Double Bench issue directives to Single Bench to " single Judge for final disposal in the week commencing 9.4.2012 " Considering the facts that the number of persons are to be employed, it would be appropriate that the single Judge might consider finally deciding the writ petition at the earliest.
It means hopefully stay on Primary Teacher recruitments will vacated from Allahabad Highcourt.
See Case Details
*****************
DOUBLE BENCH TODAY JUDGEMENT:-
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 280 of 2012
Petitioner :- Lalit Mohan Singh And Anr.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Illigible,K.S. Kushwaha
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
1. An advertisement for selection of Apprentice Teachers was published on 30.11.2011 in the primary school run by UP Basic Education Board (the Board). The Apprentice teachers are to be engaged in all districts and this advertisement was on behalf of all District Basic Education Officers of the State of UP.
2. WP No. 76039 of 2011 has been filed challenging the advertisement. The single Judge has passed an order on 4.1.2012 staying the selection and appointment in pursuance of the advertisement. Hence the present appeal by the two appellants, who claim themselves to be the applicants in the advertisement alongwith application to grant leave to file appeal.
3. Considering the facts that the appellants are also applicants in the selection of Apprentice Teachers, the leave is granted. The respondents have no objection to condone the delay in filing the appeal. The delay is condoned and it is heard for admission.
4. The counsel for the appellant submits that:
By the advertisement, 72825 posts have been advertised. This writ petition is on behalf of only one person and it is not proper to grant interim order in this case; The selection process ought not to have been stayed by the single Judge but the single Judge should have permitted the selection process to go on and the selection might have been made subject to decision in the writ petition;
The reason for grant of stay order was that advertisement was on behalf of District Basic Education Officers of the State. This is not erroneous because the District Basic Education Officers are the appointing authority and one advertisement can always be issued on their behalf together;
The publication of one advertisement is practical and better way of selecting candidates in the entire district. 5. The counsel for the petitioner-respondent states that:
Apart from this writ petition there were other writ petitions that should have been connected with this one; There is no interim order in those cases, but it is not correct to say that only one person is challenging the selection.
6. It is not disputed between the parties that counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged in the writ petition and the writ petition itself is listed before the single Judge for final disposal in the week commencing 9.4.2012. Considering the facts that the number of persons are to be employed, it would be appropriate that the single Judge might consider finally deciding the writ petition at the earliest.
7. With the aforesaid observations, the special appeal is dismissed. Order Date :- 6.4.2012
SK Singh
Source : http://elegalix2.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1781025
Double Bench passed order along with its advise in favor of TET Candidates seeking recruitment.
ReplyDeleteNo doubt stay will be removed from teachers recruitment in UP
If Highcourt issue some directived regarding -
ReplyDeleteUpper Primary Teacher recruitment,
RTE implementation at the earliest for mass public interest then it will give - Sone Pe Suhaga to
all TET candidates.
------
Because same Primary Teacher also apply for Upper Primary and it is NOT a good step finacially and technically (management point of view)
ReplyDeleteWhen Double Bench itself suggests,
Advt. is correct, then almost stay is vacated on 9th April 2012.
Full chance stay is removed.
But now Govt. will take how much time to to start its process is another issue.
For this If court issue directives then its good to candidates.
Very good news hurrrrrrrr...
ReplyDelete@BLOG EDITOR JI AAP JO HAME Jankari deti hai.ye hamari tension kam karta hai.kuchh log is blog par teacher kam advocate jyada lagte hai aise log sirf dusro ki khushi sahan nahi kar pate.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteMAHAVIR HANUMAN JI KI JAI!!!!
ReplyDeleteNIRMAL BABA KI JAI!!!!
yeh hamari vijay ka pehla aagaaj h, 9 april ko TET k saare dushmano ko court ka zordaar Tamaacha padega,agar Aap bhi TET k dushman hai to beta sudhar jaao kyon ki hmare paas ASHOK KHRE ji hain AAAAaaap k paas kya hai...................................................
