahege...degree batore liya ..bas chale merit per naukari lene. Mai to exam ka suporter hu.. wo chahe jo bhi ho.......If anything hurt u then i am sorry for that.Tet supoter ko supreem ki ladai me full support hamari taraf se bhi milega.
for any technical quarry ..
pls contact....
gyanendrashukla86@gmail.com
gyanendra@ernet.iitd.ac.in
research scholar
IIT Delhi
110016
9310209056