Judgements in Allahabad Highcourt Regarding Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) in UP in the month of December 2011

Various Recent Judgements in Allahabad Highcourt Regarding Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) in UP in the month of December 2011

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Deputy Registrar(Copying).
-------------------------
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
?Court No. - 24

Case :- MISC. SINGLE No. - 7999 of 2011

Petitioner :- Rana Pratap Chaudhury & Anr.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.,Thru. Secretary Basic Education & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Kuldeep Pati Tripathi,Suresh Kumar Pandey
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Rajiv Sharma,J.
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Vinay Bhushan, learned Standing Counsel.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have appeared in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) examination held on 13.11.2011. After comparing the answers with OMR sheet published on the internet by the Examination Committee of the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), the petitioners feel that they might have secured more marks.
Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions, submits that if the petitioner is aggrieved, he may file objections by 1.1.2012 in the requisite format after depositing Rs.100/-.
If the petitioners prefer objections in the requisite format after depositing Rs.100/- by 1.1.2012, the opposite parties directed to dispose the said objections expeditiously.
The writ petition stands disposed of finally in above terms.
Order Date :- 23.12.2011
Ajit/-
-----------------------------------------
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 7

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 75408 of 2011

Petitioner :- Phool Singh Lodhi & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another
Petitioner Counsel :- V.S. Kushwaha
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J.
The petitioners, who had appeared at the U.P. Teachers Eligibility Test Examination-2010 and had been declared successful, have filed this petition for a direction upon the respondent-U.P. Basic Education Board to relax the maximum age limit for appointment as Assistant Teachers provided as 40 years and to accept their application forms in response to the advertisement dated 22nd September, 2011 issued by the Board. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners were permitted to appear at the Teachers Eligibility Test conducted by the Board of High School and Intermediate Education without prescribing any age limit and once they have been declared successful, they should be permitted to fill up the application forms for the post of Assistant Teacher without insisting on any age requirement. This submission of learned counsel for the petitioners cannot be accepted. The Teachers Eligibility Test was not held for the purposes of providing any appointment. A candidate is only required to clear the test so that he is eligible for appointment as an Assistant Teacher.
The process of appointment of Assistant Teacher has been initiated by issuance of an advertisement which has prescribed the maximum age limit in accordance with the Rules.
The relief claimed for by the petitioners, therefore, cannot be granted.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 23.12.2011
NSC
 ---------------------------------------
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
?Court No. - 24

Case :- MISC. SINGLE No. - 7804 of 2011
-----------------------------------------

Petitioner :- Hari Ram
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Principal Secy. Of Edu. Lucknow & Anr.
Petitioner Counsel :- Ashok Kumar
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Rajiv Sharma,J.
Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Vinay Bhushan, learned Standing Counsel.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has appeared in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) examination held on 13.11.2011. After comparing the answers with OMR sheet published on the internet by the Examination Committee of the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), the petitioner feels that he might have secured more marks.
Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions, submits that if the petitioner is aggrieved, he may file objections by 1.1.2012 in the requisite format after depositing Rs.100/-.
If the petitioner prefers objections in the requisite format after depositing Rs.100/- by 1.1.2012, the opposite parties directed to dispose the said objections expeditiously.
The writ petition stands disposed of finally in above terms. Order Date :- 21.12.2011
lakshman
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
?Court No. - 24

Case :- MISC. SINGLE No. - 7978 of 2011

Petitioner :- Kiran Singh And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through The Secy. Basic Edu.Govt.Of U.P. & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Dinesh Kumar Arya,Malay Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Rajiv Sharma,J.
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Vinay Bhushan, learned Standing Counsel.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have appeared in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) examination held on 13.11.2011. After comparing the answers with OMR sheet published on the internet by the Examination Committee of the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), the petitioners feel that they might have secured more marks.
Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions, submits that if the petitioner is aggrieved, he may file objections by 1.1.2012 in the requisite format after depositing Rs.100/-. If the petitioners prefer objections in the requisite format after depositing Rs.100/- by 1.1.2012, the opposite parties directed to dispose the said objections expeditiously.
The writ petition stands disposed of finally in above terms. Order Date :- 23.12.2011
Ajit/-
------------------------------------------
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
?Court No. - 24

Case :- MISC. SINGLE No. - 7815 of 2011

Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Secy. Madhyamik Edu. And Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Ran Vijay Yadav,Jitander Kumar Bharati
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Rajiv Sharma,J.
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Sarin, learned Standing Counsel.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has appeared in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) examination held on 13.11.2011. After comparing the answers with OMR sheet published on the internet by the Examination Committee of the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), the petitioner feels that he might have secured more marks.
Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions, submits that if the petitioner is aggrieved, he may file objections by 1.1.2012 in the requisite format after depositing Rs.100/-. If the petitioner prefers objections in the requisite format after depositing Rs.100/- by 1.1.2012, the opposite parties directed to dispose the said objections expeditiously.
The writ petition stands disposed of finally in above terms. Order Date :- 21.12.2011
Ajit/-
-------------------------------------
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
?Court No. - 24

Case :- MISC. SINGLE No. - 7827 of 2011

Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Gupta
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through The Secy. Edu. Civil Sectt.And Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Ram Kumar Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Rajiv Sharma,J.
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Sarin, learned Standing Counsel.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has appeared in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) examination held on 13.11.2011. After comparing the answers with OMR sheet published on the internet by the Examination Committee of the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), the petitioner feels that he might have secured more marks.
Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions, submits that if the petitioner is aggrieved, he may file objections by 1.1.2012 in the requisite format after depositing Rs.100/-. If the petitioner prefers objections in the requisite format after depositing Rs.100/- by 1.1.2012, the opposite parties directed to dispose the said objections expeditiously.
The writ petition stands disposed of finally in above terms. Order Date :- 21.12.2011
Ajit/-
---------------------------------