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteTET ke virodh kee saaree yachikayen pehle hee kharij ho chukee hain,
Aur abhee aisa koee case meree knowledge mein nahin hai, jismein recruitment process par stay kee baat kahee gayee hai
ReplyDeleteNo STAY means - Recruitment Process should be start
Abhee tak ye bhee pata nahin ki -
Sanjay Mohan ke oopar aarop sabit hue kee nahin, aur kitne candidates ke marks badaye gaye ya dhadnhlee kee gayee hai
MUSKAN JI THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR PROVIDING SUCH A GREAT NEWS.
ReplyDeleteblog editor ji
ReplyDeletesee this case
soo sunar ke 1 lohar ke
100 tet rankar ne jeetye hai to
1 acadmic holder + tet weighate jeetange
see this case
टीईटी के आधार पर भर्ती मामले में जवाब तलब
(UPTET : Allahabad Highcourt : Seeking Clarification for Recruitment of PRT on the Basis of TET Exam)
लखनऊ : इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय में शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा टीईटी के आधार पर शिक्षकों की भर्ती किए जाने संबंधी राज्य सरकार के शासनादेश को चुनौती देने वाली जनहित याचिका पर राज्य सरकार से जवाब तलब किया है। अगली सुनवाई नौ जनवरी को होगी। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति प्रदीपकांत व न्यायमूर्ति रितुराज अवस्थी की खंडपीठ ने याची कुलदीप श्रीवास्तव की ओर से दायर जनहित याचिका पर दिए हैं। जनहित याचिका में कहा गया कि राज्य सरकार द्वारा जारी शासनादेश विधि विरुद्ध हैं। इसे रद किया जाए। कहा गया शिक्षकों की भर्ती उत्तर प्रदेश बेसिक शिक्षक अध्यापक सेवा नियमावली के तहत की जानी चाहिए। याचिका में तर्क दिया गया है कि टीईटी केवल अध्यापकों की पात्रता तय करने के लिए है
News : Jagran (05.1.12)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 1
Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 25 of 2012
Petitioner :- Kuldeep Srivastava [P.I.L.] Civil
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko. Petitioner Counsel :- In Person
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kant,J.
Hon'ble Ritu Raj Awasthi,J.
As prayed, list on Monday i.e. 9.1.2012, as fresh.
Order Date :- 4.1.2012 MFA
****************
3.SELECTION on TET or TET+ACD
Misc. Bench : 25 of 2012 [Lucknow]
Petitioner: KULDEEP SRIVASTAVA [P.I.L.] CIVIL
Respondent: STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDU. LKO.
Counsel (Pet.): IN PERSON
Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
Category: Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book-Any Other Writ Petition Not Mentioned In The Code Book
Date of Filing: 02/01/2012
Last Listed on: 22/02/2012 in CJ Court
Next Listing Date (Likely):-----
are editor sahab
ReplyDeletesee case double bench locknow
Mene saare case dekhen hai,
ReplyDeleteus case mein kahin nahin kaha gaya kee - Stay laga deeya jaye.
------
Isse pehle bhee is taeh kee yachiakayen aayee kee acad. ke base par, TET must na karne par
Lekin sabhee yachikayen kharij kee gayee.
--------
Aap hee mujhe bataiye kee agar TET sirf patrta pariksha hai to -
1.
Dobara se TET / CTET exam dene va marks increase karne ke leeye kyon kaha gaya hai
2. TET marks ko selection mein weightage dene ke leeye kyon kaha gaya hai
Aur kya abhee kisee yachika mein stay lagane kee baat kahee gaye hai ?
YOGESH G AAP BAHAS BAHUT KARTE HO KYA JUST PASS HO YA FAIL HO GYE THE JO LOGO KO BHADKA RHE HO BHAI DHEERAJ RAKHO TIME AANE DO AAP APNE AAP HI SHANT HO JAYENGE KU KI AAP LOG TO VIGYAPAN HI CANCLE KARWA RHE THE JABKI COURT KE AADESH ME SAAF SAAF KHA GYA HAI KI
ReplyDeleteJO PRACTICLE THA WAHI KIYA GYA HAI KYA FAYDA THA KI SARE BSA ALAG ALAG VIGYAPTI NIKALTE ISLIYE DEAR PHIR AAGE COURT SAHI BAT HI KAHEGA JO 100% SAHI HAI WAISE AAP PARESAAN NA HO JAB AAP ITNE TEJ HAI TO AAP TET ME MARKS LAYE HONGE AISA MAI MANTA HU SO JUST CHILL
HA BAS AB JALDI SE TET SE BHARTI SURU HONE KA INTZAAR KARO BHAI AAP ..LOG
Khisyani billi khamba nauche.
ReplyDelete@blog editor
ReplyDeletemujhe lagta hai aap ek bar thande dimag se is judgement ko fir se padhe...
Isme kahin bhi judge ne 9.4.12 ko final decision dene ke bare me kuch bhi nahi kaha hai..... isme judge ne appelant ko hi galat kaha kyoki usne kaha ki sirf ek vyakti ke karan ye process ruka hai,jise judge ne galat mana hai...aur case ko dismissed kar diya hai
@ s
ReplyDeletecase is liye dismiss hua ki nirnay single bench hi degi ku ki single bench me case listed hai aap kya advocate hai khare ji ki bat galat hai tumhari sahi hai ab bhaj ke ja aur apne advocate se milo jaldi se
bahut paresaan ho gya hai kuch log sacchai sahi na ja rhi hai aisa lagta hai
abhitak sanjay mohan par kewal gangester act hi laga hai jo unake alawa sabhi 11 logo par laga hai jo ki paise ki wasuli ke mamle se jude huye hai.abhi tak yah sabit nahi ho paya hai ki kitne rupaye ki wasuli ka mamla hai jabki police ne ise badi dhadhali ka nam dete huye apana sak more then 12 karor ki bat kahi hai.mere relative se pata chala hai ki police ne case ko halka kar diya hai anyatha sanjay mohan ke kai karibi ristedaro ke bhi khilaf same dhra lagi hoti.dosto jisane yah bat batai hai we kanpur se hi belong karte hai aur unaki ladaki ne tet me sirf 91 ank paye hai.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteObjectves fulfilled of Special Appeal , So don't worry
Whatever decision comes, you will see
h
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteKya koee aisa judgment dega kee:
Aage se siphaee sirf apne leftinent / commander kee baat mane
Lekin desh ke pradhan mantri kee baat na maane
----------
Jab senior authority ne advt. nikala vo bhee appointing authority ke behalf mein aur usne koee appointment thode hee keeya hai,
Process kee ek shuraat hai.
Kapil Dev ko kya objection hai, aur usko kya problem hai.
Kya sirf mamla atkana, aur kon log aise hain jo is par taang adana chahte hain.
Kyonkee unko koee na koee bahana chahiye.
thank you
ReplyDeletei m requesting specially to yogesh
ReplyDeleteji
bhai kisi ki khusio me badhak
kayo ban rahe hain....
agar court ne case ka final decision karane ke liye kaha hai to phir ye to sabhi ke liye achha baat hai....
MUSKAN JI,
ReplyDeleteAap order ko ek baar aur dhyan se padhen fir apne comment ko reconsidr karen.......
Only sixth(6) point was said by Hon.Judges that is --6. It is not disputed between the parties that counter and rejoinder
affidavits have been exchanged in the writ petition and the writ petition
itself is listed before the single Judge for final disposal in the week
commencing 9.4.2012. Considering the facts that the number of persons
are to be employed, it would be appropriate that the single Judge might
consider finally deciding the writ petition at the earliest.
Prashant Pandey
ReplyDeleteSupreme Court sabse achha vikalp hai kyonkee abhee kaee lof aur mamala atkane kee koshish karenege
Bhrtee Process delay karwane ke leeye.
Ek PIL seedhe supreme court mein daal denee chahiye -
1. RTE implementation ke leeye
2. Highcourt cases ke leeye
Nahin to pata nahin kab aur kitna time lagega
@blog editor
ReplyDeleteaisa hi hai aap kisi sipahi se bhi puch sakti hai,wo PM ki bat nahi manega wo kewal apne commonder ki hi bat manega
ReplyDeleteMr. "."
Agar aisa hai to state Govt. ko bhrtee apne niymon se kar lenee chahiye,
Na kee NCTE ke rule se
----
Apna constitution alag banana chahiye, aur India ke constituion ko nahin manna chahiye.
------
Kisee bhee Govt. dept. mein rider authority ke rules hee follow hote hain.
Jaise hee siphaee PM kee baat nahin manega, He and His commander can be discahrged / terminated from service.
ADITYA FAIZABAD,DOSTO ABHI ABHI AYODHYA HANUMAM GARI SE PRASAD CHARA KAR AA RAHA HU. NISCHIT ROOP SE BHAGVAN HUM SAB KE KAST DOOR KARENGE.
ReplyDelete@blog editor
ReplyDeletehamare costitution me process ka centralized hona hi corruption ka sabse bada karan hai
State govt.ke apne power hote hai,aur wo chahe to bharti bhi khud kar sakti hai,bahot sari bhartiya state govt.khud hi karti hai,
Ncte ki badhyta ke kai karan hai,jinme se major to 65% salary ka anudan hi hai,aur World bank,aur quality maintain karna bhi hai
@.said ji
ReplyDeletetheek hai humne gunah kiya tet me acche marks laker, theek hai vigyapan ghalat hai , theek hai hame job nahee milti hai; ; lekin hum proudly logo se kh sakte hain hame job milni chahiye but kuch kharab manasikta ke logo ke wajah se nahee mili in case;
tum kya bataoge apne logo se ?
tet ki merit lagane wale tet me hi achche marks laye hain esa kyo hai? itne hi kabil the to acd me kya tabiyat kharab thi ya tet me paise dekar no. incrse karaye hai? isliye jyada tet-tet kar rahe h..... are yaar bharti ki progrs bhadao na ki merit kiski lagegi is baat ki....
ReplyDeleteabe sale sachin
Deletekutte haramkhore tu phir a gaya apne acd support ke apne gande comments lekar..
Bete 90 percent aise log hai jinke tet ke sath sath acd bhi strong hai...tu hi bata tet ke paper se pehle ghass cheel raha tha jo tet me ho gayi...
Teri tai tai phis...
@blog editor ji
ReplyDeleteaapse ek request hai ki
aap kewal information dene ka kam kare..
apni taraf se uski wyakhya na kare..
log samajhdar hai khud hi samajh lenge...
kal maine ye baat suna thi ki cm hamari baat man gaye hain....
aur aaj ye kya kah rahi hain ki
court ne ye baat maan li wo baat man li...
thik se padho nahi to tumahare chakkar me mere jaiso jo tet merit wale hain unka heart fail ho jayega..kabhi khusi phir gum
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletedosto yadi viyapan sahi hai to phir
ReplyDeletehame nirash nahi hona chahiye
ye case jarror nirast hoga.
@sachin acd.ka virodh sirf isliye hai ki alag boards se pass log aur alag alag mulyankan ke tarike hai.vastunisth pariksha isliye hi tay ki gayi hai.yahi baat kal c.m. Sir ki samajh me aayi ki c.b.s.e &isc boards ke mulyankan ka tarika alag hai.inme step marking hai jabki u.p.board me nahi.
ReplyDeleteADIYYA FAIZABAD,PRAMOD bhai intezar kejiye.09 apr. ko clear ho jayega.AGAR bloc EDITAR kisi cheez ko describe kar rahi hai to aap ko kya dikkat hai .aap usko na padheye.EDITOR ne jo vyakhya ke hai wo sahi hai.aap chahe to court ja karke us decission ke ek copy le sakte hai.
ReplyDeletesachin ji up board & cbse board ki marking me kafi antar hota he so ACD merit sabhi ko saman avsar ni deti he tet merit sabhi ko saman avsar pradan karti he
ReplyDeleteHa ha ha
ReplyDeleteYE NIRNAY 200% stay hatane ke liye kafi hai aur tet merit ke favour me hai jo ise samaj nahi pa rahe hai vo v ya to tet fail hai ya ya tet me bahut hi kam marks wale hai court ne kapil dev yadav ke liye kaha hai ki ek person pure selection ko chalange nahi kar sakata, to such ko svikar karo jo such ko svikar nahi karate ve apane sath hi dokha karte hai
ReplyDeleteSACHIN JAB TERE SE CLASS 5TH STANDERD KA PAPER SOLVE NAHI HOTA TO TOO KYO SOCH RAHA HAI TEACHER BANNE KI ...ACD ME KHOOB NACKAL KI JAB TET ...ME KUCH NAHI HUA TO ....MICHI LAG RAHI HAI...TUMARE JAISE SE DES OR PRADESH BARBAD HAI....IN PVT COLLEGE WALO KA DHANDA CHAL RAHA HI.....
ReplyDeleteAcad. ka virodh karne ka aur support karne ka koee matlab nahon hai,
ReplyDeleteYe koee case hee nahin hain.
Haan itna jaroor hoga kee bhrtee kaee salon tak na ho, mamla supreme court etc mein chala jaye.
Par uske baad bhee niymanusaar TET merit holders jeet jayenge, to ismein virodh karne se koee fayda nahin.
Jis din court rule badalne ke baare mein decision de de , mujhe bata dena, mein BLOG par publish kar doongee.
Aapas mein debate karne se koee fayda nahin, Acad. merit ko koee chance nahin.
ReplyDeleteSaath hee mein ye bhee batana chahtee hoon kee - Mujhe Acad. Merit se bahut fayda hoga
Lekin aisa sambhv nahin hai aur ye galat bhee hai.
Never Give up
ReplyDeleteOne day a young lady was driving along with her father. They came upon a storm, and the young lady asked her father, What should I do?"
He said "keep driving". Cars began to pull over to the side, the storm was
Getting worse.
"What should I do." The young lady asked?
"Keep driving," her father replied.
On up a few feet, she noticed that eighteen wheelers were also pulling over. She told her dad, "I must pull over, I can barely see ahead. It is Terrible, and everyone is pulling over!"
Her father told her, "Don't give up, just keep driving!"
Now the storm was terrible, but she never stopped driving, and soon she Could see a little more clearly. After a couple of miles she was again on Dry land, and the sun came out.
Her father said, "Now you can pull over and get out."
She said "But why now?"
He said "When you get out, look back at all the people that gave up and are Still in the storm, because you never gave up your storm is now over.
This is a testimony for anyone who is going through "hard times".
Just because everyone else, even the strongest, gives up. You don't have To...if you keep going, soon your storm will be over and the sun will shine Upon your face again.
@blog editor
ReplyDeleteaap naraj badi jaldi hoti hai,maine sirf ye kaha tha ki 9 april ko kisi bhi case ki sunwai nahi honi hai
Special appeal ka kam pura hua aur dismissed hone se koi paresan na ho double bench ne hamare fever me order diya hai.
ReplyDeleteAre mere bhaeoo supream court me ek pil dalo aur chodo ye faltu ki tention 270000 muh aur utni baatain .supream court me faisla hamare hi pakch me ayega.are bhai ye bhartiya hone do sabhi 270000 Log lag jayege.
ReplyDeleteare mr.dot aap pahle apna naam to theek kariye who r u from ?
ReplyDeleteHi prashant sor hw r u dear
ReplyDeleteare bhai bharti puri hone do chahe jaise bhi
ReplyDeleteis kuldeep wala kya metter hai bhai.....ye kaha se paida ho gaya....itne dino baad koi khusi mili thi....isne barbad kar di....
ReplyDelete
ReplyDelete@Rahul
Bilkul Sahee hai kee Supreme Court mein PIL dalnee chahiye, ye roj roj kee chik chik bajee va parshaneeon se bachenge.
Jo bhee fesla aayega kam kam se kam logo la bhala hoga, Itna time waste hone apne aap mein ek mansik utpeedan va punishment hai.
Aap log sangathit ho kar Supreme Court mein PIL daal den
abe sale sachin
ReplyDeletekutte haramkhore tu phir a gaya apne acd support ke apne gande comments lekar..
Bete 90 percent aise log hai jinke tet ke sath sath acd bhi strong hai...tu hi bata tet ke paper se pehle ghass cheel raha tha jo tet me ho gayi...
Teri tai tai phis...
abe sale sachin
Deletekutte haramkhore tu phir a gaya apne acd support ke apne gande comments lekar..
Bete 90 percent aise log hai jinke tet ke sath sath acd bhi strong hai...tu hi bata tet ke paper se pehle ghass cheel raha tha jo tet me ho gayi...
Teri tai tai phis...
abe sale sachin
ReplyDeletekutte haramkhore tu phir a gaya apne acd support ke apne gande comments lekar..
Bete 90 percent aise log hai jinke tet ke sath sath acd bhi strong hai...tu hi bata tet ke paper se pehle ghass cheel raha tha jo tet me ho gayi...
Teri tai tai phis...
I requested to nitin mehta and vivekanand ji please filled a pil in supream court otherwise we all tetiens will gone mad.ye bhartiya toh itihas ke panno me darj hona chahti.es daur me gov. Naukari etni aasani se milna bahut muskil hai.yeh bhartiya hum logo ko pata nahi kab tak sukh aur dukh ke pher me dale rahengi.mujhe etna toh maloom hai ki ess kahani me abhi saikdo mod aane baki hai.time ke sath-2 dekhna abhi tet fail bhi kahenge ki akhilesh ji ne humlogo se doka dekar vote liya aur tet nirsat bhi nahi kiya.aur acedmic wale bhi court jayege par unke pass paiso ki koi kami nahi hogi kyoki unko nakal mafiao se paisa bhi mil jayega.aur ant me en vacencio ka ko radd hi kar diya jayega.i hertly requested to all the president of tet sangarsh morch to filled a pil in supream court .take a one strong step and free from all tansion.i know for the fight of truth we all contributed money too much that after win a case we all will eat ladoo with that money.
ReplyDeleteAre yaar koi kahe toh supream court me pil dalne me kitna kharch ayega sabhi calculate karke apna adhik se adhik yogdan denge.
ReplyDeleteMai muskan ji ko bahut-2 danywad dena cahoonga ki es kalyug me bhi ek accha insan hai jo devi ki tarah hum sabhi ko aasha ki umid jagaye hua hai.are bebkoof hai woh log abhi bhi ache bure ka fark nahi kar pa rahe hai.are bhai 1.30 Hour ke exam me luck ne saath nahi diya to chale hai acedmic merit banwane agar luck kam kar jata aur ache number aa jate to humare sath khade hote.kuch bhi ho jeet sach aur achae ki hogi.
ReplyDeletebhaiyo speshal apeel khariz hone ke peeche kuch takneeke kaaran hai jinkee chrachaa ham yaha nahee kar sakte hai bas ye jaaniye ab jald se jald maanniy single bech order de degi.
ReplyDelete(.) dot bhai is line par aapke kya vichaar hai.... The publication of one advertisement is practical and better way of selecting candidates in the entire district.
ReplyDelete@admin
ReplyDeleteare bhai ye court ne nahi kaha hai
yachikakarta ke wakil ne apna paksh rakha hai..
english nahi aati hai kaya
Hi
ReplyDeletegud eve before night to all.
yaar what is going on...?
MY THREE FRIENDS ARE JUDGES IN DIFFERENT COURT IN UP .i discuss with all.there is no problem in statment of hc court. n if any problem occur regarding due date. then claim as 20 time with respect to qualify candidate.means 5400000 person.one candidate affect the whole family.
TET qualified candidate are capable to penetrate national level exam in future.They will not stop on joining
as a PRT teacher.they will make effort to make great career. Bytheway
Most of acd wale to chor hi hote hai.free ka no... . wo bas wahi tak rahege...degree batore liya ..bas chale merit per naukari lene. Mai to exam ka suporter hu.. wo chahe jo bhi ho.......If anything hurt u then i am sorry for that.Tet supoter ko supreem ki ladai me full support hamari taraf se bhi milega.
for any technical quarry ..
pls contact....
gyanendrashukla86@gmail.com
gyanendra@ernet.iitd.ac.in
research scholar
IIT Delhi
110016
9310209056
Do not give any money to any one for court cases with out consulting with shiv kumar pathak or Nitin Mehta,
ReplyDeleteChahe wo r.n. singh ke liye ho yaa phir ashok kare ke naam per,
Shiv Kumar pathak:- 9415023170,
Nitin Mehta:- 9639885609
Aaj 10 April 12:41 PM pe HC ki website par kapil dev case ki next listing date nahi show kar raha hai. Next listing date blank hai.
ReplyDelete